原状和重塑海洋粉土动力特性对比试验研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
利用振动三轴仪和共振柱仪对原状和重塑海洋粉土的动强度、动剪切模量和阻尼比进行试验研究,并对原状和重塑样所表现出的动力特性的差异进行对比分析。试验结果表明:在相同工况下,原状海洋粉土的动剪切模量和参考剪应变均大于重塑样,阻尼比与重塑样比较接近;归一化的G/Gmax-γ/γr和λ-γ/γr关系曲线可以很好地消除重塑样的扰动性所引起的影响;原状海洋粉土的液化应力比和动强度比在相同工况下的重塑样小,原状和重塑样在相同等效循环振次下的动强度的差异性随着固结比的增大而减小;在试样即将破坏时,重塑样的孔压急剧增大,原状样的孔压趋于稳定值。
The behaviors of dynamic strength,dynamic shear modulus,and damping ratio of undisturbed and remolded marine silt by dynamic triaxial and resonant column tests are analyzed.The test results show that under the same conditions,the dynamic shear modulus and reference shear strain of undisturbed silt are greater than those in the remolded soil,although the damping ratios are closer in value.In addition,the normalized G/Gmax-γ/γrandλ-γ/γrcan weaken the influence caused by disturbance of the remolded silt.Moreover,the stress ratio of liquefaction and dynamic strength of undisturbed marine silt are smaller than remolded soil in the same conditions.Along with the increase in consolidation ratio,the difference in dynamic strength of undisturbed and remolded silt decreases under the same equivalent vibration cycle times.Further,the pore water pressure of remolded silt increases sharply,and the pore water pressure of remolded soil tends to be stable when the samples are about to be damaged.
引文
[1]邱大洪.海岸和近海工程科学中的科学问题技术[J].大连理工大学学报,2000,40(6):631-637.QIU Da-hong.Scientific and Technical Problems in Coastal and Offshore Engineering Science[J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology,2000,40(6):631-637.(in Chinese).
    [2]杨雪强,刘文治,刘祖德,等.武汉原状粉质黏土与其重塑土的试验对比研究(Ⅰ):试验结果描述[J].广东工业大学学报,2013,30(1):18-24.YANG Xue-qiang,LIU Wen-zhi,LIU Zu-de,et al.A Contrastive Study of Nature and Remoulded Silty Clays in Wuhan(Ⅰ):Description of Experimental Results[J].Journal of Guangdong University of Technology,2013,30(1):18-24.(in Chinese).
    [3]吴海生.太原地区原状粉土与重塑粉土动力特性研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2009.WU Hai-sheng.Research on the Dynamic Characteristic of Understand and Remolded Silt in Taiyuan[D].Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2009.(in Chinese).
    [4]王建华,赵娜.相同剪切波速的原状与重塑饱和松散粉土的抗液化强度[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(1):39-43.WANG Jian-hua,ZHAO Na.Cyclic Liquefaction Resistances of Undisturbed and Remolded Saturated Loose Silts With the Same Shear Wave Velocity[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2007,29(1):39-43.(in Chinese).
    [5]王淑华,楼志刚.原状和重塑海洋粘土经历动载后的静强度衰减[J].岩土力学,2000,21(1):20-27.WANG Shu-hua,LOU Zhi-Gang.The Degradation of Undrained Shear Strength of Undisturbed and Remolded Marine Clay After Cyclic Loading[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2000,21(1):20-27.(in Chinese).
    [6]谢定义.土动力学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.XIE Ding-yi.Soil Dynamics[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,2011.(in Chinese).
    [7]顾淦臣,沈长松,岑威钧.土石坝地震工程学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009.GU Gan-chen,SHEN Chang-song,CEN Wei-jun.Earthquake Engineering for Earthrock Dams[M].Beijing:China Water Power Press,2009.(in Chinese).
    [8]殷宗泽.土工原理[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2007.YIN Zong-ze.Earthwork Principle[M].Beijing:China Water Power Press,2007.(in Chinese).

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心