0201型瓦楞纸箱生命周期不同阶段的环境影响评价
|
摘要
目的对常用的0201型瓦楞纸箱进行生命周期环境影响评价,并对不同回收处理方案所得的环境负荷进行比较。方法应用生命周期评价理论和SimaPro 8.5软件,采用Eco-indicator99生态指数分析法对瓦楞纸箱从原料获取、生产、运输、使用到废弃处理整个过程进行环境影响评价。结果当回收利用率达到70%时,每功能单位的瓦楞纸箱全生命周期产生的环境负荷的单一值为8.91,其中生产阶段所产生的环境负荷最大,约为3.39;运输阶段次之,约为2.89;废弃阶段为2.63。当回收利用率仅达45%时,每功能单位瓦楞纸箱的环境负荷增加至9.33,相较之下环境负荷增长了4.71%。结论提高瓦楞纸箱的回收利用率将有助于降低对环境的负面影响。
The work aims to assess the environmental impact of the life cycle of style 0201 corrugated cases and compare the environmental loads from different disposal solutions. The life cycle assessment theory and SimaPro 8.5 software were used and the Eco-indicator99 ecological index analysis method was applied to evaluate the life cycle processes from raw materials acquisition, production, transportation, use to disposal process. The single environmental impact value per functional unit corrugated cases was 8.91 when the recycling rate reached 70%. The maximum environmental impact was generated during the production phase and was about 3.39, which was followed by that in the transportation phase(2.89) and the disposal phase(2.63). When the recycling rate was only 45%, the environmental impact per functional unit corrugated cases increased to 9.33, increasing by 4.71% compared to the case of 70% recycling rate. Improving the recycling rate can facilitate the decrease of the negative impact of corrugated cases in the life cycle process.
The work aims to assess the environmental impact of the life cycle of style 0201 corrugated cases and compare the environmental loads from different disposal solutions. The life cycle assessment theory and SimaPro 8.5 software were used and the Eco-indicator99 ecological index analysis method was applied to evaluate the life cycle processes from raw materials acquisition, production, transportation, use to disposal process. The single environmental impact value per functional unit corrugated cases was 8.91 when the recycling rate reached 70%. The maximum environmental impact was generated during the production phase and was about 3.39, which was followed by that in the transportation phase(2.89) and the disposal phase(2.63). When the recycling rate was only 45%, the environmental impact per functional unit corrugated cases increased to 9.33, increasing by 4.71% compared to the case of 70% recycling rate. Improving the recycling rate can facilitate the decrease of the negative impact of corrugated cases in the life cycle process.
引文
[1]刘岩.基于生态理论的物流产业成长研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.LIU Yan.Research on Logistics Industry Growth Based on Ecological Theory[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2014.
[2]余汉生,陈瑶.智能垃圾分类回收系统设计应用研究[J].包装工程,2018,39(18):154-159.YU Han-sheng,CHEN Yao.Design and Application of Intelligent Waste Sorting and Recycling System[J].Packaging Engineering,2018,39(18):154-159.
[3]商务部.中国再生资源回收行业发展报告2017[J].资源再生,2017(5):16-25.Department of Commerce.Report of China Renewable Resource Recycling Industry Development 2017[J].Resource Recycling,2017(5):16-25.
[4]乔洁,冯从从.优化包装设计实现废弃物源头减量[J].包装工程,2018,39(18):34-38.QIAO Jie,FENG Cong-cong.Optimized Packaging Design to Achieve Waste Source Reduction[J].Packaging Engineering,2018,39(18):34-38.
[5]REBITZER G,EKVALL T,FRISCHKNECHT R,et al.Life Cycle Assessment:Part 1:Framework,Goal and Scope Definition,Inventory Analysis,and Applications[J].Environment International,2004,30(5):701-720.
[6]沈建,吴金卓,林文树.锯材产品生命周期影响环境的评价方法与应用[J].东北林业大学学报,2014,42(10):135-140.SHEN Jian,WU Jin-zhuo,LIN Wen-shu.Life Cycle Impact Assessment and Its Application of Sawn Timber Product[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2014,42(10):135-140.
[7]王玉涛,王丰川,洪静兰,等.中国生命周期评价理论与实践研究进展及对策分析[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7179-7184.WANG Yu-tao,WANG Feng-chuan,HONG Jing-lan,et al.The Development of Life Cycle Assessment Theory Research in China and Analysis of Countermeasures[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(22):7179-7184.
[8]张滨.发达国家绿色物流的发展及其对中国对外贸易的影响[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.ZHANG Bin.The Development of Life Cycle Assessment Theory Research in China and Analysis of Countermeasures[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2015.
[9]CARLA B,CARMEN F,CARMELA M,et al.LCA of an Ice Cream Cup of Polyethylene Coated Paper:How Does the Choice of the End-of-life Affect the Results?[J].Environmental Technology,2017,10(7):1-10.
[10]XIE M,QIAO Q,SUN Q,et al.Life Cycle Assessment of Composite Packaging Waste Management-a Chinese Case Study on Aseptic Packaging[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2013,18(3):626-635.
[11]SCIPIONI A,NIERO M,MZAAI A,et al.Significance of the Use of Non-renewable Fossil CED as Proxy Indicator for Screening LCA in the Beverage Packaging Sector[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2013,18(3):673-682.
[12]FINNVEDEN G,EKVALL T.Life-cycle Assessment as a Decision-support Tool-the Case of Recycling Versus Incineration of Paper[J].Resources,Conservation&Recycling,1998,24(3):235-256.
[13]孙宏岭,武文斌.物流包装实务[M].北京:中国财富出版社,2014.SUN Hong-ling,WU Wen-bin.Logistics Packaging Practice[M].Beijing:China Fortune Press,2014.
[14]GB/T 6543-2008,运输包装用单瓦楞纸箱和双瓦楞纸箱[S].GB/T 6543-2008,Single and Double Corrugated Boxes for Transport Packages[S].
[15]王玉.工业化预制装配建筑的全生命周期碳排放研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.WANG Yu.Whole Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Research of Industrialized Precast Construction[D].Nanjing:Southeast University,2016.
[16]葛振香.基于LCA的山东省造纸业可持续发展研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2017.GE Zhen-xiang.Research on Sustainable Development of Shandong Paper Industry Based on LCA[D].Jinan:Shandong Normal University,2017.
[17]孔琳琳,吴金卓,董希斌,等.低质林改造对资源消耗及生态环境的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(12):1-7.KONG Lin-lin,WU Jin-zhuo,DONG Xi-bin,et al.Effect of Low-quality Forest Transformation on Resources Consumption and Ecological Environment[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2017,45(12):1-7.
[2]余汉生,陈瑶.智能垃圾分类回收系统设计应用研究[J].包装工程,2018,39(18):154-159.YU Han-sheng,CHEN Yao.Design and Application of Intelligent Waste Sorting and Recycling System[J].Packaging Engineering,2018,39(18):154-159.
[3]商务部.中国再生资源回收行业发展报告2017[J].资源再生,2017(5):16-25.Department of Commerce.Report of China Renewable Resource Recycling Industry Development 2017[J].Resource Recycling,2017(5):16-25.
[4]乔洁,冯从从.优化包装设计实现废弃物源头减量[J].包装工程,2018,39(18):34-38.QIAO Jie,FENG Cong-cong.Optimized Packaging Design to Achieve Waste Source Reduction[J].Packaging Engineering,2018,39(18):34-38.
[5]REBITZER G,EKVALL T,FRISCHKNECHT R,et al.Life Cycle Assessment:Part 1:Framework,Goal and Scope Definition,Inventory Analysis,and Applications[J].Environment International,2004,30(5):701-720.
[6]沈建,吴金卓,林文树.锯材产品生命周期影响环境的评价方法与应用[J].东北林业大学学报,2014,42(10):135-140.SHEN Jian,WU Jin-zhuo,LIN Wen-shu.Life Cycle Impact Assessment and Its Application of Sawn Timber Product[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2014,42(10):135-140.
[7]王玉涛,王丰川,洪静兰,等.中国生命周期评价理论与实践研究进展及对策分析[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7179-7184.WANG Yu-tao,WANG Feng-chuan,HONG Jing-lan,et al.The Development of Life Cycle Assessment Theory Research in China and Analysis of Countermeasures[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(22):7179-7184.
[8]张滨.发达国家绿色物流的发展及其对中国对外贸易的影响[D].长春:吉林大学,2015.ZHANG Bin.The Development of Life Cycle Assessment Theory Research in China and Analysis of Countermeasures[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2015.
[9]CARLA B,CARMEN F,CARMELA M,et al.LCA of an Ice Cream Cup of Polyethylene Coated Paper:How Does the Choice of the End-of-life Affect the Results?[J].Environmental Technology,2017,10(7):1-10.
[10]XIE M,QIAO Q,SUN Q,et al.Life Cycle Assessment of Composite Packaging Waste Management-a Chinese Case Study on Aseptic Packaging[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2013,18(3):626-635.
[11]SCIPIONI A,NIERO M,MZAAI A,et al.Significance of the Use of Non-renewable Fossil CED as Proxy Indicator for Screening LCA in the Beverage Packaging Sector[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,2013,18(3):673-682.
[12]FINNVEDEN G,EKVALL T.Life-cycle Assessment as a Decision-support Tool-the Case of Recycling Versus Incineration of Paper[J].Resources,Conservation&Recycling,1998,24(3):235-256.
[13]孙宏岭,武文斌.物流包装实务[M].北京:中国财富出版社,2014.SUN Hong-ling,WU Wen-bin.Logistics Packaging Practice[M].Beijing:China Fortune Press,2014.
[14]GB/T 6543-2008,运输包装用单瓦楞纸箱和双瓦楞纸箱[S].GB/T 6543-2008,Single and Double Corrugated Boxes for Transport Packages[S].
[15]王玉.工业化预制装配建筑的全生命周期碳排放研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.WANG Yu.Whole Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Research of Industrialized Precast Construction[D].Nanjing:Southeast University,2016.
[16]葛振香.基于LCA的山东省造纸业可持续发展研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2017.GE Zhen-xiang.Research on Sustainable Development of Shandong Paper Industry Based on LCA[D].Jinan:Shandong Normal University,2017.
[17]孔琳琳,吴金卓,董希斌,等.低质林改造对资源消耗及生态环境的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(12):1-7.KONG Lin-lin,WU Jin-zhuo,DONG Xi-bin,et al.Effect of Low-quality Forest Transformation on Resources Consumption and Ecological Environment[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2017,45(12):1-7.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |