用户名: 密码: 验证码:
多尺度下崇义县耕地质量空间分布差异特征研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Spatial distribution of cultivated land quality at different scales in Chongyi County
  • 作者:孙聪康 ; 徐俊丽 ; 余敦 ; 周微 ; 王检萍 ; 梁珍宝
  • 英文作者:SUN Congkang;XU Junli;YU Dun;ZHOU Wei;WANG Jianping;LIANG Zhenbao;College of Land Resources and Environmental Sceinces, Jiangxi Agricultural University;Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Basin Agricultural Resources and Ecology of Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Agricultural University;School of Economic Management, Jiangxi Agricultural University;Shangrao Bureau of Land and Resources;
  • 关键词:耕地质量 ; 自然质量 ; 经济质量 ; 利用质量 ; 空间尺度效应 ; 空间聚集特征 ; 崇义县
  • 英文关键词:Cultivated land quality;;Natural quality;;Economic quality;;Utilization quality;;Spatial scale effects;;Spatial aggregation effect;;Chongyi County
  • 中文刊名:中国生态农业学报(中英文)
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
  • 机构:江西农业大学国土资源与环境学院;江西农业大学江西省鄱阳湖流域农业资源与生态重点实验室;江西农业大学经济管理学院;上饶市国土资源局;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 出版单位:中国生态农业学报(中英文)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:04
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(41561107);; 江西省自然科学基金项目(20151BAB203039)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:99-110
  • 页数:12
  • CN:13-1432/S
  • ISSN:2096-6237
  • 分类号:F323.211
摘要
耕地质量优劣既取决于质量等别高低,又与空间分布特征密切相关。研究多层次的耕地质量内涵与空间结构性特征是加强耕地保护并合理配置土地资源的重要依据。本文以南方丘陵山地典型区域崇义县为例,运用Geoda、GS+等平台支持的空间自相关模型,探讨县级、乡镇级与村级空间尺度下耕地自然质量、利用质量与经济质量的空间相互作用和分布规律。结果表明:1)崇义县耕地质量存在显著相关性,耕地质量的Moran’sI值呈现自然质量(0.445)>经济质量(0.406)>利用质量(0.281)的特征;2)不同空间尺度下耕地质量具有多样的空间尺度效应,随着空间尺度缩小,自然质量差异最大、经济质量次之、利用质量差异最小,大空间尺度弱化了耕地质量的空间聚集差异特征,村级尺度下耕地质量空间聚集效应最显著;3)耕地质量正相关HH(高-高)型和LL(低-低)型多以团状或带状集中分布,负相关HL(高-低)型和LH(低-高)型无明显分布规律。研究结果揭示了耕地自然质量、利用质量与经济质量对于尺度变化的响应规律,对于各级行政主体监测保护耕地及制定精准高效的耕地质量建设方案具有一定的现实意义。
        While the quality of cultivated lands is the primary basis for judging the productivity of land, the characteristics of the spatial distribution of land quality are critical for farmland research. Multi-scale study of cultivated land quality and spatial structural characteristics are inevitable in strengthening rational allocation of land resources for the protection of cultivated lands. The enrichment of scientific connotation of cultivated land quality should objectively reflect spatial distribution differences in natural quality, utilization quality and economic quality at different scales. Based on the First Law of Geography and specific characteristics of Chongyi County, typical hilly and mountain areas were selected and evaluated for cultivated land quality in a spatial autocorrelation model supported by platforms such as Geoda and GS+. The work discussed the spatial interactions and distributions of natural quality, utilization quality and economic quality of cultivated lands at county, township and village scales. The results show that: 1) the natural quality of cultivated lands in Chongyi County was during grade 9–12 and the utilization quality during grade 6–9. There was a gradually increasing "northwest to southeast" trend with an economic quality of grade 7–10. There was a degree of spatial aggregation effect which was strongest when spatial distance was 4 500 m.The Moran's I value of cultivated land quality showed that natural quality(0.445) > economic quality(0.406) > utilization quality(0.281). The natural quality of cultivated land had the strongest positive spatial correlation with weakest degree of variation, while the utilization quality was weakest in spatial correlation and strongest in spatial variability. 2) The quality of cultivated lands showed different scale effects for different quality indexes. For the difference in spatial aggregation between township and county scales, the natural quality was largest, followed by economic quality and then utilization quality. Larger spatial scales weakened spatial aggregation, and spatial aggregation effect was most significant at village scale. 3) The spatial agglomeration type HH of cultivated land quality was mainly distributed in the southwest of county, LL distributed in Jinkeng Village and Zhukeng Village. The HH type of utilization quality was mainly distributed in the flat Longgous and Qianchang Townships, and LL type in deep mountain area where the elevation was higher and the cultivated land most dispersed. The HH type of economic concentrated in Guantian Town, Longqi Township and Shangbao Township where the terrain was relatively flat and the road access degree high. The LL type was distributed in a strip shape in relatively occluded area. The research results revealed that cultivated land quality had different spatial differentiation characteristics at different spatial scales and large spatial scale weakened the aggregation difference of cultivated land quality. The research had practical significance for monitoring and protection of cultivated lands at different spatial scales and more accurate management of arable land quality.
引文
[1]付国珍,摆万奇.耕地质量评价研究进展及发展趋势[J].资源科学,2015,37(2):226-336FU G Z,BAI W Q.Advances and prospects of evaluating cultivated land quality[J].Resources Science,2015,37(2):226-336
    [2]沈仁芳,陈美军,孔祥斌,等.耕地质量的概念和评价与管理对策[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1210-1217SHEN R F,CHEN M J,KONG X B,et al.Conception and evaluation of quality of arable land and strategies for its management[J].Acta Pedologica Sinica,2012,49(6):1210-1217
    [3]杜国明,刘彦随,于凤荣,等.耕地质量观的演变与再认识[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(14):243-249DU G M,LIU Y S,YU F R,et al.Evolution of concepts of cultivated land quality and recognition[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2016,32(14):243-249
    [4]张超,乔敏,郧文聚,等.耕地数量、质量、生态三位一体综合监管体系研究[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(1):1-6ZHANG C,QIAO M,YUN W J,et al.Trinity comprehensive regulatory system about quantity,quality and ecology of cultivated land[J].Transactions of the Chinese society for Agricultural Machinery,2017,48(1):1-6
    [5]祖健,郝晋珉,陈丽,等.耕地数量、质量、生态三位一体保护内涵及路径探析[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(7):84-95ZU J,HAO J M,CHEN L,et al.Analysis on trinity connotation and approach to protect quantity,quality and ecology of cultivated land[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2018,23(7):84-95
    [6]刘恬,胡伟艳,魏安奇,等.基于多尺度的基本农田空间区位选择--以武汉城市圈为例[J].资源科学,2018,40(7):1365-1374LIU T,HU W Y,WEI A Q,et al.Multiscale study of location selection of prime farmland in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area[J].Resources Science,2018,40(7):1365-1374
    [7]姜广辉,张凤荣,孔祥斌,等.耕地多功能的层次性及其多功能保护[J].中国土地科学,2011,25(8):42-47JIANG G H,ZHANG F R,KONG X B,et al.The different levels and the protection of multi-functions of cultivated land[J].China Land Science,2011,25(8):42-47
    [8]李国敏,卢珂,黄烈佳.国家尺度下耕地功能占补平衡模式研究[J].地域研究与开发,2017,36(6):110-114LI G M,LU K,HUANG L J.Model of requisition-compensation balance of function of cultivated land under national scale[J].Areal Research and Development,2017,36(6):110-114
    [9]张蚌蚌,孔祥斌,郧文聚,等.我国耕地质量与监控研究综述[J].中国农业大学学报,2015,20(2):216-222ZHANG B B,KONG X B,YUN W J,et al.A review on quality and monitoring of arable land in China[J].Journal of China Agricultural University,2015,20(2):216-222
    [10]程锋,王洪波,郧文聚.中国耕地质量等级调查与评定[J].中国土地科学,2014,28(2):75-82CHENG F,WANG H B,YUN W J.Study on investigation and assessment of cultivated land quality grade in China[J].China Land Science,2014,28(2):75-82
    [11]MUELLER L,SCHINDLER U,SHEPHERD T G,et al.The muencheberg soil quality rating for assessing the quality of global farmland[M]//MUELLER L,SAPAROV A,LISCHEIDG.Novel Measurement and Assessment Tools for Monitoring and Management of Land and Water Resources in Agricultural Landscapes of Central Asia.Cham:Springer,2014:235-248
    [12]TESFAHUNEGN G B.Soil quality indicators response to land use and soil management systems in northern Ethiopia’s catchment[J].Land Degradation&Development,2016,27(2):438-448
    [13]SLEE B,BROWN I,DONNELLY D,et al.The‘squeezed middle’:Identifying and addressing conflicting demands on intermediate quality farmland in Scotland[J].Land Use Policy,2014,41:206-216
    [14]刘婧鸣,侯现慧,王占岐,等.耕地细碎化与耕地集约利用水平空间相关特征研究--以湖北省为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(12):51-59LIU J M,HOU X H,WANG Z Q,et al.Spatial correlation characteristics of fragmentation and intensive use levels of cultivated land in Hubei Province[J].China Land Science,2017,31(12):51-59
    [15]张雅芹,闫弘文,赵贤锋,等.半岛丘陵区城市周边永久基本农田划定研究--以山东省海阳市为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2018,26(7):1080-1088ZHANG Y Q,YAN H W,ZHAO X F,et al.Permanent prime farmland demarcation in city periphery in peninsula hill areas:A case of Haiyang City in Shandong Province[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2018,26(7):1080-1088
    [16]石玉琼,李团胜.武功县耕地质量空间变异分析[J].土壤通报,2017,48(2):257-262SHI Y Q,LI T S.Analysis of spatial variation of arable land quality in Wugong County[J].Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2017,48(2):257-262
    [17]卫新东,王筛妮,员学锋,等.陕西省耕地质量时空变化特征及其分异规律[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(3):240-248WEI X D,WANG S N,YUAN X F,et al.Spatial and temporal changes and its variation of cultivated land quality in Shaanxi Province[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2018,34(3):240-248
    [18]高星,陈景,刘蕾,等.雄安新区耕地质量空间分布特征与建设占用推荐分区[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(1):1-7GAO X,CHEN J,LIU L,et al.Spatial distribution characteristics and construction occupancy zoning of cultivated land quality in Xiong’an New Area[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2018,34(1):1-7
    [19]李武艳,朱从谋,王华,等.浙江省耕地质量多尺度空间自相关分析[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(23):239-245LI W Y,ZHU C M,WANG H,et al.Multi-scale spatial autocorrelation analysis of cultivated land quality in Zhejiang Province[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2016,32(23):239-245
    [20]熊昌盛,韦仕川,栾乔林,等.基于Moran’s I分析方法的耕地质量空间差异研究--以广东省广宁县为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(10):2066-2074XIONG C S,WEI S C,LUAN Q L,et al.Spatial pattern disparity and cultivated land quality based on Moran’s I analysis[J].Resources Science,2014,36(10):2066-2074
    [21]熊昌盛,谭荣,岳文泽.基于局部空间自相关的高标准基本农田建设分区[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(22):276-284XIONG C S,TAN R,YUE W Z.Zoning of high standard farmland construction based on local indicators of spatial association[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2015,31(22):276-284
    [22]辛芸娜,范树印,孔祥斌,等.四重质量维度下的县域耕地质量评价方法研究[J].资源科学,2018,40(4):737-747XIN Y N,FAN S Y,KONG X B,et al.Evaluation of cultivated land quality based on four quality dimensions[J].Resources Science,2018,40(4):737-747
    [23]JOO D,WOOSNAM K M,SHAFER C S,et al.Considering Tobler’s first law of geography in a tourism context[J].Tourism Management,2017,62:350-359
    [24]熊昌盛,栾乔林,韦仕川.基于空间自相关的耕地质量分布格局[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(5):128-132XIONG C S,LUAN Q L,WEI S C.Spatial pattern disparity of arable land quality based on spatial autocorrelation analysis[J].Areal Research and Development,2016,35(5):128-132
    [25]杨建宇,徐凡,赵龙,等.基于综合质量空间自相关性分析的耕地保护分区方法[J].农业机械学报,2017,48(3):156-163YANG J Y,XU F,ZHAO L,et al.Protection zoning of cultivated land comprehensive quality based on spatial autocorrelation[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2017,48(3):156-163
    [26]汪晓燕,赵小敏,郭熙,等.基于空间自相关的贵溪市耕地保护分区研究[J].浙江农业学报,2017,29(3):489-497WANG X Y,ZHAO X M,GUO X,et al.Protection zoning of cultivated land based on local spatial autocorrelation in Guixi City[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2017,29(3):489-497
    [27]张晗,赵小敏,欧阳真程,等.基于空间自相关的耕地质量空间差异特征及耕地保护分区--以江西省上高县为例[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(1):304-312ZHANG H,ZHAO X M,OUYANG Z C,et al.Spatial disparity features and protection zoning of cultivated land quality based on spatial autocorrelation-A case study of Shanggao County,Jiangxi Province[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,25(1):304-312
    [28]陈彦光,罗静.地学计算的研究进展与问题分析[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(4):481-488CHEN Y G,LUO J.On development and problems of GeoComputation[J].Progress in Geography,2009,28(4):481-488
    [29]赵越,罗志军,赵杰,等.崇义县土壤有机质空间变异及在不同侵蚀程度下的影响因素[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(6):1209-1215ZHAO Y,LUO Z J,ZHAO J,et al.Study on spatial variability of soil organic matter in Chongyi County and affecting factors under different degree of erosion[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2018,31(6):1209-1215
    [30]魏洪斌,吴克宁,赵华甫,等.中国中部粮食主产区耕地等别空间分布特征[J].资源科学,2015,37(8):1552-1560WEI H B,WU K N,ZHAO H F,et al.Spatial distribution characteristics of cultivated land quality gradation in the main grain production area of central China[J].Resources Science,2015,37(8):1552-1560
    [31]郭晓飞,李建华,李成学,等.基于多尺度的祥云县县域耕地自然质量空间分布特征分析[J].云南农业大学学报:自然科学,2016,31(5):923-929GUO X F,LI J H,LI C X,et al.Spatial distribution features for natural quality of cultivated land at county levels based on multi-scale in Xiangyun County[J].Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University:Natural Science,2016,31(5):923-929
    [32]任平,吴涛,周介铭.基于GIS和空间自相关模型的耕地空间分布格局及变化特征分析--以成都市龙泉驿区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(3):325-334REN P,WU T,ZHOU J M.Analysis of spatial distribution pattern and evolutionary characteristics of cultivated lands based on spatial autocorrelation model and GIS platform-Acase study of Longquanyi District,Chengdu,China[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2016,24(3):325-334
    [33]祝锦霞,徐保根,章琳云.基于半方差函数与等别的耕地质量监测样点优化布设方法[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(19):254-261ZHU J X,XU B G,ZHANG L Y.Optimization layout method of monitoring sample points of cultivated land quality based on semi-variance analysis and grade combination[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2015,31(19):254-261
    [34]杨婷.崇义县地质灾害易发性区划评价研究[D].抚州:东华理工大学,2016:83YANG T.A study on lability zoning of geological disasters in Chongyi County[D].Fuzhou:East China University of Technology,2016:83
    [35]杨雪,谈明洪.北京市耕地功能空间差异及其演变[J].地理研究,2014,33(6):1106-1118YANG X,TAN M H.Spatial differences and evolution of arable land functions in Beijing[J].Geographical Research,2014,33(6):1106-1118

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700