不同国家抗震设计方法的对比
|
摘要
本文旨在综合比较中、美、日、欧洲抗震设计规范关于抗震设防水准、抗震设防目标、抗震设计方法及地震力降低系数取值的大小,设计的目标的一致性,即都希望用最少的资金建造最牢固的实用的建筑结构,这是我们一直努力的方向,也是本文进行比较的目的,期待在总结自己好的经验的基础上再借鉴些别国先进的概念,使我国的结构设计规范能够更加完善。
There is a contrast between seismic design code of different countries because of seismic design standard、seismic design objectives、seismic design methods and value of force coefficients. The code of China, United States, Japan and European Union are compared. As have the same purpose that we all hope use little money to build the practical and firmly buildings, this is the direction we have been working hard and also is the purpose of this paper, In summing up his expectations based on the good experience and other countries more advanced concepts make the code of our country more perfect.
There is a contrast between seismic design code of different countries because of seismic design standard、seismic design objectives、seismic design methods and value of force coefficients. The code of China, United States, Japan and European Union are compared. As have the same purpose that we all hope use little money to build the practical and firmly buildings, this is the direction we have been working hard and also is the purpose of this paper, In summing up his expectations based on the good experience and other countries more advanced concepts make the code of our country more perfect.
引文
[1]建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011-2001)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.2001,7
[2]建筑抗震设计规范(GBJ 11-89)[S].北京:中国建筑土业出版社.1989,3
[3]王亚勇,郭子健,吕西林.建筑抗震设计中地震作用取值—主要国家抗震规范比较[J].建筑科学.1999,15(5):36-39
[4]Structural Engineers Associationo f California. Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book)[M].SeventhE dition.1999.
[5] European Prestandard, Eurocode8, CEN,ENV 1998-1-1.1994
[6] 大崎顺彦编著; 毛春茂,刘忠译.建筑物抗震设计法[M].北京:冶金工业出版社.1990
[7] 杨媛, 白绍良.从各国规范对比看我国抗震设计安全水准评价中的有关问题.重庆建筑大学学报,2005,5
[8] Euro2 international Committe of concrete,Seismicd esign of reinforcedc oncretes tructures forc ontrolledi nelasticr esponseD esignc oncepts[M], Thom as Telford L td, 1998
[9] Architectural Institute of Japan, A IJ Designg uidelinesf ore arthquaker esistant reinforced concreteb uildings based onu ltimate strengthc oncept[M],Nov.1 990
[2]建筑抗震设计规范(GBJ 11-89)[S].北京:中国建筑土业出版社.1989,3
[3]王亚勇,郭子健,吕西林.建筑抗震设计中地震作用取值—主要国家抗震规范比较[J].建筑科学.1999,15(5):36-39
[4]Structural Engineers Associationo f California. Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book)[M].SeventhE dition.1999.
[5] European Prestandard, Eurocode8, CEN,ENV 1998-1-1.1994
[6] 大崎顺彦编著; 毛春茂,刘忠译.建筑物抗震设计法[M].北京:冶金工业出版社.1990
[7] 杨媛, 白绍良.从各国规范对比看我国抗震设计安全水准评价中的有关问题.重庆建筑大学学报,2005,5
[8] Euro2 international Committe of concrete,Seismicd esign of reinforcedc oncretes tructures forc ontrolledi nelasticr esponseD esignc oncepts[M], Thom as Telford L td, 1998
[9] Architectural Institute of Japan, A IJ Designg uidelinesf ore arthquaker esistant reinforced concreteb uildings based onu ltimate strengthc oncept[M],Nov.1 990
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心