特厚煤层综放开采冲击地压防治技术与实践
|
摘要
基于华亭煤矿250102综放工作面冲击地压显现强烈、巷道返修难度大,开展了一系列技术研究和防治实践。分析表明,大采深、煤层具有冲击倾向性、坚硬厚层砂岩顶板、护巷煤柱留宽不合理是导致该工作面发生冲击地压的主要因素,并采用综合指数法判定该综放面冲击危险指数0.89,具有强冲击地压危险性。在早期预测的基础上,采用微震法对冲击危险区域进行监测。对具备冲击危险的区域,综合采用巷帮煤体卸压爆破、顶板深孔爆破、动压注水(8~13 MPa)与静压注水等卸压解危措施,削弱了冲击地压显现强度,有效降低了综放工作面冲击地压的发生。
According to the serious mine pressure bumping,gateway repair difficulty and other production problems of No.250102 fully mechanized top coal caving mining face in Huating Mine,a series technical research and the prevention and control practices was conducted.The analysis showed that the deep mining depth,seam with pressure bumping tendency,hard and thick sandstone roof and irrational width of the gateway coal pillars would be main influence factors to cause the pressure bumping in the coal mining face.The comprehensive index was applied to judge the pressure bumping danger index as 0.89 of the fully mechanized top coal caving mining face and the mining face would have a strong pressure bumping danger.Based on the early prediction,the micro seismic method was applied to monitor and measure the bumping danger zone.As for the bumping danger zone,the pressure releasing blasting in the gateway side wall,deep borehole blasting in the roof,dynamic water injection(8~13 MPa) and static water injection as well as other pressure releasing and danger control measures were comprehensively applied to reduce the mine pressure bumping behavior strength and to effectively reduce the pressure bumping occurred in the fully mechanized top coal caving mining face.
According to the serious mine pressure bumping,gateway repair difficulty and other production problems of No.250102 fully mechanized top coal caving mining face in Huating Mine,a series technical research and the prevention and control practices was conducted.The analysis showed that the deep mining depth,seam with pressure bumping tendency,hard and thick sandstone roof and irrational width of the gateway coal pillars would be main influence factors to cause the pressure bumping in the coal mining face.The comprehensive index was applied to judge the pressure bumping danger index as 0.89 of the fully mechanized top coal caving mining face and the mining face would have a strong pressure bumping danger.Based on the early prediction,the micro seismic method was applied to monitor and measure the bumping danger zone.As for the bumping danger zone,the pressure releasing blasting in the gateway side wall,deep borehole blasting in the roof,dynamic water injection(8~13 MPa) and static water injection as well as other pressure releasing and danger control measures were comprehensively applied to reduce the mine pressure bumping behavior strength and to effectively reduce the pressure bumping occurred in the fully mechanized top coal caving mining face.
引文
[1]齐庆新,窦林名.冲击地压理论与技术[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2008.
[2]窦林名,何学秋.冲击地压防治理论与技术[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2002.
[3]MT/T 174—2000,煤的冲击倾向性分类及指数的测定方法[S].
[4]钱鸣高,缪协兴,许家林,等.岩层控制的关键层理论.[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.
[5]陈炎光,陆士良.中国煤矿巷道围岩控制[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1994.
[6]窦林名,Bernard Drzezla.冲击地压危险性评定的综合指数法[C]//高效洁净开采与支护技术研讨会论文集.徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.
[7]姜福兴,Xun Luo.微震监测技术在矿井岩层破裂监测中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,24(2):147-149.
[8]姜福兴,杨淑华,成云海.煤矿冲击地压的微地震监测研究[J].地球物理学报,2008,49(5):1513-1516.
[2]窦林名,何学秋.冲击地压防治理论与技术[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2002.
[3]MT/T 174—2000,煤的冲击倾向性分类及指数的测定方法[S].
[4]钱鸣高,缪协兴,许家林,等.岩层控制的关键层理论.[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.
[5]陈炎光,陆士良.中国煤矿巷道围岩控制[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,1994.
[6]窦林名,Bernard Drzezla.冲击地压危险性评定的综合指数法[C]//高效洁净开采与支护技术研讨会论文集.徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2000.
[7]姜福兴,Xun Luo.微震监测技术在矿井岩层破裂监测中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,24(2):147-149.
[8]姜福兴,杨淑华,成云海.煤矿冲击地压的微地震监测研究[J].地球物理学报,2008,49(5):1513-1516.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心