模型结构的磁流变阻尼减振控制试验研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
在磁流变阻尼器力学性能试验基础上,利用MTS793系列软件平台,对安装有两种不同型号磁流变阻尼器的五层钢框架模型结构进行了地震模拟振动台减振控制试验,控制策略包括两种被动控制和基于有限传感器的H∞静态输出反馈控制方法的半主动控制。试验结果表明:两种磁流变阻尼系统的被动控制与半主动控制均可以有效减小地震作用下模型结构的位移反应和绝对加速度反应;当磁流变阻尼控制Passive-off提供的阻尼力过大时,Passive-on只起着刚性支撑的作用;当磁流变阻尼控制Passive-off提供的阻尼力较小时,Passive-on的控制效果要好于Passive-off;半主动控制与被动控制相比,优势并不明显。指出了磁流变阻尼器与模型相匹配的重要性,在工程应用中应引起高度重视。
Magnetorheological (MR) damper performance experiments were conducted. Based on the MTS 793 software system, shaking table tests of a five-story steel frame model with two different MR dampers were carried out using different control strategies, including two passive ones and some semi-active ones based on H ∞ static output feedback. The results experimentally demonstrated that the control system is effective for the five story model structure with all the control strategies. When off-state force corresponding to zero input current of MR damper was sufficiently large, MR damper in the case of on-stage almost does not move. When off-state force corresponding to zero input current of MR damper is small, the performance of MR device in the case of on-stage is superior to that of off-stage. The semi-active control system is not considerably more than the passive systems. Experimental results also show that MR damper must match the structure, which is particularly important for the semi-active seismic response control.
引文
[1]Spencer B F Jr,Dyke S J.Phenomenological model for magnetorheological damper[J].J.Engrg.Mech.,ASCE,1997,123(3):230~238.
    [2]Soong T T,Spencer B F Jr.Supplemental energy dissipation:State-of-the-art and state-of-the practice[J].Engineering Structures,2002,24:243~259.
    [3]欧进萍.结构振动控制—主动、半主动和智能控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.Ou Jinping.Structural vibration control—active,semi-active and intelligent control[M].Beijing:SciencePress,2003.(in Chinese)
    [4]Yi F,Dyke S J,Caicedo J M,Carlson J D.Experimental verification of multiinput seismic control strategies for smart dampers[J].J.Engrg.Mech.,ASCE,2001,127:1152~1164.
    [5]Jansen L M,Dyke S J.Semiactive control strategies for mr dampers:Comparative study[J].J.Engrg.Mech.,ASCE,2000,126:795~803.
    [6]欧进萍,关新春.磁流变耗能器性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1999,12:76~81.Ou Jinping,Guan Xinchun.Experimental study of magnetorheological damper performance[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,1999,12:76~81.(in Chinese)
    [7]Guan Xinchun,Li Jinhai,Ou Jinping.Experiment study of large-scale magnetorheological fluid damper[A].SPIE International Symposium Smart Structures and Materials,Sam Diego,California,USA,2004,SPIE5384,26.
    [8]李忠献,吴林林,徐龙河,周云.磁流变阻尼器的构造设计及其阻尼力性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(1):128~132.Li Zhongxian,Wu Linlin,Xu Longhe,Zhou Yun.Structural design of MR damper and experimental study for performance of damping force[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2003,23(1):128~132.(in Chinese)
    [9]Kose I E,Schmitendorf W E,Jabbari F,Yang J N.Active seismic response control using static output feedback[J].J.Engrg.Mech.,ASCE,1996,122:651~659.
    [10]张微敬,欧进萍.模型结构的磁流变阻尼控制试验研究[A].第三届中-日-美结构健康监测与控制学术研讨会暨第四届中国结构控制年会,大连,2004.Zhang Weijing,Ou Jinping.Experimental study of model structure using magnetorheological damper for seismic response reduction[A].In:Third China–Japan-Us Symposium on Structural Health Monitoring and Control and Forth Chinese National Conference on Structural Control,Dalian,China,2004.(in Chinese)

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心