东营凹陷盐膏层的重震联合解释技术
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
用单一的物探方法难以探测沉积盆地中的盐膏层,为此提出了基于重力“剥皮”的变密度多界面重磁震联合解释技术。首先利用地震、钻井确定的第三系深度和重力反演的中生界、奥陶系、太古界深度,采用重力“剥皮”技术获得由盐膏层引起的剩余异常,据此反演得到了东营凹陷的盐膏层的顶面深度和等效厚度。反演结果表明,东营凹陷盐膏层主要由10个规模较大的盐膏体组成,呈北东向的扇状展布,顶面深度在1 700~3 700 m,北部埋深较大,南部埋深较小。与钻遇盐膏层的25口钻井资料对比,反演误差仅为2.96%,说明利用重磁震联合解释技术反演盐膏层是一项可行的技术。
It is difficult to inverse salt-gypsum strata in deposit basin only using one geophysical method.Based on gravity "barking method",a method of jointing gravity-magnetic and seismic data was presented for variational density multi-interfaces inversion.First based on the depth of Tertiary getting from seismic and bores and the depth of Mesozoil,Ordovician system and Archean by gravity inversion,the residual anomaly of salt-gypsum strata was calculated by gravity "barking method".Then the depth and equivalent thickness were inversed.The results show the salt-gypsum strata in Dongying sag are mainly made up of ten big salt-gypsum bodies,which are fan-shaped tend to northeast(NE).The depth range of salt-gypsum strata is from 1700 to 3700 m.It is deeper on the north and shallower on the south.The inverse error is only 2.96% compared with the data of 25 bores drilling through salt-gypsum strata.It is shown that the interpretation method by jointing gravity-magnetic and seismic data is effective to inverse salt-gypsum stratum.
引文
[1]王万银,潘作枢.双界面模型重力场快速正反演问题[J].石油物探,1993,32(2):83-87.WANG Wan-yin,PAN Zuo-shu.Fast solution of for-ward and inverse problems for gravity field in a dual inter-face model[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,1993,32(2):83-87.
    [2]袁静,赵澄林,张善文.东营凹陷沙四段盐湖的深水成因模式[J].沉积学报,2000,18(1):114-118.YUAN Jing,ZHAO Cheng-lin,ZHANG Shan-wen.Ge-netic model of the deep water salt lake of the PaleogeneSha 4 member in Dongying sag[J].Acta Sedement Olog-ica Sinica,2000,18(1):114-118.
    [3]孙镇城,杨藩,张枝焕,等.中国新生代咸化湖泊沉积环境与油气生成[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997.167-170.
    [4]李春光.东营凹陷断裂系统对油气藏分布的控制[J].石油与天然气地质,1994,15(1):87-93.LI Chun-guang.Control of fault systems on oil and gasdistribution Dongying depression[J].Oil&Gas Geolo-gy,1994,15(1):87-93.
    [5]王秉海,钱凯.胜利油区地质研究与勘探实践[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1992.
    [6]蒋有录,陈清华.东辛油气田构造特征与油气富集规律研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学板),1997,21(6):8-12.JIANG You-lu,CHEN Qing-hua.Structural feature andoil-gas distribution in Dongxin complicated fault block oil-gas field[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,Chi-na(Edition of Natural Science),1997,21(6):8-12.
    [7]宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝,等.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义[J].高校地质学报,1999,5(3):275-282.ZONG Guo-hong,XIAO Huan-qin,LI Chang-bao,etal.Evolution of Jiyang depression and its tectonic impli-cations[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,1999,5(3):275-282.
    [8]衣学磊,侯贵廷.济阳坳陷中、新生代断裂活动强度研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2002,38(4):504-509.YI Xue-lei,HOU Gui-ting.A study of intensity of thefaults activity in Jiyang depression in Mesozoic and Ceno-zoic[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium UniversitatisPekinensis,2002,38(4):504-509.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心