用户名: 密码: 验证码:
西南民族旅游地形象感知对比研究——以西江千户苗寨、龙脊梯田和傣族园为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative Study on the Image Perception of the Ethnic Tourist Destinations in the Southwest China: Cases Study of Xijiang Miao Village, Longji Terrace and Dai Park
  • 作者:朱中原 ; 王蓉 ; 胡静 ; 李亚娟
  • 英文作者:ZHU Zhongyuan;WANG Rong;HU Jing;LI Yajuan;The College of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University;Wuhan Branch of China Tourism Academy;Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation Hubei Province, Central China Normal University;
  • 关键词:旅游形象感知 ; 民族旅游地 ; 内容分析 ; 社会网络分析
  • 英文关键词:tourism image perception;;ethnic tourist destination;;content analysis;;social network analysis
  • 中文刊名:中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版)
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology(Social Sciences)
  • 机构:华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院;中国旅游研究院武汉分院;华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-15
  • 出版单位:中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目“旅游扶贫背景下山地民族社区生计方式变迁与社区重构研究”(41601127);; 教育部哲学社会科学发展报告项目“中国旅游业发展报告”(11JBGP041)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:105-111
  • 页数:7
  • CN:43-1478/F
  • ISSN:1673-9272
  • 分类号:F592.7
摘要
基于网络点评数据,以西江千户苗寨、龙脊梯田、傣族园西南地区三大著名的民族旅游地为案例地,综合运用内容分析法和社会网络分析法,分别从认知形象和情感形象两个维度对比分析了旅游者对三大民族旅游地形象感知的特征和差异,研究发现:旅游者对这三大民族旅游地的形象认知存在着明显的差异,且三大民族旅游地分别类属于三种不同的旅游体验类型,西江千户苗寨是民俗风情体验型的代表,龙脊梯田是典型的田园风光体验型,而傣族园则为综合型的代表;旅游者对三大民族旅游地均持相对积极的情感态度,整体满意度较高,且旅游者对三大民族旅游地的特色餐饮和民宿客栈的关注度均较高。
        As Xijiang Miao Village, Longji Terrace and Dai Park are the famous ethnic tourist destinations in southwest China, taking the three destinations as the study areas, used the content analysis and social network analysis methods to analyze the perceived image characteristics and differences among the three destinations based on network comments.It is found that:(1) There is remarkable difference among the tourists' perceived image of the three destinations, and the three areas belong to three different types of tourism experience destinations respectively. Xijiang Miao village is the representative folk custom experience destination, Longji terrace is the typical pastoral experience destination, and the Dai Park is the integrated tourism destination.(2)Tourists are holding relatively positive emotional attitude toward to the three destinations, and they are more concerned about the local special dining and B&B.
引文
[1]PIKE S.Destination image analysis:a review of 142 papers from1973 to 2000[J].Tourism Management,2002(23):541-549.
    [2]GROSSPIETSCH M.Perceived and projected images of Rwanda:Visitor and international tour operator perspectives[J].Tourism Management,2006(27):225-234.
    [3]GARTNER W C.Image Formation Process[J].Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing,1993(2):199-212.
    [4]谢朝武,黄远水.论旅游地形象策划的参与型组织模式[J].旅游学刊,2002,17(2):63-67.
    [5]BALOGLU S,MCCLEARY K W.A model of destination image formation[J].Annals of Tourism Research,1999,26(4):868-897.
    [6]王纯阳,屈海林.旅游动机、目的地形象与旅游者期望.旅游学刊[J].2013,28(6):26-37.
    [7]ZHANG H,WU Y,BUHALIS D.A model of perceived image,memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention[J].Journal of Destination Marketing&Management,2018,8(6):326-336.
    [8]ESTELA M R,SALVADOR A C.Perceived image specialization in multiscalar tourism destinations[J].Journal of Destination Marketing&Management,2016,5(3):202-213.
    [9]程金龙.城市旅游形象感知的机理研究[J].人文地理,2011,26(3):142-146.
    [10]刘智兴,马耀峰,高楠,等.山岳型旅游目的地形象感知研究——以五台山风景名胜区为例[J].山地学报,2013,31(3):370-376.
    [11]史坤博,杨永春.大陆大学生在台湾的旅游动机及旅游形象感知评价[J].资源科学,2015,37(3):593-604.
    [12]ZHANG H M,WU Y.Dimitrios Buhalis,A model of perceived image,memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention[J].Journal of Destination Marketing&Management,2018(8):326-336.
    [13]HUNTER W C.The social construction of tourism online destination image:A comparative semiotic analysis of the visual representation of Seoul[J].Tourism Management,2016(54):221-229.
    [14]MAK A H N.Online destination image:Comparing national tourism organization’s and tourists’perspectives[J].Tourism Management,2017(60):280-297.
    [15]冯志伟,吴悦芳,徐红罡.东道国视域下中国出境游客形象的塑造与认知——基于泰国媒体文本挖掘视角[J].热带地理,2017,37(4):462-472.
    [16]李萍,陈田,王甫园,等.基于文本挖掘的城市旅游社区形象感知研究——以北京市为例[J].地理研究,2017,36(6):1106-1122.
    [17]朱翠兰,侯志强.基于网络口碑的旅游目的地形象感知——以厦门市为例[J].热带地理,2013,33(4):489-495.
    [18]陈志军,杨洪,刘嘉毅,等.基于崀山游客旅游形象感知的形象重塑和传播研究——博客+文本挖掘法视角[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,9(2):44-50.
    [19]赵鹏宇,冯文勇,张慧,等.世界文化景观遗产型旅游目的地形象感知研究——以五台山为例[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2015,9(4):44-49.
    [20]张高军,李君轶,张柳.华山风景区旅游形象感知研究——基于游客网络日志的文本分析[J].旅游科学,2011,25(4):87-94.
    [21]ZHOU L X.Online rural destination images:Tourism and rurality[J].Journal of Destination Marketing&Management,2014,3(4):227-240.
    [22]陈翠婷,罗明春.靖港古镇旅游形象游客感知与官方传播对比研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018,12(4):88-93.
    [23]宋炳华,马耀峰,高楠,等.基于网络文本的TDI感知探究——平遥古城实证分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(3):202-208.
    [24]DOERFEL M L,BARNETT G A.A semantic network analysis of the international communication association[J].Human Communication Research.1999(254):589-603.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700