滑塌浊积砂体精细地层划分对比方法——以大芦湖油田樊107块沙三段中亚段为例
|
摘要
大芦湖油田樊107块沙三段中亚段滑塌浊积砂体纵横向上连通性差、相变快,加大了小层对比的难度。综合地质、测井和地震3方面的资料,运用高分辨率层序地层学等时沉积的观点,建立了适合研究区的精细地层划分与对比方法。首先在区域不整合面识别的基础上,划分了长期基准面旋回;在井震精细标定标志层的基础上,在标志层的控制下,建立了中期基准面旋回等时地层格架;然后结合自旋回、相序递变规律进行短期基准面旋回识别,进而实现了沉积时间单元的划分与对比;最后在沉积时间单元内部结合沉积相研究了单砂体的连通方式。最终将大芦湖油田樊107块沙三段中亚段划分为4,5,6和7共4个砂层组,26个沉积时间单元,识别了5种单砂体连通类型,实现了单砂体的对比。
The sedimentary facies is semi-deep lake-slump fan in block Fan107 in Daluhu Oilfield.For turbidite sandstone the stratigraphic correlation is very difficult because of irregular distribution and large variability in lateral direction.Based on the theory of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy,the information of seismic,well logging and core data were analyzed and applied to the stratigraphic division and correlation.The long-term base-level cycle was recognized by the regional unconformity.The isochronous stratigraphie framework of middle-term base-level cycle was built according to the fine calibration of maker bed integrating wells with seismic data.The method of combining autocyclicity analysis with facies sequence was used to recognize short-term base-level cycles and depositional time cells.The lateral connectivity styles of single sandstone were established by researching of sedimentary facies.Middle Sha3 member in block Fan107 of Daluhu Oilfield was divided into No.4,No.5,No.6 and No.7 four sand groups,and 26 depositional time cells and 5 connectivity styles of the single sandstone.The result of stratigraphic division and correlation is feasible.
The sedimentary facies is semi-deep lake-slump fan in block Fan107 in Daluhu Oilfield.For turbidite sandstone the stratigraphic correlation is very difficult because of irregular distribution and large variability in lateral direction.Based on the theory of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy,the information of seismic,well logging and core data were analyzed and applied to the stratigraphic division and correlation.The long-term base-level cycle was recognized by the regional unconformity.The isochronous stratigraphie framework of middle-term base-level cycle was built according to the fine calibration of maker bed integrating wells with seismic data.The method of combining autocyclicity analysis with facies sequence was used to recognize short-term base-level cycles and depositional time cells.The lateral connectivity styles of single sandstone were established by researching of sedimentary facies.Middle Sha3 member in block Fan107 of Daluhu Oilfield was divided into No.4,No.5,No.6 and No.7 four sand groups,and 26 depositional time cells and 5 connectivity styles of the single sandstone.The result of stratigraphic division and correlation is feasible.
引文
[1]王光付,战春光,刘显太,等.精细地层对比技术在油藏挖潜中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,2000,27(6):56-57.
[2]雍世和,张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1996:58-70.
[3]吴瑞棠,张守信.现代地层学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989:61-100.
[4]裘亦楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术[M].2版.北京:石油工业出版社,1997:121-140.
[5]陈立官.油气田地下地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1983.
[6]刘泽容,信荃麟,王伟锋,等.油藏描述原理与技术方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
[7]罗群,郑德山,孙宏智.地质地震综合地层划分对比法及其应用[J].江汉石油学院学报,2001,23(3):26-29.
[8]陆基孟.地震勘探原理[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1993:340- 380.
[9]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆.层序地层底层基准面的识别对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-183.
[10]黄彦庆,张尚锋,张昌民,等.高分辨率层序地层学中自旋回作用的探讨[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(2):6-8.
[11]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):96-102.
[12]王宁,郑和荣,信荃麟,等.东营凹陷岩性油气藏勘探中的层序地层学研究应用[C]//复杂油气藏勘探技术国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:石油大学出版社,1998.
[13]陈景山,彭军,周彦,等.基准面旋回层序与油层单元划分关系[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(2):162-165.
[14]朱强,毕彩芹.陆相地层精细对比方法及应注意的问题[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(3):27-30.
[15]刘伟方,于兴河,孙勤华,等.井震联合分级控制小层对比方法[J].石油物探,2006,45(6):597-601.
[16]Weber K J,van Geuns L C.Frame work for constructing clastic reservoir simulation models[J].JPT,1990,42(10):1 248-1 297.
[17]郭秀蓉,程守田,刘星.油藏描述中的小层划分与对比——以垦西油田K71断块东营组为例[J].地质科技情报,2001,20 (2):55-58.
[2]雍世和,张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1996:58-70.
[3]吴瑞棠,张守信.现代地层学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989:61-100.
[4]裘亦楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术[M].2版.北京:石油工业出版社,1997:121-140.
[5]陈立官.油气田地下地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1983.
[6]刘泽容,信荃麟,王伟锋,等.油藏描述原理与技术方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995.
[7]罗群,郑德山,孙宏智.地质地震综合地层划分对比法及其应用[J].江汉石油学院学报,2001,23(3):26-29.
[8]陆基孟.地震勘探原理[M].东营:石油大学出版社,1993:340- 380.
[9]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆.层序地层底层基准面的识别对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177-183.
[10]黄彦庆,张尚锋,张昌民,等.高分辨率层序地层学中自旋回作用的探讨[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(2):6-8.
[11]王洪亮,邓宏文.地层基准面原理在湖相储层预测中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1997,18(2):96-102.
[12]王宁,郑和荣,信荃麟,等.东营凹陷岩性油气藏勘探中的层序地层学研究应用[C]//复杂油气藏勘探技术国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:石油大学出版社,1998.
[13]陈景山,彭军,周彦,等.基准面旋回层序与油层单元划分关系[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(2):162-165.
[14]朱强,毕彩芹.陆相地层精细对比方法及应注意的问题[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(3):27-30.
[15]刘伟方,于兴河,孙勤华,等.井震联合分级控制小层对比方法[J].石油物探,2006,45(6):597-601.
[16]Weber K J,van Geuns L C.Frame work for constructing clastic reservoir simulation models[J].JPT,1990,42(10):1 248-1 297.
[17]郭秀蓉,程守田,刘星.油藏描述中的小层划分与对比——以垦西油田K71断块东营组为例[J].地质科技情报,2001,20 (2):55-58.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心