柴北缘构造活动及其磷灰石裂变径迹记录

英文篇名：Tectonic Activities and Apatite Fission-track Records in the Northern Margin of Qaidam Basin
中文刊名：石油天然气学报
英文刊名：Journal of Oil and Gas Technology
作者：曾春林 ; 姜波 ; 张敏 ; 尹成明 ; 王超勇
英文作者：ZENG Chun-lin ; JIANG Bo (School of Resources and Earth Science ; China University of Mining and Technology ; Xuzhou 221116 ; Jiangsu ; China) ZHANG Ming ; YING Cheng-ming (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development ; Qinghai Oilfield Company ; PetroChina ; Dunhuang 736202 ; Gansu ; China)WANG Chao-yong (School of Resources and Earth Science ; China University of Mining and Technology ; Xuzhou 221116 ; Jiangsu ; China)
中文关键词：柴达木盆地 ; 构造演化 ; 沉积 ; 磷灰石 ; 裂变径迹 ; 油气
英文关键词：Qaidam Basin ; tectonic evolution sedimentary ; apatite ; fission-track ; oil and gas.
出版日期：2009-04-15
机构：中国矿业大学资源与地球科学学院;青海油田分公司勘探开发研究院;
年：2009
期：02
出版单位：石油天然气学报

摘要

根据野外典型构造变形观测和主干地震测线解释与分析,将柴北缘构造演化划分为早-中侏罗世的断坳盆地、晚侏罗世-白垩纪的坳陷盆地、白垩纪末期的反转挤压抬升剥蚀、古近纪坳陷盆地和新近纪挤压坳陷盆地5个阶段。柴北缘侏罗系主要是在造山期后的伸展作用及自身的沉积载荷下沉积的,其构造的复杂性主要是后期构造旋回叠加和改造的结果。受构造活动的控制,柴北缘侏罗系沉积中心具有由南西向北东迁移且沉积范围不断萎缩的特点。磷灰石裂变径迹测试显示,表观年龄(85±12)～(78±9)Ma、(34±9)Ma和2.9～1.1Ma,分别与燕山末期、喜马拉雅中、晚期挤压抬升构造活动相对应,为盆地构造演化分析提供了有力佐证。
Based on the analysis of structural deformation and seismic sections, tectonic evolution of Mesozoic and Cenozoic was divided into 5 stages: such as fault-depression stage in early-middle Jurassic; depression stage in late Jurassic-Cretaceous; uplift-erosion stage in late Cretaceous; depression stage in Paleogene; squeezed sag in Neogene. Controlled by the extension and postorogenic phase and self sedimentary loading, the Jurassic was formed, but the complexity of structure was the result of later activities and reformation. The deposition center was transferred from SW to NE controlled by structural activities. Results of apatite fission-track shows that apparent ages are 85±12Ma~78±9Ma, 34±9Ma and 2.9~1.1Ma, which are corresponding to the late Yanshan stage and middle-late Himalayan stage. The test proves an evidence to the analysis of tectonic evolution.

引文

[1]姜波,徐凤银,彭德华,等.柴达木盆地北缘断裂构造变形特征[J].中国矿业大学学报,2004,33(6):687~692.
    [2]姜波,徐凤银,刘仰露,等.柴达木北缘煤镜质组光性组构及应力-应变分析[J].中国矿业大学学报,2002,31(6):561~564.
    [3]罗群.柴达木盆地成因类型探讨[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(2):115~120.
    [4]袁万明,张雪亭,董金泉,等.东昆仑隆升作用的裂变径迹研究[J].原子能科学技术,2004,38(2):166~168.
    [5]Green P F,Duddy I R,Geradow AJ W,et al.Thermal annealing of fission tracksin apatite 1:Aqualitative description[J].Chemi-cal Geology,1986,59:237~253.
    [6]刘丽,任战利.磷灰石裂变径迹退火模型及其在热史模拟中的应用[J].西北大学学报(自然科学网络版),2004,11(2):1~8.
    [7]陈正乐,宫红良,李丽,等.阿尔金山脉新生代隆升-剥露过程[J].地学前缘,2006,13(4):91~102.
    [8]袁万明,董金泉,王世成,等.东昆仑南部带磷灰石裂变径迹分析的地质意义[J].核技术,2005,28(9):707~711.
    [9]赵生贵.祁连造山带特征及其构造演化[J].甘肃地质学报,1996,5(1):16~29.
    [10]金振奎,齐聪伟,薛建勤,等.柴达木盆地北缘侏罗系沉积相[J].古地理学报,2006,8(2):199~210.
    [11]杨永泰,张宝民,李伟,等.柴达木盆地北缘侏罗系层序地层与沉积相研究[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):145~151.
    [12]屈争辉,姜波,王超勇.柴北缘石泉滩和冷湖三号储层特征对比研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2007,36(6):837~842.
    [13]郑孟林,李明杰,曹春潮,等.柴达木盆地北缘西段侏罗纪盆地构造特征及其演化[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(4):315~318.
    [14]胡授权,郭文平,曹运江,等.柴达木盆地构造格局及在中、新生代的演化[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(1):13~16.
    [15]陈宣华,An Yin,George E,等.青藏高原北缘阿尔金东段中生代南北向伸展作用[J].地质力学学报,2004,10(3):192~212.