嘎隆拉隧道断层区进洞口段轴向地震响应及抗震缝效果研究

英文篇名：Longitudinal Seismic Response and Effect of Aseismatic Joint of Tunnel Entrance in Fault Zone
中文刊名：交通科技
英文刊名：Transportation Science & Technology
作者：陈亮 ; 王永亮 ; 文栋梁 ; 吴楚刚
英文作者：Chen Liang ; Wang Yongliang ; Wen Dongliang ; Wu Chugang ; Highway Construction Headquarters of Gonghe to Yushu in Qinghai ; Xinjiang Highway Planning Survey Design & Research Institute
中文关键词：断层 ; 隧道洞口 ; 抗震缝 ; 有限元 ; 峰值应力
英文关键词：fault ; the mouth of the tunnel ; aseismatic joint ; finite element ; peak stress.
出版日期：2013-10-15
机构：青海省高等级公路建设管理局;新疆交通规划勘察设计研究院;
年：2013
期：05
出版单位：交通科技

摘要

针对嘎隆拉隧道洞口段,考虑断层影响,对衬砌设置抗震缝和不设置抗震缝2种工况进行模拟计算,对比分析得出:断层对隧道衬砌的影响主要为增加断层处衬砌的剪应力;抗震缝的设置将使隧道衬砌应力从洞口向洞内沿轴向很快趋于稳定,并将降低衬砌30%的峰值主应力;设置抗震缝后将使衬砌节段内的峰值应力均匀分布,且比不设置抗震缝的衬砌应力小,但衬砌的破坏部位将集中在抗震缝处,并有可能导致结构失稳,因此抗震缝的设置间距不宜过短,数量不宜过多。
Considering the effect of fault,two cases which is the lining of Galongla tunnel entrance with aseismatic joint and without aseismatic joint are calculated,the result shows:the fault mainly increases the shear stress of the tunnel lining in fault zones;aseismatic joint will stabilize the longitudinal stress of lining from tunnel entrance quickly,and will decrease the peak response main stress of lining by 30%;aseismatic joint will average the peak responded stress of inner part of lining between the joint too,and the peak response stress is smaller than which of lining without aseismatic joint,but it will give rise to stress concentrate of lining near the aseismatic joint,which means that aseismatic joint should not be used too frequently and the distance between two aseismatic joint should not be too short.

引文

[1]胡聿贤.地震工程学[M].北京:地震出版社,1988.
    [2]蒋树屏.“主动洞”的减震作用研究[C].中国科协第十一届年会19分会场论文集.北京:人民交通出版社,2009.9:447-454.
    [3]周德培,张建经,汤涌.汶川地震中道路边坡工程震害分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,20(3):565-576.
    [4]谷拴成,朱彬,杨鹏.地下结构地震反应非线性分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006(5):748-752.
    [5]聚敏,周锡元,高小旺,等.抗震工程学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2000.
    [6]刘晶波.一致粘弹性人工边界及粘弹性边界单元[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(9):1070-1075.
    [7]高峰,关宝树.隧道地震反应分析中几种边界条件的比较[J].甘肃科学学报,2004,16(1):109-112.