带脉冲效应近场纪录的概率地震反应分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
着重于研究一般框架结构在脉冲型近场地震纪录作用下的地震反应,并得到其均值和标准差。近场脉冲周期TP对结构的地震反应影响尤为重要,特别反映在层间位移比的竖向分布形式上。该文大致按照TP与结构周期T1的关系,把一般框架结构分为TP>T1和TPThis paper lies on investigating the seismic response of the normal moment frames undergoing the near-field records(NFR) with significant pulses signal.It is revealed that the seismic response values abide the lognormal distribution and the mean and the dispersion are also calculated.As we know,the relation between the fundamental period T1 of building and the pulse period Tp is significant on the structural seismic response,especially on the vertical distribution of inter-storey drift ratio.The structures are divided into two groups as the one of TP>T1 and another of TPof buildings under NFRs containing different TP will be observed here,respectively.Accordingly,the existing researches have demonstrated that the peak ground velocity(PGV) is an effective intensity measure.So we scale the value of PGV to be 40 cm/s,80 cm/s,120 cm/s,160 cm/sand 200 cm/s,respectively.Finally,The probability density function(PDF) of the response parameters(such as maximum inter-storey drift ratio) of the buildings under different intensity levels can be calculated.Simultaneously,The annual exceeding probability regression function λ(IM)=k0(IM)-k is adopted to evaluate the seismic hazard of the structures.And then,the IM-based approach is used to evaluate the mean annual exceeding probability of the seismic response,so the PDF of the seismic response of the buildings can be concluded,as encountering to the pulse-like records.
引文
[1]Bertero V V.Strength and Deformation Capacities of Building Under Extreme Environment[C]//Pister KS.Structural Engi-neering and Structural Mechanics.New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1977:211-215.
    [2]Bazzuro P,Cornell C A.Seismic Hazard Analysis for Non-linear Structures.I:Methodology[J].ASCE Journal of StructuralEngineering,1994,120(11):3345-3365.
    [3]Ellingwood B R.Probability-based Codified Design for Earthquakes Engineering Structures[J].Engineering Structures,1994,16(7):498-506.
    [4]Santa-Ana P R,Miranda E.Strength Reduction Factors for Multi-degree of Freedom Systems[C]//Proceedings 12thWorldConference on Earthquake Engineering.Auckland:[s.n.],2000.
    [5]Wen Y K.Building Reliability and Code Calibration[J].Earthquake Spectra,1995,11(2):269-296.
    [6]Luco N,Cornell C A.Effects of Connection Fractures on SMRF Seismic Drift Demands[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2000,126(1):127-136.
    [7]Paul G.Somerville,Magnitude Scaling of the Near Fault Rupture Directivity Pulse[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary In-teriors,2003,137:201-212.
    [8]Sinan Akkar,Ufuk Yazgan,Polat Gülkan.Drift Estimates in Frame Buildings Subjected to Near-fault Ground Motions[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2005(7):1014-1024.
    [9]Babak Alavi,Helmut Krawinkler.Effects of Near-fault Ground Motions on Frames Structures[R].Stanford:Stanford Univer-sity,2001.
    [10]中华人民共和国建设部.GB50011—2001建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
    [11]Shome N,Cornell C A.Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures[R].Atanford:Stanford University,1999.
    [12]Grubbs F E.Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples[J].Technometrics,1969,11(1):1-21.
    [13]Cornell C A.Reliability-based Earthquake-resistant Design—the Future[C]//Proceedings of the 11thWorld Conference onEarthquake Engineering.Oxford:Pergamon,Elsevier Science Ltd,1996.
    [14]Aslani H,Eduardo Miranda.Probability-based Seismic Response Analysis[J].Engineering Structures,2005(27):1151-1163.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心