大跨度双塔斜拉桥地震响应分析方法研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
以某主跨为416 m的双塔斜拉桥为工程背景,选取2条人工波和2条天然波,分别采用反应谱法、时程分析法和功率谱法进行地震响应分析.分析结果表明:在人工地震波作用下,三种方法计算得到的主梁和主塔地震响应基本一致;在天然地震波作用下,主梁和主塔的反应谱分析结果介于其它两种方法之间.对斜拉索而言,时程分析结果与其它两种方法计算结果有较大差别.因此,可选择反应谱法对主梁和主塔进行地震响应分析;选择时程分析法对斜拉索进行地震响应分析.
In this paper,a practical project is taken as research background which is double pylon cable-stayed bridge with main span of 416 m.Two artificial seismic waves and two seismic records were selected to analyze the seismic behaviors by the response spectrum method,time history analysis method and power spectrum method.The result shows that seismic responses of the girder and main tower are basically identical under the effect of artificial seismic wave.The response spectrum analysis results of them are between the other two methods under the effect of the natural seismic wave.For stay cable,time history analysis results has great difference compared with other two methods’ results.Therefore,researchers can choose response spectrum method to analyze seismic response of girder and tower,and time history analysis method for stay-cables.
引文
[1]杨玉民,袁万城,范立础.大跨度斜拉桥横向地震反应及其分形特征[J].同济大学学报,2001,2(1):15-19.
    [2]胡辛贤.地震工程学[M].北京:地震出版社,1988.
    [3]王晨,李爱群,王浩,等.南京江心洲大桥主桥的地震反应谱分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2009,29(3):325-328.
    [4]焦常科,李爱群,王浩.三塔悬索桥动力特征参数分析[J].公路交通科技,2010,24(1):59-67.
    [5]Kiureghian A D,Neuenhofer A.Response spectrum method for muli-support seismic excitations[J].Earthquake Engineeringand Structural Dynamics,1992,21(8):713-740.
    [6]Dumanoglu A A,Sevem R T.Stochastic response of suspension bridge to earthquake forces[J].Earthquake Engineering andStructural Dynamics,1990,19(1):133-152.
    [7]林家浩.随机地震响应的确定性算法[J].地震工程与工程振动,1985,5(1):89-93.
    [8]范立础.桥梁抗震[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心