应对效能在地震创伤后应激障碍状况的中介效应分析

英文篇名：Analysis of coping efficacy as a mediator in post traumatic stress disorder in earthquake areas
中文刊名：中国健康教育
英文刊名：Chinese Journal of Health Education
作者：陈策 ; 王文霞 ; 钱胜 ; 林崇光 ; 王瑶
英文作者：CHEN Ce ; WANG Wen-xia ; QIAN Sheng ; LIN Chong-guang ; WANG Yao.Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital ; Wenzhou 325005 ; China
中文关键词：四川地震灾区 ; 高中生 ; 创伤后应激障碍
英文关键词：Sichuan earthquake areas ; High middle school students ; Post traumatic stress disorder
出版日期：2012-09-20
机构：温州市第七人民医院;温州职业技术学院;河南大学教育科学学院;
年：2012
期：09
出版单位：中国健康教育

摘要

目的调查5.12汶川地震后四川省汉源县高中生的创伤后应激障碍现状。探讨乐观主义、悲观主义、应对效能和创伤后应激障碍的关系模型。方法采用乐观主义—悲观主义量表、应对效能问卷、事件影响量表、心理创伤后应激障碍自评量表对300名灾区高中生施测。结果震灾2周后,32.65%的灾区高中生应激水平在临界值以上,女生的应激水平显著高于男生,悲观主义能够直接和通过应对效能间接地正向预测PTSD-SS总分,乐观主义通过应对效能间接地负向预测PTSD-SS总分。结论乐观主义和应对效能是灾区高中生的心理保护因素。
Objective To understand post traumatic stress disorder(PTSD)among high middle school students in Hanyuan who experienced earthquake in Sichuan,China on May 12,2008,and establish an interaction model for optimism,pessimism,coping efficacy and PTSD.Methods 300 high middle school students in earthquake area were assessed on 4 scales including Optimism-pessimism Scale,Coping Efficacy Questionnaire,Impact of Event Scale(IES),PTSD self-rating scale(PTSD-SS).Results Two weeks after the earthquake,32.65% of the high middle school students had higher PTSD-SS total scores than the recommended critical score.Girls had higher stress level than boys.Pessimism could directly and indirectly predict the total scores of PTSD-SS positively.Optimism could indirectly predict the total scores of PTSD-SS negatively through coping efficacy.Conclusion Optimism and copying efficacy are two psychological protective factors for high middle school students in Sichuan Earthquake area.

引文

[1]Galea S,Nandi A,Vlahov D.The epidemiology of post-traumaticstress disorder after disasters[J].Epidemiologic Reviews,2005,27:78-91.
    [2]袁莉敏.大学生乐观、归因方式与心理幸福感的关系研究[D].石家庄:河北大学,2005.
    [3]Uskul AK,Greenglass E.Psychological Well-being in a Turkish-Ca-nadian sample[J].Anxiety Stress and Coping,2005,18:269-278.
    [4]袁立新,林娜,江晓娜.乐观主义—悲观主义量表的编制及信效度研究[J].广东教育学院学报,2007,27(1):55-59.
    [5]童辉杰.应对效能:问卷的编制及理论模型的建构[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):413-419.
    [6]赵丞智,汪向东,常连玺,等.事件影响量表的信度、效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(10):679-681.
    [7]刘贤臣,马登岱,刘连启.心理创伤后应激障碍自评量表的编制和信度效度研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1998,7(2):93-96.
    [8]温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,等.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620.
    [9]Hu L,Bentler PM.Cutoff criteria in covariance structure analysis:conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J].Structural EquationModeling,1999,6(1):1-35.
    [10]王相兰,陶炯,温盛霖,等.汶川地震灾民的心理健康状况及影响因素[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2008,29(4):367-371.
    [11]赵玉芳,赵守良.震前生活事件、创伤程度对中学生震后心理应激状况的影响[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(3):511-515.
    [12]Haden SC,Scarpa A,Jones RT.Posttraumatic stress disorder symp-toms and injury:the moderating role of perceived social support andcoping for young adults[J].Personality and Individual Differ-ences,2007,42:1187-1198.