鄂西黄陵花岗岩岩基岩石大地构造学研究
|
摘要
鄂西黄陵花岗岩岩基位于扬子地台北缘,是我国新元古代晋宁期花岗岩的典型代表之一:与汉南、鲤鱼寨岩基一起构成了扬子地台北缘的低钾花岗岩带,属晋宁晚期(833Ma～770Ma)扬子地块北侧的“秦岭洋”向南俯冲造成大陆边缘造山运动的产物。
依据侵入岩演化序列理论、按照岩石谱系单位建立的依据,经调查研究将黄陵岩基分解为四个岩套、十五个单元;依序为:板块碰撞造山前的三斗坪岩套(石英辉长岩-英云闪长岩系)、黄陵庙岩套(奥长花岗岩-淡色花岗闪长岩系)、板块碰撞造山隆起的大老岭岩套(二长闪长岩-二长花岗岩系)、造山晚期的晓峰岩套(石英二长闪长玢岩-花岗闪长斑岩系)以及造山期后的A型花岗岩。
地球化学特征显示这些岩套为钙碱性系列Ⅰ型花岗岩—A型花岗岩组合;三斗坪岩套、黄陵庙岩套为同源岩浆分异演化序列。Nd、Sr同位素研究表明黄陵岩基具有不同的源岩。三斗坪岩套和黄陵庙岩套源岩主要起源于受壳-幔混合作用影响的太古宙“北崆岭群”;大老岭岩套和晓峰岩套的源岩则可能为较“北崆岭群”稍年轻些的镁铁质或高钾钙碱性变质火成岩。对岩体中镁铁质微粒包体及其寄主岩石的研究表明:它们都是熔融岩浆结晶的产物,是岩浆混合作用的标志。
通过岩体构造及其侵位机制研究,认为三斗坪岩套、黄陵庙岩套是在近南北向区域挤压应力场中于深部塑性域定位的同构造花岗岩,前者依靠岩浆沿构造弱面逐次强力楔入创造定位空间,后者则在近东西向剪切作用和岩浆流体压力双重影响下侵入定位。大老岭和晓峰岩套则是在引张环境下在相当于地壳浅部脆性域定位的构造晚期花岗岩。
运用岩石人地构造学理论,经综合分析对比,黄陵岩基的形成与当时北侧的“秦岭洋”板块向扬子板块俯冲的碰撞消减机制有关,分别形成了板块碰撞前、碰撞后隆起期、造山晚期和造山期后的花岗岩系列;晓峰岩墙群和A型花岗岩属扬子地块北缘标志性裂解事件的产物。研究认为:黄陵岩基的形成可能代表了新元古代扬子地块北缘统一古陆块的形成固结,于800Ma±古陆块发生伸展、裂解,并向显生宙构造格局转化的过程;而裂解事件可能预示着Rodinia超大陆破裂的开始。
Huangling granite batholith ,along with Hannan and Liyuzai granite batholith,constructs a low-K granite belt in the northern periphery of Yangtze Platform.It was formed during the orogenetic process of "Qinling Ocean" subduction toward southern Yangtze Plate in the late Proterozoic(833Ma~770Ma).It is disintegrated into 4 suites, comprising 15 units, and the invading sequence successively is Sand-ouping quartz tonalite suites and Huanglingmiao trondjiemite-light-colored granodolerite suites of pre-plate collision, Dalaoling monzonite granite suites of post-plate collsion uplift, Xiaofeng quartz monzonite dior-itic porphyrite suites of late-orogenic and A-type granite of post- orogenic.Geochemistry characteristics shows that Huangling granite batholith belongs to calc-alkalic series I-type granite and A- ype granite association. Sandouping suites and Huanglingmiao suites are comagmatic evolution series. Nd and Sr Isotope geochemical data indicates that Huangling granite batholith had different source rock. Sandouping and Huanglingmiao suites were formed by magma of Late Archeozic Kongling" group. Daoling and Xiaofeng suits are probably derived from mafic or H-K calc-alkalic igenous rock slightly youger than the former. Study on mafic microgranular enclave and its host rock of Huangling granite batholith reveals that they were magma crystallized products .It is symbol of magma mixing.Sandouping and Huanglingmiao suites are syntectonic granitonic emplaced at the ductile domain about 16 km deep under the action of SN-strikingregional compression. Dalaoling and Xiaofeng suites are late-tectonic granitoids emplaced at the brittle domain formed during rapid uplift and stretche of the crust.Emplacement ages of Huangling granite batholith are between 833 and 770 Ma. And caused by the subduction occurred beneath northern Yangtze plate during late Proterozoic. Xiaofeng dyke and A-type granite make up of the indicative breaking-up events along the northern margin of Yangtze plate. The forming of Huangling granite batholith probably represents concretion of united block along Yangtze Platefrom in Neoproterozoic, stretching and rifting of the united block in 800Ma.
依据侵入岩演化序列理论、按照岩石谱系单位建立的依据,经调查研究将黄陵岩基分解为四个岩套、十五个单元;依序为:板块碰撞造山前的三斗坪岩套(石英辉长岩-英云闪长岩系)、黄陵庙岩套(奥长花岗岩-淡色花岗闪长岩系)、板块碰撞造山隆起的大老岭岩套(二长闪长岩-二长花岗岩系)、造山晚期的晓峰岩套(石英二长闪长玢岩-花岗闪长斑岩系)以及造山期后的A型花岗岩。
地球化学特征显示这些岩套为钙碱性系列Ⅰ型花岗岩—A型花岗岩组合;三斗坪岩套、黄陵庙岩套为同源岩浆分异演化序列。Nd、Sr同位素研究表明黄陵岩基具有不同的源岩。三斗坪岩套和黄陵庙岩套源岩主要起源于受壳-幔混合作用影响的太古宙“北崆岭群”;大老岭岩套和晓峰岩套的源岩则可能为较“北崆岭群”稍年轻些的镁铁质或高钾钙碱性变质火成岩。对岩体中镁铁质微粒包体及其寄主岩石的研究表明:它们都是熔融岩浆结晶的产物,是岩浆混合作用的标志。
通过岩体构造及其侵位机制研究,认为三斗坪岩套、黄陵庙岩套是在近南北向区域挤压应力场中于深部塑性域定位的同构造花岗岩,前者依靠岩浆沿构造弱面逐次强力楔入创造定位空间,后者则在近东西向剪切作用和岩浆流体压力双重影响下侵入定位。大老岭和晓峰岩套则是在引张环境下在相当于地壳浅部脆性域定位的构造晚期花岗岩。
运用岩石人地构造学理论,经综合分析对比,黄陵岩基的形成与当时北侧的“秦岭洋”板块向扬子板块俯冲的碰撞消减机制有关,分别形成了板块碰撞前、碰撞后隆起期、造山晚期和造山期后的花岗岩系列;晓峰岩墙群和A型花岗岩属扬子地块北缘标志性裂解事件的产物。研究认为:黄陵岩基的形成可能代表了新元古代扬子地块北缘统一古陆块的形成固结,于800Ma±古陆块发生伸展、裂解,并向显生宙构造格局转化的过程;而裂解事件可能预示着Rodinia超大陆破裂的开始。
Huangling granite batholith ,along with Hannan and Liyuzai granite batholith,constructs a low-K granite belt in the northern periphery of Yangtze Platform.It was formed during the orogenetic process of "Qinling Ocean" subduction toward southern Yangtze Plate in the late Proterozoic(833Ma~770Ma).It is disintegrated into 4 suites, comprising 15 units, and the invading sequence successively is Sand-ouping quartz tonalite suites and Huanglingmiao trondjiemite-light-colored granodolerite suites of pre-plate collision, Dalaoling monzonite granite suites of post-plate collsion uplift, Xiaofeng quartz monzonite dior-itic porphyrite suites of late-orogenic and A-type granite of post- orogenic.Geochemistry characteristics shows that Huangling granite batholith belongs to calc-alkalic series I-type granite and A- ype granite association. Sandouping suites and Huanglingmiao suites are comagmatic evolution series. Nd and Sr Isotope geochemical data indicates that Huangling granite batholith had different source rock. Sandouping and Huanglingmiao suites were formed by magma of Late Archeozic Kongling" group. Daoling and Xiaofeng suits are probably derived from mafic or H-K calc-alkalic igenous rock slightly youger than the former. Study on mafic microgranular enclave and its host rock of Huangling granite batholith reveals that they were magma crystallized products .It is symbol of magma mixing.Sandouping and Huanglingmiao suites are syntectonic granitonic emplaced at the ductile domain about 16 km deep under the action of SN-strikingregional compression. Dalaoling and Xiaofeng suites are late-tectonic granitoids emplaced at the brittle domain formed during rapid uplift and stretche of the crust.Emplacement ages of Huangling granite batholith are between 833 and 770 Ma. And caused by the subduction occurred beneath northern Yangtze plate during late Proterozoic. Xiaofeng dyke and A-type granite make up of the indicative breaking-up events along the northern margin of Yangtze plate. The forming of Huangling granite batholith probably represents concretion of united block along Yangtze Platefrom in Neoproterozoic, stretching and rifting of the united block in 800Ma.
引文
[1] 地矿部南岭项目花岗岩专题组.南岭花岗岩地质及其成因和地矿作用.北京:地质出版社,1989.1～471.
[2] 董申保.近代花岗岩研究的回顾.高校地质学报.1995,1(2):1～12
[3] 李昌年.火成岩微量元素岩石学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992
[4] 李志昌,王桂华,张自超.鄂西黄陵花岗岩基同位素年龄谱.华南地质与矿产,2002,71(3):19～28
[5] 李江海.前寒武纪的超大陆旋回及其板块构造演化意义.地学前缘,1998,5(增刊):141～151
[6] 李江海,何文渊,钱祥麟.元古代基性岩墙群的成因机制、构造背景及其古板块再造意义.高校地质学报,1997,3(3):272～281
[7] 李献华.广西北部新元古代花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学及其构造意义.地球化学,1999,28:1～9
[8] 凌文黎,王歆华,程建萍.扬子北缘晋宁期望江山基性岩体的地球化学特征及其构造背景.矿物岩石地球化学通报,2001,20:218～221
[9] 冯定犹,李志昌,张自超.黄陵花岗岩基南部岩体侵入时代和同位素特征.湖北地质,1991,5(2):1～12
[10] 高山,金振民.拆沉作用及其壳幔演化动力学意义.地质科技情报,1997,16:1～8
[11] 洪大卫.碱性花岗岩的构造环境分类极其鉴别标志.中国科学(B辑),1995,25:418～426
[12] 湖北省地矿局鄂西地质大队.黄陵花岗岩基侵入期次、时代及成因.1992
[13] 胡世玲,刘鸿允,王松山等.据~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar快中子年龄新资料讨论震旦系底界年龄.地质科学,1989,1:16～25
[14] 马昌前,王人镜,邱家镶.花岗质岩浆起源和多次岩浆混合的标志:包体—以北京周口店岩体为例.1992,地质论评,38(2):109～119
[15] Malcolm P R,John D C.高钾钙碱性Ⅰ型花岗岩类的成因(懂传万 译).世界地质,1994,13(4):8～11
[16] 马国干,张自超,等.华南地区震旦纪时限范围的研究.宜昌地质矿产研究所刊,1984,8:1～29
[17] 马大铨,杜绍华,肖志发.黄陵花岗岩基的成因.岩石矿物学杂志,2002,21(2):151～161
[18] 马大铨,李志昌,肖志发.鄂西崆岭杂岩的组成、时代及地质演化.地球学报,1997,1(3):233～241
[19] 任富根,孙忠和等.汉中纲厂晚元古代火山—侵入岩的特征及相关地层对比.天津地质矿产研究所所刊,1989.21:75～87
[20] 穆克敏等.华北地台区花岗岩质岩石的成因.吉林:吉林科技出版社,1989
[21] 谭东娟,林景仟.华北地台中生代钾质岩浆区.北京:地震出版社,1994
[22] 陶洪祥,高肇英,王庆金等.扬子板块西北缘高压低温蓝片岩带的地质特征.西安地质学院学报,1986,(2):23～31
[23] 涂光炽,张玉泉,赵振华.华南两个富碱侵入岩带的初步研究.见徐克勤、涂光炽主编,花岗岩地质和成矿关系.南京:江苏科学技术出版社.1984
[24] 王德滋,沈渭洲.中国东南部花岗岩成因与地壳演化.地学前缘,2003,10(3):209～220
[25] 王德滋,周金城.我国花岗岩的研究与回顾.岩石学报,1999,15(2):161～169
[26] 王德滋,刘昌实.中国东南部沿海海西-印支旋回花岗岩类的分布规律及其成因.岩石学报,1986,2(4):12～31
[27] 王剑.华南新元古代裂谷盆地演化:兼论与Rodinia解体的关系.北京:地质出版社,2000
[28] 王式洸,姜常义,王廷印等.太行山北段某些燕山期花岗岩类岩石中黑云母和角闪石的化学特征,国际花岗岩地质和成矿关系论文集,1982,21～37
[29] 肖庆辉,邓晋福,马大铨等.花岗岩研究思维与方法.北京:地质出版社,2004
[30] 邢凤鸣.锶同位素比值在划分花岗岩成因类型的应用探讨.岩石学报,3(2):75～78
[31] 熊成云,韦昌山,金光富.鄂西黄陵背斜地区前南华纪古构造格架及主要地质事件.地质力学学报,2004,10(2):98～112
[32] 熊成云,韦昌山,金光富.鄂西黄陵背斜核部中段金矿基本特征及成矿规律.华南地质与矿产,1991,1:32～48
[33] 徐夕生,周新民,O'Reilly S Y,唐红峰.中国东南部下地壳物质与花岗岩成因探索.岩石学报,1999,15(2):217～223
[34] 徐夕生,周新民.广东麒麟新生代玄武质角砾岩筒中岩石包体研究.岩石学报,1995,11(4):441～448
[35] 颜丹平,周美夫,宋鸿林等.华南在Rodinia古陆块位置的讨论.地学前缘,2002,9(4):249～256
[36] 阎国翰,许宝良,牟保磊.房山岩体中闪长质包体的矿物稀土元素地球化学及其包体成因.中国科学,B辑,1995,25(2):219～224
[37] 严阵.陕西省花岗岩.西安:西安交通大学出版社,1985
[38] 杨巍然.东秦岭“开”、“合”史.地球科学,1987,12:487～493
[39] 袁万明,白宜真.北京大庄科花岗杂岩微粒-细粒包体成因及其定位的动力学机理.“花岗岩中岩石包体学术讨论会”论文摘要集,24,1990.
[40] 张德全,孙桂英.中国东部花岗岩.武汉:中国地质出版社,1988
[41] 张成立,周鼎武,刘颖宇.武当山地块基性岩墙群地球化学研究及其大地构造意义.地球化学,1999,28(2):126～135
[42] 张宏飞,骆庭川,张本仁.扬子克拉通北缘岛弧型花岗岩成分极性及其形成原因的地球化学讨论.地球科学.1994a,19(2):219～226
[43] 张宏飞,骆庭川,张本仁.陕西船铁山岩体的地球化学特征、成因及形成的构造环境.现代地质.1994b,8(4):453～158
[44] 张儒瑗,丛伯林.矿物温度计和矿物压力计.北京:地质出版社,1983
[45] 曾雯,钟增球,周汉文等.黄陵地区基性岩墙群的地球化学特征及其地质意义.地球科学,2004,29(1):31～37
[46] 郑永飞.新元古代超大陆构型中华南的位置.科学通报,2004,49(8):715～717
[47] 周鼎武,张成立,刘良,王居里,刘颖宇.武当地块基性岩墙群的Sm-Nd定年及其相关问题讨论.地球学报,1998,19(1):25～30
[48] 周鼎武,张成立,王居里等.武当地块基性岩墙群研究及其地质意义,科学通报,1997,42(23):2546～2549
[49] 周金城,王孝磊,邱检生,高剑峰.桂北中—新元古代镁铁质-超镁铁质岩的岩石地球化学.岩石学报,2003,19(1):9～18
[50] 周金城,徐夕生.微花岗岩类包体与岩浆的扩散作用和熔离作用—以诸广山桂东、上堡岩体为例.地质论评,1992,33(3):197～204
[51] 周新民.对华南花岗岩研究的若干思考.高校地质学报,2003,9(4):556～5651
[52] 周新民,姚玉鹏,徐夕生.浙东大巨山花岗岩中淬冷包体及其成因机制.岩石学报,1992,8(3):234～242
[53] Adbel Rahman A M. Nature of biotites alkaline, calc- alkaline, and peraluminous magma. Journal of Petrology, 1994, 35:525～541
[54] Arth J G, Barker F, Peterman Z E. et al. Geochemistry of the gabbro-diorite-tonalite-trondhjemite suite of Southwest Finland and its implications for the origin of tonalitic and trondhjemitic magmas. J. Petrol, 1978, 19(2): 289～316
[55] Barbarin B. A eview of the relationships bweteen granitoid type, their origins and their geodynamic environments. Lithos. 1999, 46:605～625
[56] Barbafin B. Granitoids main petrgenetic in relation to origin and tectonic setting. Geol. J. 1990, 25:227～238
[57] Brown M. The generation, segregation, ascent and emplacement of graintemagma: the migmatit-to-crustually -derived grinate connection in thickened orogens. Earth Science Review, 1994, 36, 83～130
[58] Barker F, Arth J G. Generation of trondhjemitic-tonalitic liquids and Archean bimodal trondhjemite-basalt suites. Geology, 1976, 4(10):596～600
[59] Czamanske, G K, Eichelberger, J C. Mineralogy and petrology of the intrusive complex of the Pliuy Range, New Hampshire. Am. J. Sci., 1977, 277:1073～1123
[60] Chappell B W. White A J R.. Two contrasting granite types. Pacific Geol., 1974, 8:173～174
[61] Chivas A R. Geochememical evidence for magmatic fluids in porphyre copper mineralization. Partl. Mafic silicate from the Koloula igneous complex. Contrib. Mineral. Petro., 1981, 78:389～403.
[62] Clemens J D, Holloway J R, White A J R. Origin of an A-type granite: Experimental constrains. Amer. Mineral., 71:317～324
[63] Collins W J, Beams S D White A J R, Chappell B W. Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to Southeastern Austraia. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1982, 80:189～200
[64] Creaser R A, Price R C. A-type granites revisited: Assessment of a residual-source model. Geology, 19:163～166
[65] Dalziel D W. Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctic-A ustralia as a conjugate rift pair: evidence and implication for an Eoncambrine suppercontinent. Geology, 1991, 19:598～601
[66] Debon F, Fefort F. A cationic classification of common plutonic rocks and their associations: principles, method, application. Bull. Mineral., 1988, 11:493～510
[67] Debon F et al. The four plutonic belts of the Transh imalaya—H imalaya: A chemical, mineralogical, isotopic and chronological synthesis along a Tibet—Nepal section. J. Petrol., 1986, 27:219～250
[68] Depaolo J D. A neodymium and strontium isotopic study of the Mesozoic calc2alkaline granitic batholiths of the Sierra Nevada and peninsular Ranges, California. J. Geophys Res, 1981, 86:10470～10488
[69] Duchesne J C, wilmart E. Ignesous chamockites and related rocks from the Bjerkreim-Sokndal layeredintrusion (Southern Norway): a Jounite (hypersthene monzdiorite)-derived A-type granitoid suite. J. Petrol., 1997, 38(3):337～369
[70] Eby G N. Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids: petrogenetic and tectonic implications, Geology, 1992, 20:641～644
[71] Eby G N. The A-type granitoids: Areview of their occurrence and chemical characteristics and speculation on their petrogenesis. Lithos, 1990, 26: 115～～134
[72] Fyfe W S and Leonardos O H. Ancientmetamorphic-migmatitebelts of the Brazibian African coasts. Nature, 1973,224:501-502
[73] Fulong W P et al. Continental crustal underplateing: Thermal consideration and seismic-petrollgia consequence. Geophy Res,1986,91(B8):8285~8294
[74] Hammarstrom J M, Zen E A. Aluminum in hornblende: An empirical igneous geobarometer. American Mineralogists.1986,71: 1297-1313
[75] Hoffman P F. Did the breakup of Laurentia turn Gondwana inside out ? Science, 1991,252 : 1409—1412
[76] Irvine T N. A duide to the chemical classifications of the common volcanic rocks. Canadian. J. Earth. Sci.,1971, 8: 523-548
[77] Johson M C et al. Experimental calibration of the aluminum in hornblende geobarometer with application to long Valley caldera (California) volcanic rocks. Geology, 1989,17:837—841
[78] Kerr A, Fryer B J. Nd isotope evidence for crust-mantle interaction in the generation of A-type granitoid suites in Labrador,Canada .Chem. geol.,1993,104:39~60
[79] Leak B E. Nomenclature of amphibole. Am. Mineral, 1978,67:1023—1052.
[80] Le Maitre, R W. Some problems of the projection of chemical data into mineralogical classifications,Contr. Min. Pet, 1976,56,181-189
[81] Li Z X,Eyans D A W.Zhang S. A 90° spin on Rodinia: possible causal links between the Neoproterozoic supercontinent,superplume,true polar wander and low-latitude glaciation. Earth Plane Sci Lett, 2004, 220: 409—421
[82] Li Z X,Li X H,Zhou H,Kinny P D. Grenvillian continental collision in South China : New SHRIMP U-Pb zircon results and implications for the configuration of Rodinia[J ]. Geology,2002,30 : 163—166
[83] Li Z X, Li X H, Kinny P D, Wang J . The breakup of Rodinia :Did it start with a mantle plume beneath South China ? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett .,1999,173 : 171-181
[84] Li Z X.Zhang L,Powell C M. Positions of the East Asian cratons in the Neoproterozoic supercontinent Ro- dinia Aust. J .Earth Sci, 1996,43 : 593-604
[85] Li Z X,Zhang L,Powell C M. South China in Rodinia: part of the missing link between Australia-East Antarctica and Laurentia?. Geology,1995,23 :407—410
[86] Loiselle M C, Wones P M. Characteristics and origin of grsnites. Geological Society of American Bulletin. 1979,101:635-643
[87] Mason G H. The mineralogy and textures of the Costal Batholith,Peru. In: W. S. Pitcher et ai. (eds), Magmatism at a Plate Edge, Blackie Halsted Press,1985,156—166
[88] Maniar P D, Piccoli P D. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geological society of America Bulletin, 1989, 101: 635-643
[89] Martin H.Bonin B.Capdevila R,et al. The Kuiqi peralkaline granitic comple(SE China): petrology and geochemistry. J. Petrol, 1994,35 (4) 983-1015
[90] Middlemmost E AK. Asimple classification of volcanic rocks. Bulletin of Volcano, 1972, 36: 382—397
[91] Moores E W. South west U. S. —East Antarctic (SWEAT) connection : a hypothesis. Geology, 1991,19 : 425—428
[92] Muschler F E. The precious metal deposits associated with alkaline rocks —a spatial and temoral process in cordillera. Mining Engeralogist, 1991,3: 304—309
[93] Nardi L V S, Bonin B. Post-orogenic and non-orogenic alkaline granite associations: the Saibro intrusive suite .southern Brazil------A case study. Chem. Geol,1991,92:197—211
[94] Park J K. Paleomagnetic constraints on the hypo thesis of Laurentia from middle Neopro— terozoic to early Cambrian times. Precambrian Research, 1994,69: 95—11
[95] Parsons T.Thompson G A, Sleep N H. Mantle plume influence on the Neogene uplift and extension of The U.S. western Cordillera? Geology, 1994,22,83—86
[96] Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of grainitic rocks. J. Petrol, 1984,25: 956—984
[97] Peccerillo A,Taylor S R. Geochemical of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu Area, Northern Turey. J. Petrol,Contrib,Mineral,1976,58: 63—81
[98] Pitcher W S. The Nature and Origin of Granite. London : Chapman & Hall,1993,321
[99] Pitcher W S,Atherton M P, Cobbing E J et al. Magmatism at a plate edge, the Peruvian andes. Blackie and Son, Glasgow,United Kingdom /John Wiley and Sons. New York,United States,1986,p.328
[100] Pitcher W S. Comments on the geological environments of granite. Origin of Granite Batholiths : Geochemical Evidence[M]. [s. 1. ]: Shiva Publishing Limited, 1979. 1—8.
[101] Powell C M, Li Z X, McElhinny M W et al. Paleomagnetic constraints on timing of the Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia and the Cambrian fo rmation of Gondwanaland . Geology, 1993,21: 889—892
[102] Read,H H. Granite controversy. T ,Murby London. 1957,374—398
[2] 董申保.近代花岗岩研究的回顾.高校地质学报.1995,1(2):1～12
[3] 李昌年.火成岩微量元素岩石学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992
[4] 李志昌,王桂华,张自超.鄂西黄陵花岗岩基同位素年龄谱.华南地质与矿产,2002,71(3):19～28
[5] 李江海.前寒武纪的超大陆旋回及其板块构造演化意义.地学前缘,1998,5(增刊):141～151
[6] 李江海,何文渊,钱祥麟.元古代基性岩墙群的成因机制、构造背景及其古板块再造意义.高校地质学报,1997,3(3):272～281
[7] 李献华.广西北部新元古代花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学及其构造意义.地球化学,1999,28:1～9
[8] 凌文黎,王歆华,程建萍.扬子北缘晋宁期望江山基性岩体的地球化学特征及其构造背景.矿物岩石地球化学通报,2001,20:218～221
[9] 冯定犹,李志昌,张自超.黄陵花岗岩基南部岩体侵入时代和同位素特征.湖北地质,1991,5(2):1～12
[10] 高山,金振民.拆沉作用及其壳幔演化动力学意义.地质科技情报,1997,16:1～8
[11] 洪大卫.碱性花岗岩的构造环境分类极其鉴别标志.中国科学(B辑),1995,25:418～426
[12] 湖北省地矿局鄂西地质大队.黄陵花岗岩基侵入期次、时代及成因.1992
[13] 胡世玲,刘鸿允,王松山等.据~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar快中子年龄新资料讨论震旦系底界年龄.地质科学,1989,1:16～25
[14] 马昌前,王人镜,邱家镶.花岗质岩浆起源和多次岩浆混合的标志:包体—以北京周口店岩体为例.1992,地质论评,38(2):109～119
[15] Malcolm P R,John D C.高钾钙碱性Ⅰ型花岗岩类的成因(懂传万 译).世界地质,1994,13(4):8～11
[16] 马国干,张自超,等.华南地区震旦纪时限范围的研究.宜昌地质矿产研究所刊,1984,8:1～29
[17] 马大铨,杜绍华,肖志发.黄陵花岗岩基的成因.岩石矿物学杂志,2002,21(2):151～161
[18] 马大铨,李志昌,肖志发.鄂西崆岭杂岩的组成、时代及地质演化.地球学报,1997,1(3):233～241
[19] 任富根,孙忠和等.汉中纲厂晚元古代火山—侵入岩的特征及相关地层对比.天津地质矿产研究所所刊,1989.21:75～87
[20] 穆克敏等.华北地台区花岗岩质岩石的成因.吉林:吉林科技出版社,1989
[21] 谭东娟,林景仟.华北地台中生代钾质岩浆区.北京:地震出版社,1994
[22] 陶洪祥,高肇英,王庆金等.扬子板块西北缘高压低温蓝片岩带的地质特征.西安地质学院学报,1986,(2):23～31
[23] 涂光炽,张玉泉,赵振华.华南两个富碱侵入岩带的初步研究.见徐克勤、涂光炽主编,花岗岩地质和成矿关系.南京:江苏科学技术出版社.1984
[24] 王德滋,沈渭洲.中国东南部花岗岩成因与地壳演化.地学前缘,2003,10(3):209～220
[25] 王德滋,周金城.我国花岗岩的研究与回顾.岩石学报,1999,15(2):161～169
[26] 王德滋,刘昌实.中国东南部沿海海西-印支旋回花岗岩类的分布规律及其成因.岩石学报,1986,2(4):12～31
[27] 王剑.华南新元古代裂谷盆地演化:兼论与Rodinia解体的关系.北京:地质出版社,2000
[28] 王式洸,姜常义,王廷印等.太行山北段某些燕山期花岗岩类岩石中黑云母和角闪石的化学特征,国际花岗岩地质和成矿关系论文集,1982,21～37
[29] 肖庆辉,邓晋福,马大铨等.花岗岩研究思维与方法.北京:地质出版社,2004
[30] 邢凤鸣.锶同位素比值在划分花岗岩成因类型的应用探讨.岩石学报,3(2):75～78
[31] 熊成云,韦昌山,金光富.鄂西黄陵背斜地区前南华纪古构造格架及主要地质事件.地质力学学报,2004,10(2):98～112
[32] 熊成云,韦昌山,金光富.鄂西黄陵背斜核部中段金矿基本特征及成矿规律.华南地质与矿产,1991,1:32～48
[33] 徐夕生,周新民,O'Reilly S Y,唐红峰.中国东南部下地壳物质与花岗岩成因探索.岩石学报,1999,15(2):217～223
[34] 徐夕生,周新民.广东麒麟新生代玄武质角砾岩筒中岩石包体研究.岩石学报,1995,11(4):441～448
[35] 颜丹平,周美夫,宋鸿林等.华南在Rodinia古陆块位置的讨论.地学前缘,2002,9(4):249～256
[36] 阎国翰,许宝良,牟保磊.房山岩体中闪长质包体的矿物稀土元素地球化学及其包体成因.中国科学,B辑,1995,25(2):219～224
[37] 严阵.陕西省花岗岩.西安:西安交通大学出版社,1985
[38] 杨巍然.东秦岭“开”、“合”史.地球科学,1987,12:487～493
[39] 袁万明,白宜真.北京大庄科花岗杂岩微粒-细粒包体成因及其定位的动力学机理.“花岗岩中岩石包体学术讨论会”论文摘要集,24,1990.
[40] 张德全,孙桂英.中国东部花岗岩.武汉:中国地质出版社,1988
[41] 张成立,周鼎武,刘颖宇.武当山地块基性岩墙群地球化学研究及其大地构造意义.地球化学,1999,28(2):126～135
[42] 张宏飞,骆庭川,张本仁.扬子克拉通北缘岛弧型花岗岩成分极性及其形成原因的地球化学讨论.地球科学.1994a,19(2):219～226
[43] 张宏飞,骆庭川,张本仁.陕西船铁山岩体的地球化学特征、成因及形成的构造环境.现代地质.1994b,8(4):453～158
[44] 张儒瑗,丛伯林.矿物温度计和矿物压力计.北京:地质出版社,1983
[45] 曾雯,钟增球,周汉文等.黄陵地区基性岩墙群的地球化学特征及其地质意义.地球科学,2004,29(1):31～37
[46] 郑永飞.新元古代超大陆构型中华南的位置.科学通报,2004,49(8):715～717
[47] 周鼎武,张成立,刘良,王居里,刘颖宇.武当地块基性岩墙群的Sm-Nd定年及其相关问题讨论.地球学报,1998,19(1):25～30
[48] 周鼎武,张成立,王居里等.武当地块基性岩墙群研究及其地质意义,科学通报,1997,42(23):2546～2549
[49] 周金城,王孝磊,邱检生,高剑峰.桂北中—新元古代镁铁质-超镁铁质岩的岩石地球化学.岩石学报,2003,19(1):9～18
[50] 周金城,徐夕生.微花岗岩类包体与岩浆的扩散作用和熔离作用—以诸广山桂东、上堡岩体为例.地质论评,1992,33(3):197～204
[51] 周新民.对华南花岗岩研究的若干思考.高校地质学报,2003,9(4):556～5651
[52] 周新民,姚玉鹏,徐夕生.浙东大巨山花岗岩中淬冷包体及其成因机制.岩石学报,1992,8(3):234～242
[53] Adbel Rahman A M. Nature of biotites alkaline, calc- alkaline, and peraluminous magma. Journal of Petrology, 1994, 35:525～541
[54] Arth J G, Barker F, Peterman Z E. et al. Geochemistry of the gabbro-diorite-tonalite-trondhjemite suite of Southwest Finland and its implications for the origin of tonalitic and trondhjemitic magmas. J. Petrol, 1978, 19(2): 289～316
[55] Barbarin B. A eview of the relationships bweteen granitoid type, their origins and their geodynamic environments. Lithos. 1999, 46:605～625
[56] Barbafin B. Granitoids main petrgenetic in relation to origin and tectonic setting. Geol. J. 1990, 25:227～238
[57] Brown M. The generation, segregation, ascent and emplacement of graintemagma: the migmatit-to-crustually -derived grinate connection in thickened orogens. Earth Science Review, 1994, 36, 83～130
[58] Barker F, Arth J G. Generation of trondhjemitic-tonalitic liquids and Archean bimodal trondhjemite-basalt suites. Geology, 1976, 4(10):596～600
[59] Czamanske, G K, Eichelberger, J C. Mineralogy and petrology of the intrusive complex of the Pliuy Range, New Hampshire. Am. J. Sci., 1977, 277:1073～1123
[60] Chappell B W. White A J R.. Two contrasting granite types. Pacific Geol., 1974, 8:173～174
[61] Chivas A R. Geochememical evidence for magmatic fluids in porphyre copper mineralization. Partl. Mafic silicate from the Koloula igneous complex. Contrib. Mineral. Petro., 1981, 78:389～403.
[62] Clemens J D, Holloway J R, White A J R. Origin of an A-type granite: Experimental constrains. Amer. Mineral., 71:317～324
[63] Collins W J, Beams S D White A J R, Chappell B W. Nature and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to Southeastern Austraia. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1982, 80:189～200
[64] Creaser R A, Price R C. A-type granites revisited: Assessment of a residual-source model. Geology, 19:163～166
[65] Dalziel D W. Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctic-A ustralia as a conjugate rift pair: evidence and implication for an Eoncambrine suppercontinent. Geology, 1991, 19:598～601
[66] Debon F, Fefort F. A cationic classification of common plutonic rocks and their associations: principles, method, application. Bull. Mineral., 1988, 11:493～510
[67] Debon F et al. The four plutonic belts of the Transh imalaya—H imalaya: A chemical, mineralogical, isotopic and chronological synthesis along a Tibet—Nepal section. J. Petrol., 1986, 27:219～250
[68] Depaolo J D. A neodymium and strontium isotopic study of the Mesozoic calc2alkaline granitic batholiths of the Sierra Nevada and peninsular Ranges, California. J. Geophys Res, 1981, 86:10470～10488
[69] Duchesne J C, wilmart E. Ignesous chamockites and related rocks from the Bjerkreim-Sokndal layeredintrusion (Southern Norway): a Jounite (hypersthene monzdiorite)-derived A-type granitoid suite. J. Petrol., 1997, 38(3):337～369
[70] Eby G N. Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids: petrogenetic and tectonic implications, Geology, 1992, 20:641～644
[71] Eby G N. The A-type granitoids: Areview of their occurrence and chemical characteristics and speculation on their petrogenesis. Lithos, 1990, 26: 115～～134
[72] Fyfe W S and Leonardos O H. Ancientmetamorphic-migmatitebelts of the Brazibian African coasts. Nature, 1973,224:501-502
[73] Fulong W P et al. Continental crustal underplateing: Thermal consideration and seismic-petrollgia consequence. Geophy Res,1986,91(B8):8285~8294
[74] Hammarstrom J M, Zen E A. Aluminum in hornblende: An empirical igneous geobarometer. American Mineralogists.1986,71: 1297-1313
[75] Hoffman P F. Did the breakup of Laurentia turn Gondwana inside out ? Science, 1991,252 : 1409—1412
[76] Irvine T N. A duide to the chemical classifications of the common volcanic rocks. Canadian. J. Earth. Sci.,1971, 8: 523-548
[77] Johson M C et al. Experimental calibration of the aluminum in hornblende geobarometer with application to long Valley caldera (California) volcanic rocks. Geology, 1989,17:837—841
[78] Kerr A, Fryer B J. Nd isotope evidence for crust-mantle interaction in the generation of A-type granitoid suites in Labrador,Canada .Chem. geol.,1993,104:39~60
[79] Leak B E. Nomenclature of amphibole. Am. Mineral, 1978,67:1023—1052.
[80] Le Maitre, R W. Some problems of the projection of chemical data into mineralogical classifications,Contr. Min. Pet, 1976,56,181-189
[81] Li Z X,Eyans D A W.Zhang S. A 90° spin on Rodinia: possible causal links between the Neoproterozoic supercontinent,superplume,true polar wander and low-latitude glaciation. Earth Plane Sci Lett, 2004, 220: 409—421
[82] Li Z X,Li X H,Zhou H,Kinny P D. Grenvillian continental collision in South China : New SHRIMP U-Pb zircon results and implications for the configuration of Rodinia[J ]. Geology,2002,30 : 163—166
[83] Li Z X, Li X H, Kinny P D, Wang J . The breakup of Rodinia :Did it start with a mantle plume beneath South China ? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett .,1999,173 : 171-181
[84] Li Z X.Zhang L,Powell C M. Positions of the East Asian cratons in the Neoproterozoic supercontinent Ro- dinia Aust. J .Earth Sci, 1996,43 : 593-604
[85] Li Z X,Zhang L,Powell C M. South China in Rodinia: part of the missing link between Australia-East Antarctica and Laurentia?. Geology,1995,23 :407—410
[86] Loiselle M C, Wones P M. Characteristics and origin of grsnites. Geological Society of American Bulletin. 1979,101:635-643
[87] Mason G H. The mineralogy and textures of the Costal Batholith,Peru. In: W. S. Pitcher et ai. (eds), Magmatism at a Plate Edge, Blackie Halsted Press,1985,156—166
[88] Maniar P D, Piccoli P D. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geological society of America Bulletin, 1989, 101: 635-643
[89] Martin H.Bonin B.Capdevila R,et al. The Kuiqi peralkaline granitic comple(SE China): petrology and geochemistry. J. Petrol, 1994,35 (4) 983-1015
[90] Middlemmost E AK. Asimple classification of volcanic rocks. Bulletin of Volcano, 1972, 36: 382—397
[91] Moores E W. South west U. S. —East Antarctic (SWEAT) connection : a hypothesis. Geology, 1991,19 : 425—428
[92] Muschler F E. The precious metal deposits associated with alkaline rocks —a spatial and temoral process in cordillera. Mining Engeralogist, 1991,3: 304—309
[93] Nardi L V S, Bonin B. Post-orogenic and non-orogenic alkaline granite associations: the Saibro intrusive suite .southern Brazil------A case study. Chem. Geol,1991,92:197—211
[94] Park J K. Paleomagnetic constraints on the hypo thesis of Laurentia from middle Neopro— terozoic to early Cambrian times. Precambrian Research, 1994,69: 95—11
[95] Parsons T.Thompson G A, Sleep N H. Mantle plume influence on the Neogene uplift and extension of The U.S. western Cordillera? Geology, 1994,22,83—86
[96] Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of grainitic rocks. J. Petrol, 1984,25: 956—984
[97] Peccerillo A,Taylor S R. Geochemical of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu Area, Northern Turey. J. Petrol,Contrib,Mineral,1976,58: 63—81
[98] Pitcher W S. The Nature and Origin of Granite. London : Chapman & Hall,1993,321
[99] Pitcher W S,Atherton M P, Cobbing E J et al. Magmatism at a plate edge, the Peruvian andes. Blackie and Son, Glasgow,United Kingdom /John Wiley and Sons. New York,United States,1986,p.328
[100] Pitcher W S. Comments on the geological environments of granite. Origin of Granite Batholiths : Geochemical Evidence[M]. [s. 1. ]: Shiva Publishing Limited, 1979. 1—8.
[101] Powell C M, Li Z X, McElhinny M W et al. Paleomagnetic constraints on timing of the Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia and the Cambrian fo rmation of Gondwanaland . Geology, 1993,21: 889—892
[102] Read,H H. Granite controversy. T ,Murby London. 1957,374—398
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |