薄储层叠后反演影响因素分析与地震属性解释研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
薄储层是岩性地震勘探的主要研究对象和难点之一,而地震反演被普遍认为是解决此类地震勘探问题的主要解释技术与方法。尽管现今的反演技术已经从叠后发展到叠前,从AVO反演发展为弹性反演,但反演技术仍面临着地震采集、处理和解释等方面诸多因素的影响以及认识上和观念上存在的一些问题的影响,这些影响很多时候会导致反演的地质解释结果与钻井结果相差甚远。为此,在不考虑叠前地震影响因素,和在理想的成像条件下,基于薄储层褶积模型对叠后反演面临的主要影响因素进行了讨论与分析。在此基础上,对叠后反演与地震属性的理论关系和地质解释关系进行了讨论,同时给出了叠后反演应考虑的主要步骤。
Thin reservoir is the main research object and one of the diffi- culties in lithologic seismic exploration while the seismic inversion is commonly regarded as an important interpretation technology and method for solving this problem.Having been developed from post-stack inversion to pre-stack inversion,from AVO inversion to elastic inversion,the current inversion technology is still impacted by many factors in seismic acquisition,processing,and interpreta- tion.Moreover,some differences in understanding and ideas also af- fect the inversion technology,resulting in a big difference between geologic interpretation results of inversion and that of drilling. Therefore,without considering the pre-stack seismic affecting fac- tors,the main factors affecting post-stack inversion was discussed and analyzed base on the convolution model of thin reservoir under the ideal imaging conditions.After the analysis,the theoretical rela- tion and geologic interpretation relation of post stack inversion and seismic attribute was probed,and main steps of post-stack inversion were proposed.
引文
1 Peterson R A,Fillipone W R,Coker F B.The syn- thesis of seismograms from well log data[J].Geo- physics,1955,20(3) :516~538
    2 Sengbush R L,Lawrence P L,McDonal F J.Inter- pretation of synthetic seismograms[J].Geophysics, 1961,26(2):138~157
    3 Lindseth R O.Synthetic sonic logs:a process for stra- tigraphic interpretation[J].Geophysics,1979,44(1) : 3~26
    4 Becquey M,Lavergne M,Willm C.Acoustic imped- ance logs computed from seismic traces[J].Geophys- ics,1979,44(9):1485~1501
    5 Levy S,Fullagar P K.Reconstruction of a sparse spike train from a portion of its spectrum and applica- tion to high-resolution deconvolution[J].Geophysics, 1981,46(9):1235~1243
    6 Berteussen K A,Ursinl B.Approximate computation of the acoustic impedance from seismic data[J].Geo- physics,1983,48(10):1351~1358
    7 Walker C,Ulrych T J.Autoregressive recovery of the acoustic impedance [J].Geophysics,1983,48 (10) : 1338~1350
    8 Cooke D A,Schneider W A.Generalized inversion of reflection seismic data[J].Geophysics,1983,48 (6): 665~676
    9 Maver K G,Rasmussen K B,Pedersen J M,et al. Global stochastic seismic inversion with variable prior knowledge for lithology prediction[J].Expanded Ab- stracts of 64~(th) Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1994, 1024~1027
    10 Debeye H W.Seismic character inversion[J].Ex- panded Abstracts of 65~(th) Annual Internat SEG Mtg, 1995,1077~1080
    11杨文采,陈军中.地球物理反演的理论与方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1997.1~271
    12范祯祥.地震波参数反演与应用技术[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1998.1~331
    13 Oldenburg D W,Scheuer T,Levy S.Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms[J]. Geophysics,1983,48(10):1318~1337
    14 Oldenburg D W,Levy S,Stinson K.Root-mean- square velocities and recovery of the acoustic imped- ance[J].Geophysics,1984,49(10):1653~1663
    15 Levy S,Oldenburg D.Practical inversion of reflection seismograms[J].Expanded Abstracts of 54~(th) Annual Intrnat SEG Mtg,1984,562~564
    16 Gardner G H F,Gardner L W,Gregory A R.Forma- tion velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for stra- tigraphic trap[J].Geophysics,1974,39(6)770~780
    17 Francis A.Acoustic impedance inversion pitfalls and some fuzzy analysis[J].The Leading Edge,1997.26 (3) :275~280
    18 Huang X,Kelkar M,Chopra A,et al.Wavelet sensi- tivity study on inversion using heuristic combinatorial algorithms[J].Expanded Abstracts of 65~(th) Annual In- ternat SEG Mtg,1995,1088~1090
    19 Yu G.Offset-amplitude variation and controlled-am- plitude processing [J].Geophysics,1985,50 (12) : 2697~2708
    20 Swan H W.Amplitude versus offset analysis in a fine- ly layered media[J].Expanded Abstracts of 58~(th) An- nual Internat SEG Mtg,1988,1195~1198
    21 Swan H W.Amplitude-versus-offset measurement er- rors in a finely medium[J].Geophysics,1991,56(1) : 41~49
    22 Black J L,Schleicher K L,Zhang L.True-amplitude imaging and dip moveout[J].Geophysics,1993,58 (1):47~66
    23 Tura M A C,Hanitzsch C.Influence of velocity un- certainty on AVO migration/inversion[J].Expanded Abstracts of 65~(th) Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1995, 1028~1031
    24 Roden R,Sepǘlveda H.The significance of phase to the interpreter:practical guidelines for phase analysis [J].The Leading Edge,1999,18(7):774~777
    25 Purnell G,Sukup D,Higginbotham J,et al.Migrating sparse-receiver data for AVO analysis at Teal South Field[J].Expanded Abstracts of 70~(th) Annual Internat SEG Mtg,2000,190~193
    26 Contreras A,Verdin C T,Fasnacht T.Sensitivity a- nalysis of data-related factors controlling AVA simul- taneous inversion of partially stacked seismic amplitude data[J].Geophysics,2007,72(1):19~29
    27 Robinson E A.Predictive decomposition of seismic traces[J].Geophyscis,1957,22(4):767~778
    28 Robinson E A.Predictive decomposition of time series with application to seismic exploration[J].Geophys- cis,1967,32(3):418~484
    29 Goupillaud P.An approach to inverse filtering of near- surface layer effects from seismic records [J].Geo- physics,1961,26(4):754~760
    30 Clarke G K C.Time-varying deconvolution filters[J]. Geophysics,1968,33(6):936~944
    31 Berkout A J.Least squares inverse filtering and wave- let deconvolution [J].Geophysics,1977,42 ( 8 ) : 1369~1383
    32 Wiggins R A.Minimum entropy deconvolution[J]. Geoexploration,1978,16( 1 ) :21~35
    33 Kjartansson E.Constant Q-wave propagation and at- tenuation[J].Geophysics,1979,84 (B9) :4737~4748
    34 Taylor H L,Banks S C,McCoy J F.Deconvolution with the L_1-norm[J].Geophysics,1979,44 (1): 39~52
    35 Morley L,Claerbout J F.Predictive deconvolution in shot-receiver space[J].Geophysics,1983,48 (8): 515~531
    36 Levin S A.Surface-consistent deconvolution[J].Geo- physics,1989,54(8):1123~1133
    37凌云研究组.叠前相对保持振幅、频率、相位和波形处理的研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(5):543~552
    38凌云研究组.叠后相对保持振幅处理研究[J].石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(5):501~506
    39凌云,孙德胜,高军,等.基于地质概念的空间相对分辨率地震勘探研究[J].石油物探,2007,46(5):433~450
    40凌云研究组.储层演化地震分析[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(6):672~678

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心