地震作用下边坡潜在破坏面预测研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
实际边坡在地震作用下的潜在破坏面往往并不是预先可以确定的。本文利用时程分析法对地震作用下的均质土坡和顺层岩质边坡进行动力响应分析,以地震波正向峰值时刻和震后瞬间所对应的塑性云图作为研究依据,利用极限平衡法对理想弹塑性边坡的安全系数Fs×(1+5%)范围及其对应的潜在圆弧破坏面范围和塑性区之间的关系进行研究。最终发现对于均质土坡而言,地震波正向峰值时刻和震后瞬间安全系数Fs×(1+5%)所对应的潜在圆弧破坏面范围以及所对应的塑性贯通区具有相似的区域;对于顺层岩质边坡,地震波正向峰值时刻和震后瞬间安全系数Fs×(1+5%)所对应的潜在直线破坏面范围集中在岩层交界面附近,而且两个时刻所对应的潜在破坏面范围十分接近。
The potential failure surface of slope cannot be pre-determined on the condition of earthquake. This paper analyzed the homogeneous soil slope and bedding rock slope by the process analysis,and on the use of limit equilibrium method,the relationship between the zone corresponding to the safety factor Fs×( 1 + 5%) of ideal elasto-plastic slope and the corresponding range of potential failure surfaces was studied at the seismic wave peak moment and the moment after the earthquake based on the contours of plastic strain. Finally,for the soil slope,the range of potential failure surfaces and the zone corresponding to the safety factor Fs×( 1 + 5%) of ideal elasto-plastic slope are very similar; for the bedding rock slope,the range of potential failure surfaces and the zone corresponding to the safety factor Fs×( 1 +5%) of ideal elasto-plastic slope are focused on rock interface,and the range of potential failure surfaces at the seismic wave peak moment and the moment after the earthquake are very close.
引文
[1]郑颖人,叶海林,黄润秋.地震边坡破坏机制及其破裂面的分析探讨[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,(8):1714-1723.
    [2]言志信,张刘平,曹小红,张学东,蔡汉成.地震作用下顺层岩质边坡动力响应规律及变形机制研究[J].岩土工程学报,2011,S1:61-65.
    [3]祁生文,伍法权,刘春玲,等.地震边坡稳定性的工程地质分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(16):2792-2797.
    [4]Duncan J M.State of the art:limit equilibrium and finite-element analysis of slopes[J].Journal of Geotechnical engineering,1996,122(7):577-596.
    [5]Khosravi M,Khabbazian M.Presentation of Critical Failure Surface of Slopes Based on the Finite Element Technique[J].Bridges,2014,(10).
    [6]郑颖人,赵尚毅,邓楚键,刘明维,唐晓松,张黎明.有限元极限分析法发展及其在岩土工程中的应用[J].中国工程科学,2006,(12):39-61+112.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心