考虑压缩失效时埋地管线跨地震断层的最佳交角研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
在断层错动下埋地管线跨断层的最佳交角研究方面,已有方法均以管道受拉失效为基本假定,未考虑管道压缩失效的情况.本文利用管体壳模型有限元方法进行了跨断层管线在断层错动下管体反应的计算分析,在考虑管材特性、管道尺寸及地基土特性多种影响因素的情况下,探讨了在仅控制轴向拉伸应变值和同时控制轴向拉伸应变值与轴向压缩应变值两种管道失效控制准则下管道的失效问题,分析了不同失效控制准则对管线跨断层的最佳交角的影响.发现失效控制准则是确定最佳交角值的关键因素,而且基于同时考虑拉伸和压缩失效的控制准则,管线跨断层的最佳交角应在70°左右.
The basic assumptions of existing approaches are that the pipelines fail in tension crack of pipe for studies on the best crossing angle between pipeline and fault,but they do not consider the cases of pipeline failures induced by the compression crack or buckling of pipe.In this paper,some case studies are made by the finite element method with shell model of pipe,in which the different material behaviors of pipe,dimensions of pipe and properties of surrounding soils are taken into consideration.Based on the results of case studies,the failure problems of pipelines are discussed under different rules of failure control of pipes which are the rules of only controlling the tension failure of pipe or controlling both the tension failure and the compression failure of pipe,and the influences of the different rules of failure control are analyzed on the best crossing angle between pipeline and fault.The opinions are obtained that the rule of failure control is an important factor to bring out the best crossing angle between pipeline and fault,and the best crossing angle should be about 70 degrees under the rules of controlling both the tension failure and the compression failure of pipe.
引文
[1]Newmark N M,HallW J.P ipeline design to resist large fau lt d isplacem ent[A].Proceed ings U.S.National Conferenceon Earthquake Engineering[C].Un iversity ofM ich igan,Ann Arbor,M I,1975:416-425
    [2]Kennedy R P,Chow A W,W illwam son R A.Fau lt movem ent effects on buried oil p ipeline[J].Journal of theTransportation Engineering D ivision,ASCE,1977,103(TE5):617-633
    [3]W ang L R L,Yeh Y.A refined seism ic analysis and design of buried p ipeline for fau lt movem ent[J].Journal ofEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynam ics,1985,13:75-96
    [4]W ang L L R,W ang L J.Param etric study of buried p ipelines due to large fau ltmovem ent[A]∥Hu Y X,Takada Sh iro,eds.Proceed ings of Th ird Ch ina-Japan-US Trilateral Symposium on L ifeline Earthquake Engineering[C].IG,CSB,Kobe Un i,1995:165-172
    [5]刘爱文,张素灵,胡聿贤,等.地震断层作用下埋地管线的反应分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2002,22(2):22-27L iu A iwen,Zhang Su ling,Hu Yuxian,et al.A m ethod for analyzing response of buried p ipeline due to earthquake fau ltmovem ent[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering V ibration,2002,22(2):22-27
    [6]刘爱文,胡聿贤,李小军,等.大口径埋地钢管在地震断层作用下的破坏模式的研究[J].工程力学,2005,22(3):82-87L iu A iwen,Hu Yuxian,L i X iaojun,et al.Study on the damage behaviors of steel p ipelines w ith large-d iam eter underfau ltmovem ents[J].EngineeringM echan ics,2005,22(3):82-87
    [7]刘爱文.基于壳模型的埋地管线地震反应分析[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2002L iu A iwen.Earthquake Response Analysis of Buried P ipeline Based on SellModel[D].Beijing Institute ofGeophysics,CEA,2002.
    [8]中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准.输油(气)埋地钢质管道抗震设计规范[S].SY/T0450-97.Professional standard of Petroleum and natural gas in the People's Repub lic of Ch ina.Seism ic design code of oil and gasburied steel p ipeline[S].SY/T0450-97
    [9]刘学杰,孙绍平.地下管道穿越断层的应变方法[J].特种结构,2005,22(2):81-85L iu Xuejie,Sun Shaop ing Strain m ethods of the crossing fau lt-buried p ipelines[J].Special Structures,2005,22(2):81-85

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心