济阳坳陷正反转构造发育特征与油气成藏
|
摘要
济阳坳陷正反转构造研究程度较低,整体缺乏系统、规律性的认识。以高精度的三维地震资料为基础,结合区域应力场及不整合面的发育特征,对济阳坳陷正反转构造进行了综合判识和解释,并论述了正反转构造发育与油气成藏的关系。结果表明:济阳坳陷典型的正反转构造主要发育在埕岛地区的埕北20断层及东营凹陷陈南断层东段,在断层上盘形成明显的反转挤压背斜,形成于晚白垩世和古近纪东营末区域挤压应力场背景之下;正反转构造的判识必须充分考虑区域构造应力场的转型、不整合发育特征、构造样式的差异性以及地层、沉积相特征;正反转构造的发育会改造先期形成油气藏、形成有利的背斜和不整合型圈闭、改善储集性能,可以形成有利的背斜型油气藏、地层超覆油气藏和不整合遮挡型油气藏。
The study on positive inversion tectonics in Jiyang Depression is relatively insufficient, lacking systematic and regular research. Based on high-precision three-dimensional seismic data, combined with regional stress field and unconformity characteristics, the positive inversion tectonics in Jiyang Depression has been comprehensively identified and interpreted, and the relation between development characteristics of positive inversion tectonics and hydrocarbon accumulation has been discussed. The results show that the typical positive inversion tectonics mainly developed in Chengbei 20 Fault in Chengdao Area and the eastern section of Chennan Fault in Dongying Sag. The positive inversion tectonics shows obvious reversed compressional anticline in hanging wall and it formed under the background of regional compressional stress field in Upper Cretaceous and in the end of Dongying stage of Paleogene. The identification of positive inversion tectonics must be fully considered the transition of area stress, the development characteristic of unconformity, difference of tectonic style, stratum and sedimentary facies. The development of positive inversion not only can destroy or reform the existed reservoir, form favorable anticline and unconformity traps, improve reservoir property, but also be favorable to form reservoir of anticline, stratigraphic overlap and unconformity.
The study on positive inversion tectonics in Jiyang Depression is relatively insufficient, lacking systematic and regular research. Based on high-precision three-dimensional seismic data, combined with regional stress field and unconformity characteristics, the positive inversion tectonics in Jiyang Depression has been comprehensively identified and interpreted, and the relation between development characteristics of positive inversion tectonics and hydrocarbon accumulation has been discussed. The results show that the typical positive inversion tectonics mainly developed in Chengbei 20 Fault in Chengdao Area and the eastern section of Chennan Fault in Dongying Sag. The positive inversion tectonics shows obvious reversed compressional anticline in hanging wall and it formed under the background of regional compressional stress field in Upper Cretaceous and in the end of Dongying stage of Paleogene. The identification of positive inversion tectonics must be fully considered the transition of area stress, the development characteristic of unconformity, difference of tectonic style, stratum and sedimentary facies. The development of positive inversion not only can destroy or reform the existed reservoir, form favorable anticline and unconformity traps, improve reservoir property, but also be favorable to form reservoir of anticline, stratigraphic overlap and unconformity.
引文
[1]Glennie K W, Boegner P L E. Sole Pit inversion tectonics. In: Illing L V, Hobson G D, eds. Petroleum Geology of the Continental Shelf of Northwest Europe.London: Institute of Petroleum, 1984:110～120.
[2]Williams G D, Powell C M. Geometry and kinematics of inversion tectonics. In: Cooper M A, Wi1liams G D, eds. Inversion Tectonics. London: Geological Society,1989:3～15.
[3]王燮培.石油勘探构造分析[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990.
[4]谭明友,邴进营.山东北部滨海地区负反转断层及古生界负反转结构成因分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(6):25～34.
[5]陈洁,董冬,邱明文.济阳坳陷内的负反转构造及其石油地质意义[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):201～206.
[6]郝雪峰,宗国洪,李传华,等.济阳坳陷正反转构造初步分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(3):8～10.
[7]李丕龙,张善文,王永诗,等.多样性潜山成因、成藏与勘探——以济阳坳陷为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003.
[8]常国贞,毕彩芹,林红梅,等.低潜山反转构造演化、成藏体系与勘探——以胜利油区孤北潜山为例[J].断块油气田,2002,9(5):19～23.
[9]肖焕钦,孙锡年,汤冬梅,等.济阳坳陷拗陷期构造带划分及其石油地质意义[J].中国石油勘探,2009,14(1):30～34.
[10]吴智平,李伟,任拥军.济阳坳陷中生代盆地演化及其与新生代盆地叠合关系探讨[J].地质学报,2003,77(2):280～286.
[11]李伟,吴智平,周瑶琪.济阳坳陷中生代地层剥蚀厚度、原始厚度恢复及原型盆地研究[J].地质论评,2005,51(5):507～514.
[12]邵济安,牟保垒,何国琦,等.华北北部在古亚洲域与古太平洋域构造叠加过程中的地质作用[J].中国科学(D辑),1997,27(5):390～394.
[13]郭令智,马瑞士,施央申,等.论西太平洋活动大陆边缘中—新生代弧后盆地的分类和演化[J].成都理工学院学院,1998,25(2):134～143.
[14]吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J].地学前缘,2003,10(3):51～60.
[15]周立宏,李三忠,刘建忠,等.渤海湾盆地区燕山期构造特征与原型盆地[J].地球物理学进展,2003,18(4):692～699.
[16]史卜庆,吴智平,王纪祥,等.渤海湾盆地东营运动的特征及成因分析[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):196～200.
[17]蔡东升,罗毓晖,武文来,等.渤海浅层构造变形特征、成因机理与渤中坳陷及其周围油气富集的关系[J].中国海上油气(地质),2001,15(1):36～43.
[18]朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生.郯庐断裂带早白垩世走滑运动中的构造、岩浆、沉积事件[J].地质学报,2002,76(3):325～334.
[19]朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋的板块运动的影响[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):36～49.
[20]于建国,李三忠,王金铎,等.东营凹陷盐底辟作用与中央隆起带断裂构造成因[J].地质科学,2005,40(1):55～68.
[21]潘元林,张善文,肖焕钦,等.济阳断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003.
[22]林松辉,王华,王兴谋,等.断陷盆地陡坡带砂砾岩扇体地震反射特征——以东营凹陷为例[J].地质科技情报,2005,24(4):55～59.
[23]Mietra S. Geometry and kinematics evolution of inversion structures. AAPG Bulletin, 1993,77(7):1159～1191.
[24]张功成,金利.论反转构造[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1997,17(4):83～88.
[25]胡望水.松辽盆地北部正反转构造与油气聚集[J].天然气工业,1996,16(5):20～24.
[26]胡望水,刘学锋,吕新华.论正反转构造的分类[J].新疆石油地质,2000,21(1):5～8.
[27]胡望水,李瑞升,李涛,等.正反转构造动力学成因探讨[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(4):23～29.
[28]王同和,王根海,赵宗举.中国含油气盆地的反转构造样式及其油气聚集[J].海相油气地质,1997,6(3):27～37.
[29]谭试典.关于反转构造的几个问题——与蔡希源、王同和先生商榷[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(1):103～104.
[30]蔡希源,王同和,王根海,等.中国油气区反转构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[31]褚庆忠,王长江.反转构造的识别及研究方法[J].重庆石油高等专科学校学报,2003,5(1):37～40.
[32]褚庆忠.含油气盆地反转构造研究综述[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(1):28～32.
[33]沈华,陈发景.伸展构造体系中反转构造研究[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(1):23～25.
[34]徐士银,张庆龙,舒良树,等.反转构造的识别及其地质意义[J].江苏地质,2006,30(1):6～9.
[35]朱光有,金强,张水昌,等.东营凹陷沙河街组湖相烃源岩的组合特征[J].地质学报,2004,78(3):416～426.
[36]张升平,吕宝凤,夏斌,等.东营凹陷新生代构造转型及其控油意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(3):281～287.
[37]孙雄,洪汉净.构造应力场对油气运移的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(1):1～3.
[38]葛云龙,逯径铁,廖保方,等.构造应力场与油气运移关系的研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(1):84～87.
[39]张乐,姜在兴,郭振廷.构造应力与油气成藏关系[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(1):32～35.
[40]隋风贵,赵乐强.济阳坳陷不整合结构类型及控藏作用[J].大地构造与成矿学,2006,30(2):161～167.
[2]Williams G D, Powell C M. Geometry and kinematics of inversion tectonics. In: Cooper M A, Wi1liams G D, eds. Inversion Tectonics. London: Geological Society,1989:3～15.
[3]王燮培.石油勘探构造分析[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1990.
[4]谭明友,邴进营.山东北部滨海地区负反转断层及古生界负反转结构成因分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(6):25～34.
[5]陈洁,董冬,邱明文.济阳坳陷内的负反转构造及其石油地质意义[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):201～206.
[6]郝雪峰,宗国洪,李传华,等.济阳坳陷正反转构造初步分析[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(3):8～10.
[7]李丕龙,张善文,王永诗,等.多样性潜山成因、成藏与勘探——以济阳坳陷为例[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003.
[8]常国贞,毕彩芹,林红梅,等.低潜山反转构造演化、成藏体系与勘探——以胜利油区孤北潜山为例[J].断块油气田,2002,9(5):19～23.
[9]肖焕钦,孙锡年,汤冬梅,等.济阳坳陷拗陷期构造带划分及其石油地质意义[J].中国石油勘探,2009,14(1):30～34.
[10]吴智平,李伟,任拥军.济阳坳陷中生代盆地演化及其与新生代盆地叠合关系探讨[J].地质学报,2003,77(2):280～286.
[11]李伟,吴智平,周瑶琪.济阳坳陷中生代地层剥蚀厚度、原始厚度恢复及原型盆地研究[J].地质论评,2005,51(5):507～514.
[12]邵济安,牟保垒,何国琦,等.华北北部在古亚洲域与古太平洋域构造叠加过程中的地质作用[J].中国科学(D辑),1997,27(5):390～394.
[13]郭令智,马瑞士,施央申,等.论西太平洋活动大陆边缘中—新生代弧后盆地的分类和演化[J].成都理工学院学院,1998,25(2):134～143.
[14]吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J].地学前缘,2003,10(3):51～60.
[15]周立宏,李三忠,刘建忠,等.渤海湾盆地区燕山期构造特征与原型盆地[J].地球物理学进展,2003,18(4):692～699.
[16]史卜庆,吴智平,王纪祥,等.渤海湾盆地东营运动的特征及成因分析[J].石油实验地质,1999,21(3):196～200.
[17]蔡东升,罗毓晖,武文来,等.渤海浅层构造变形特征、成因机理与渤中坳陷及其周围油气富集的关系[J].中国海上油气(地质),2001,15(1):36～43.
[18]朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生.郯庐断裂带早白垩世走滑运动中的构造、岩浆、沉积事件[J].地质学报,2002,76(3):325～334.
[19]朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋的板块运动的影响[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):36～49.
[20]于建国,李三忠,王金铎,等.东营凹陷盐底辟作用与中央隆起带断裂构造成因[J].地质科学,2005,40(1):55～68.
[21]潘元林,张善文,肖焕钦,等.济阳断陷盆地隐蔽油气藏勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003.
[22]林松辉,王华,王兴谋,等.断陷盆地陡坡带砂砾岩扇体地震反射特征——以东营凹陷为例[J].地质科技情报,2005,24(4):55～59.
[23]Mietra S. Geometry and kinematics evolution of inversion structures. AAPG Bulletin, 1993,77(7):1159～1191.
[24]张功成,金利.论反转构造[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1997,17(4):83～88.
[25]胡望水.松辽盆地北部正反转构造与油气聚集[J].天然气工业,1996,16(5):20～24.
[26]胡望水,刘学锋,吕新华.论正反转构造的分类[J].新疆石油地质,2000,21(1):5～8.
[27]胡望水,李瑞升,李涛,等.正反转构造动力学成因探讨[J].石油天然气学报,2007,29(4):23～29.
[28]王同和,王根海,赵宗举.中国含油气盆地的反转构造样式及其油气聚集[J].海相油气地质,1997,6(3):27～37.
[29]谭试典.关于反转构造的几个问题——与蔡希源、王同和先生商榷[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(1):103～104.
[30]蔡希源,王同和,王根海,等.中国油气区反转构造[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001.
[31]褚庆忠,王长江.反转构造的识别及研究方法[J].重庆石油高等专科学校学报,2003,5(1):37～40.
[32]褚庆忠.含油气盆地反转构造研究综述[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,19(1):28～32.
[33]沈华,陈发景.伸展构造体系中反转构造研究[J].特种油气藏,2005,12(1):23～25.
[34]徐士银,张庆龙,舒良树,等.反转构造的识别及其地质意义[J].江苏地质,2006,30(1):6～9.
[35]朱光有,金强,张水昌,等.东营凹陷沙河街组湖相烃源岩的组合特征[J].地质学报,2004,78(3):416～426.
[36]张升平,吕宝凤,夏斌,等.东营凹陷新生代构造转型及其控油意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(3):281～287.
[37]孙雄,洪汉净.构造应力场对油气运移的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(1):1～3.
[38]葛云龙,逯径铁,廖保方,等.构造应力场与油气运移关系的研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1999,26(1):84～87.
[39]张乐,姜在兴,郭振廷.构造应力与油气成藏关系[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(1):32～35.
[40]隋风贵,赵乐强.济阳坳陷不整合结构类型及控藏作用[J].大地构造与成矿学,2006,30(2):161～167.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心