利用远震P波质点运动检核区域地震计水平分量方位
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
地震计三分量方位的准确性对现代地震学研究具有很重要的意义。文献[1]利用P波偏振原理和多地震事件加权叠加方法计算表明,中国"十五"数字地震网络台站中有近三分之一的台站存在地震计水平方位偏差大、极性接反或分量互换等方面的问题。本文选取鄂尔多斯地块周缘地区24个代表性台站,利用2007年8月至2011年3月期间73个M≥7远震事件的P波资料,对台站分量方位等问题进行了检核计算。考虑到期间地震仪的可能重新安装因素,应用单地震事件的反演方位时间序列变化来计算分量方位偏差及其可能的方位校正。研究结果表明,反演的方位与文献[1]的结果基本一致,表明中国"十五"数字地震网络确实存在部分台站方位偏差较大等方面问题。因此,在SKS横波分裂等现代地震学研究中应充分考虑台站地震计方位不准和变动等因素的影响。
Orientation accuracy of three components of station seismometers is very important for modern seismology research.Many aspects of modern seismic studies require rotating the BHN,BHE,and BHU as three-dimensional orthogonal coordinate components of particle motion;that is,radial(horizontal direction of incidence),horizontal(in the horizontal plane perpendicular to the incident direction),and vertical.If the station seismometer's BHN component direction and the true north direction N are really larger than the azimuth deviation,then the radial and transverse components will have a greater system deviation,which is based on the back azimuth value.This will affect the authenticity and reliability of modern seismic studies,such as shear-wave splitting SKS results,and also confuse seismic interpretation.For many years,seismic workers at home and abroad have attached great importance to the seismometer azimuth's accuracy and correction testing for basic research.If P-waves are compressed through horizontal layered anisotropic media to seismic stations,then the particle trajectories will be in the large in-plane circle composed of the seismic focus,the seismostation,and the geocentre.Seismic P-waves in the plane incident to station direction(radial or station azimuth direction) were also determined to have radial(plane incident) P-waves with the greatest polarization energies in the plane perpendicular to the incident direction of landscape orientation with the lowest vibrational energy.If BHN coincides with the north direction N(BHE direction coincides with the East direction E),the rotation angle from BHN to the P-wave plane incident direction(energy maximum polarization direction) will be the seismostation to seismic focus's back azimuth.If the seismometer station BHN direction and the North direction N slightly deviate,the rotation angle from BHN to P-wave plane incident direction(polarization energy maximum) will not equal the seismostation to seismic focus's back azimuth.From the seismostation-seismic focus back azimuth angle and the rotation angle determined from the BHN/BHE components to the maximum polarization energy's direction,the seismometer BHN component's azimuth deviation could be obtained.Using an SNR-weighted multievent method and teleseismic P-wave particle motions,Niu(2011) found that about one-third of the CEArray stations have some sort of problems,including misorientation of the two components,mislabeling of BHN and BHE components,as well as polarity reversal in one or more components,all of which were brought to the attention of the China Earthquake Administration and seismic data users.In this study,we rechecked the component azimuths of the circum-Ordos block of CEArrays from P-wave particle motions of 73 M>7 teleseismic events from August 2007 through March 2011.Considering possible seismometer re-installation,we estimated the north-component azimuth for each station by analyzing the time series of the calculated azimuths of each individual event.Our calculated azimuths are very consistent with the results of Niu(2011),which implies that the CEArray does have a problem with misorientation.The teleseismic P-wave particle motion method can be used to effectively check the seismometer stations' horizontal azimuth deviations.Therefore,in modern seismology research such as SKS splitting with CEArray data,users should pay particular attention to component misorientation,polarity reversal,and mislabeling problems.
引文
[1]NIU Feng-lin,JUAN Li.Component Azimuths of the CEAr-ray Station Estimated from P-wave Particle Motion[J].Earthq.Sci.,2011,24:3-13.
    [2]Laske G.Global Observation of Off-great-circle Propagation ofLong-period Surface Waves[J].Geophysical Journal Interna-tional,1995,123:245-259.
    [3]Laske G,G Masters.Constraints on Global Phase VelocityMaps from Long-period Polarization Data[J].Journal of Geo-physical Research,1996,101:16059-16075.
    [4]Larson E W F.Measuring Refraction and Modeling Velocitiesof Surface Waves[D].Cambridge,Massachusetts:Harvard U-niversity,2000.
    [5]Larson E W F,G Ekstrm.Determining Surface Wave ArrivalAngle Anomalies[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2002,107,doi:10.1029/2000JB000048.
    [6]Yoshizawa K,K Yomogida,S Tsuboi.Resolving Power ofSurface Wave Polarization Data for Higher-order Heterogenei-ties[J].Geophysical Journal International,1999,138:205-220.
    [7]Schulte-Pelkum,V G Masters,P M Shearer.Upper MantleAnisotropy from Long-period P Polarization[J].Journal ofGeophysical Research,2001,106:21,917-21,934.
    [8]Gran Ekstrm,Robert W Busby.Measurements of Seismom-eter Orientation at Usarray Transportable Array and BackboneStations[J].Seismological Research Letters,2008,79(4):554-561.
    [9]李佐堂,潘颖凌,田秀丰,等.强震动台站与干扰源最小距离的初步研究[J].西北地震学报,2012,34(1):88-92.Li Z T,Pan Y L,Tian X F,et al.Preliminary Study on theMinimum Distance between Strong Motion Station and Inter-ference Source[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal,2012,34(1):88-92.
    [10]范雷彪,任忠.调整形变观测思路探寻地震预报的新途径[J].西北地震学报,2011,33(4):408-412.Fan L B,Ren Z.Adjust Deformdtion Observation Way toExplore New Path of Earthquake Forecasting[J].North-western Seismological Journal,2011,33(4):408-412.
    [11]刘瑞丰,高景春,陈运泰,等.中国数字地震台网的建设与发展[J].地震学报,2008,30(5):533-539.Liu R F,Gao J C,Chen Y T,et al.Construction and Devel-opment of Digital Seismograph Networks in China[J].ActaSeismologica Sinica,2008,30(5):533-539.
    [12]胡亚轩,崔笃信,季灵运,等.鄂尔多斯块体及其周缘上地幔各项异性分析研究[J].地球物理学报,2011,54(6):1549-1558.Hu Y X,Cui D X,Ji L Y,et al.Seismic Anisotropy of UpperMantle in Ordos Block and Adjacent Regions,Chinese[J].Geophys.,2011,54(6):1549-1558.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心