摘要
文章阐述了集体经营性建设用地入市实施主体的主要形式,对比分析了不同形式入市实施主体的优点和不足。将入市实施主体划分为过渡类、适宜类、阶段类和探索类,并指出不同类型实施主体的发展前景。目前入市实施主体存在村民自治组织与经济组织之间的关系未理清、村民委员会作为入市主体呈现两面性、集体经济组织未能立法规范、土地联营公司等作为入市主体的角色定位不明晰等问题。建议:理清村民自治组织与经济组织之间的关系,规范村民自治组织代行集体经济组织职责的行为,加快集体经济组织建设,培育企业法人作为入市代理主体。
This paper expounds the main forms of the implementation of collective management land for the implementation of the main body, and comparatively analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of different forms of implementation of the main body. The main body of the market entry is divided into transitional, appropriate, phase, and exploration categories, and the development prospects of different types of implementation entities are pointed out. At present, the relationship between the villagers' self-governing organizations and the economic organizations is unclear, the villagers' committees are two-sided as the main body of the market, the collective economic organizations fail to legislate, and the land association companies are not clearly defined as the main players. Suggestions: clarify the relationship between village self-governing organizations and economic organizations, standardize the behavior of village self-governing organizations acting as collective economic organizations, speed up the construction of collective economic organizations, and cultivate corporate legal persons as agents in the market.
引文
[1]高飞.我国集体土地所有权主体的法律界定:一个法解释论的视角[J].山东大学法律评论,2009(0):115-125.
[2]邱芳荣,赵旭.同权同价流转顺畅收益共享:记德清县农村集体经营性建设用地入市试点工作[J].浙江国土资源,2018(1):55-56.
[3]农村集体经营性建设用地入市改革的“大兴方案”[J].中国土地,2019(1):9-15.
[4]岳永兵.集体经营性建设用地调整入市模式对比分析[J].中国国土资源经济,2018,31(6):23-27.
[5]张守夫,张少停.中国农村集体土地所有权主体的确认和重构[J].甘肃社会科学,2017(2):229-233.
[6]国务院发展研究中心农村经济研究部.集体所有制下的产权重构[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2015:89.
[7]关锐捷,黎阳,郑有贵.新时期发展壮大农村集体经济组织的实践与探索[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2011(5):28-34,84.
[8]胡琴.农村集体经济组织的法律地位与治理结构探索[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2018,39(12):46-49.
(1)根据《关于农村土地征收、集体经营性建设用地入市、宅基地制度改革试点工作的意见》(中办发71号文)规定,集体经营性建设用地入市是指集体经营性建设用地使用权出让、租赁、入股,主要指集体土地一级市场。
(2)“四议”:党支部会提议、“两委”会商议、党员大会审议、村民代表会议或村民会议决议;“两公开”:决议公开、实施结果公开。