可液化场地下不同因素对地下结构动力响应的影响
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
目前,我国在地下结构抗震分析与液化破坏研究中尚存在诸多问题,需要深入研究地下结构的动力响应分析的影响因素:对不同结构截面形式、水平-竖向波共同作用、不同地震波输入.在地震作用下处于可液化场地的拱形结构和矩形结构的受力形式和最不利受力位置;模型分别在竖向波以及横向波单独和共同作用下,孔压比幅值也不相同;不同地震波对结构的受力形式影响不大,却对结构加速度影响十分巨大.这些问题的研究分析对可液化场地下结构在地震作用下的动力响应规律与液化破坏形式具有重要的工程应用价值和意义.
At present,there are many problems still existing in the seismic analysis of underground structure and research of liquefaction failure. They are needed to be investigated further. This paper emphasizes on three factors which effect analysis of dynamic response of the underground structure:different forms of structural section, combinational action of horizontal and vertical wave and inputtingdifferent seismic wave. The stress forms and the most adverse location of arch and rectangular structure in the liquefiable site under seismic activity are addressed. The model is under the attack of transverse waves and longitudinal waves respectively and collectively. And the amplitude of pore pressure ratio is various. Different seismic waves have little influence on the stress forms of structure. But the acceleration of structure varies with different seismic waves remarkably; The research and analysis on above problems have important engineering application value and significance of the dynamic response law and liquefaction failure form of underground structures in liquefiable soil when the earthquake strikes.
引文
[1]刘汉龙.土动力学与岩土地震工程[A]∥中国土木工程学会第九届土力学及岩土工程学术会议论文集[C].北京:清华大学出版社,2003:56-68
    [2]张鹏,刘春阳,张继清.北京地铁车站结构抗震分析[J].铁道标准设计,2014,58(1):97-101
    [3]庄海洋,陈国兴,胡晓明.两层双柱岛式地铁车站结构水平向非线性地震反应分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(S1):3074-3079
    [4]朱言灯.土-地下结构地震动力响应分析及不同场地条件的影响[D].广州:广州大学,2013
    [5]苏涛.探讨框架式地下建筑结构的抗震性能[J].低碳世界,2014(7):157-158
    [6]Finn W D L,Yogendrakumar M,Lendbetter R,et al.Analysis of liquefaction induced displacements[A]∥Proceedings of 7thInternational Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics,Cairns[C].Australia,1991:913-921
    [7]Martin G R,Finn W D L,Seed H B.Fundementals of liquefaction under cyclic loading[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geo-environmental Engineering,1975:101
    [8]Byrne P A.Cyclic shear-volume coupling and pore-pressure model for sand[A]∥Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics[C].Missouri,1991:47-55
    [9]陈育民,徐鼎平.FLAC/FLAC3D基础与工程实例[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009:297-302
    [10]Itasca Consulting Group Inc.Fast lagrangian analysis of continua in 3 dimension[M].Minneapolis:Itasca Consulting Group Inc,2002:188-190
    [11]陈健云,温瑞智,于品清,等.浅埋软土地铁车站地震响应数值分析[J].世界地震工程,2009(2):46-53
    [12]李围.隧道及地下工程FLAC解析方法[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2009:240
    [13]Lysmer J,Kuhlemeyer R L.Finite dynamic model for infinite media[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE,1969(95):859-877

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心