装配整体式浆锚插筋及钢板箍连接柱试验研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为了研究装配整体式浆锚插筋及钢板箍连接柱的抗震性能,设计2根装配式连接柱与2根现浇柱足尺模型并进行了低周反复试验,对装配式连接柱与现浇柱的破坏机理、破坏形态、滞回曲线、骨架曲线、变形、耗能能力和延性进行了分析;研究了轴压比、钢板箍对装配式连接柱抗震性能的影响.试验表明装配式连接柱的破坏机理与形态和现浇柱有较大的区别,塑性铰区的发展方向完全相反;轴压比是装配式连接柱的延性系数主要影响因素之一,轴压比越小延性系数越大,反之亦然;钢板箍在高轴压比的情况下,更能提高柱子的抗震效果.
In order to study the seismic behavior of the assembled integral type slurry anchor inserted steel reinforcement and steel plate hoop connecting column,2 assembled connecting columns and 2 cast-in-place column models and the low cyclic loading are designed and tested.The assembly connecting the column and a cast-in-place column failure mechanism,failure pattern,hysteresis curves,skeleton curves,deformation,energy dissipation capacity and ductility are also analyzed together with the study of axial compression ratio,steel plate hoop for assembling connecting column seismic performance.Experiments show that the assembly type connecting column failure mechanism and morphology and cast-in-situ concrete column have a big difference,and the plastic hinge zone develops in different directions.Axial compression ratio is assembled connecting column ductility coefficient as one of main influencing factors.The axial compression ratio is small and so is the ductility coefficient.The steel plate hoop in high shaft pressure ratio of the case can also improve the seismic effect.
引文
[1]张林振.预制预应力混凝土框架结构抗震设计有关问题研究[D].南京:东南大学,2006.ZHANG Lin-zhen.Precast prestressed concrete frame structure seismic design related problems[D].Nanjin:Southeast University,2006.
    [2]KUTTAB A,DOUGILLl J W.Grouted and dowelled jointed precast concrete columns:behaviour in combined ben-ding and compression[J].Magazine of Concrete Research,1988,40(144):131-142.
    [3]ZHENG L X.Grouted precast concrete column connections under reversed cyclic bending and compression[J].ACI structural journal,1996,93(3).
    [4]钢筋混凝土装配整体式框架节点与连接设计规程CECS43:92[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1992.Specification for quality control of concrete and precast concrete components CECS43:92[S].Beijing:China Build-ing Industry Press,1992.
    [5]吕西林,张国军,陈绍林.高轴压比高强混凝土足尺框架柱抗震性能研究[J].建筑结构学报,2009(3):20-26.LXi-lin,ZHANG Guo-jun,CHEN Shao-lin.High axial compression ratio of high strength concrete frame col-umns in seismic performance study[J].Journal of building structures,2009(3):20-26.
    [6]阎石,肖潇,张曰果,等.高强钢筋约束混凝土矩形柱的抗震性能试验研究[J].沈阳建筑大学学报:自然科学版,2006(1):7-10.YAN Shi,XIAO Xiao,ZHANG Yue-guo,et al.High strength reinforced confined rectangular concrete columns seismic behavior experimental study[J].Journal of Shenyang Construction University:Natural Science Edition,2006(1):7-10.
    [7]张国军,吕西林,白国良.周期反复荷载作用下高轴压比框架柱抗震性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005(6):70-75.ZHANG Guo-jun,LXi-lin,BAI Guo-liang.Under cyclic loading frame columns with high axial load ratio seismic performance experimental study[J].Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration,2005(6):70-75.
    [8]混凝土结构设计规范GB50010-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.Code for design of concrete structures GB50010-2010[S].Beijing:China Building Industry Press,2010.
    [9]邓艳青.HRB500钢筋混凝土柱的抗震性能试验研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2010.DENG Yan-qing.HRB500reinforced concrete columns seismic behavior experimental study[D].Chongqing:Chongqing University,2010.
    [10]关柱良.CRB550级钢筋约束混凝土柱抗震性能研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2011.GUAN Zhu-liang.CRB550reinforced concrete columns seismic performance study[D].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology,2011.
    [11]徐培蓁,聂瑞锋,叶列平.方钢管混凝土柱塑性变形性能的试验研究[J].西安:西安建筑科技大学学报:自然科学版,2011,43(5):609-614.XU Pei-zhen,NIE Rui-f eng,YE Lie-ping.Experimental study on seismic behavior of concrete filled square steel tubular columns to low-cycle reversed horizontal load.[J].Xi′an:J.Xi′an Univ.of Arch.&Tech.:Natural Sci-ence Edition,2011,43(5):609-614.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心