汶川8.0级地震时徐州台地震动和形变同震响应分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
通过对汶川8.0级地震和6次强余震时徐州地震台的形变同震响应和地震位移量研究,计算了汶川地震主震发生时地震面波到达徐州的时间和位移量,统计了汶川8.0级地震及其强余震引起的同震阶变时间参数、幅度参数和阶跃形态。研究结果表明:①该台4套形变观测均有较高的同震响应能力,同震阶变的开始时间与主震面波到达徐州台的时间基本吻合,可以认为同震应变阶和同震波是由强震面波引起的,是一种叠加在体应变固体潮曲线上的高频变化,并呈现快速振荡衰减的形式。②同台同岩性的不同形变观测对同一个地震的响应是不同的,阶跃形状、响应大小、响应时间、变化幅度都有较大的差别,这种差别更多的是反映了仪器本身的性能、观测精度、频率响应的不同,并不是应力场变化和构造特征的差异。③汶川地震引起的徐州地区应力变化以压应力为主,大地震的动态应力触发作用对远场的应变变化具有重要影响。
Co-seismic changes of Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake and six strong aftershocks were recorded by 4 digital deformation instruments at Xuzhou seismic station at an epicentral distance of 1392 km.The result shows that the strain-step changes and wave motions are caused by the arrival of the corresponding surface waves.The shape and size of the step changes and the response time recorded by different instruments were different,even they were located in the same rock body only 7.65 m to 10.57 m apart.This difference is probably a reflection of different instrument properties,such as sensitivity and frequency response.The earthquake-causing stress changes,which were mainly compression in Xuzhou,had an important triggering effect on far-field strain changes.
引文
[1]Hill D P,Reasonberg P A,Michael A.Seismicity re-motely triggered by the magnitude 7.3Lan ders[J].California Earthquake Science,1993,(260):1617-1623.
    [2]邱泽华,石耀霖.观测应变阶在地震应力触发研究中的应用[J].地震学报,2004,26(5):481-487.Qiu Z H,Shi Y L.Observed strain step applicationfor research of earthquake stress trigger[J].ActaSeismologica Sinica,2004,26(5):481-487.
    [3]邱泽华,唐磊,周龙寿,等.四分量钻孔应变台网汶川地震前的观测应变变化[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2009,29(1):1-5.Qiu Z H,Tang L,Zhou L Sh,et al.Observed strainchange recorded by four-component borehole strainnetwork before Wenchuan earthquake[J].Geodesyand Geodynamics,2009,29(1):1-5.
    [4]牛安福,吉平,高福旺,等.印尼强地震引起的同震形变波[J].地震,2006,26(1):131-137.Niu A F,Ji P,Gao F W,et al.Co-seismic deforma-tion wave caused by Indonesian strong earthquake[J].Earthquake,2006,26(1):131-137.
    [5]郑江蓉,徐桂明,李鸿宇,等.2004年l2月26印尼8.7级强震后江苏地区同震效应分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2005,25(1):105-113.Zheng J R,Xu G M,Li H Y,et al.Co-seismic analy-sis after Indonesian M8.7strong earthquake on 26De-cember,2004in Jiangsu[J].Journal of Disaster Pre-vention and Mitigation Engineering,2005,25(1):105-113.
    [6]尹宝军,马丽,陈会忠,等.汶川8.0级地震及其强余震引起的唐山井水位同震响应特征分析[J].地震学报,2009,31(2):195-204.Yin B J,Ma L,Che H Zh,et al.Co-seismic responsefeature analysis of drawdown of well in Tangshancaused by Wenchuan M8.0earthquake and its strongearthquake aftershock[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,2009,31(2):195-204.
    [7]顾申宜,李志雄,张慧,等.海南地区五口井水位对汶川地震的同震响应及其频谱分析[J].地震研究,2010,33(1):35-42.Gu Sh Y,Li Zh X,Zhang H,et al.Waterlevel of fivewells′co-seismic response on Wenchuan earthquakeand its frequency analysis in Hainan[J].Journal ofSeismological Research,2010,33(1):35-42.
    [8]谈洪波,申重阳,玄松柏.地壳分层和地壳厚度对汶川地震同震效应的影响[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2010,30(4):29-35.Tan H B,Shen Ch Y,Xuan S B.Crustal layer andcrustal thickness′influence on co-seismic effect ofWenchuan[J].Geodesy and Geodynamics,2010,30(4):29-35.
    [9]周龙寿,邱泽华,唐磊.汶川8.0级地震前驱波的统计检验[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2009,29(2):24-38.Zhou L Sh,Qiu Z H,Tang L.Statistics and test ofdriving wave before Wenchuan M8.0earthquake[J].Geodesy and Geodynamics,2009,29(2):24-38.
    [10]徐韶光,熊永良,廖华,等.汶川地震同震形变的静态和动态分析[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2010,30(3):27-30.Xu Sh G,Xiong Y L,Liao H,et al.Static and dy-namic analysis of co-seismic deformation for Wenchuanearthquake[J].Geodesy and Geodynamics,2010,30(3):27-30.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心