异质典型县域耕地流转绩效评价及差异分析
|
摘要
为宏观把握耕地流转绩效及区域差异,从我国农业大省湖南省四大异质经济板块中选取5个有梯度的典型农业大县、强县,构建耕地流转绩效综合评价指标体系及评判标准,基于实地调研数据,采用熵权法与模糊综合评判法相结合的方法定量评价区域耕地流转绩效。结果表明:①从评价等级来看,浏阳市、湘潭县耕地流转的经济和社会绩效较好,汉寿县耕地流转的社会和环境绩效较好,3县(市)耕地流转表现出较好的综合绩效,耒阳市耕地流转的环境绩效较好,但经济和社会绩效不高,耕地流转综合绩效一般,龙山县耕地流转的经济、社会和环境绩效均较低,耕地流转综合绩效较差;②从综合得分来看,浏阳市、湘潭县、汉寿县、耒阳市和龙山县耕地流转绩效得分依次递减,综合绩效基本呈现出由长株潭城市群向洞庭湖生态经济区、湘南丘陵山区、大湘西地区逐步降低的空间分异特征;③经济发展水平、宏观区位条件、劳动力转移状况、耕地资源禀赋及农业优势特色产业规模化经营水平等是引起耕地流转绩效差异的主要原因。在提高耕地流转率的同时,针对差异及问题,分类施策,有利于全面提升耕地流转的综合绩效,推进农业农村高质量发展。
In order to grasp the performance and regional difference of cultivated land transfer, five typical large and strong agricultural counties in Hunan Province were selected as empirical objects, this paper designed a set of comprehensive evaluation index system and evaluation standard, using the entropy method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to make a quantitative evaluation on regional cultivated land transfer performance based on the field investigation data. The results were as followed: 1) From the evaluation grades, the economic and social performance of the cultivated land transfer were better in Liuyang City and Xiangtan County, it had better social and environmental performance in Hanshou County, the cultivated land transfer of the above three counties(or cities) showed good comprehensive performance. The cultivated land transfer of Leiyang City had better environmental performance, but the economic and social performance were not high and the comprehensive performance was general. For Longshan County,all of the economic, social and environmental performance of cultivated land transfer were at low level, and the comprehensive performance was poor. 2) About the comprehensive scores, the rank of the performance scores( from high to low) was Liuyang City, Xiangtan County, Hanshou County, Leiyang City and Longshan County, and the comprehensive performance basically showed the gradually reduced spatial differentiation characteristic from ChangshaZhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration to Dongting Lake Ecological Economic Zone, the southern and western of Hunan Province. 3) The economic development level, macro-location condition, labor transfer status, cultivated land resource endowment and large-scale operation benefit of agricultural advantage characteristic industry were the main reasons that caused the performance difference of cultivated land transfer. Meanwhile, increasing the rate of cultivated land transfer, making and implementing the pointed countermeasures aiming at the differences and problems are beneficial to fully improve the comprehensive performance of cultivated land transfer.
In order to grasp the performance and regional difference of cultivated land transfer, five typical large and strong agricultural counties in Hunan Province were selected as empirical objects, this paper designed a set of comprehensive evaluation index system and evaluation standard, using the entropy method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to make a quantitative evaluation on regional cultivated land transfer performance based on the field investigation data. The results were as followed: 1) From the evaluation grades, the economic and social performance of the cultivated land transfer were better in Liuyang City and Xiangtan County, it had better social and environmental performance in Hanshou County, the cultivated land transfer of the above three counties(or cities) showed good comprehensive performance. The cultivated land transfer of Leiyang City had better environmental performance, but the economic and social performance were not high and the comprehensive performance was general. For Longshan County,all of the economic, social and environmental performance of cultivated land transfer were at low level, and the comprehensive performance was poor. 2) About the comprehensive scores, the rank of the performance scores( from high to low) was Liuyang City, Xiangtan County, Hanshou County, Leiyang City and Longshan County, and the comprehensive performance basically showed the gradually reduced spatial differentiation characteristic from ChangshaZhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration to Dongting Lake Ecological Economic Zone, the southern and western of Hunan Province. 3) The economic development level, macro-location condition, labor transfer status, cultivated land resource endowment and large-scale operation benefit of agricultural advantage characteristic industry were the main reasons that caused the performance difference of cultivated land transfer. Meanwhile, increasing the rate of cultivated land transfer, making and implementing the pointed countermeasures aiming at the differences and problems are beneficial to fully improve the comprehensive performance of cultivated land transfer.
引文
[1]杜挺，朱道林，张立新，等.河南省耕地流转价格空间分异及形成机制分析[J].农业工程学报，2016,32(20):250-258.
[2]张兰，冯淑怡，曲福田.农地流转区域差异及其成因分析[J].中国土地科学，2014,28(5):73-80.
[3]甘臣林，陈璐，陈银蓉，等.基于农户满意度的农地转出绩效评估研究[J].中国土地科学，2018,32(10):28-35.
[4]程令国，张晔，刘志彪.农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗？[J].管理世界，2016(1):88-98.
[5]吕悦风，陈会广.农业补贴政策及其对土地流转的影响研究[J].农业现代化研究，2015,36(3):362-367.
[6]周文，赵方，杨飞，等.土地流转户籍制度改革与中国城市化：理论与模拟[J].经济研究，2017(6):183-197.
[7]林善浪，王健，张锋.劳动力转移行为对土地流转意愿影响的实证研究[J].中国土地科学，2010,24(2):19-23.
[8]王亚辉，李秀彬，辛良杰.农业劳动力年龄对土地流转的影响研究——来自CHIP2013的数据[J].资源科学，2017,39(8):1 457-1 468.
[9]纪红蕾，蔡银莺.生计资本异质对农户农地流转行为的影响——以武汉城市郊区的516户农民为例[J].长江流域资源与环境，2017,26(2):220-225.
[10]许恒周，郭玉燕.农民非农收入与农村土地流转关系的协整分析——以江苏省南京市为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2011,21(6):61-66.
[11]杨昭熙，杨钢桥.农地细碎化对农户农地流转决策的影响研究[J].中国土地科学，2017,31(4):33-42.
[12]诸培新，张建，张志林.农地流转对农户收入影响研究——对政府主导与农户主导型农地流转的比较分析[J].中国土地科学，2015,29(11):70-77.
[13]杨子，马贤磊，诸培新，等.土地流转与农民收入变化研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2017,27(5):111-120.
[14]黄祖辉，王建英，陈志钢.非农就业、土地流转与土地细碎化对稻农技术效率的影响[J].中国农村经济，2014(11):4-16.
[15]戚焦耳，郭贯成，陈永生.农地流转对农业生产效率的影响研究——基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析[J].资源科学，2015,37(9):1 816-1 824.
[16]张建，诸培新.不同农地流转模式对农业生产效率的影响分析——以江苏省四县为例[J].资源科学，2017,39(4):629-640.
[17]李灿.土地流转背景下农地适度规模经营绩效形成机理分析——基于本量利(CVP)模型[J].经济地理，2017,37(11):191-197.
[18]赵智，郑循刚，李冬梅.土地流转非农就业与市民化倾向基于四川省农业转移人口的调查分析[J].南京农业大学学报：社会科学版，2016,16(4):90-99.
[19]陈丹，任远，戴严科.农地流转对农村劳动力乡城迁移意愿的影响[J].中国农村经济，2017(7):56-71.
[20]宋戈，武晋伊.土地承包经营权流转非粮化原因剖析及政策调控[J].学术交流，2016(17):122-126.
[21]张藕香.农户分化视角下防止流转土地非粮化对策研究[J].中州学刊，2016(4):49-54.
[22]邵景安，张仕超，李秀彬.山区土地流转对缓解耕地撂荒的作用[J].地理学报，2015,70(4):636-649.
[23]张英，李秀彬，宋伟，等.重庆市武隆县农地流转下农业劳动力对耕地撂荒的不同尺度影响[J].地理科学进展，2014,33(4):552-560.
[24]杜挺，朱道林.中国土地流转价格时空演化与宏观机制研究[J].资源科学，2018,40(11):2 202-2 212.
[25]王桂民，陈聪，曹光乔，等.中国耕地流转时空特征及影响因素分解[J].农业工程学报，2017,33(1):1-7.
[26]王亚辉，李秀彬，辛良杰，等.中国土地流转的区域差异及其影响因素——基于2003—2013年农村固定观察点数据[J].地理学报，2018,73(3):487-502.
[27]信桂新，杨朝现，杨庆媛，等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报，2017,33(1):238-249.
[28]凌红波，徐海量，乔木，等.基于AHP和模糊综合评判的玛纳斯河流域水资源安全评价[J].中国沙漠，2010,30(4):899-994.
[2]张兰，冯淑怡，曲福田.农地流转区域差异及其成因分析[J].中国土地科学，2014,28(5):73-80.
[3]甘臣林，陈璐，陈银蓉，等.基于农户满意度的农地转出绩效评估研究[J].中国土地科学，2018,32(10):28-35.
[4]程令国，张晔，刘志彪.农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗？[J].管理世界，2016(1):88-98.
[5]吕悦风，陈会广.农业补贴政策及其对土地流转的影响研究[J].农业现代化研究，2015,36(3):362-367.
[6]周文，赵方，杨飞，等.土地流转户籍制度改革与中国城市化：理论与模拟[J].经济研究，2017(6):183-197.
[7]林善浪，王健，张锋.劳动力转移行为对土地流转意愿影响的实证研究[J].中国土地科学，2010,24(2):19-23.
[8]王亚辉，李秀彬，辛良杰.农业劳动力年龄对土地流转的影响研究——来自CHIP2013的数据[J].资源科学，2017,39(8):1 457-1 468.
[9]纪红蕾，蔡银莺.生计资本异质对农户农地流转行为的影响——以武汉城市郊区的516户农民为例[J].长江流域资源与环境，2017,26(2):220-225.
[10]许恒周，郭玉燕.农民非农收入与农村土地流转关系的协整分析——以江苏省南京市为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2011,21(6):61-66.
[11]杨昭熙，杨钢桥.农地细碎化对农户农地流转决策的影响研究[J].中国土地科学，2017,31(4):33-42.
[12]诸培新，张建，张志林.农地流转对农户收入影响研究——对政府主导与农户主导型农地流转的比较分析[J].中国土地科学，2015,29(11):70-77.
[13]杨子，马贤磊，诸培新，等.土地流转与农民收入变化研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2017,27(5):111-120.
[14]黄祖辉，王建英，陈志钢.非农就业、土地流转与土地细碎化对稻农技术效率的影响[J].中国农村经济，2014(11):4-16.
[15]戚焦耳，郭贯成，陈永生.农地流转对农业生产效率的影响研究——基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析[J].资源科学，2015,37(9):1 816-1 824.
[16]张建，诸培新.不同农地流转模式对农业生产效率的影响分析——以江苏省四县为例[J].资源科学，2017,39(4):629-640.
[17]李灿.土地流转背景下农地适度规模经营绩效形成机理分析——基于本量利(CVP)模型[J].经济地理，2017,37(11):191-197.
[18]赵智，郑循刚，李冬梅.土地流转非农就业与市民化倾向基于四川省农业转移人口的调查分析[J].南京农业大学学报：社会科学版，2016,16(4):90-99.
[19]陈丹，任远，戴严科.农地流转对农村劳动力乡城迁移意愿的影响[J].中国农村经济，2017(7):56-71.
[20]宋戈，武晋伊.土地承包经营权流转非粮化原因剖析及政策调控[J].学术交流，2016(17):122-126.
[21]张藕香.农户分化视角下防止流转土地非粮化对策研究[J].中州学刊，2016(4):49-54.
[22]邵景安，张仕超，李秀彬.山区土地流转对缓解耕地撂荒的作用[J].地理学报，2015,70(4):636-649.
[23]张英，李秀彬，宋伟，等.重庆市武隆县农地流转下农业劳动力对耕地撂荒的不同尺度影响[J].地理科学进展，2014,33(4):552-560.
[24]杜挺，朱道林.中国土地流转价格时空演化与宏观机制研究[J].资源科学，2018,40(11):2 202-2 212.
[25]王桂民，陈聪，曹光乔，等.中国耕地流转时空特征及影响因素分解[J].农业工程学报，2017,33(1):1-7.
[26]王亚辉，李秀彬，辛良杰，等.中国土地流转的区域差异及其影响因素——基于2003—2013年农村固定观察点数据[J].地理学报，2018,73(3):487-502.
[27]信桂新，杨朝现，杨庆媛，等.用熵权法和改进TOPSIS模型评价高标准基本农田建设后效应[J].农业工程学报，2017,33(1):238-249.
[28]凌红波，徐海量，乔木，等.基于AHP和模糊综合评判的玛纳斯河流域水资源安全评价[J].中国沙漠，2010,30(4):899-994.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |