汶川震区典型区不同受损阶段群落多样性特征——以北川县为例
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为了解汶川地震灾区典型区域不同受损阶段群落特征,采用野外调查和室内分析相结合的方法,研究了北川县苏保河和魏家沟流域4种植被类型(灾后恢复草地、受损林地、裸地、未受损林地)群落种类组成、垂直结构、多样性等特征。结果表明:不同受损阶段群落在物种组成、物种数量、群落分层等方面差异显著;灾后恢复草地草本层Simpson指数和Shannon-Wienner指数最大,Pielou均匀度指数则以裸地最大;灌木层及乔木层多样性指数均以未受损林地最大;总体多样性指数则表现为未受损林地>受损林地>灾后恢复草地>裸地。基于以上分析结果,本文得出地震灾区植物生长条件严重衰退,在植被恢复过程中应采用人工辅助方式,增大其物种多样性及恢复潜力。
To study the characteristics of different damaged stages in typical regions of Wenchuan earthquake area, Sichuan Province of southwestern China, field surveys and laboratory experiments were carried out in Subaohe and Wenjiagou watersheds as typical regions of Wenchuan earthquake area, including four vegetation types of restored grassland, damaged forest, bare land and none-damaged place. The results showed that different damaged communities had significant differences in species composition, species number, vertical structure and level distribution,etc. Simpson index and Shannon-Weinner index of herb layer in restored grassland were higher than that of other communities with the highest Pielou index in bare land. The diversity indices of shrub layer and tree layer had the highest values in non-damaged forest. Based on the diversity indices, average height and average coverage of different layers, general diversity indices of communities were calculated and the highest value appeared in non-damaged forest, whereas the lowest in bare land. According to the results, the living condition of vegetation deteriorated due to secondary geo-hazards, so vegetation restoration would be improved by manual intervene to increase its species diversity and restoration potentials.
引文
[1]包维楷.汶川地震重灾区生态退化及其恢复重建对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2008,23(4):324-329.
    [2]崔鹏,韩用顺,陈晓清.汶川地震堰塞湖分布规律与风险评估[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2009,41(3):35-42.
    [3]崔鹏,韦方强,陈晓清,等.汶川地震次生山地灾害及其减灾对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2008,23(4):317-323.
    [4]崔鹏,韦方强,何思明,等.“5.12”汶川地震诱发的山地灾害及减灾措施[J].山地学报,2008,26(3):280-282.
    [5]王峰,周立江,刘波,等.汶川地震四川重灾区森林景观变迁及间接损失研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):67-71.
    [6]张文,周立江,潘发明,等.利用CBERS进行汶川地震区森林资源损失快速评估[J].山地学报,2008,26(6):748-756.
    [7]张翔,王庆安,方自力,等.汶川地震灾区自然植被恢复的先锋植物特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2011(4):47-50.
    [8]林勇明,吴承祯,洪伟,等.汶川地震灾区典型区不同植被类型土壤种子库特征:以北川县苏保河/魏家沟流域为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(1):99-104.
    [9]孙儒泳,李庆芬,牛翠娟.基础生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.
    [10]LIN C Y,LO H M,CHOU W C,et al.Vegetation recovery assessment at the Jou-Jou Mountain landslide area caused by the921Earthquake in central Taiwan[J].Ecol Model,2004,176:75-81.
    [11]LIN W T,CHOU W C,LIN C Y,et al.Vegetation recovery monitoring and assessment at landslides caused by earthquake in Central Taiwan[J].For Ecol Manage,2005,210:55-66.
    [12]LIN W T,LIN C Y,CHOU W C.Assessment of vegetation recovery and soil erosion at landslides caused by a catastrophic earthquake:A case study in Central Taiwan[J].Ecol Eng,2006,28:79-89.
    [13]游勇,柳金峰,陈兴长.“5.12”汶川地震后北川苏保河流域泥石流危害及特征[J].山地学报,2010,28(3):358-366.
    [14]胡晓敏,董安强,王发国,等.广东南岭大东山浙江润楠群落物种多样性与区系地理成分分析[J].植物科学学报,2011,29(3):265-271.
    [15]王伯荪,余世孝,彭少麟.植物群落学实验手册[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1996:1-106.
    [16]马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994:141-165.
    [17]高贤明,黄建辉,万师强,等.秦岭太白山弃耕地植物群落演替的生态学研究Ⅱ:演替系列的群落a多样性特征[J].生态学报,1997,17(6):619-625.
    [18]王梅,张文辉.不同坡向人工油松林生长状况与林下物种多样性分析[J].西北植物学报,2009,29(8):1678-1683.
    [19]王永健,陶建平,张炜银,等.茂县土地岭植被恢复过程中物种多样性动态特征[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1028-1036.
    [20]秦伟,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植被恢复自然演替系列及其植物物种多样性特征[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(4):507-513.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心