汶川地震次生山地灾害危险性评价及震后减灾对策经济学分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
从地形地貌、地质、气候、水文、植被、灾害状况、人类活动等7个方面选取11个因子,采用定性与定量相结合的方法,引入危险性指数来评价汶川地震次生山地灾害的危险性大小,并利用GIS技术,按区域因素"相同或相似归类、相异分级"的原则,将研究区分为高度危险区、中度危险区、低度危险区和无危险区等四个等级,进行次生山地灾害危险性评价与区划,并运用最优灾害成本模型对减灾投入进行经济性评价,从而提出合理的防灾减灾对策与建议。
From seven aspects:topography,geology,climate,hydrology,vegetation,disaster situation,and human activities,11 factors are selected to evaluate the Wenchuan Earthquake-induced disasters by using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods,with the help of risk index.According to regional factors,and "the same or similar classification,the different classification" principle,together with the use of GIS technology,the study area is divided into 4 grades:high risk areas,medium-risk areas,low-risk areas and safety areas.By conducting secondary mountain hazard assessment and zoning as well as the use of optimal cost model of disaster risk reduction into the economic evaluation,reasonable disaster prevention and mitigation measures and suggestions are raised.
引文
[1]崔鹏,韦方强,陈晓清,等.汶川地震次生山地灾害及其减灾对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2008,23(4):317-323.
    [2]易桂喜,闻学泽,王思维,等.由地震活动参数分析龙门山-岷山断裂带的现今活动习性与强震危险性[J].中国地震,2006,22(2):117-125.
    [3]陈运泰.汶川特大地震的震级和断层长度[J].科技导报,2008,26(10):26-27.
    [4]苏凤环,刘洪江,韩用顺.汶川地震山地灾害遥感快速提取及其分布特点分析[J].遥感学报,2008,12(6):956-963.
    [5]殷跃平.汶川八级地震地质灾害研究[J].工程地质学报,2008,16(4):433-444.
    [6]Costa J E,Schuster R L.The formation and failure of natural dams[J].International Journal of Rock Me-chanics and Mining Sciences&Geomechanics,1989,26(1):1054-1068.
    [7]Tamura T.Analysis of the relationship between the areal distribution of earthquake-induced landslides and the earthquake magnitudes[J].Geological Review of Japan,1978,19(8):662-672.
    [8]徐娟.灾害经济学中的减灾投入与成本问题[J].灾害学,2006,21(2):103-105.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心