巴音都兰凹陷阿尔善组碎屑岩储层特征及其主控因素
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
通过采用岩心观察、薄片鉴定,以及地震相、测井相、沉积相、成岩作用研究等方法,分析了二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷阿尔善组碎屑岩储层特征。结果表明:岩石类型以长石砂岩和砂砾岩为主,岩屑砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩次之,具有近物源特征;储层物性总体上属于低孔、特低渗性,但也存在相对有利的低孔、低渗储层(测井孔隙度为9.37%~11.55%,渗透率为6.14×10-3~6.27×10-3μm2),有利于形成含油气储层。针对研究区储层特点,进一步分析认为,储层的形成和分布主要受沉积微相和成岩作用两大因素的控制。扇三角洲前缘分流河道和席状砂微相为有利储层分布相带;同时,差异压实作用、溶蚀作用和压溶作用,使得储层原生残余粒间孔、粒间溶孔、粒内溶孔及微裂缝发育并得以保存,而强烈的压实作用和胶结作用,使得储层物性整体变差。
The characteristics of clastic rocks in Aershan Formation of Bayindulan Sag, Erlian Basin are analyzed by core observation, thin section examination of rock, seismic facies, log data, sedimentary facies and diagenesis. The result shows that rock types are mainly of arkose and glutenite, while lithic sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone are less, which are near provenances;reservoir physical property generally belongs to low porosity, extra-low permeability, but there are also relatively good low porosity low permeability reservoirs(the average log porosity is 9.37%-11.55%, the average permeability is 6.14-6.27 md), which is conductive to formation of oil and gas reservoir. Considering the characteristics of the reservoirs in the study area, further analysis concludes the formation and distribution of the favorable reservoirs are mainly controlled by sedimentary micro-facies and diagenesis. The distributary channel of fan delta front and sheet sand microfacies are favorable reservoir belts; differetial compaction, dissolution and pressure solution develop and preserve original residual intergranular pore, reservoir intergranular dissolved pore, intragranular solution pores and micro cracks, but strong compaction and cementation worsen the reservoir physical property.
引文
[1]杜金虎,易士威,张以明,等.二连盆地隐蔽油藏勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:1-148.
    [2]焦贵浩,王同和,郭绪杰,等.二连裂谷构造演化与油气[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:1-184.
    [3]李德生.中国含油气盆地构造学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2002:1-675.
    [4]费宝生,祝玉衡,邹伟宏,等.二连裂谷盆地群油气地质[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:1-326.
    [5]李正文,殷宏平,常亮,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷隐蔽油藏勘探[J].中国石油勘探,2002,7(2):14-30.
    [6]任战利,冯建辉,刘池洋,等.巴音都兰凹陷烃源岩有机地球化学特征[J].西北大学学报,2000,30(4):328-331.
    [7]任战利,刘池洋,冯建辉,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷热演化史研究[J].石油学报,2000,21(4):42-45.
    [8]李启波.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷油气成藏条件研究[J].石油天然气学报,2009,31(3):51-56.
    [9]崔周旗,吴健平,李莉,等.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷早白垩世构造岩相带特征及含油性[J].古地理学报,2001,3(1):25-34.
    [10]田福清.二连盆地巴音都兰凹陷烃源岩评价及油源研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(4):541-544.
    [11]琚惠姣,孙卫,杨希濮,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延安地区山2段储层特征及其主控因素[J].断块油气田,2011,18(2):142-145.
    [12]易士威.断陷盆地岩性地层油藏分布特征[J].石油学报,2005,26(4):38-41.
    [13]刘忠群,胡杨.大牛地气田山西组山1段储层孔隙结构特征[J].断块油气田,2008,15(5):37-39.
    [14]颜其彬,陈培元,杨辉廷,等.普光气田须家河组绿泥石成因及其与储层关系[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(2):16-20.
    [15]赵追,赵全民,孙冲,等.陆相断陷湖盆的成岩圈闭:以泌阳凹陷下第三系核桃园组三段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2001,22(2):154-157.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心