彭州市龙门山震后迹地植物群落生态恢复初探
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
汶川大地震不仅造成大量人员伤亡,并且严重破坏社会财产和生态环境。通过对彭州市龙门山区域选取地震崩塌地(地震创面裸地)、泥石流裸地(大型泥石流冲积扇)、滑坡体(整体滑坡)、居住地(灾后居民安置点)4类具有代表性区域进行样地调查和采样,分析了不同地震灾毁情况下植物群落恢复状况。结果表明:各类样地多样性指数大小为泥石流冲积扇>滑坡体>地震崩塌地>居民安置点;居民安置点与其他3类恢复地的多样性指数有明显差异,相似度也较低。说明这类群落恢复到原生群落可能需要较长的时间;土壤有机碳含量变化趋势为泥石流冲积扇>滑坡体>地震崩塌迹地,微生物量碳和易氧化态碳含量为滑坡体>泥石流裸地>地震崩塌地,而可溶性有机碳含量为地震崩塌地>泥石流裸地>滑坡体,表明在不同迹地上土壤有机碳不同组分的恢复进程存在差异。
The devastation resulting from Wenchuan earthquake caused the largest number of casualties and injuries,and the most serious damage of social property and destruction of local ecosystems and environment.Restoration communities of 4 types of typical plots of earthquake site,i.e.,(Earthquake wound bareland),bare mud-rock flow(Large debris flow alluvial fan),landslide(Overall decline),and residence(Resettlement in post-disaster),had been investigated in Pengzhou in summer 2011,and biodiversity indices and soil organic carbon fractions of communities had been analyzed to determined ecological restoration status of these earthquake-damaged sites after 3 years of the Wenchuan earthquake.The results showed that restoration of communities under different status of destroy influenced by the earthquake showed that the diversity index in these plots followed the sequence of landslides alluvial fan>landslide>earthquake landslides>resident settlements,the diversity index of residents settlements was significantly different from the others,and with a low similarity.The result showed that this type of community recovery to native community might take longer.The change trends of organic carbon content in soil was in the order of landslides alluvial fan>landslide>Earthquake Landslides.Microbial biomass carbon and easily oxidizable carbon contents were in the order of landslide>landslides alluvial fan>earthquake landslides,and dissolved organic carbon content was in the order of earthquake landslides>bare mud-rock flow>landslide,which indicateed that there were differences among the restoration process of different components of soil carbon in different trace-land.
引文
[1]吴建华.地震与生态环境关系初探[J].山西地震,2000,10(4):1-3.
    [2]吴瑾冰,郭安红.地震与环境生态[J].灾害学,2001,16(3):88-92.
    [3]杨红露,刘冬梅,孙辉.地震的生态破坏及其恢复重建研究进展[J].四川环境,2009,28(4):97-101.
    [4]李忠东.“地开花”,埋了整个村子:银厂沟风景区纪实[J].人与生物圈,2008,11(4):20-30.
    [5]刘守江,张斌.汶川地震非规范滑坡体上植被的自然恢复能力研究:以彭州银厂沟谢家店子为例[J].山地学报,2010,28(3):373-378.
    [6]Magurran A E.Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement[M].New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1988.
    [7]马克平,马克明.生物群落多样性测度方法:α多样性的测度方法[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):281-239.
    [8]Vance E D,Brookes P C,Jenkinson D S.An extractionmethod for measuring microbial biomass C[J].Soil Biol-ogy&Biochemistry,1987,19(6):703-707.
    [9]Jones D L,Willett V B.Experimental evaluation ofmethods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen(DON)and dissolved organic carbon(DOC)in soil[J].Soil Bi-ology and Biochemistry,2006,38(5):991-999.
    [10]Cambardella C A,Elliott E T.Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1992,56(3):777-783.
    [11]Cody M L,Diamond M J.Towards a Theory of Continen-tal Species Diversity Bird Distributions over MediterraneanHabitat Gradients:Ecology and Evolution of Communities[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1975.
    [12]Haynes R J.Labile organic matter fractions as central com-ponents of the quality of agricultural soils:An overview[J].Advances in Agronomy,2005,85:221-268.
    [13]King A N,Pimm S I.Complexity,diversity and stabil-ity:a reconciliation of theoretical and empirical results[J].The Amer Nature,1983,122(2):229-239.
    [14]Grime J P.Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems:immediate,filter and founder effects[J].J.Ecol.,1998,86(6):901-910.
    [15]白永飞,许志信,李德新.内蒙古高原针茅草原群落多样性研究[J].生物多样性,2000,8(4):353-360.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心