河南省国家高新技术产业开发区产城融合测度评价
|
摘要
从产业发展、城市功能、居民需求、资源配置4个方面选择16个具体指标构建指标体系,采用主成分分析和熵值法相结合的方法对河南省7个国家高新技术产业开发区的产城融合度进行评价。结果表明:河南省国家高新区的产城融合整体水平不高且存在明显差异,郑州、洛阳、新乡高新区产城融合水平较高,安阳、平顶山高新区产城融合水平较低;产城融合度与服务业发展水平呈正相关,郑州高新区现代服务业发展活跃,产城融合水平较高,平顶山高新区服务业规模较小,产城融合发展不足;产业发展和资源配置在推动产城融合发展中作用突出,郑州、洛阳高新区产业发展水平较高,创新资源较为富集,促进了产城融合;产城融合度随城市规模大小而不同,郑州人口规模及人口密度较大,规模集聚效应使其产城融合优势较为明显。提出加快河南省国家高新区产城融合的建议,即:在优势产业集聚基础上加快产业升级;在完善城市功能基础上实现"三生"空间融合。
From the four aspects of industrial development, urban functions, residents' demands, and resource allocation, the paper selects 16 specific indicators to construct the index system. Based on that,the paper applies principal component analysis and entropy method to evaluate the degree of industry-city integration about National Hi-tech Zones of Henan Province.The research shows that the overall level of industry-city integration about National Hi-tech Zones of Henan Province is not high and that there are obvious differences.The National Hi-tech Zones in Zhengzhou, Luoyang and Xinxiang have higher level of industry-city integration.The National Hi-tech Zones in Anyang and Pingdingshan have lower level of industry-city integration.The degree of industry-city integration is positively correlated with the level of service industry development.The modern service industry in Zhengzhou Hi-tech Zone is active and its level of industry-city integrationis relatively high.The service industry of Pingdingshan Hi-tech Zone is small and the industry-city integration is insufficient.Industrial development and resource allocation play important roles in promoting the industry-city integration.The two hi-tech zones in Zhengzhou and Luoyang have higher industrial development levels and the innovative resources are more concentrated, which promotes the industry-city integration.The degree of industry-city integration varies with the size of the city. The population size and population density of the provincial capital Zhengzhou are large and the scale agglomeration effect makes the advantages of industry-city integration more obvious.At last,the paper points out two suggestions on industry-city integration: accelerating the industrial upgrading on the basis of agglomeration of competitive industries, and realizing the "production-living-ecological" space fusion on the basis of improving urban functions.
From the four aspects of industrial development, urban functions, residents' demands, and resource allocation, the paper selects 16 specific indicators to construct the index system. Based on that,the paper applies principal component analysis and entropy method to evaluate the degree of industry-city integration about National Hi-tech Zones of Henan Province.The research shows that the overall level of industry-city integration about National Hi-tech Zones of Henan Province is not high and that there are obvious differences.The National Hi-tech Zones in Zhengzhou, Luoyang and Xinxiang have higher level of industry-city integration.The National Hi-tech Zones in Anyang and Pingdingshan have lower level of industry-city integration.The degree of industry-city integration is positively correlated with the level of service industry development.The modern service industry in Zhengzhou Hi-tech Zone is active and its level of industry-city integrationis relatively high.The service industry of Pingdingshan Hi-tech Zone is small and the industry-city integration is insufficient.Industrial development and resource allocation play important roles in promoting the industry-city integration.The two hi-tech zones in Zhengzhou and Luoyang have higher industrial development levels and the innovative resources are more concentrated, which promotes the industry-city integration.The degree of industry-city integration varies with the size of the city. The population size and population density of the provincial capital Zhengzhou are large and the scale agglomeration effect makes the advantages of industry-city integration more obvious.At last,the paper points out two suggestions on industry-city integration: accelerating the industrial upgrading on the basis of agglomeration of competitive industries, and realizing the "production-living-ecological" space fusion on the basis of improving urban functions.
引文
[1] 杨立勋,姜增明.产业结构与城镇化匹配协调及其效率分析[J].经济问题探索,2013(10):34-39.
[2] 李文彬,陈浩.产城融合内涵解析与规划建议[J].城市规划学刊,2012(7):99-103.
[3] 谭静,张建华.国家高新区推动城市全要素生产率增长了吗?——基于277个城市的“准自然实验”分析[J].经济与管理研究,2018,39(9):75-90.
[4] 张建清,沈姊文.长江中游城市群产城融合度评价[J].上海经济研究,2017(3):109-114.
[5] 杨惠,方斌.基于主成分分析法的扬中市产城融合度研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(6):99-105.
[6] 丛海彬,邹德玲,刘程军.新型城镇化背景下产城融合的时空格局分析——来自中国285个地级市的实际考察[J].经济地理,2017,37(7):46-55.
[7] 史宝娟,邓英杰.资源型城市发展过程中产城融合生态化动态耦合协调发展研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(10):122-125.
[8] 王霞,王岩红,苏林,等.国家高新区产城融合度指标体系的构建及评价——基于因子分析及熵值法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(7):79-88.
[9] 唐晓宏.基于灰色关联的开发区产城融合度评价研究[J].上海经济研究,2014(6):85-92.
[10] 付岱山,付静.基于模糊层次综合评价法的产城融合程度测评——以沈阳经济区为例[J].沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,8(5):425-435.
[11] 郑宝华,朱佳翔.国家自主创新示范区产城融合度评价[J].统计与决策,2016(18):65-68.
[12] SU L,JIA J J.Empirical Research about the Degree of City-industry Integration:A Contrast of the Typical Cities in China[J].Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics,2017,20(1):87-100.
[13] SHAO Z.Industry and City Integration[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2015:229-239.
[14] 王菲.基于组合赋权和四格象限法的产业集聚区产城融合发展评价研究[J].生态经济,2014,30(3):36-41.
[15] 张明之.产业集聚、新产业区与城市经济空间整合[J].中国软科学,2003(7):119-124.
[16] 谢呈阳,胡汉辉,周海波.新型城镇化背景下“产城融合”的内在机理与作用路径[J].财经研究,2016,42(1):72-82.
[17] 刘欣英.产城融合的影响因素及作用机制[J].经济问题,2016(8):26-29.
[18] 李靖华,郭耀煌.主成分分析用于多指标评价的方法研究——主成分评价[J].管理工程学报,2002,16(1):39-43.
[19] 姚士谋,陈维肖,陈振光,等.新常态下中国新型城镇化的若干问题[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(1):1-4.
[20] 岳隽,古杰.产城融合的概念框架搭建:基于空间组织逻辑的识别与评价[J].城市观察,2015(6):168-177.
[21] 刘路云,郑伯红.基于工业用地扩展的长沙城市空间演变与优化[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(4):54-59.
[22] 李建伟,刘科伟,刘林.城市新区与城市功能的关联耦合机制[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(1):15-19.
[23] 王振坡,游斌,王丽艳.基于精明增长的城市新区空间结构优化研究——以天津市滨海新区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2014,33(4):90-95.
[2] 李文彬,陈浩.产城融合内涵解析与规划建议[J].城市规划学刊,2012(7):99-103.
[3] 谭静,张建华.国家高新区推动城市全要素生产率增长了吗?——基于277个城市的“准自然实验”分析[J].经济与管理研究,2018,39(9):75-90.
[4] 张建清,沈姊文.长江中游城市群产城融合度评价[J].上海经济研究,2017(3):109-114.
[5] 杨惠,方斌.基于主成分分析法的扬中市产城融合度研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(6):99-105.
[6] 丛海彬,邹德玲,刘程军.新型城镇化背景下产城融合的时空格局分析——来自中国285个地级市的实际考察[J].经济地理,2017,37(7):46-55.
[7] 史宝娟,邓英杰.资源型城市发展过程中产城融合生态化动态耦合协调发展研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(10):122-125.
[8] 王霞,王岩红,苏林,等.国家高新区产城融合度指标体系的构建及评价——基于因子分析及熵值法[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(7):79-88.
[9] 唐晓宏.基于灰色关联的开发区产城融合度评价研究[J].上海经济研究,2014(6):85-92.
[10] 付岱山,付静.基于模糊层次综合评价法的产城融合程度测评——以沈阳经济区为例[J].沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版),2015,8(5):425-435.
[11] 郑宝华,朱佳翔.国家自主创新示范区产城融合度评价[J].统计与决策,2016(18):65-68.
[12] SU L,JIA J J.Empirical Research about the Degree of City-industry Integration:A Contrast of the Typical Cities in China[J].Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics,2017,20(1):87-100.
[13] SHAO Z.Industry and City Integration[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag,2015:229-239.
[14] 王菲.基于组合赋权和四格象限法的产业集聚区产城融合发展评价研究[J].生态经济,2014,30(3):36-41.
[15] 张明之.产业集聚、新产业区与城市经济空间整合[J].中国软科学,2003(7):119-124.
[16] 谢呈阳,胡汉辉,周海波.新型城镇化背景下“产城融合”的内在机理与作用路径[J].财经研究,2016,42(1):72-82.
[17] 刘欣英.产城融合的影响因素及作用机制[J].经济问题,2016(8):26-29.
[18] 李靖华,郭耀煌.主成分分析用于多指标评价的方法研究——主成分评价[J].管理工程学报,2002,16(1):39-43.
[19] 姚士谋,陈维肖,陈振光,等.新常态下中国新型城镇化的若干问题[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(1):1-4.
[20] 岳隽,古杰.产城融合的概念框架搭建:基于空间组织逻辑的识别与评价[J].城市观察,2015(6):168-177.
[21] 刘路云,郑伯红.基于工业用地扩展的长沙城市空间演变与优化[J].地域研究与开发,2015,34(4):54-59.
[22] 李建伟,刘科伟,刘林.城市新区与城市功能的关联耦合机制[J].地域研究与开发,2016,35(1):15-19.
[23] 王振坡,游斌,王丽艳.基于精明增长的城市新区空间结构优化研究——以天津市滨海新区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2014,33(4):90-95.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |