橡胶混凝土砖填充墙的抗震性能
|
摘要
采用有限元方法分析了橡胶混凝土砖填充墙-框架体系的滞回性能.橡胶砖的滞回曲线饱满,其耗能面积比粘土砖大,耗能系数是粘土砖结构的1.17倍.橡胶砖结构刚度较小,整体结构刚度低于粘土砖结构.橡胶混凝土砖结构的延性优于粘土砖结构,其结构体系具有良好的延性,能提高结构的抗震性能.橡胶砖结构具有良好的吸耗能能力,保证结构在地震作用下具有良好的变形能力.
The hysteretic performance of rubber concrete brick infilled wall-frame system was studied by using finite element analysis.Rubber brick hysteretic curve is full,and the energy dissipation area is more than the clay brick.The energy dissipation coefficient is 1.17 times of clay brick wall.Because of low stiffness,the stiffness of the rubber brick infilled wall-frame system is less than of clay brick one.The ductility of rubber brick concrete infilled wall is better than of clay brick.The plastic deformation of structure was reduced,and the system has good ductility.Rubber concrete brick infilled wall has good absorption energy dissipation capacity and ensures that the structure has good deformation capability under seismic action.
The hysteretic performance of rubber concrete brick infilled wall-frame system was studied by using finite element analysis.Rubber brick hysteretic curve is full,and the energy dissipation area is more than the clay brick.The energy dissipation coefficient is 1.17 times of clay brick wall.Because of low stiffness,the stiffness of the rubber brick infilled wall-frame system is less than of clay brick one.The ductility of rubber brick concrete infilled wall is better than of clay brick.The plastic deformation of structure was reduced,and the system has good ductility.Rubber concrete brick infilled wall has good absorption energy dissipation capacity and ensures that the structure has good deformation capability under seismic action.
引文
[1]王凤池,燕晓,刘涛.橡胶水泥土强度特性与机理研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2010,42(2):46-51.
[2]Parducci A,Mezzi M.Reported horizontal displacement of infilled frames having different stiffness and connection-experimen-tal analysis[C]//Proc 7th World Conference on Earth.Istanbul:[s.n.],1997:193-196.
[3]Dawe J L,Schriver A B.Masonry infilled steel frames subjected to dynamic load[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,1989,16(6):877-885.
[4]王凤池,丁军胜,刘凤起.橡胶混凝土砖砌体力学性能试验[J].沈阳建筑大学学报:自然科学版,2013,29(1):50-55.
[5]中国建筑科学研究院,国家地震局工程力学研究所,同济大学.JGJ 101-96建筑抗震试验方法规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
[6]中国建筑工业出版社.JGJ50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[7]胡艳容,滕军.钢筋混凝土框架填充墙结构抗震性能分析及设计[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
[8]施楚贤.砌体结构理论与设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[2]Parducci A,Mezzi M.Reported horizontal displacement of infilled frames having different stiffness and connection-experimen-tal analysis[C]//Proc 7th World Conference on Earth.Istanbul:[s.n.],1997:193-196.
[3]Dawe J L,Schriver A B.Masonry infilled steel frames subjected to dynamic load[J].Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,1989,16(6):877-885.
[4]王凤池,丁军胜,刘凤起.橡胶混凝土砖砌体力学性能试验[J].沈阳建筑大学学报:自然科学版,2013,29(1):50-55.
[5]中国建筑科学研究院,国家地震局工程力学研究所,同济大学.JGJ 101-96建筑抗震试验方法规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
[6]中国建筑工业出版社.JGJ50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[7]胡艳容,滕军.钢筋混凝土框架填充墙结构抗震性能分析及设计[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
[8]施楚贤.砌体结构理论与设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心