弹塑性结构等效线性化方法的对比研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
本文对五种等效线性化方法———割线刚度法、Hwang的经验系数法、平均刚度和能量法、Iwan的经验系数法、平均刚度和阻尼法的计算精度进行了统计分析。以误差的均值和变异系数作为评价标准 ,研究不同延性、不同结构周期、不同阻尼比对这些简化计算方法计算精度的影响
The computation precision of five equivalent linearization methods, i.e. secant stiffness method, the empirical method by Iwan, the empirical method by Hwang, the method based on the average stiffness and energy, and the method based on the average stiffness and damping coefficient are evaluated using the average error and variation coefficient as the evaluation standard. Influences of displacement ductility demand, structual periods and damping ratio on the results of the simplified methods are analyzed.
引文
[1] FEMA274,1997,NEHRPCommentaryontheGuidelinesfortheSeismicRehabilitationofBuildings[R].FederalEmer gencyManagementAgency,Washington,D .C .
    [2] RosenbluethE ,HerreraI.Onakindofhystereticdamping[J].JournalofEngineeringMechanicsDivision,ASCE ,1964:37~48.
    [3] IwanWD ,GatesNC .EstimatingEarthquakeResponseofSimpleHystereticStructures[J].JournaloftheEngineeringMechanicsDivesion,ASCE ,1979,105(3):391~405.
    [4] 欧进萍,吴斌,龙旭.耗能减振结构的抗震设计方法[J].地震工程与工程振动,1998,18(2).
    [5] EduardoMirandaandJorgeRuizGarcia.Evaluationofap proximatemeth-odstoestimatemaximuminelasticdisplace mentdemands[J].EarthquakeEngineeringandStructuralDynamics,2002:539~560.
    [6] HwangJS .EvaluationofEquivalentLinearAnalysisMethodsofBridgeIsolation[J].JournalofStructuralEngineering,ASCE ,1996,122(8):872~976.
    [7] 李妍.弹塑性结构抗震设计的简化方法[D].哈尔滨工业大学硕士学位论文,2003.
    [8] [http: peer.berkeley.edu smcat search.html]

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心