岩溶区不同土洞探测方法的对比研究——以桂阳高速公路K23+100~K23+190路段为例

详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文

英文篇名：Comparison of different geophysic prospecting methods for the detection of cave in karst region——A case study in Guilin-Yangshuo highway 中文刊名：中国岩溶 英文刊名：Carsologica Sinica 作者：喻立平 ; 韦吉益 ; 卢呈杰 英文作者：YU Li-ping1 ; 2 ; WEI Ji-yi2 ; LU Cheng-jie2 (1.China University of Geoscience ; Beijing 100083 ; China ; 2.Institute of Karst Geology ; CAGS ; Guilin ; Guangxi 541004 ; China) 中文关键词：土洞 ; 地质灾害 ; 探测 ; 地质雷达 英文关键词：earth cave ; geological hazard ; detection ; GPR 出版日期：2008-09-15 机构：中国地质大学;中国地质科学院岩溶地质研究所; 年：2008 期：03 出版单位：中国岩溶

摘要

岩溶土洞及塌陷严重影响高速公路建设和安全运营,是覆盖型岩溶区高速公路路基面临而且又难以解决的主要岩溶病害问题。本文在桂阳高速公路K 23+100~K 23+190路段利用地质雷达、浅层地震反射法、高密度电阻率法三种常规物探方法对土洞探测进行对比实验,结果表明:地质雷达具有精度和效率高、成本低、成果直观等特点,是探测浅埋藏(<10m)、小尺寸(<3m)土洞的最佳方法。
Collapse occurs very frequent in southwest China.Sinkhole happens suddenly and unforeseen,so it is very harmful for the highway construction and run.It is important and urgent to choose a fast and economical and reliable method or incorporated methods to detect the buried cave.Three common geophysic prospecting methods-resistivity sounding and seismic reflection and ground penetrating radar(GPR),had been used in K23+100~K23+190 in Guilin-Yangshuo highway.The result shows GPR is the most efficient and economical and reliable method for the diction of shallow buried(<10m) and small size(<3m) caves.

引文

[1]常士骠,等.工程地质手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1990:115,316.
    [2]陈仲候,王兴泰,杜世汗.工程与环境物探教程[M]北京:地质出版社,1993:23,101.
    [3]李大心.探地雷达方法与应用[M].北京,地质出版社,1994.
    [4]单娜琳,程志平,刘云祯.工程地质勘探[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2006:42,97.
    [5]The American Society of Testing and Materials,D6429—99Standard Guide for Selscting Surface Geophysical Methods[S].1999.
    [6]British Standards Institute,BS5930 British Standard Code ofPractice for Site Investigations[S].1999.