半主动干摩擦阻尼器在隔振系统中的抗冲击优化设计研究
|
摘要
建立了吸力型电磁铁的电磁和动力学模型,得到了控制电压与电磁力的关系,通过调节施加在摩擦片上的电磁力,达到控制干摩擦力的目的,从而得到了一个新型半主动式的干摩擦阻尼器。根据最优抗冲力理论,设计了半主动式干摩擦阻尼器与隔振器并联的隔振抗冲系统。通过PID控制,该设计可以在不影响隔振性能的同时,极大的提高系统的抗冲击性能。冲击响应和极限性能分析的结果均表明:该优化设计比传统的抗冲设计具有更高的抗冲击性能。
The mechanical model of an electromagnet was built,the relationship between its control voltage,and electromagnetic force was obtained.The dry friction force was controlled by adjusting the electromagnectic force exerted on the friction sheets.A new semi-active control dry friction damper was designed based on the above idea.According to the optimal shock isolation theory,a vibration and shock isolation system was designed,it was composed of a semi-active control dry friction damper and a vibration isolator.Through PID control,the performance of shock isolation could be improved greatly while the performance of vibration isolation was not affected.The results of shock response and limit performance analysis showed that the proposed optimal design has much better anti-shock performance than the conventional one does.
The mechanical model of an electromagnet was built,the relationship between its control voltage,and electromagnetic force was obtained.The dry friction force was controlled by adjusting the electromagnectic force exerted on the friction sheets.A new semi-active control dry friction damper was designed based on the above idea.According to the optimal shock isolation theory,a vibration and shock isolation system was designed,it was composed of a semi-active control dry friction damper and a vibration isolator.Through PID control,the performance of shock isolation could be improved greatly while the performance of vibration isolation was not affected.The results of shock response and limit performance analysis showed that the proposed optimal design has much better anti-shock performance than the conventional one does.
引文
[1]汪玉,华宏星.舰船现代冲击理论及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:1-68.
[2]Rudolph J S,Henry C P.Naval shock analysis and design[M].The shock and vibration information analysis centerbooz,Allen and Hamilton,inc.USA,2000.
[3]赵应龙,何琳,黄映云,等.限位器对隔振系统抗冲击性能的影响[J].振动与冲击,2005,24(2):71-76.
[4]Sevin E,Pilkey W D.Optimum shock and vibration isolation[M].Shock and Vibration Information Analysis Center,Washington,D.C.1971.
[5]Mcmanus S J,Clair K A S T.Evaluation of vibration andshock attenuation performance of a suspension seat with asemi-active maghetorheological fluid damper[J].Journal ofSound and Vibration,2002,253(1):313-327.
[6]徐龙河,周云,李献忠.半主动磁流变阻尼控制方法的比较与分析[J].世界地震工程,2000,16(3):95-100.
[7]Laura M J,Shirley J D.Semiactive control strategies for MRDampers:comparative study[J].Journal of EngineeringMechanics.2000,8:795-803.
[8]Mikulowski G,Holnicki-Szulc J.Adaptive aircraft shockabsorbers[C],AMAS Workshop Materticals and Structures.2003,(3):63-72.
[9]Jason E L,Glen A D,Wereley N M.Design of amagnetorheological automotive shock absorber[J].Proceedings of SPIE.2000,3985:424-437.
[10]Sapinski B,Rosol M.Real-time controllers for MR seatdamper[J].Smart Materials and Structures.2003,3:181-194.
[11]Mehdi A,James A N.Rheological controllability of double-ended MR dampers subjuected to impact loading[J].SmartStructures and Materials,2004,5386:185-194.
[12]田正东,姚熊亮,沈志华,等.基于MR的船用减振抗冲隔离器力学特性研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2008,29(8):784-789.
[13]姚熊亮,邓忠超,张明.船用智能抗冲击隔离器动力学数值试验分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2007,28(2):128-132.
[14]单树军,何琳.可控阻尼半主动冲击隔离技术研究[J].振动与冲击,2006,25(5):144-147.
[15]冯慈璋,马西奎.工程电磁场导论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[16]白志红,周玉虎.电磁铁的动态特性的仿真与分析[J].电力学报,2004,19(3):200-204.
[17]Thamsen J J,Fidlin A.Analytical approximations forstickslip vibration amplitudes[J].Intenational Journal ofNon-Linear Mechanics,2003,38:389-403.
[2]Rudolph J S,Henry C P.Naval shock analysis and design[M].The shock and vibration information analysis centerbooz,Allen and Hamilton,inc.USA,2000.
[3]赵应龙,何琳,黄映云,等.限位器对隔振系统抗冲击性能的影响[J].振动与冲击,2005,24(2):71-76.
[4]Sevin E,Pilkey W D.Optimum shock and vibration isolation[M].Shock and Vibration Information Analysis Center,Washington,D.C.1971.
[5]Mcmanus S J,Clair K A S T.Evaluation of vibration andshock attenuation performance of a suspension seat with asemi-active maghetorheological fluid damper[J].Journal ofSound and Vibration,2002,253(1):313-327.
[6]徐龙河,周云,李献忠.半主动磁流变阻尼控制方法的比较与分析[J].世界地震工程,2000,16(3):95-100.
[7]Laura M J,Shirley J D.Semiactive control strategies for MRDampers:comparative study[J].Journal of EngineeringMechanics.2000,8:795-803.
[8]Mikulowski G,Holnicki-Szulc J.Adaptive aircraft shockabsorbers[C],AMAS Workshop Materticals and Structures.2003,(3):63-72.
[9]Jason E L,Glen A D,Wereley N M.Design of amagnetorheological automotive shock absorber[J].Proceedings of SPIE.2000,3985:424-437.
[10]Sapinski B,Rosol M.Real-time controllers for MR seatdamper[J].Smart Materials and Structures.2003,3:181-194.
[11]Mehdi A,James A N.Rheological controllability of double-ended MR dampers subjuected to impact loading[J].SmartStructures and Materials,2004,5386:185-194.
[12]田正东,姚熊亮,沈志华,等.基于MR的船用减振抗冲隔离器力学特性研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2008,29(8):784-789.
[13]姚熊亮,邓忠超,张明.船用智能抗冲击隔离器动力学数值试验分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2007,28(2):128-132.
[14]单树军,何琳.可控阻尼半主动冲击隔离技术研究[J].振动与冲击,2006,25(5):144-147.
[15]冯慈璋,马西奎.工程电磁场导论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[16]白志红,周玉虎.电磁铁的动态特性的仿真与分析[J].电力学报,2004,19(3):200-204.
[17]Thamsen J J,Fidlin A.Analytical approximations forstickslip vibration amplitudes[J].Intenational Journal ofNon-Linear Mechanics,2003,38:389-403.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心