草地退化生态修复工程实施绩效评价——基于异质性农牧民满意度的新视角
|
摘要
基于草地生态退化区279份农牧民调研数据,在划分农牧民养殖类型的基础上,运用有序Probit模型实证分析了异质性农牧民对修复工程实施绩效的满意度及影响因素。结果表明:(1)农牧民对修复工程生态绩效的满意度较高,对经济绩效与社会绩效的满意度较低;持续养殖农牧民对工程的满意度低于断续养殖农牧民。(2)工程的生态绩效和经济绩效是影响两类农牧民满意度的关键;同时,工程可持续性对持续养殖农牧民满意度影响显著,社会绩效对断续养殖农牧民满意度影响显著。基于此,未来修复工程的实施须避免过去"一刀切"式的实施方式,应根据不同类型农牧民的自身特质需要,就修复工程进行系统的优化调整,统筹解决草原生态保护与农牧民利益之间的矛盾,以此提高修复工程的实施绩效。
Based on 279 survey data of farmers and herdsmen in the ecological degraded grassland area, orderly Probit model was used to empirically analyze the satisfaction degree of heterogeneous farmers and herdsmen on the implementation performance of the restoration project. The results indicated that: 1) Farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction with the ecological effects of restoration project are higher, but the satisfaction with the economic and social effects are lower. Sustainable breeding farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction with the overall effects is lower than intermittent breeding farmers and herdsmen. 2) Further research shows that the ecological and economic effects of restoration project are the key influence factors on farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction. In addition, the sustainability of restoration project has significant impact on sustainable breeding farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction, and the social effect has significant impact on intermittent breeding farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction. Based on this, we argue that the implementation of restoration project must avoid the previous implementation methods of one size fits all. In the follow-up project implementation process, restoration project should be systematically optimized and the implementation scope, compensation standards and other aspects of the project should be adjusted according to the special needs of different type's farmers and herdsmen. The contradiction between grassland ecological protection and farmers and herdsmen's interests should comprehensively be resolved so as to improve the implementation performance of restoration project.
Based on 279 survey data of farmers and herdsmen in the ecological degraded grassland area, orderly Probit model was used to empirically analyze the satisfaction degree of heterogeneous farmers and herdsmen on the implementation performance of the restoration project. The results indicated that: 1) Farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction with the ecological effects of restoration project are higher, but the satisfaction with the economic and social effects are lower. Sustainable breeding farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction with the overall effects is lower than intermittent breeding farmers and herdsmen. 2) Further research shows that the ecological and economic effects of restoration project are the key influence factors on farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction. In addition, the sustainability of restoration project has significant impact on sustainable breeding farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction, and the social effect has significant impact on intermittent breeding farmers and herdsmen's satisfaction. Based on this, we argue that the implementation of restoration project must avoid the previous implementation methods of one size fits all. In the follow-up project implementation process, restoration project should be systematically optimized and the implementation scope, compensation standards and other aspects of the project should be adjusted according to the special needs of different type's farmers and herdsmen. The contradiction between grassland ecological protection and farmers and herdsmen's interests should comprehensively be resolved so as to improve the implementation performance of restoration project.
引文
[1]Fan J,Zhong H,Harris W,et al.Carbon storage in the grasslands of China based on field measurements of above- and below-ground biomass[J].Climatic Change,2008,86(3):375-396.
[2]米文宝,梁晓磊,米楠.限制开发区主体功能细分研究:以宁夏同心县为例[J].经济地理,2013,33(1):142-148.
[3]Shao H,Sun X,Wang H,et al.A method to the impact assessment of the returning grazing land to grassland project on regional eco-environmental vulnerability[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2016,56:155-167.
[4]Ren Y,Lü Y,Fu B.Quantifying the impacts of grassland restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in China:A meta-analysis[J].Ecological Engineering,2016,95:542-550.
[5]田晓艳.退牧还草政策对我国牧民生活的影响[J].中国草地学报,2011,33(4):1-4.
[6]陈勇,周立华,张秀娟,等.禁牧政策的生态经济效益:以盐池县为例[J].草业科学,2013,30(2):291-297.
[7]Easterlin R A.Life cycle welfare:evidence and conjecture[J].Journal of Socio-Economics,2001,30(1):31-61.
[8]张雷,高名姿,陈东平.政策认知、确权方式与土地确权的农户满意度[J].西部论坛,2017,27(6):33-41.
[9]Ehrhardt J J,Saris W E,Veenhoven R.Stability of life-satisfaction over time:analysis of change in ranks in a national population[J].Journal of Happiness Studies,2000,1(2):177-205.
[10]Dolan P,White M P.How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy?[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,2007,2(1):71-85.
[11]韩枫,朱立志.基于草原生态建设的牧户满意度分析:以甘南草原为例[J].农业技术经济,2017,(3):120-128.
[12]李云龙,周宇庭,张宪洲,等.羌塘牧民对"退牧还草"工程的认知与响应[J].草业科学,2013,30(5):788-794.
[13]张会萍,王冬雪.退牧还草生态补奖对农户行为影响及其政策效果评价研究评述:基于北方农牧交错带的视角[J].宁夏社会科学,2017(S1):150-155.
[14]韩枫,朱立志.草场生态治理中的牧民收入影响因素研究:基于甘南草原的调研分析[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(2):37-44,131-132.
[15]陈春霞.行为经济学和行为决策分析:一个综述[J].经济问题探索,2008(1):124-128.
[16]汪海燕.论刑事庭审实质化[J].中国社会科学,2015(2):103-122,204-205.
[17]张海燕,樊江文,邵全琴,等.2000-2010 年中国退牧还草工程区生态系统宏观结构和质量及其动态变化[J].草业学报,2016,25(4):1-15.
[18]付文凤,郭杰,欧名豪,等.成本效益、政策认知与农村居民点整理农户补偿满意度研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(5):138-145.
[19]卫龙宝,张菲.农村基层治理满意程度及其影响因素分析:基于公共物品供给的微观视角[J].中国农村经济,2012(6):85-96.
[20]路慧玲,周立华,陈勇,等.基于农户视角的盐池县退牧还草政策可持续性分析[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):1065-1071.
[21]石智雷,杨云彦.外出务工对农村劳动力能力发展的影响及政策含义[J].管理世界,2011(12):40-54.
[22]李玉新,魏同洋,靳乐山.牧民对草原生态补偿政策评价及其影响因素研究:以内蒙古四子王旗为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(11):2442-2450.
[23]左冰,万莹.去内卷化:乡村旅游对农业发展的影响研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,32(4):21-30.
[24]朱洪革,胡士磊.重点国有林区职工家庭贫困类型及影响因素研究[J].农林经济管理学报,2017,16(1):105-113.
[2]米文宝,梁晓磊,米楠.限制开发区主体功能细分研究:以宁夏同心县为例[J].经济地理,2013,33(1):142-148.
[3]Shao H,Sun X,Wang H,et al.A method to the impact assessment of the returning grazing land to grassland project on regional eco-environmental vulnerability[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2016,56:155-167.
[4]Ren Y,Lü Y,Fu B.Quantifying the impacts of grassland restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in China:A meta-analysis[J].Ecological Engineering,2016,95:542-550.
[5]田晓艳.退牧还草政策对我国牧民生活的影响[J].中国草地学报,2011,33(4):1-4.
[6]陈勇,周立华,张秀娟,等.禁牧政策的生态经济效益:以盐池县为例[J].草业科学,2013,30(2):291-297.
[7]Easterlin R A.Life cycle welfare:evidence and conjecture[J].Journal of Socio-Economics,2001,30(1):31-61.
[8]张雷,高名姿,陈东平.政策认知、确权方式与土地确权的农户满意度[J].西部论坛,2017,27(6):33-41.
[9]Ehrhardt J J,Saris W E,Veenhoven R.Stability of life-satisfaction over time:analysis of change in ranks in a national population[J].Journal of Happiness Studies,2000,1(2):177-205.
[10]Dolan P,White M P.How can measures of subjective well-being be used to inform public policy?[J].Perspectives on Psychological Science,2007,2(1):71-85.
[11]韩枫,朱立志.基于草原生态建设的牧户满意度分析:以甘南草原为例[J].农业技术经济,2017,(3):120-128.
[12]李云龙,周宇庭,张宪洲,等.羌塘牧民对"退牧还草"工程的认知与响应[J].草业科学,2013,30(5):788-794.
[13]张会萍,王冬雪.退牧还草生态补奖对农户行为影响及其政策效果评价研究评述:基于北方农牧交错带的视角[J].宁夏社会科学,2017(S1):150-155.
[14]韩枫,朱立志.草场生态治理中的牧民收入影响因素研究:基于甘南草原的调研分析[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(2):37-44,131-132.
[15]陈春霞.行为经济学和行为决策分析:一个综述[J].经济问题探索,2008(1):124-128.
[16]汪海燕.论刑事庭审实质化[J].中国社会科学,2015(2):103-122,204-205.
[17]张海燕,樊江文,邵全琴,等.2000-2010 年中国退牧还草工程区生态系统宏观结构和质量及其动态变化[J].草业学报,2016,25(4):1-15.
[18]付文凤,郭杰,欧名豪,等.成本效益、政策认知与农村居民点整理农户补偿满意度研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(5):138-145.
[19]卫龙宝,张菲.农村基层治理满意程度及其影响因素分析:基于公共物品供给的微观视角[J].中国农村经济,2012(6):85-96.
[20]路慧玲,周立华,陈勇,等.基于农户视角的盐池县退牧还草政策可持续性分析[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(4):1065-1071.
[21]石智雷,杨云彦.外出务工对农村劳动力能力发展的影响及政策含义[J].管理世界,2011(12):40-54.
[22]李玉新,魏同洋,靳乐山.牧民对草原生态补偿政策评价及其影响因素研究:以内蒙古四子王旗为例[J].资源科学,2014,36(11):2442-2450.
[23]左冰,万莹.去内卷化:乡村旅游对农业发展的影响研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,32(4):21-30.
[24]朱洪革,胡士磊.重点国有林区职工家庭贫困类型及影响因素研究[J].农林经济管理学报,2017,16(1):105-113.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |