新10号泉水化学测项中强地震前兆异常特征的研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
选取1980年以来距新10号泉300 km范围内的16次5级以上地震为研究对象,通过对新10号泉水化学参数在上述地震前后的全程时空扫描,初步总结出该泉水化学测项的前兆异常特征。(1)异常形态各异:硫化物为中期高值异常;氟离子以短期异常和中期异常为主;电导率基本上表现为中期高值异常;水汞以中期高值异常为主,个别地震前会出现临震高值异常;水氡为中期高值异常或年变畸变;甲烷则一般表现为高值中期异常,个别地震前也会在中期异常的基础上叠加大幅度临震异常;氦气为高值正异常。(2)映震对应率:硫化物为81.3%,氟离子为57.1%,电导率为31.3%,水汞为55.6%,水氡为18.8%,甲烷为46.7%,氦气为46.7%。
There are 16 earthquakes with MS≥5.0 which are in 300 km distance from new No.10 spring since 1980,studying hydrochemical parameters of new No.10 spring before the 16 earthquakes.and summarizing the precursor anomalous characteristics,(1) precursor characteritics are different,metaphase high value is abnormity for sulfid,F-shows short term abnormity and middle term abnormity,conductivity shows high value abnormity of middle term,Mercury content in groundwater shows high value abnormity of middle term,imminent earthquake high value abnormity occurs before individual earthquakes;water radon shows high value abnormity of middle term or annual aberrance;firedamp shows high value abnormity of middle term,imminent earthquake abnormity pile up the middle term abnormity before individual earthquakes;helium shows positive abnormity of high value.(2) Corresponding ratio of reflecting capacity: sulfid is 81.3%,F-is 57.1%,conductivity is 31.3%,Mercury content in groundwater is 55.6%,water radon is 18.8%,firedamp is 46.7%,helium is 46.7%.
引文
[1]王道.新疆天山地区地下流体地震前兆研究的现状与发展前景[J].内陆地震,1995,9(2):137-149.
    [2]高小其,王道,许秋龙.硫化物的映震特征及其映震机理的研究[J].地震,2001,21(l):91-97.
    [3]高小其,许秋龙,王道.地下流体中强震源兆、场兆和强震远兆特征的研究[J].地震,2002,22(3):81-88.
    [4]高小其,蓝陵,许秋龙,等.乌鲁木齐10号泉氦气含量变化的映震特征[J].四川地震,2002,(3):27-31.
    [5]高小其,李新勇,李艳萍,等.乌鲁木齐10号泉地下水中溶解气甲烷的映震特征的研究[J].华南地震,2001,21(1):14-18.
    [6]高小其,地里夏提.乌鲁木齐地区地下水中氟离子映震特征的研究[J].地震学刊,2002,22(1):5-11.
    [7]高小其,许秋龙.乌鲁木齐10号泉水汞短临前兆特征探讨[J].内陆地震,1999,13(1):72-77.
    [8]高小其,许秋龙,李艳萍,等.新疆轮台两次地震前地下流体前兆异常的对比分析[J].华北地震科学,2001,(3):56-62.
    [9]高小其,许秋龙.石河子5.4级地震前北天山地区地下流体前兆异常的分析[J].内陆地震,2004,18(1):64-71.
    [10]高小其,许秋龙,王道.昆仑山口西8.1级地震前后地下流体远场效应的研究[J].高原地震,2002,14(3):12-20.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心