新型磁流变脂阻尼器对铁路连续梁桥地震响应模糊神经网络控制
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为解决传统磁流变液阻尼器(Magneto Rheological Fluid Damper,MRFD)磁场利用率低及磁流变液沉降导致控制特性劣化难题,提出新型阻尼器—磁流变脂阻尼器(Magneto Rheological Grease Damper,MRGD)。采用神经网络(Neural Network,NN)对足尺MRGD动力特性进行辨识,通过将改进的限幅最优(Modified Clipped-Optimal,MCO)算法整合到模糊神经网络(Fuzzy Neral Network,FNN)理论来设计适合MRGD的FNN/MCO半主动控制策略,并构建SIMULINK仿真分析平台。以典型三跨铁路连续梁桥为工程背景,分别对未控制、FNN/MCO半主动控制及线性二次型高斯(Linear Quadratic Gaussian,LQG)主动控制下桥梁各项评价指标进行分析。结果表明,所提FNN/MCO半主动控制策略对桥梁地震响应控制效果明显优于LQG主动控制策略;FNN/MCO策略较LQG策略更利于控制装置性能发挥;FNN/MCO策略稳定性、鲁棒性均明显优于LQG策略。
In view of the problems of low utilization rate of magnetic field and degraded control characteristic due to sedimentation of magneto rheological fluid in traditional magneto rheological fluid damper( MRFD),magneto rheological grease damper( MRGD) as a new type of damper was proposed. The neural network( NN) was employed to identify the dynamic characteristics of a full-scale MRGD,the FNN / MCO semi-active control strategy for MRGD was designed by integrating the modified clipped-optimal( MCO) algorithm with the fuzzy neral network( FNN) theory, and the SIMULINK simulation analysis platform corresponding to FNN / MCO strategy was constructed. Taking the typical threespan continuous girder railway bridge as engineering background,the various evaluation criteria for the bridge with noncontrol,FNN / MCO semi-active control and active control based on linear quadratic Gaussian( LQG) strategy were analyzed respectively. The analytical results show that the control effect on seismic responses of bridge with the FNN / MCO semi-active control strategy proposed is obviously superior to those with LQG active control strategy. Comparing with LQG strategy,the FNN / MCO strategy can more obviously contribute to the performance exertion of control devices. The stability and robustness of the FNN / MCO strategy are both superior to those of LQG control strategy.
引文
[1]Maddaloni G,Caterino N,Occhiuzzi A.Semi-active control of the benchmark highway bridge based on seismic early warning systems[J].Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2011,9(5):1703-1715.
    [2]Ali S,Ramaswamy A.Optimal dynamic inversion-based semiactive control of benchmark bridge using MR dampers[J].Structural Control and Health Monitoring,2009,16(5):564-585.
    [3]Erkus B,Abe M,Fujino Y.Investigation of semi-active control for seismic protection of elevated highway bridges[J].Engineering Structures,2002,24(3):281-293.
    [4]Ali S F,Ramaswamy A.Optimal dynamic inversion-based semi-active control of benchmark bridge using MR dampers[J].Structural Control and Health Monitoring,2009,16(5):564-585.
    [5]Gordaninejad F,Kavlicoglu B M.Study of a magnetorheological grease(MRG)clutch[C].//Proceedings of the SPIE 14th International Symposium on:Smart Structures and Materials and Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring,San Diego,2007.
    [6]Park B O,Park BJ,Hato M J,et al.Soft magnetic carbonyl iron microsphere dispersed in grease and its rheological characteristics under magnetic field[J].Colloid and Polymer Science,2011,289(4):381-386.
    [7]Marksmeier T M,Gordaninejad F,Wang E L,et al.Design and performance of an electro-rheological grease(ERG)shock absorber[J].International Journal of Modern Physics B,1999,13(14):2135-2142.
    [8]Sukhwani V K,Hirani H.A comparative study of magnetorheological-fluid-brake and magnetorheological-grease-brake[J].Tribology Online,2008,3(1):31-35.
    [9]Zhu C S.Experimental investigation on the dynamic behavior of a disk-type damper based on magnetorheological grease[J].Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures,2006,17(8):793-799.
    [10]Laun H M,Rady M,Hassager O.Analytical solutions for squeeze flow with partial wall slip[J].Journal of NonNewtonian Fluid Mechanics,1999,81(1):1-15.
    [11]Yoshida O,Dyke S J,Giacosa L M,et al.Experimental verification of torsional response control of asymmetric buildings using MR dampers[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2003,32(13):2085-2105.
    [12]Yi F,Dyke S J,Caicedo J M,et al.Experimental verification of multi-input seismic control strategies for smart dampers[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2001,127(11):1152-1164.
    [13]Jangid R S.Seismic response of isolated bridges[J].Journal of Bride Engineering,2004,9(2):156-166.
    [14]Yoshida O,Dyke S J.Seismic control of a nonlinear benchmark building using smart dampers[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2004,130(4):386-392.
    [15]Mosleh M,Otadi M,Abbasbandy S.Evaluation of fuzzy regression models by fuzzy neural network[J].Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics,2010,234(3):825-834.
    [16]Hameed I A.Using gaussian membership functions for improving the reliability and robustness of students'evaluation systems[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(6):7135-7142.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心