大庆石化乙烯扩建工程地震安全性评价
|
摘要
大庆石化分公司 80 万吨乙烯扩建工程属于大型工矿工程,并且属于受地震破坏后可能引发严重次生灾害的建设工程,按照我国相关法规和条例,必须进行场地地震安全性评价。本文结合工程具体特征,提出了场地地震安全性评价的主要任务,主要包括:按Ⅱ级标准完成地震安全性评价的工作内容;完成对大庆石化总厂高压聚乙烯装置改造工程场址的地震安全性评价工作;对场址给出 50 年超越概率3%、10%和 63%地表水平向设计地震动反应谱和加速度时程(阻尼比为 5%)。
针对所确定的主要工作任务,本文主要进行了如下几个方面的工作:地震活动环境评价;区域及近场区地震地质构造评价;场址地震危险性分析;场地勘探及土层波速测试;场地土层反应分析;设计地震动参数确定。
在大量的地震地质资料收集整理及系统的地震活动性分析工作的基础上,通过对工程场址区域和近场区地震构造、地震活动环境分析、地震危险性分析与地震反应分析计算,得出了大庆石化乙烯扩建工程场地地震动峰值加速度及其设计反应谱参数等地震安全性评价的主要评价参数。同时评价结果表明,场地 50 年超越概率 10%的烈度值为该场址的基本地震烈度,建筑场地稳定性以及适应性较好、无不良地质现象。评价结论为工程建设的可行性研究、规划设计以及制定防震减灾对策提供了科学的依据。
The 800 000 tons ethane extending project of Petrifaction Filial Factory in Daqing is a large project. It is a construction project which would arise serious by-disaster after earthquake. According to the interrelated codes and principles in China, a workaround safety evaluation must be performed. This paper presents the major task of workaround earthquake safety evaluation by combining the very properties of the project, including performing earthquake safety evaluation according to the II grade Standard, completing the workaround earthquake safety evaluation of Daqing Petrifaction Chief Factory high pressure polythene rebuilding project, and presenting the 3%, 10% and 63% super probabilities within 50 years of superficial horizontal design earthquake response and acceleration transient( the damp ratio is 5%).
According to the planned major task, this paper performs as follows: evaluating the earthquake active circumstances, evaluating earthquake region and adjacent workaround geology conformation, analyzing workaround earthquake risk, surveying workaround and testing ground wave velocity, analyzing workaround earth layer response, and conforming the design earthquake dynamic parameters.
On the basis of a large account of earthquake geology information collection and analyzing the system earthquake activity, by working out the project workaround and adjacent area earthquake conformation, analysis of earthquake active circumstances, analysis of earthquake risk and response, this paper concludes the major earthquake safety evaluation parameters of Daqing Petrifaction ethane extending project workaround earthquake peak values and design earthquake response. The evaluation presents that the workaround intensity of 10% super probability within 50 years is its basic earthquake intensity. The stability and adaptability of this building is good, without any bad geology phenomenon. The evaluation conclusion presents scientific supports for the feasible research of construction, plan, quakeproof and disaster reduction treasures to take.
针对所确定的主要工作任务,本文主要进行了如下几个方面的工作:地震活动环境评价;区域及近场区地震地质构造评价;场址地震危险性分析;场地勘探及土层波速测试;场地土层反应分析;设计地震动参数确定。
在大量的地震地质资料收集整理及系统的地震活动性分析工作的基础上,通过对工程场址区域和近场区地震构造、地震活动环境分析、地震危险性分析与地震反应分析计算,得出了大庆石化乙烯扩建工程场地地震动峰值加速度及其设计反应谱参数等地震安全性评价的主要评价参数。同时评价结果表明,场地 50 年超越概率 10%的烈度值为该场址的基本地震烈度,建筑场地稳定性以及适应性较好、无不良地质现象。评价结论为工程建设的可行性研究、规划设计以及制定防震减灾对策提供了科学的依据。
The 800 000 tons ethane extending project of Petrifaction Filial Factory in Daqing is a large project. It is a construction project which would arise serious by-disaster after earthquake. According to the interrelated codes and principles in China, a workaround safety evaluation must be performed. This paper presents the major task of workaround earthquake safety evaluation by combining the very properties of the project, including performing earthquake safety evaluation according to the II grade Standard, completing the workaround earthquake safety evaluation of Daqing Petrifaction Chief Factory high pressure polythene rebuilding project, and presenting the 3%, 10% and 63% super probabilities within 50 years of superficial horizontal design earthquake response and acceleration transient( the damp ratio is 5%).
According to the planned major task, this paper performs as follows: evaluating the earthquake active circumstances, evaluating earthquake region and adjacent workaround geology conformation, analyzing workaround earthquake risk, surveying workaround and testing ground wave velocity, analyzing workaround earth layer response, and conforming the design earthquake dynamic parameters.
On the basis of a large account of earthquake geology information collection and analyzing the system earthquake activity, by working out the project workaround and adjacent area earthquake conformation, analysis of earthquake active circumstances, analysis of earthquake risk and response, this paper concludes the major earthquake safety evaluation parameters of Daqing Petrifaction ethane extending project workaround earthquake peak values and design earthquake response. The evaluation presents that the workaround intensity of 10% super probability within 50 years is its basic earthquake intensity. The stability and adaptability of this building is good, without any bad geology phenomenon. The evaluation conclusion presents scientific supports for the feasible research of construction, plan, quakeproof and disaster reduction treasures to take.
引文
[1] 张丽.浅谈地震安全性评价报告的编辑与排版.山西地震, 2003.3, 29-30
[2] 邹其嘉,陶裕禄.地震安全性评价效益评估的探讨. 地震学报, 2004, 26(1), 84-93
[3] 龚湘湖. 剪切波速测试及其在地震安全性评价工作中的应用. 岩土工程界, 2000, 3(10), 52-54.
[4] 胡钧,刘小青. 电力工程场地地震安全性评价工作研究. 电力勘测, 2001, 1, 23-26
[5] 杜国林,薛仲新,韦庆海. 潜在震源区划分对地震安全性评价的影响. 东北地震研究, 2001, 17(2), 75-81
[6] 孙静,袁晓铭,孙锐. 土动剪切模量和阻尼比的推荐值和规范值的合理性比较. 地震工 程与工程振动. 2004, 24(2),126-135
[7] 国家标准:工程场地地震安全性评价技术规范(GB17741—1999)国家质量技术监督局, 1999
[8] 国家标准:构筑物抗震设计规范(GB50191—93).中华人民共和国冶金工业部,1994
[9] 廖振鹏等. 地震小区划. 北京, 地震出版社, 1990. 1-150
[10] 胡聿贤著. 地震工程学. 北京, 地震出版社, 1998. 38-90
[11] 吴戈等. 东北大陆历史地震研究. 成都, 成都地图出版社, 1988. 全部
[12] 谢毓寿主编. 中国历史地震资料汇编. 1986
[13] 国家地震局分析预报中心. 中国东部地震目录. 1980
[14] 黑龙江省地震局. 黑龙江省地震目录. 1980
[15] 黑龙江省地震局分析预报中心. 黑龙江省地震台网报告. 1972—2001
[16] 吉林省地震局分析预报中心. 吉林省地震台网报告. 1972—2001
[17] 辽宁省地震局分析预报中心. 辽宁省地震台网报告. 1972—2001
[18] 内蒙地震局分析预报中心. 内蒙古自治区地震台网报告.1972—2001
[19] 郭良迁等. 东北断块区的现代地壳垂直形变及其垂直形变的意义. 东北地震研究, 1990.6 (2)34-37
[20] 大庆油田科学研究设计院. 松辽盆地石油地质研究报告汇编. 1977
[21] 卢振恒等. 地震区划与抗震防灾研究. 北京 地震出版社, 1989. 25-69
[22] 魏柏林等. 震源机制变化的机理—转换应力场. 北京 地震出版社, 1992.30-73
[23] 陈禺页等. 地震危险性分析和震害预测. 北京 地震出版社, 1999,56-69
[24] 杜国林等. 哈尔滨高新技术开发区场址砂土液化评价与抗液化措施. 东北地震研究. 2001. 17(2), 40-43
[25] 方明远等. 牡丹江市地震小区划工作中的技术思路. 东北地震研究. 2001.17(1):43-46
[26] 韦庆海等. 浅析现代物探技术在工程地震中的应用. 东北地震研究. 2001. 2001.17(1), 76-80
[27] 丁原章等. 水库诱发地震. 北京, 地震出版社, 1989.74-82
[28] 蒋溥,戴丽思等. 工程地震学概论. 北京, 地震出版社, 1993.102-119
[29] 赵成刚, 冯启民等. 生命线地震工程. 北京, 地震出版社, 1994.1-27
[30] 廖振鹏, 金星等. 重大工程场地设计地震动与地震动场的研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 1992.8(1)12-17
[31] 袁晓铭, 孙悦, 孙静等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究. 地震工程与工程振 动. 2000.20(4)134-141
[32] 中国地震局工程力学研究所. 哈尔滨市轨道交通一期工程场地地震安全性评价报告. 2003.11
[33] 马杏垣,丁国瑜等. 中国岩石圈动力学图集. 北京,中国地图出版社, 1989
[34] Zou Qijia, Tao Yulu. Research on the Effect Estimation of Seismic Safety Evaluation. ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA. 2004 VoL17(1) 87-99
[35] Shen Jian-wen Shi Shu-zhong. Large, Moderate, Small Earthquakes and Seismic Fortification Criterion. ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA. 2004 VoL17(5) 589-595
[36] Wang, Jenmu and Yimin Chen. An Information System for Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of RC Buildings. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. April 3~5, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 495-500 (2002)
[37] Buckle I G, Cooper J D. Mitigation of Seismic Damages to Lifelines: Highways and Railroads. Schiff A. T. Edited. Critical Issues and State of Art in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. New York: ASCE, 1995: 121～126
[38] Kun Yuan, Zhuang Yong, Lin Xu. Influence of Long Period Seismic Waves Induced by the Taiwan Large Earthquake on Shanghai Area. ACTA SE ISMOLO G ICA S IN ICA Vol. 10 No. 6(783～790)
[39] Huang Weiqiong, Wu Xuan. Influence of Statistical Time Range on Estimating Seismicity Parameters. ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA Vol.14 No.6 (626~633)
[40] Huang Weiqiong, Shi Zhenliang, Cao Xuefeng. 1990. Factors Influencing the Estimation of B Value and Selection of B Value in Hazard Analysis [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3(4): 421~436
[41] Huang Weiqiong, Li Wenxiang. 1998. Determining the Time and Space Domains for Estimating B Value in Seismic Zoning [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(5): 517~522
[42] Wang Zanjun, Yuan Keming, Zhang Ruibin. Styles and Characteristics of the Surface Rupture of the West Kunlun Mountains Earthquake with Ms 811 Plateau Earthquake Rsearch, 2002, 14 (1): 17-25
[43] Ellingwood B R. Probability-based Codified Design for Earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 1994. 16(7): 498~506
[2] 邹其嘉,陶裕禄.地震安全性评价效益评估的探讨. 地震学报, 2004, 26(1), 84-93
[3] 龚湘湖. 剪切波速测试及其在地震安全性评价工作中的应用. 岩土工程界, 2000, 3(10), 52-54.
[4] 胡钧,刘小青. 电力工程场地地震安全性评价工作研究. 电力勘测, 2001, 1, 23-26
[5] 杜国林,薛仲新,韦庆海. 潜在震源区划分对地震安全性评价的影响. 东北地震研究, 2001, 17(2), 75-81
[6] 孙静,袁晓铭,孙锐. 土动剪切模量和阻尼比的推荐值和规范值的合理性比较. 地震工 程与工程振动. 2004, 24(2),126-135
[7] 国家标准:工程场地地震安全性评价技术规范(GB17741—1999)国家质量技术监督局, 1999
[8] 国家标准:构筑物抗震设计规范(GB50191—93).中华人民共和国冶金工业部,1994
[9] 廖振鹏等. 地震小区划. 北京, 地震出版社, 1990. 1-150
[10] 胡聿贤著. 地震工程学. 北京, 地震出版社, 1998. 38-90
[11] 吴戈等. 东北大陆历史地震研究. 成都, 成都地图出版社, 1988. 全部
[12] 谢毓寿主编. 中国历史地震资料汇编. 1986
[13] 国家地震局分析预报中心. 中国东部地震目录. 1980
[14] 黑龙江省地震局. 黑龙江省地震目录. 1980
[15] 黑龙江省地震局分析预报中心. 黑龙江省地震台网报告. 1972—2001
[16] 吉林省地震局分析预报中心. 吉林省地震台网报告. 1972—2001
[17] 辽宁省地震局分析预报中心. 辽宁省地震台网报告. 1972—2001
[18] 内蒙地震局分析预报中心. 内蒙古自治区地震台网报告.1972—2001
[19] 郭良迁等. 东北断块区的现代地壳垂直形变及其垂直形变的意义. 东北地震研究, 1990.6 (2)34-37
[20] 大庆油田科学研究设计院. 松辽盆地石油地质研究报告汇编. 1977
[21] 卢振恒等. 地震区划与抗震防灾研究. 北京 地震出版社, 1989. 25-69
[22] 魏柏林等. 震源机制变化的机理—转换应力场. 北京 地震出版社, 1992.30-73
[23] 陈禺页等. 地震危险性分析和震害预测. 北京 地震出版社, 1999,56-69
[24] 杜国林等. 哈尔滨高新技术开发区场址砂土液化评价与抗液化措施. 东北地震研究. 2001. 17(2), 40-43
[25] 方明远等. 牡丹江市地震小区划工作中的技术思路. 东北地震研究. 2001.17(1):43-46
[26] 韦庆海等. 浅析现代物探技术在工程地震中的应用. 东北地震研究. 2001. 2001.17(1), 76-80
[27] 丁原章等. 水库诱发地震. 北京, 地震出版社, 1989.74-82
[28] 蒋溥,戴丽思等. 工程地震学概论. 北京, 地震出版社, 1993.102-119
[29] 赵成刚, 冯启民等. 生命线地震工程. 北京, 地震出版社, 1994.1-27
[30] 廖振鹏, 金星等. 重大工程场地设计地震动与地震动场的研究. 地震工程与工程振动. 1992.8(1)12-17
[31] 袁晓铭, 孙悦, 孙静等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究. 地震工程与工程振 动. 2000.20(4)134-141
[32] 中国地震局工程力学研究所. 哈尔滨市轨道交通一期工程场地地震安全性评价报告. 2003.11
[33] 马杏垣,丁国瑜等. 中国岩石圈动力学图集. 北京,中国地图出版社, 1989
[34] Zou Qijia, Tao Yulu. Research on the Effect Estimation of Seismic Safety Evaluation. ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA. 2004 VoL17(1) 87-99
[35] Shen Jian-wen Shi Shu-zhong. Large, Moderate, Small Earthquakes and Seismic Fortification Criterion. ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA. 2004 VoL17(5) 589-595
[36] Wang, Jenmu and Yimin Chen. An Information System for Seismic Evaluation and Rehabilitation of RC Buildings. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. April 3~5, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 495-500 (2002)
[37] Buckle I G, Cooper J D. Mitigation of Seismic Damages to Lifelines: Highways and Railroads. Schiff A. T. Edited. Critical Issues and State of Art in Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. New York: ASCE, 1995: 121～126
[38] Kun Yuan, Zhuang Yong, Lin Xu. Influence of Long Period Seismic Waves Induced by the Taiwan Large Earthquake on Shanghai Area. ACTA SE ISMOLO G ICA S IN ICA Vol. 10 No. 6(783～790)
[39] Huang Weiqiong, Wu Xuan. Influence of Statistical Time Range on Estimating Seismicity Parameters. ACTA SEISMOLOGICA SINICA Vol.14 No.6 (626~633)
[40] Huang Weiqiong, Shi Zhenliang, Cao Xuefeng. 1990. Factors Influencing the Estimation of B Value and Selection of B Value in Hazard Analysis [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 3(4): 421~436
[41] Huang Weiqiong, Li Wenxiang. 1998. Determining the Time and Space Domains for Estimating B Value in Seismic Zoning [J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 11(5): 517~522
[42] Wang Zanjun, Yuan Keming, Zhang Ruibin. Styles and Characteristics of the Surface Rupture of the West Kunlun Mountains Earthquake with Ms 811 Plateau Earthquake Rsearch, 2002, 14 (1): 17-25
[43] Ellingwood B R. Probability-based Codified Design for Earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 1994. 16(7): 498~506
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |