求解结构地震反应能量的两种计算方法比较
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为了比较基于时域直接积分和基于小波变换空间的两种计算地震反应能量的方法和各自的优点,推导了基于小波变换空间的地震反应能量的计算方法,通过实例研究同一个结构在不同地震波作用下的两种能量计算方法。算例分析表明:两种能量计算方法都有各自的优势,基于时域直接积分计算结构地震反应的能量,揭示了地震反应中结构的能量吸收与耗散之间的本质关系;而基于小波变换空间的能量计算方法更能够按频率真实地体现地震动能量的分布,明确地震波在结构传播过程中能量的变化规律。
The two methods of seismic response energy computation respectively based on time domain immediate integration and wavelet transform were studied. And the energy computation based on wavelet transform was deduced. Through practical case,the response energies of same structure under different seismic waves were computed respectively by the two methods. The results show that each of the two energy computation methods has its respective advantages. The energy computation method of time domain immediate integration can reveal the nature of the relationship between the seismic responses of the structure of energy absorption and dissipation. The energy computation method of wavelet transform may practically reveal the distribution of seismic energy by spectrum,and define the energy change in the diffusion of seismic wave in structure.
引文
[1]丰定国.工程结构抗震[M].北京:地震出版社,2002.
    [2]刘哲锋,沈蒲生,胡习兵.地震总输入能量与瞬时输入能量谱的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,14(6):31-36.
    [3]胡冗冗,王亚勇.地震动瞬时输入能量谱探讨[J].工程抗震,2004,12(1):9-13.
    [4]周瑞忠,吴琛,周小平.求解结构动力响应的小波分解法[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(6):43-48.
    [5]刘强,周瑞忠,袁文君.高耸结构地震瞬态反应计算与动力特性研究[J].土木工程学报,2010,43(5):63-69.
    [6]吴琛,周瑞忠.基于小波变换的结构地震反应与能量计算分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(6):24-30.
    [7]刘强,周瑞忠,刘宇航.地震动瞬时能量谱与结构位移响应关系研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2009,29(5):46-51.
    [8]Iyama J,Kuwamura H.Application of Wavelets to Analysis and Simulation of Earthquake Motions[J].Earthquake EngngStruct Dyn,1999,28(3):255-272.
    [9]Eysa S,Ali H.Time History Dynamic Analysis of Structures Using Filter Banks and Wavelet Transforms[J].Computersand Structures,2005,83:53-68.
    [10]吴琛,周瑞忠.基于小波包变换的长周期结构高频地震动瞬态反应[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(6):55-60.
    [11]王庆禹,褚福磊.小波变换中的能量泄漏问题[J].机械科学与技术,2001,20(1):12-13.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心