青岛市生态重点保护片区评价及其规划引导研究
|
摘要
青岛作为典型的海滨山地城市,拥有丰富的山水资源,本文旨在构建青岛市生态重点保护片区评价指标体系,并基于体系得分情况提出各片区的功能定位及发展策略。主要研究方法为:基于青岛市域的用地现状,划定全域生态空间中的重点保护片区;继而在生态重点保护片区层面将市域的生态环境、生产空间和景观风貌作为综合评价指标体系的三个方面,选取片区中所有体现空间特征的要素作为评价片区得分指标,对各个片区进行评价,并按照评价指标体系对片区进行综合评分。基于得分情况确定各片区的发展定位,其中将胶南与大泽山片区定位为观光农园片区;大珠山和小珠山保护片区定位为休闲体验农业片区;崂山和城阳两个片区定位为都市农业片区。并基于片区的功能定位对总体的引导控制内容进行细化,以期对未来各重点保护区的生态空间引导、功能产业布局以及城乡景观营造提供规划依据。
Tsingtao,as a typical coastal mountain city,is abundant in landscape resources. This paper aims at quantifying the ecological development on the basis of comprehensible consideration of the overall situation of each ecologically protected area in Tsingtao,sets up an evaluation index system for Tsingtao area,and put forward with specific function orientation and development strategy in the line with the score of the evaluation index system. The main research methods are as follows:based on the current land use situation in Tsingtao,defining the key protection area in the whole ecological space;Then,setting ecological environment,production space and landscape features as three aspects of the comprehensive evaluation index system in the ecological protection area,selecting all elements that can reflect the space characteristics as evaluation index to analyze area development status amd making comprehensive evaluation to determine the score of various areas,Based on the scores,this paper determines the functional positioning of each area. Therefore,Jiaonan and Daze mountain area are viewed as sightseeing agriculture garden areas,Dazhu Mountain and Xiaozhu Mountain areas are viewed as the leisure experience agriculture areas,and Laoshan and Chengyang are viewed as urban agriculture areas. And then propose overall control intervention strategies for each key protection regions based on the functional positioning,So as to provide planning basis for ecological space design,functional industrial layout and construction of urban and rural landscape of key protection area in the future.
Tsingtao,as a typical coastal mountain city,is abundant in landscape resources. This paper aims at quantifying the ecological development on the basis of comprehensible consideration of the overall situation of each ecologically protected area in Tsingtao,sets up an evaluation index system for Tsingtao area,and put forward with specific function orientation and development strategy in the line with the score of the evaluation index system. The main research methods are as follows:based on the current land use situation in Tsingtao,defining the key protection area in the whole ecological space;Then,setting ecological environment,production space and landscape features as three aspects of the comprehensive evaluation index system in the ecological protection area,selecting all elements that can reflect the space characteristics as evaluation index to analyze area development status amd making comprehensive evaluation to determine the score of various areas,Based on the scores,this paper determines the functional positioning of each area. Therefore,Jiaonan and Daze mountain area are viewed as sightseeing agriculture garden areas,Dazhu Mountain and Xiaozhu Mountain areas are viewed as the leisure experience agriculture areas,and Laoshan and Chengyang are viewed as urban agriculture areas. And then propose overall control intervention strategies for each key protection regions based on the functional positioning,So as to provide planning basis for ecological space design,functional industrial layout and construction of urban and rural landscape of key protection area in the future.
引文
[1]张宇星.城镇生态空间理论初探[J].城市规划,1995(02):17-19.
[2]张小军.基于RS和GIS的苏尼特右旗草地生态服务功能评价研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古工业大学,2011.
[3]杨志荣,吴次芳,刘勇.快速城市化地区湿地脆弱性评价-以杭州湾湿地为例[J].资源科学,2009(2):243-249
[4]张远景,俞滨洋.城市生态网络空间评价及其格局优化[J].生态学报,2016,36(21):6969-6984.
[5]Jian Pen,Yanxu Liu,Jiansheng Wu,Huiling Lv,Xiaoxu Hu.Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health:A case study in Shenzhen City,China[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2015(143):56-68.
[6]王静雅,何政伟,于欢.GIS与层次分析法相结合的生态环境综合评价研究--以渝西地区为例[J].2011,20(02):1268-1272.
[7]陆启荣.国土生态空间评价研究进展与展望[J].广州土地科学,2014,13(04):12-16.
[8]傅强,宋军,王天青.生态网络在城市非建设用地评价中的作用研究[J].规划师,2012(12):91-96.
[9]郑仰阳,谢正观.基于生态敏感性评价的城市非建设用地规划研究--以龙海市九龙江地区为例[J].城乡规划与管理,2011(5):65-71.
[10]陈晨,赵民.对“非城市建设用地”及其规划管控问题的若干探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2011(4):39-45.
[11]于海霞,徐礼强,陈晓宏,等.海湾型城市滨水空间的战略区位及生态格局--以厦门市马銮湾新城为例[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(07):1130-1138.
[12]彭建,汪安,刘焱序,等.城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望[J]地理学报,2015(02):333-346.
[13]陈海嵩.“生态红线”制度体系建设的路线图[J].中国人口资源与环境,2015,25(09):52-59.
[14]Paul Opdam,Eveliene Steingr?ver,Sabine van Rooij.Ecological networks:A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006(75):322-332.
[15]吴建生,张理卿,彭建,等.深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4125-4133.
[16]陆希刚.图与底关于城市非建设用地规划的思考[J].城市规划学刊,2013(04):68-72.
[17]朱查松,张京祥,罗震东.城市非建设用地规划主要内容探讨[J].现代城市研究,2010(03):39-43.
[18]詹运洲,李艳.特大城市城乡生态空间规划方法与实施机制思考[J].城市规划学刊,2011(02):49-57.
[19]Jolande W.Termorshuizen,Paul Opdam.Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development[J].Landscape Ecol,2009(24):1037-1052.
[20]Wu JG.Landscape sustainability science:ecosystem.services and human well-being in changing landscapes[J].Landscape Ecol,2013(28):999-1023.
[21]Myungjun Jang,Chang-Deok Kang.Urban greenway and compact land use development:A multilevel assessment in Seoul,South Korea[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2015(143):160-172.
[22]Egoh B,Reyers B,Rouget M,Richardson DM,Le Maitre DC,van Jaarsveld.AS.Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management[J].Agric Ecosyst Environ,2008(127):135-140.
[23]贾有余,李辉,王钊齐,等.苏州市吴中区生态保护红线区生态环境质量定量评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(06):525-532.
[2]张小军.基于RS和GIS的苏尼特右旗草地生态服务功能评价研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古工业大学,2011.
[3]杨志荣,吴次芳,刘勇.快速城市化地区湿地脆弱性评价-以杭州湾湿地为例[J].资源科学,2009(2):243-249
[4]张远景,俞滨洋.城市生态网络空间评价及其格局优化[J].生态学报,2016,36(21):6969-6984.
[5]Jian Pen,Yanxu Liu,Jiansheng Wu,Huiling Lv,Xiaoxu Hu.Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health:A case study in Shenzhen City,China[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2015(143):56-68.
[6]王静雅,何政伟,于欢.GIS与层次分析法相结合的生态环境综合评价研究--以渝西地区为例[J].2011,20(02):1268-1272.
[7]陆启荣.国土生态空间评价研究进展与展望[J].广州土地科学,2014,13(04):12-16.
[8]傅强,宋军,王天青.生态网络在城市非建设用地评价中的作用研究[J].规划师,2012(12):91-96.
[9]郑仰阳,谢正观.基于生态敏感性评价的城市非建设用地规划研究--以龙海市九龙江地区为例[J].城乡规划与管理,2011(5):65-71.
[10]陈晨,赵民.对“非城市建设用地”及其规划管控问题的若干探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2011(4):39-45.
[11]于海霞,徐礼强,陈晓宏,等.海湾型城市滨水空间的战略区位及生态格局--以厦门市马銮湾新城为例[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(07):1130-1138.
[12]彭建,汪安,刘焱序,等.城市生态用地需求测算研究进展与展望[J]地理学报,2015(02):333-346.
[13]陈海嵩.“生态红线”制度体系建设的路线图[J].中国人口资源与环境,2015,25(09):52-59.
[14]Paul Opdam,Eveliene Steingr?ver,Sabine van Rooij.Ecological networks:A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006(75):322-332.
[15]吴建生,张理卿,彭建,等.深圳市景观生态安全格局源地综合识别[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4125-4133.
[16]陆希刚.图与底关于城市非建设用地规划的思考[J].城市规划学刊,2013(04):68-72.
[17]朱查松,张京祥,罗震东.城市非建设用地规划主要内容探讨[J].现代城市研究,2010(03):39-43.
[18]詹运洲,李艳.特大城市城乡生态空间规划方法与实施机制思考[J].城市规划学刊,2011(02):49-57.
[19]Jolande W.Termorshuizen,Paul Opdam.Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development[J].Landscape Ecol,2009(24):1037-1052.
[20]Wu JG.Landscape sustainability science:ecosystem.services and human well-being in changing landscapes[J].Landscape Ecol,2013(28):999-1023.
[21]Myungjun Jang,Chang-Deok Kang.Urban greenway and compact land use development:A multilevel assessment in Seoul,South Korea[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2015(143):160-172.
[22]Egoh B,Reyers B,Rouget M,Richardson DM,Le Maitre DC,van Jaarsveld.AS.Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management[J].Agric Ecosyst Environ,2008(127):135-140.
[23]贾有余,李辉,王钊齐,等.苏州市吴中区生态保护红线区生态环境质量定量评价[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(06):525-532.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |