土钉支护抗震性能的振动台试验研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为研究土钉支护结构体系的抗震性能,设计并完成了土钉支护边坡1:12比尺的振动台试验,研究了土钉支护边坡的动力反应特征和规律。结果表明:土钉支护边坡坡面的最大变形主要发生在边坡坡腹处,坡顶与坡趾的变形相对较小;增大土钉倾角会增大边坡的侧向位移,增加土钉长度以及减小土钉间距则会减小边坡侧向位移;土钉支护最大作用带基本位于土钉支护区的中前部,呈折线形,与计算假设的圆弧形不同,而且该作用带与滑裂面的位置并不相同;边坡土体中部和下部的加速度放大系数较小而且比较接近,边坡上部土体的加速度放大系数则较大。
In order to investigate the aseismic behavior of soil nailing slope,shaking table tests of 1:12 reduced scale models were designed and carried out.Dynamic characteristics of the soil nailing slope were obtained from the model tests.The maximum lateral displacement mainly occurs at the abdomen of the slope,and the displacements at the crest and foot are relatively small.Increasing nail dip will increase the lateral displacement,while increasing nail length or reducing nail space will minish the lateral displacement. The shape of most functional belt is polygonal-shape instead of hypothetical arc.And the most functional belt is located in the foreside or middle part of the soil nailing area,which is not in accordance with the slide plane appearing in vibration condition.The response accelerations in the middle of the slope and at the bottom are smaller and very close,and are larger at the top part.
引文
[1]段东明,张明聚,郜新军,等.永久性土钉支护工程及其耐久性设计[J].北京工业大学学报,2006,32(9):778- 783. Duan D M,Zhang M J,Gao X J,et al.The permanent engineering of soil nailing and its durability design [J].Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2006,32(9):778-783.
    [2]Collin J G,Chouery-Curtis V E.Berg R R.Field observations of reinforced soil structures under seismic ??loading[C]// Proc.Int.Symp.on Earth Reinforcement Prac.,Earth Reinforcement Practice,Ochiai, Hayashi & Otani(eds),Balkema,Rotterdam,The Netherlands:[s.n.],1992.223-228.
    [3]Vucetic M,Tufenkjian M R,Doroudian M.Dynamic centrifuge testing of soil-nailed excavations[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal,1993,16(2):172-187.
    [4]Sandri D.Retaining walls stand up to the Northridge earthquake[J].Geotechnical Fabrics Report,1994,12 (4):30-31.
    [5]Hanna S,Juran I,Levy O,et al.Recent developments in soil nailing-design & practice[J].Journal of Engineering and Applied Science,1998,(81):259-284.
    [6]Cotton P E,David M,Luark P F,et al.Seismic response and extended life analysis of the deepest topdown soil nail wall in the U.S.[J].Geotechnical Special Publication,2004,(124):723-740.
    [7]陈建仁.土钉加劲边坡之耐震研究[D].台湾:台湾大学,2001. Chen J R.Study on the anti-earthquake of soil nailed slopes[D].Taiwan:Taiwan University,2001.
    [8]赖荣毅.土钉模型边坡动态反应仿真[D].台湾:台湾大学,2003. Lai R Y.Dynamic response simulation of modal soil nailed slopes[D].Taiwan:Taiwan University,2001.
    [9]董建华,朱彦鹏.地震作用下土钉支护高速公路边坡动力参数分析[J].西安建筑科技大学学报,2007,39 (5):661-666. Dong J H,Zhu Y P.Parametric analysis on seismic behavior of highway slope protected by soil nailing re- taining wall under earthquake[J].Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology,2007,39 (5):661-666.
    [10]董建华.地震作用下土钉支护边坡动力分析与抗震设计方法研究[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2008. Dong J H.Study on dynamic analysis and seismic design of slope protected by soil nailing retaining wall under earthquake[D].Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of ??Technology,2008.
    [11]王春放.土钉墙在地震作用下的动力稳定性分析[D].兰州:兰州理工大学,2008. Wang C F.Stability analysis of soil nailing wall under earthquake[D].Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of Technology, 2008.
    [12]SL 237-1999,土工试验规程[S].

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心