用户名: 密码: 验证码:
重力式挡墙大型振动台模型试验与基于性能的抗震设计方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
重力式挡墙是岩土工程中的重要构造物,开展大型振动台模型试验及基于性能的抗震设计方法研究,能进一步揭示重力式挡墙在地震作用下的破坏机理和规律,完善抗震设计理论及方法,提高抗震水平和能力,对抗震设计规范的发展具有重要意义。为此,本文主要完成了如下工作:
     1.依据烈度、结构形式、破坏类型、场地条件、砌筑方式、线路走向与断裂带关系对汶川地震支挡结构震害进行了归类与分析,总结了上述因素对震害分布的影响规律,从震害调查分析的角度为抗震规范的修编提供了支撑。
     2.阐述了中国、欧洲、日本、新西兰4国抗震规范中地震土压力的计算流程,结合挡墙实例对比研究了各国地震土压力计算思想的差异性,总结了我国规范地震土压力计算与其他国家的差异,对现行抗震规范地震土压力的计算方法提出了改进建议。
     3.详细介绍了重力式挡墙大型振动台模型试验的设计、实施及主要试验结果,总结了墙体位移及土压力的变化规律,对比研究了4国抗震规范计算与实测土压力的差距,系统考察了不同地基条件下挡墙抗震性能的差异性。最后,对现行抗震规范的相关设计标准进行了外延,为现行抗震规范的修编提出了合理性建议。
     4.以支挡结构震害调查分析及大型振动台模型试验为支撑,构建了重力式挡墙基于性能的抗震设计方法,首次将分级设防理念引入挡墙的抗震设计中,实现了路基支挡构造物由基于力法的抗震设计向基于性能抗震设计的转变。经与现行抗震规范对比,显示了基于性能抗震设计的优越性,最终形成了重力式挡墙基于性能抗震设计的规范化流程,提高了性能设计在工程应用中的可行性。
     5.凝练全文主要研究结论,从现行抗震技术框架的扩展与更新角度出发,讨论了挡墙抗震设计的关键技术问题,填补了现行抗震规范的空白领域,提出了抗震设计规范的修编建议。
Gravity retaining wall is key structure in geotechnical engineering, developing large scale shaking table tests and performance-based seismic design not only can reveal failure mechanism and laws of gravity retaining walls under seismic loads, perfect the seismic design theory and method, but also improve seismic competence and ability, and is of great significance to the development of seismic code. Therefore, the mainly works we have done in this paper are as follows:
     1. According to intensity, structure form, damage types, site condition, masonry type and the relationship between line alignment and fault zone, seismic damage of retaining structures in WenChuan earthquake are classified and analysis. The distribution law of seismic damage affected by the above factors is summarized, in the perspective of seismic damage survey and analysis, the revising suggestions of seismic codes are proposed.
     2. Seismic earth pressure calculation flows of seismic codes among China, European countries, Japanese and New Zealand are introduced. Combined with an example of a retaining wall, the differences of the above seismic codes and the gap between China seismic code and the others are discussed. By analyzing the calculation results, some suggestions for modifying seismic earth pressure calculation method in Chinese code are proposed.
     3. Experimental designs, implementations and the main test results of large scale shaking table tests are firstly described in detail, variation law of displacement and earth pressure are summarized later. After carrying out comparative studies of earth pressure calculated by seismic codes and measured values, the seismic performance differences of retaining walls lying in different site conditions are systematically investigated. Finally, some relative design criteria of current seismic code are affirmed and extended, the reasonable revising suggestions for seismic code are also proposed.
     4. Based on the survey and analysis of retaining structures seismic damage in WenChuan earthquake and large scale shaking table tests, a seismic performance-based design method for gravity retaining walls is established, which firstly introduces the graded protection design idea into the seismic design of retaining walls, and the transformation from force-based to displacement-based of seismic design ideas for subgrads retaining structure is also realized. By comparing the design method of seismic code and performance-based design, the superiority of performance design has been revealed. Finally, a standard flow of performance-based seismic design for gravity retaining walls is formed, which improves the feasibility of performance-based design in engineering applications.
     5. By refining the main research results of the whole paper, the key technique problems of seismic design are discussed in two perspectives which are extension and updating of current seismic technique formwork, the gap of current seismic code are also filled based on the above works. Lastly, we put forward revising suggestions for seismic code.
引文
[1]Matsuo H,O Hara S.Lateral earth pressure and stabilit of Quay walls during earthquake engineering. Proc of the Second World Conference on arthquake Engineering. Tokyo and Kyoto, July 11-18,1960.Vol.1,165-181.
    [2]王云球.地震土压力的非线性分布[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),1983(4)
    [3]Seed, H.B, and Whiteman,R,V."Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic loads," Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures [J]. ASCE,1970, 103-147.
    [4]Wood,J.H, "Earthquake-induced Soil Pressures on Structures," Report No.EERL73-05; Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,Calif,1973
    [5]Wood,J.H, "Earthquake-induced Soil Pressures on a Rigid Wall Structure," Bulletin of New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering,Vol.8,No.3,1975, 175-186.
    [6]李涛.地震主动土压力简化公式.铁道工程学报[J],1996(1):103-105.
    [7]顾慰慈.挡墙土压力计算[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社,2001
    [8]陈学良,陶夏新 黏性土挡墙地震土压力解析解//现代地震工程进展[M]南京:东南大学出版社,2002:218-224
    [9]Newmark, N. M. Effect of earthquakes on dams and embankments [J]. Geotechnique,1965, 15(2),139-159.
    [10]Richard R, Elms D G. Seismic behavior of gravity retaining walls [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.ASCE,1979,105(4):449-464.
    [11]Richard R, Elms D G. Seismic behavior of gravity retaining walls [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.ASCE,1979,105(4):449-464.
    [12]陈学良,袁一凡.挡墙地震反应非线性波动模拟.地震工程与工程震动[J],2003,23(4):9-16.
    [13]Nadim F, Whitman R V. Seismically induced movement of retainingwalls[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical EngineeringDivision, ASCE,1983,109(7):915-931
    [14]Nadim F, Whitman R V. Coup led sliding and tilting of gravity retaining walls during earthquakes[A]. Proceedings of 8 th WCEE [C]. San Francisco, CA.1984.
    [15]Al-Homoud, A.S.and Whiteman,R.V.Comparision Between Fe Prediction and Result from Dynamic Centrifuge Test on Tilting Gravity Walls. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.1995(14):259-268.
    [16]朱桐浩,郑素璋,兰永珍.模拟地震荷载作用重力式挡墙土压力的模型试验[J].四川建筑科学研究,1983,(01)
    [17]Nadakumaran P, Behaviour of retaining wall under dynamic loads [Ph.D.Thesis]. Rorkee,India 1973
    [18]A.Sherif and Yung-Show Fang, Dynamic earth pressures on walls rotating about the top [J].Soils and Foundations,1984,24(4):109-117
    [19]Isao Ishibashi andYung-Show Fang. Dynamic earth pressures with different wall movement modes[J].Soils and Foundations,1987,24(4):11-22
    [20]C-C.Hang,S-H.Wu and H-J.Seismic Displacement Criterion for Soil Retaining Walls Based on Soil Strength Mobilization[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2009.
    [21]Elms,D.G.,and Richards,R.1990."Seismic design of retaining walls." Proc., Design and Performance of Earth Retaining Structures, Geotechnical Special Publication No.25, P. Lambe and L.Hansen,eds. ASCE, New York,854-871.
    [22]Koseki J,Munaf Y,Tat suoka F et all, Shaking and Tilt Table Tests of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil and Conventional-Type Retaining Walls Geosynthetics International, 1998,5(1-2):73-96
    [23]Watanbe K, Munaf Y, Koseki J et all, Behavios of Several Types of Model Retaining Walls Subjected to Irregular Excitation 1 Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society:Soils and foundation,2003,143 (5):13-27
    [24]Oritz LA. Dynamic centrifuge testing of cantilever retaining wall[Ph.D.Thesis].Cali-fornia Institute Technology,Pasadena,CA,USA,1982.
    [25]Oritiz,Scott R F,Lee J. Dynamic centrifuge testing of cantilever retaining wall.J.of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic,1983,(11):251-268.
    [26]Bolton M D,Steedman R S.The behavior of fixed cantilever subjected to lateral shaking. Proc.of a symposium on the application of centrifuge modeling to geotechnical design.Manchester, April,1984.301-313.
    [27]Whitman,R.V.and Ting,N.H.Experimental Result for Tilting Wall with Saturated Backfill. International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems,Arulanandan and Scott(Eds).1993,2.
    [28]Zeng,X.Seismic Response of Gravity Quay Walls I:Centrifuge Modeling. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.ASCE.1998,124 (5):406-417
    [29]Todorovski.An Experimental Study on the Kinetics of a Free Standing Retaining Wall under Seismic Exitation.Ph.D.Dissertation.Department of Civil Engineering,Texas A&M University.1999:85-149
    [30]Iai S. Rigid and flexible retaining walls during kobe earthquake.Proc.Of the Forth International Conference on case histories in Geotechnical Engineering. St.Louis,MO,C-D-ROM,SOA-4,1998.108-127.
    [31]许强,曾裕平,具有蠕变特点滑坡的加速度变化特征及临滑预警指标研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报2009,(28):1009-1106
    [32]周德培,张建经,汤勇.汶川地震道路边坡工程震害分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(3):565-576.
    [33]陈强,杨长卫,张建经,周新文.汶川地震中高大加筋土挡墙破坏机理研究[J].铁道建筑,2010,9:73-77.
    [34]中华人民共和国铁道部.GB 50111-2006铁路工程抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社.
    [35]中华人民共和国交通部.JTJ 004-89公路工程抗震设计规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社.
    [36]EUROPEAN STANDARD 1998 Eurocode 8:Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 5:Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects[S]
    [37]日本铁道综合技术研究所日本铁道构造物设计标准[S]1998.
    [38]J. Koseki, F. Tatsuoka, Y. Munaf, M. Tateyama and K. Kojima A Modified Procedure to Evaluate Seismic Active Earth Pressure Considering Effects of Strain Localization in Backfill Soil [J], Soils Found,1998,209-216,Special issue.
    [39]J.H.Wood D.GElms SESMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGE ABUTMENTS AND RETAINING WALL [R] Road Research Unit Bulletin 84 Volume 2 ISSN 0549-0030
    [40]张建经,冯君,肖世国,刘昌清支挡结构抗震设计的两个关键技术问题[J].西南交通大学学报2009,(44):321-326
    [41]Harris,H.G. Dynamic Modeling of Concrete Structure[R] Publication SP-73, ACI,Detroit,US A,1982.
    [42]吕西林.结构抗震模型试验的相似条件[A].结构抗震试验(朱伯龙主编)[C].北京:地震出版社,1989,2:8-13.
    [43]陈国兴,王志华,左熹,杜修力,韩晓健,振动台试验叠层剪切型土箱的研制[J].岩土工程学报.2010,(33):89-97
    [44]MEYMAND P. Shaking table scale model test of nonlinear soil-pile-superstru-cture interaction in soft clay [D]. Berkeley:University of California,1998.
    [45]陈跃庆,吕西林,李培振,等.分层土-基础-高层框架结构相互作用体系振动台模型试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(3):104-112.
    [46]陈国兴,王志华,宰金珉.考虑土与结构相互作用效应的结构减震大型振动台模型试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(4):117-127.
    [47]王志华,陈国兴,宰金珉.考虑SSI效应的TMD减震特性振动台模型试验研究[J].南京工业大学学报,2002,24(5):34-39.
    [48]张建经,冯君,肖世国,刘昌清支挡结构抗震设计的两个关键技术问题[J].西南交通大学学报2009,(44):321-326.
    [49]中华人民共和国铁道部.TB 10025-2006铁路路基支挡结构设计规范[S].北京:中国铁道出版社.
    [50]中华人民共和国交通部.JTG D30-2004公路路基设计规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社.
    [51]中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司.2008公路挡墙设计与施工细则[S].北京:人民交通出版社.
    [52]罗奇峰,王玉梅 从近几年震害总结中提出的结构性能设计理论[J].工程抗震 2001,(2):3-7
    [53]陈厚群 大坝的抗震设防水准及相应性能目标[J].工程抗震与加固改造2005,(27):1-6
    [54]王亚勇 我国年抗震设计模式规范展望[J].建筑结构1999,(6):32-36
    [55]陈惠发,段炼桥梁工程抗震设计[M].北京:机械工业出版社2007
    [56]Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 273)[S].Washington D.C.:BSSC,1997
    [57]《汶川地震公路震害图集》编纂委员会.汶川地震公路震害图集[M]北京:人民交通出版社,2009,5
    [58]Newmark, N. M. Effect of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique,1965, 15(2),139-159.
    [59]X.Zeng, and R.S.Steedman. Rotating Block Method For Seismic Displacement of Gravity Retaining Walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE.2000,126(8):709-717
    [60]Z.Cai and R.J.Bathurst.Deterministic sliding block methods for estimating seismic displacements of earth structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 15 (1996) 255-268
    [61]WILLIAM BJOYNER and DAVID M. BOORE.PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATI-ON AND VELOCITY FROM STRONGMOTION RECORDS INCLUDING RECOR-S FROM THE 1979 IMPERIAL VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, EARTHQUAKE. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.71, No.6, pp. 2011-2038, December 1981

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700