中美抗震规范地震作用计算方法对比分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
本文将我国《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB 50011-2001)中地震作用计算公式进行转化,使之可与美国规范UBC97及IBC2000的地震作用计算公式对比,分析了我国规范与美国规范的地震作用静态计算方法,并按两国规范公式计算了钢筋混凝土框架结构的地震作用,分析了计算结果差异的原因及我国规范需改进之处。
The calculation formulas of earthquake action in seismic code of China are changed into the form that can be compared with the American code.The static calculation methods of seismic effect in GB50011-2001,UBC97 and IBC2000 are analyzed respectively.Comparison between the results of the seismic calculations for concrete frame structure in Chinese and American codes is made to gain the reasons of the difference and the points need to be improved in Chinese code.
引文
[1]朱文静.中美建筑规范抗震相关条文的比较研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2008.
    [2]GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
    [3]UBC 1997,Uniform Building Code[S].
    [4]IBC 2000,International Building Code[S].
    [5]Michael R Lindeburg,Majid Baradar.Seismic Designof Building Structures[M].Belmont CA:US Profes-sional Publications Inc,2001.
    [6]Leyend Ecker E V,Hunt R J,Frankel A D,et al.Development of maximum considered earthquakeground motion maps[J].Earthquake Spectra,2006,16(1):21-40.
    [7]韦锋,李刚强,白绍良.各国设计规范对基准设防地震和结构超强的考虑[J].重庆大学学报,2007,30(6):102-108.
    [8]Reza Karami Mohammadi,MHesham EI Naggar.Mod-ifications on Equivalent Lateral Force Mothod[R].13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Pa-per NO.928.
    [9]GB 50009-2001,建筑结构荷载规范[S].
    [10]Dobry R,Borcherdt R D,Crouse C B,et al.Newsitecoefficients and site classification system used in recentbuilding seismic code provisions[J].EarthquakeSpectra,2002,16(1):41-68.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心