琼州海峡铁路隧道方案初步比选分析
|
摘要
琼州海峡隧道的修建不仅能满足海峡客货运量和国防的需要,而且建成后将会对海南的经济发展起到巨大的拉动作用。琼州海峡隧道前期工作十分紧迫,研究工作量巨大,技术复杂,难度大,所需的时间较长。在研究琼州海峡的气象、水文、地质条件等的基础上,对桥隧方案及隧道线位方案进行了初步比选分析,认为琼州海峡跨海工程宜隧不宜桥,并且Ⅱ线隧道线位方案较优,在对Ⅱ线线位浅埋隧道和深埋隧道的比较后认为浅埋隧道采用盾构法施工的方案较优。由于公路隧道存在诸多技术难题,以及工程造价和运营成本都很高,因此,把铁路隧道方案作为首选方案是可行的,汽车可通过穿梭列车背负过隧道。
The construction of the Qiongzhou strait tunnel will not only meet the requirements of the straits' passenger and cargo traffic,but also the needs of national defense,and the constructed tunnel will play a huge pulling role in Hainan's economic development.Comparing with the similar projects abroad,the preliminary work of Qiongzhou strait tunnel was very urgent and needed a long time,because of enormous workload of research,complex technology and difficulties.Based on the study of meteorological,hydrological,geological data and other information of Qiongzhou strait tunnel,the bridge and tunnel schemes are simply compared,which indicate that the tunnel scheme is suitable,moreover,the shield tunnel scheme for line Ⅱ is better than others.After compared the shallow tunnel with deep tunnel schemes of line Ⅱ,the shallow tunnel using shield method scheme is proposed.As highway tunnel had many technical problems,and project costs and operating costs are very high,therefore,the railway tunnel plan as the preferred option is feasible,and cars could pass through the tunnel by shuttle trains.
The construction of the Qiongzhou strait tunnel will not only meet the requirements of the straits' passenger and cargo traffic,but also the needs of national defense,and the constructed tunnel will play a huge pulling role in Hainan's economic development.Comparing with the similar projects abroad,the preliminary work of Qiongzhou strait tunnel was very urgent and needed a long time,because of enormous workload of research,complex technology and difficulties.Based on the study of meteorological,hydrological,geological data and other information of Qiongzhou strait tunnel,the bridge and tunnel schemes are simply compared,which indicate that the tunnel scheme is suitable,moreover,the shield tunnel scheme for line Ⅱ is better than others.After compared the shallow tunnel with deep tunnel schemes of line Ⅱ,the shallow tunnel using shield method scheme is proposed.As highway tunnel had many technical problems,and project costs and operating costs are very high,therefore,the railway tunnel plan as the preferred option is feasible,and cars could pass through the tunnel by shuttle trains.
引文
[1]海南年鉴编辑委员会.海南经济年鉴[M].海口:海南年鉴出版社,1998
[2]海南年鉴编辑委员会.2006海南经济普查年鉴[M].海口:海南年鉴出版社,2007
[3]海南年鉴编辑委员会.2007海南年鉴[M].海口:海南年鉴出版社,2008
[4]陈哲培.海南省岩石地层[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1997
[5]海南地学研究中心.地震安全性评价报告(琼州海峡铁路轮渡新海港、四塘港)[R].1995.3
[6]谭忠盛.琼州海峡工程地质问题及铁路隧道的可行性研究[R].北方交通大学博士后出站报告,2001.7
[7]谭忠盛,王梦恕,张弥.琼州海峡铁路隧道可行性研究探讨[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(2):139-143
[8]谭忠盛,杨小林,王梦恕.海底隧道施工技术及琼州海峡隧道可行性[J].焦作工学院学报,2001,20(4):286-291
[9]北方交大隧道中心.琼州海峡铁路隧道方案论证及可行性研究探讨[R].2001.3
[10]铁道部科学研究院西南分院编.国内外隧道掘进机文献汇集[M].成都,1998.3
[11]Tuneyoshi Hunasaki.Mechanizing and construction result of worldlargest diameter tunnel for Trans-Tokyo Bay Highway[J].Pro-ceedings of the word tunnel congress’99-Challenges for the21stCentury,Norway,1999,5:543-554
[12]Thomas R K.直布罗陀海峡的桥隧通道方案[J].王英,译.世界隧道,1997,(5):36-41
[2]海南年鉴编辑委员会.2006海南经济普查年鉴[M].海口:海南年鉴出版社,2007
[3]海南年鉴编辑委员会.2007海南年鉴[M].海口:海南年鉴出版社,2008
[4]陈哲培.海南省岩石地层[M].北京:中国地质大学出版社,1997
[5]海南地学研究中心.地震安全性评价报告(琼州海峡铁路轮渡新海港、四塘港)[R].1995.3
[6]谭忠盛.琼州海峡工程地质问题及铁路隧道的可行性研究[R].北方交通大学博士后出站报告,2001.7
[7]谭忠盛,王梦恕,张弥.琼州海峡铁路隧道可行性研究探讨[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(2):139-143
[8]谭忠盛,杨小林,王梦恕.海底隧道施工技术及琼州海峡隧道可行性[J].焦作工学院学报,2001,20(4):286-291
[9]北方交大隧道中心.琼州海峡铁路隧道方案论证及可行性研究探讨[R].2001.3
[10]铁道部科学研究院西南分院编.国内外隧道掘进机文献汇集[M].成都,1998.3
[11]Tuneyoshi Hunasaki.Mechanizing and construction result of worldlargest diameter tunnel for Trans-Tokyo Bay Highway[J].Pro-ceedings of the word tunnel congress’99-Challenges for the21stCentury,Norway,1999,5:543-554
[12]Thomas R K.直布罗陀海峡的桥隧通道方案[J].王英,译.世界隧道,1997,(5):36-41
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心