洞庭湖地区某特大桥饱和砂土液化判别及其液化特征
|
摘要
在地震作用下,洞庭湖地区存在的大量砂土层会出现液化破坏。通过SPT(现场标准贯入试验)、SWVT(剪切波速测试)和CPT(静力触探试验)等原位技术对洞庭湖地区某特大桥饱和砂土层进行了地震液化判别并对其液化特征进行分析。结果表明,综合采用静力触探和标准贯入试验进行液化判别的方法结果较好,静力触探方法更适合本地区砂土液化评判;在本特大桥,液化等级随着砂土顶板埋深的减小而由不液化变为严重的趋势,液化指数随砂土顶板埋深的减小而增大,基本呈线性关系;当埋深超过13.3 m时,基本不会产生液化,而当埋深小于5.95 m时液化等级为严重可能性大。
Sand liquefaction hazards may occur in the Dong Ting Lake region for the great deal of sandy soil.The results of Sand liquefaction prediction are proposed by methods of standard penetration test(SPT),cone penetration test(CPT) and shear wave velocity test(SWVT),and characteristics of sand liquefaction are analysis.It has been shown that synthetically using the methods of SPT and CPT is suitable for estimating the liquefaction,and the method of CPT is more suitable.In the Dong Ting Lake region,with decreasing of the embedded depth of sandy soil,the index of liquefaction is increased,and the liquefaction grade is more severity.Liquefaction mainly occurred in the sandy soil with embedded depth less than 13.3 m,and the liquefaction grade is severity with embedded depth less than 5.95 m.
Sand liquefaction hazards may occur in the Dong Ting Lake region for the great deal of sandy soil.The results of Sand liquefaction prediction are proposed by methods of standard penetration test(SPT),cone penetration test(CPT) and shear wave velocity test(SWVT),and characteristics of sand liquefaction are analysis.It has been shown that synthetically using the methods of SPT and CPT is suitable for estimating the liquefaction,and the method of CPT is more suitable.In the Dong Ting Lake region,with decreasing of the embedded depth of sandy soil,the index of liquefaction is increased,and the liquefaction grade is more severity.Liquefaction mainly occurred in the sandy soil with embedded depth less than 13.3 m,and the liquefaction grade is severity with embedded depth less than 5.95 m.
引文
[1]张永双,雷伟志,石菊松,等.四川5.12地震次生地质灾害的基本特征初析[J].地质力学学报,2008,14,(2):109-114.
[2]施斌,王宝军,张巍,等.汶川地震次生地质灾害分析与调查[J].高校地质学报,2008,14,(3):387-394.
[3]杜国云,邢秀臣.龙门山山前砂土液化初步研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2010,37,(1):108-112.
[4]陈跃庆,吕西林.几次大地震中地基基础震害的启示[J].工程抗震,2001,17.(2):8-15.
[5]王克鲁,盛学斌,蔡灵铎,等.唐山地震时不同烈度区液化砂土的特征及其液化判别[J].地震地质,1982,(2):59-70.
[6]陈文化,孙巨平,徐兵.砂土地震液化的研究现状及发展趋势[J].世界地震工程,1999,15,(1):16-24,40.
[7]Chi-Yuen WANG,Douglas S D,Chung-Ho WANG,eta1.Field relation among coseismic ground motion,waterlevel change and liquefaction for the 1999 Chi-Chi(Mw=7.5)earthquake,Taiwan[J].GE0PHYSICAL RE-SEARCH LETTERS,2003,30,(17):1890-1893.
[8]阮永芬,侯克鹏.粉土地震液化判别方法研究的现状和实际存在的问题[J].昆明理工大学学报(理工版),2000,25,(1):64–67.
[9]陈国兴,张克绪,谢君斐.以剪切波速为指针的液化判别方法及其适用性[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,1996,29,(1):97-103.
[10]GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范(2008年版)[S].
[11]GB 50021-2001,岩土工程勘察规范(2009年版)[S].
[12]JTG/T B02-01-2008,公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S].
[13]石兆吉,张荣祥,顾宝和.砂土液化判别和评价综合方法研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1997,17,(1):82-88.
[2]施斌,王宝军,张巍,等.汶川地震次生地质灾害分析与调查[J].高校地质学报,2008,14,(3):387-394.
[3]杜国云,邢秀臣.龙门山山前砂土液化初步研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2010,37,(1):108-112.
[4]陈跃庆,吕西林.几次大地震中地基基础震害的启示[J].工程抗震,2001,17.(2):8-15.
[5]王克鲁,盛学斌,蔡灵铎,等.唐山地震时不同烈度区液化砂土的特征及其液化判别[J].地震地质,1982,(2):59-70.
[6]陈文化,孙巨平,徐兵.砂土地震液化的研究现状及发展趋势[J].世界地震工程,1999,15,(1):16-24,40.
[7]Chi-Yuen WANG,Douglas S D,Chung-Ho WANG,eta1.Field relation among coseismic ground motion,waterlevel change and liquefaction for the 1999 Chi-Chi(Mw=7.5)earthquake,Taiwan[J].GE0PHYSICAL RE-SEARCH LETTERS,2003,30,(17):1890-1893.
[8]阮永芬,侯克鹏.粉土地震液化判别方法研究的现状和实际存在的问题[J].昆明理工大学学报(理工版),2000,25,(1):64–67.
[9]陈国兴,张克绪,谢君斐.以剪切波速为指针的液化判别方法及其适用性[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报,1996,29,(1):97-103.
[10]GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范(2008年版)[S].
[11]GB 50021-2001,岩土工程勘察规范(2009年版)[S].
[12]JTG/T B02-01-2008,公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S].
[13]石兆吉,张荣祥,顾宝和.砂土液化判别和评价综合方法研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1997,17,(1):82-88.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心