扁铲侧胀试验在地基土液化判别中的应用
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
传统的液化判别方法虽然简便,但各有缺点。陈国民根据上海地区的经验关系,给出了考虑粘粒含量的液化判别式,并给出了液化等级的计算方法。文中比较了扁铲液化判别方法和标准贯入试验的判别结果。实践结果表明:扁铲侧胀试验是一种较好的、有前途的液化判别方法。
Although the traditional methods of liquefaction estimation are conventional, there are some shortcomings of these methods. A new formula is recommended to estimate liquefaction by professor chen guomin, which take the clay content into account according to the experience in Shanghai area. The article compares the result of liquefaction estimation between DMT and SPT. The result proves that the dilatometer test (DMT) can act as a better method with boundless prospects to predict the sand liquefaction potential.
引文
[1]Marchetti,S.(2001).“The Flat Dilatometer Test(DMT)in Soil Investigations”.IN SITU2001,intnl.Conf.On In Measurement of Soil Properties,Bali,Indonesia.
    [2]ASTM Subcommittee D18.02.10,J.H.Schmertmann,Chairman,Suggested Method for Performing the Flat Dilatometer Test,ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal Vol.9.June.
    [3]European Committee for Standardization:EUROCODE7.Geotechnical design assisted by field tests,Section9:Flat Dilatometer Test,(Apr.1999).
    [4]《岩土工程勘察规范》(GB50021-2001).
    [5]南光地质仪器厂.《DMT-W1型扁铲侧胀仪用户使用手册》.
    [6]陈国兴,工程地震[M].南京工业大学土木工程学院.2004.
    [7]Sladen,J.A.1989.Problems with interpretation of sand state from cone penetration test.Geotechnique39,No.3:55-65.
    [8]陈国民,李隽毅等.扁铲侧胀试验判别液化的研究和实践[J].上海地质.2003,(1):20~24.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心