隧道施工爆破对地表滑坡稳定性的影响
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
基于爆炸地震波衰减过程将作用在滑体上的动荷载修正为随时间变化的波动应力,并将其引入传递系数法中,提出了考虑施工爆破荷载影响的滑坡传递系数法.利用该方法分析了宝鸡-天水高速渭河2号大桥17号桥台码头隧道洞口滑坡稳定性在隧道爆破施工中的变化特性.结果表明:隧道爆破施工产生的振动荷载使地表滑坡的稳定系数围绕天然条件下的稳定系数呈现衰减型波动变化;隧道爆破施工荷载作用下地表滑坡稳定系数衰减到天然工况量值所需时间及稳定系数变化值与所使用的爆破药量有关,药量越大,衰减时间越长,滑坡稳定系数变化值越大;码头滑坡在隧道施工爆破药量超过1000 kg后,滑坡稳定系数最小值降低到1.15以下,滑坡体在隧道爆破施工期间易于失稳,据此提出了隧道单炮施工药量取750kg的优化方案,实践证明该药量对该滑坡的稳定性未造成劣化影响.研究成果为有效评估隧道施工爆破对地表地质环境尤其是滑坡安全性具有积极意义.
Correct dynamic load acting of landslide body was used as a time-dependent fluctuating stress and was introduced to the transfer coefficient method;a revised transfer coefficient method was established to consider the construction blasting load.Taking as an example the landslide at the mouth of Matou tunnel in the 17~# abutment of the 2rd bridge on the highway from Baoji to Tianshui,we analyzed the time behavior of the stability of landslide under action of tunnel construction,and the results showed that the vibration load by blasting construction in the tunnel made the stability coefficient of the landslide over the tunnel vary with fluctuations around the stability coefficient in the natural status.The stability coefficient variations of landslide and time attenuation for stability coefficient at blasting were calculated to reduce the impact in natural status,showing that therw was a high correlation with the amount of explosive used in the tunnel construction,i.e.bigger blasting doses and longer time of the attenuation would cause a bigger landslide stability coefficient variation.Landslide stability coefficient was depressed to lower than 1.15 when the blasting dose exceeded 1 000 kg,and the landslide was easy to be induced.According to this,the proposed prioritization scheme is that the blasting dose should be 750 kg,which was proved not to threaten a landslide.This is of very positive significance for evaluating the surface geological environment and even the surface landslide stability behavior.
引文
[1]钟冬望,吴亮,韩芳,等.爆破载荷下岩质边坡动力响应及控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
    [2]张东明,尹志光,许江,等.多台阶山坡露天矿边帮稳定性分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
    [3]周志斌.大冶铁矿东采场边坡变形破坏特征及滑坡时间预报[J].中国矿冶,2000(增刊2):79-82.
    [4]Adamson W,Scherpenise C.The measurement and control of blast induced damage of final Pin Wall in open Pit Mines[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique,New Orleans:Louisiana,1998:539-556.
    [5]Ling H I,Leshchinsky D,Mohri Y.Soil slopes under combined horizontal and vertical seismic accelerations[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic,1997,26(2):1231-1241.
    [6]Singh P K.Blast vibration damage to underground coal mines from Adjcent open-pit blasting[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science,2002,18(39):959-973.
    [7]Siad L.Seismic stability analysis of fractured rock by yield design theory[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2003,23(3):203-212.
    [8]徐红涛,卢文波,周创兵,等.基于时程分析的岩质高边坡开挖爆破动力稳定性计算方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(11):2213-2219.
    [9]卢文波,赖世骧,朱传云.岩石高边坡爆破震动动力稳定分析[J].矿冶工程,1996,16(1):3-6.
    [10]赵涛,折学森.地震力作用下的黄土边坡的稳定性分析[J].重庆科技学院学报,2012,14(3):117-120.
    [11]吴玮江,穆鹏.汶川地震重灾区武都三家地滑坡治理工程效果分析[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2014,50(5):633-638.
    [12]袁道阳,雷中生,杨青云,等.1879年甘肃武都南8级地震的震灾特征[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2014,50(5):611-621.
    [13]重庆市地质环境监测总站.地质灾害防治工程设计规范[S].DB50/5029-2004:4-5.
    [14]卢文波,Hustrulid W.质点峰值振动速度衰减公式的改进[J].工程爆破,2002,8(3):1-4.
    [15]燕永峰,陈士海,张秋华,等.爆破振动峰值速度计算的优化研究[J].工程爆破,2010,16(4):9-12.
    [16]言志信,言涅,江平,等.爆破振动峰值速度预报方法探讨[J].振动与冲击,2010,29(5):179-182.
    [17]王迪安.一维应力波理论在爆破地震效应研究中的应用[J].矿业研究与开发,1997,17(1):59-63.
    [18]孟海利,郭峰.爆破地震波主频率的试验研究[J].铁道工程学报,2009(11):81-83,93.
    [19]陈洪凯,唐红梅,王林峰,等.地质灾害理论与控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2011.
    [20]王玉杰,陈先锋,彭天浩.浅析岩石夹层对爆破效果的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(8):1385-1387.
    [21]张伟,焦玉勇,郭小红.隧道洞口滑坡稳定性分析与防治措施[J].岩土力学,2008,29(增刊1):311-314.
    [22]毛红梅.青花坪隧道爆破对古滑坡体稳定性评估及控制[J].路基工程,2007(5):43-44.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心