青藏高原东缘区域地壳稳定性评价
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
青藏高原东缘新构造运动复杂而强烈,地震与地质灾害多发,区域地壳稳定性评价工作意义重大。基于地质力学和大陆动力学相互补充的区域地壳稳定性评价理论,选择深部地球物理场、区域构造变形、地震活动、区域构造应力场作为内动力因素,地形地貌、降雨量、河流冲蚀组合计算所产生的地质灾害条件作为外动力因素,地层岩性和活动断裂影响带作为介质因素,进行了区域地壳稳定性评价。结果表明,采用地质要素梯度来反映内动力作用和通过地质环境要素综合分析表现外动力作用是提高评价准确性的有效手段;青藏高原东缘可分为8个构造特征差异显著的一级分区,75个综合因素差别较大的二级分区,653个外动力条件有一定差别的三级分区;总体而言,龙门山断裂、鲜水河断裂和安宁河断裂带构成的Y字型构造格架断裂带附近的地壳稳定性最差,西部次之,东部最好,北部区块较完整,南部复杂破碎。
Eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau is a sharpen change zone of geomorphology and geology,with complex and strong Neotectonic movement,breeding environment of numerous earthquakes and geo-hazards occurred largely. It is of great significance to carry out Regional Crustal Stability Assessment(RCSA). Using RCSA combined geo-mechanics and continental dynamics theory,this paper selected four types data,deep geophysical fields,regional tectonic deformation,regional tectonic stress fields and seismic activity,as internal dynamic factors,geo-hazard combining with topography,rainfall and river erosion as the external factors,lithology and affecting strip of active fault as the medium factors,then to carry out the RCSA. The results show that:(1) it is an effective means to improve the assessment accuracy that using geological elements gradient reflects the internal dynamic action and using comprehensive analysis of geological environment reflects external dynamic action;(2)evaluation results show that the study area can be divided into eight one-class zonations by tectonic characteristics significantly different,75 secondary zonations by comprehensive factors differences vary greatly,and 653 three-class zonations by outside dynamic conditions;(3)in brief,fault belts near and/or in the tectonic skeleton,composed mainly with Longmenshan fault,Xianshuihe fault,Anninghe fault,are the worst,followed by the west,the east is best,the north relatively complete,and the southern breaking and complex.
引文
[1]姚鑫.区域地壳稳定性评价研究进展与问题兼谈规范编制[J].地质论评,2014,60(1):22-30.
    [2]唐明辉,李德威,胡新丽.龙山门断裂带活动特征与工程区域地壳稳定性评价理论[J].工程地质学报,2009,17(2):145-151.
    [3]李兴唐,许兵,黄鼎成,等.区域地壳稳定性研究理论和方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1987.
    [4]刘国昌.区域稳定工程地质[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,1993.
    [5]孙叶,谭成轩.区域地壳稳定性定量化评价[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
    [6]胡海涛.区域地壳稳定性评价的“安全岛”理论及方法[J].地质力学学报,2001,7(2):97-103.
    [7]Zhang Yongshuang,Yao Xin,Hu Daogong,et al.Quantitative Zoning Assessment of Crustal Stability Along the Yunnan-Tibet Railway Line,Western China[J].Acta Geological Sinica,2012,86(4):1004-1012.
    [8]Jenks George F.The Data Model Concept in Statistical Mapping[J].International Yearbook of Cartography,1967,7:186-190.
    [9]Mc Master Robert.In Memoriam:George F.Jenks(1916-1996)[J].Cartography and Geographic Information Science,1996,24(1):56-59.
    [10]王庆良,崔笃信,王文萍,等.川西地区现今垂直地壳运动研究[J].中国科学(D辑),2008,38(5):598-610.
    [11]刘凤山,吴中海,张岳桥,等.青藏高原东缘新构造与活动构造研究新进展及展望[J].地质通报,2014,33(4):403-418.
    [12]国家重大科学工程“中国地壳运动观测网络”项目组.GPS测定的2008年汶川Ms 8.0级地震的同震位移场[J].中国科学(D辑):地球科学,2008,38(10):1195-1206.
    [13]中国地震局监测预报司.汶川8.0级地震科学研究报告[M].北京:地震出版社,2009.
    [14]范桃园,孙玉军,吴中海.青藏高原东缘旋转变形机制的数值模拟分析[J].地质通报,2014,33(4):497-502.
    [15]Xu Chong,Xu Xiwei,Yao Xin,et al.Three(nearly)complete inventories of landslides triggered by the May 12,2008 Wenchuan Mw 7.9 earthquake of China and their spatial distribution statistical analysis[J].Landslides,2012.DOI:10.1007/s10346-013-0404-6.
    [16]GB50218-1994,工程岩体分级标准[S].
    [17]Tan Chengxuan,Sun Ye,Wang Ruijiang,et al.Quantitative assessment and zonation of regional crustal stability in the dam region of the Three Gorges Project on the Yangtze River and its vicinity[J].Environmental Geology,1997,32(4):285-295.
    1唐文清.青藏高原东缘地壳形变GPS监测.中国地质调查局地质调查工作报告,2013.
    2张永双,姚鑫,郭长宝,等.龙门山及邻近构造带地震工程地质调查评价.中国地质调查局地质调查工作报告,2013.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心