郯庐断裂带构造演化特征及其与相邻盆地的关系
|
摘要
郯庐断裂带是中国东部呈NNE走向的巨型走滑断裂带,在中国境内延伸长度达2400km,该断裂带也是中国东部重要的地质分界线。经过50多年的研究表明,郯庐断裂带中生代以来经历了多期、复杂的演化历史,是一个兼具走滑、伸展、挤压性质的复杂地质体,其活动时期、活动方式一方面到受深部构造活动及区域构造背景的控制,另一方面又明显改造或控制了其周缘构造的演化,特别是对相邻中、新生代盆地的构造沉降、沉积充填及油气地质条件具有重要影响或控制作用。郯庐断裂带相邻地区发育了一系列中、新生代盆地,既包括渤海湾、苏北等富油气盆地,也包括目前尚未有油气发现的胶莱、南华北盆地等。因此,将郯庐断裂带与在时间、空间上彼此分割的相邻沉积盆地置于同一构造体系下来研究它们之间的构造演化关系,可以从宏观上把握郯庐断裂带对沉积盆地形成、演化乃至对油气生成、运聚成藏的影响,明确不同盆地地质条件的差异及油气富集规律,这对我国东部老油区寻找新层系、优选有利勘探区块具有重要意义。
通过野外地质和室内实验分析,系统分析了郯庐晚期左旋剪切带的构造特征、形成的温压环境及形成时间。糜棱岩显微构造及野外露头尺度S-C构造、旋转残斑等均指示郯庐晚期剪切带为左旋走滑活动的产物;糜棱岩中新生矿物组合、变形行为及白云母电子探针测试结果表明,郯庐晚期剪切带形成温度为400-500℃,形成压力为低压环境;通过2个白云母、6个黑云母的40Ar/39Ar年龄测试,获得了一个代表郯庐断裂带晚期剪切带活动的冷却年龄(149.8±0.9 Ma),即郯庐断裂带晚期左旋走滑活动发生于150Ma之前的晚侏罗世。
本论文通过对华北克拉通东部早白垩世岩浆活动时期分析表明,最早为蒙阴盆地青山组135Ma及郯庐断裂带上的黄石坝组133Ma,其峰期喷发时间为120-110Ma,这期岩浆活动在大部分断陷盆地均有发育,这指示郯庐断裂带与华北克拉通东部一起处于拉伸背景,在早白垩世发生了强烈的伸展断陷活动;同时,华北东部早白垩世断陷盆地在以青山组等为代表的火山喷发之前,普遍发育了一套陆相沉积,即莱阳群、蒙阴组、朱巷组,并且合肥盆地、胶莱盆地等早白垩世均表现为由郯庐断裂带控制的半地堑或地堑结构,地层时代指示郯庐断裂带伸展活动的时间持续至古近纪;另外,华北克拉通东部普遍发育的变质核杂岩形成时间集中在早白垩世初145Ma至早白垩世中晚期的116Ma,指示了伸展活动开始于早白垩世早期。因此,综合华北克拉通东部岩浆活动、断陷盆地发育及变质核杂岩形成时间等多种证据,认为郯庐断裂带伸展活动始于早白垩世初,并持续至古近纪。
在综合前人研究成果的基础上,本研究应用断层滑动面上擦痕资料对郯庐断裂带及邻区区域应场进行了分析,获得了研究区晚侏罗世以来各时期的区域应力场演化状况,本次重点分析了晚侏罗世挤压作用、早白垩世区域拉张与裂谷作用、晚白垩世-古近纪区域拉张与郯庐断裂走滑伸展等3期构造应力场的转变与盆地演化的关系。
通过对盆地沉积充填特征、区域构造及应力场的分析,明确了郯庐断裂带晚侏罗世以来与周缘盆地的关系:(1)晚侏罗世时期,由于太平洋区大洋板块的高速斜向运动,使中国大陆东部呈现左旋压扭性活动,中国东部普遍缺失晚侏罗世沉积,该时期郯庐断裂带发生晚期左旋平移;(2)在白垩纪期间郯庐断裂带转变为伸展断陷活动,成为中国东部的巨型断陷活动带,对带内及相邻陆相盆地发育与沉积具有明显的控制作用,其中下白垩统沉积时沉降中心明显向郯庐断裂带附近迁移,上白垩统沉积中心向郯庐断裂带旁侧的东西向断陷区迁移;(3)古近纪断陷活动最强处为渤海湾盆地,其次为苏北盆地。渤海湾盆地的强烈断陷活动是在近南北向的拉伸作用下,古近纪从早至晚沉积中心呈现自南向北、自西向东的有规律迁移,也使沉积中心最终向着郯庐断裂带所在的海域内迁移;(4)研究区至新近纪结束断陷活动,断陷盆地发生反转,一部分抬升消亡,另一部分转变为拗陷式盆地(渤海湾盆地、苏北盆地),接受披盖式沉积,拗陷最强处出现郯庐断裂带的海域内。
以渤海湾盆地为重点,对郯庐断裂带周缘盆地古近纪伸展活动、构造沉降进行了对比分析。结果表明,渤海湾地区不同凹陷新生代主要伸展方向为南北向,伸展作用主要发生在孔店组—沙三段沉积时期,盆地最大伸展量、伸展率、伸展速率等从早到晚具有自南北两端向渤海中部迁移的特征;同时,郯庐断裂带内及其附近坳陷(昌潍、济阳、渤中、辽东等坳陷)古近纪构造沉降量较大,而远离郯庐断裂带坳陷(临清、冀中等坳陷)构造沉降量较小,指示郯庐断裂带是断陷活动中的强活动带,控制着强断陷带的发育。
结合深部构造研究成果,分析了华北克拉通东部郯庐断裂带周缘盆地早白垩世以来构造沉降规律及与深部构造活动的关系。盆地的主要构造沉降中心早白垩世集中于华北克拉通南部和北部,而古近纪则迁移至华北克拉通内部渤海湾盆地区,构造沉降中心的迁移从早到晚具有由克拉通边缘向内部变化的规律;盆地构造沉降中心的迁移主要受岩石圈结构及岩石圈温度与强度演化的控制,而岩石圈热状态与强度、岩石圈结构、区域拉伸应力方向的控制及动力学机制等四个因素共同控制了郯庐断裂带周缘早白垩世以来断陷盆地的发育特征。
本研究系统分析了郯庐断裂带周缘盆地古近系烃源岩有机地化、空间分布特征。研究区古近系主要发育孔店期、沙四期、沙三期、沙一期及东营期等五套烃源岩,其中孔店期、沙三期烃源岩是区内主要烃源岩,烃源岩发育层位自南而北时代逐渐变新;构造沉降中心的迁移控制了主要烃源岩发育层位和厚度大小的迁移变化,而沉积相带明显控制了烃源岩的有机丰度和类型,因而郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及盆地沉降中心的迁移控制了烃源岩品质。郯庐断裂带白垩纪期间的伸展活动造成盆地沉积与沉降中心向着郯庐断裂带附近迁移,深湖—半深湖相沉积环境主要出现在郯庐断裂带附近,烃源岩较为发育,品质较好,因此,济阳坳陷惠民、沾化凹陷、胶莱盆地莱阳凹陷中部是胜利探区下步中生界勘探的有利方向;孔店—沙四期渤海湾盆地南部潍北凹陷、东营凹陷和惠民凹陷烃源岩发育,是胜利探区古近系深层勘探的有利方向。
The Tan-Lu fault zone is a large-scale strike-slip fault zone and important geological boundary striking NNE in East China, which extends about 2400 km. More than fifty years studies on the large fault zone suggest that it has experienced polyphase and complicated evolution history since Mesozoic , and is a complex geological body which has strike-slip, extensional and compressive behaviors on different segments during different geological stages. On the one hand the active stage and regime of the fault zone was controlled by the activities of deep structure and the regional tectonic setting, but on the other hand the active stage and regime significantly has modified or affected the evolution of its adjacent structures, and has important effects on the tectonic subsidence, sedimentary filling and petroleum geological conditions in the adjacent Meso-Cenozoic basins. There are many Meso-Cenozoic basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone, including basins rich in hydrocarbon, such as the Bohai Bay Basin and the Subei Basin, also including basins without oil and gas, such as the Jiaolai Basin and the Southern North China Basin. Therefore, putting the Tan-Lu fault zone and its adjacent basins, which is independent in time, space on each other, under the same tectonic system to research their evolution relationship in the macro level, we can understand the effects of the Tan-Lu fault zone on the formation, evolution as well as petroleum generation, migration and accumulation of its adjacent sedimentary basins, and grasp the law of geological conditions and the petroleum enrichment, which is meaningful for targeting new strata, optimizing favorable exploration blocks in the eastern old oilfields.
On the basis of the field geology research and laboratory analysis, the dissertation systematically studied the structural features, the formation temperature and pressure environment, and the formation time of the late sinistral shear belt along the Tan-Lu fault zone. The structure characteristics, such as the microstructures of mylonite, the outcrop-scale S-C structures, the rotation porphyroblasts, indicates the late shear belt formed due to the sinistral activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone. The newformed mineral assemblage, deformation behaviors in mylonite, and muscovite electron probe test results show that the formation temperatures of the late shear belt is 400-500℃, and the formation pressure is low pressure environment; Through two muscovite, 6 biotite ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating, this study obtained a representative age (149.8±0.9 Ma) which was the cooling age of the late shear belt due to the sinistral activity of the Tan-Lu fault zone, that is, the second sinistral activity of the Tan-Lu fault zone occurred at the Late Jurassic and before 150Ma.
Timing of magmatic activities in North China in the Early Cretaceous shows that the earliest age of magmatic activities is 135Ma (found in the Qingshan Formaition in the Mengyi basin) and 133Ma (found in the Huangshiba Formation along the Tan-Lu fault zone), and the peak time of magmatic eruption is 120-110Ma, which was widely distributed in most rift basins. The above magmatic activities indicate that both the Tan-Lu fault zone and the eastern North China Craton were involved into intensively extensional faulted events in the Early Cretaceous due to a tensile tectonic setting. According to the stratigraphic sequence of Cretaceous in the eastern North China craton, before the large-scale volcanic eruption represented by the Qingshan Formation, the rift basins were filled with a set of continental sediments including the Laiyang Group, the Mengyin Formation and the Zhuxiang Formation, etc. Some rift basins, such as the Hefei and Jiaolai basins, showed the half-graben or graben structures controlled by the Tan-Lu fault zone, and the stratigraphic thickness increases markedly near the boundary normal faults, thus the stratigraphic age of the faulted basins indicates the extensional activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone continued to Paleogene; In addition, the formation time of metamorphic core complex distributed generally in the eastern North China Craton, concentrates in the earliest(145 Ma) to middle (116 Ma) Early Cretaceous, and indicates the extensional activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone occurred at the beginning of the Early Cretaceous. Therefore, the evidence, including magmatic activities in the eastern North China Craton, faulted basin development and the formation of metamorphic core complexes and so on, demonstrates that the extensional activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone started at the beginning of the Early Cretaceous and continued to Paleogene.
Combined with previous results and based on the fault slip data from field work along the Tan-Lu fault zone and adjacent areas, we analyzed the regional stress fields, and summarize stress field evolution since Late Jurassic. This study divides the stress field evolution into 6 stages, and focused on 3 stages of tectonic stress field evolution and their relationship with the evolution of the basins. Three stages are the compression in Late Jurassic, the regional extension and rifting in Early Cretaceous, and regional extension with a strike-slip component along the Tan-Lu fault zone during Late Cretaceous to Paleogene.
The study established the relationship between activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone and its adjacent basin development since Late Jurassic, through analyzing sedimentary filling, regional tectonics and stress fields. The relation of activities between the fault zone and its adjacent tectonics can be divided into 4 stages: (1) During the Late Jurassic period, the high-speed, oblique subduction of the Pacific ocean plate occurred underneath the eastern Eurasia plate amrgin, which caused the eastern China in a sinistral transpression stress field and hiatus of Late Jurassic deposition. Sinistral motion took place along the Tan-Lu fault zone in the Late Jurassic; (2) During the Early Cretaceous, the activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone changed into extension, leading to devilment of rift basins along the Tan-Lu fault zone and its adjacent areas in eastern China. According to the isopach maps of the residual strata, normal faulting along the Tan-Lu fault zone resulted in the sedimentary centers obviously around the Tan-Lu fault zone when the Lower Cretaceous strata were deposited while the sedimentary centers of the Upper Cretaceous strata migrated to the east-west trending, normal faults flanking the Tan-Lu fault zone; (3) Bohai Bay Basin was the intense rifted area in Paleogene, followed by the Subei Basin. The near north-south extension event, combined with the right-lateral slip pull-apart between the Tan-Lu fault zone and the frontal fault of the Taihang Mountains, induced the intensive extension of the Bohai Bay Basin. Under the control by both the near norh-south extension and the right strike-slip pull-apart, the sedimentary centers in the Bohai Bay Basin in Paleogene, migrated from south to north and from west to east regularly. In the end of Paleogene, the sedimentary center migrated to the central part of the Bohai sea where the Tan-Lu fault zone passed through; (4) The extensional activities ended in the study area in the Early Neogene due to the change of regional stress field from extension to compression. As a response to the change of stress field, the inversion widely happened in the faulted basins with termination for most of the rift basins due to uplifting and survival for other basins into depression-type basins (such as the Bohai Bay Basin, Subei Basin) and filled with draping sediments. According to the isopach maps of the Neogene, the Bohai sea segment of the Tan-Lu fault zone was the center of the depression deposition.
Focusing on the structural analysis in the Bohai Bay Basin in Cenozoic, this study analyzed Paleogene extensional activities, and compared tectonic subsidence in different basins or sags adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone. The results show that the main extension direction is north-south in different sags of the Bohai Bay region during Cenozoic, and extensional activities occurred mainly in the deposition period from the Kongdian Formation to Member 3 of the Shahejie Formation. From the Early Paleogene to the Late Paleogene, the largest extensional quantity, extensional rate, and extensional velocity migrate from both north and south ends in the study area to the Central Bohai. Moreover, the farther from the Tan-Lu fault zone, the smaller subsidence quantity of the depression is, that is, the depressions (such as the Changwei, Jiyang, Bozhong, Liaodong depression) within and near the Tan-Lu fault zone have a larger subsidence quantity, and the depressions far away from the Tan - Lu fault zone (the Linqing, Jizhong depression, etc.) have a smaller subsidence quantity. The above phenomenon shows that the Tan-Lu fault zone is a strong rifting zone during the extensional activities, and controls the development of the strong rifting region.
On the basis of researches on the tectonic activities in the eastern North China Craton since Early Cretaceous, combined with the results from previous studies on deep structure, the tectonic subsidence characteristics of the basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone and its relationship with deep structures were discussed in this study. The main tectonic subsidence centers of the basins in the study area focused on the southern and northern areas of the eastern North China Craton in Early Cretaceous, and in Paleogene the subsidence centers moved to the Bohai Bay basin area within the eastern North China Craton, thus the subsidence centers migrated from the margin to the internal of the eastern North China Craton with the changes in geological ages since Early Cretaceous. The research results shows that tectonic subsidence centers of the basins were mainly controlled by the structures and temperatures of lithosphere while the development characteristics of the rift basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone since Early Cretaceous were controlled by the four geological factors, namely, thermal state and strength of lithosphere, lithosphere structure, regional extension stress direction and dynamic mechanism.
The study systematically analyzed the organic geochemical characteristics and the spatial distribution characteristics of Paleogene source rocks in the basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone. There are five hydrocarbon source rocks for Eogene, including the Kongdian Formation, Member1, 3 and Member 4 of the Shahejie Formation, and the Dongying Formation, Of which source rocks for the Kongdian Formation and Member 3 of the Shahejie Formation are the major source rocks in the study area, and the geologic ages of the source rocks progressively become younger from south to north. The migration of tectonic subsidence centers controls the source rock development and thicknesses, and the sedimentary fades in the basins obviously controlled organic abundance and type of the source rocks, thus the extending of the Tan-Lu fault zone and tectonic subsidence center migration of the adjacent basins have great effect on quality of source rocks. The extensional activities along the Tan-Lu fault zone in Cretaceous make sedimentary centers in the adjacent basins migrated to the nearby of the Tan-Lu fault zone., such as deep lake -semi-deep lacustrine sedimentary environment mainly appearing near the Tan-Lu fault zone where is suitable for high-quality source rock development. Therefore, the Huming and zhanhua sags in the Jiyang Depression, and the center of the Laiyang sag in the Jiaolai Basin are the favorable exploration areas of Mesozoic exploration. The Weibei, Dongying and Huimin sags in the south of the Bohai bay basin are the favorable exploration areas for the Kongdian Formation and Member 4 of the Shahejie Formation.
通过野外地质和室内实验分析,系统分析了郯庐晚期左旋剪切带的构造特征、形成的温压环境及形成时间。糜棱岩显微构造及野外露头尺度S-C构造、旋转残斑等均指示郯庐晚期剪切带为左旋走滑活动的产物;糜棱岩中新生矿物组合、变形行为及白云母电子探针测试结果表明,郯庐晚期剪切带形成温度为400-500℃,形成压力为低压环境;通过2个白云母、6个黑云母的40Ar/39Ar年龄测试,获得了一个代表郯庐断裂带晚期剪切带活动的冷却年龄(149.8±0.9 Ma),即郯庐断裂带晚期左旋走滑活动发生于150Ma之前的晚侏罗世。
本论文通过对华北克拉通东部早白垩世岩浆活动时期分析表明,最早为蒙阴盆地青山组135Ma及郯庐断裂带上的黄石坝组133Ma,其峰期喷发时间为120-110Ma,这期岩浆活动在大部分断陷盆地均有发育,这指示郯庐断裂带与华北克拉通东部一起处于拉伸背景,在早白垩世发生了强烈的伸展断陷活动;同时,华北东部早白垩世断陷盆地在以青山组等为代表的火山喷发之前,普遍发育了一套陆相沉积,即莱阳群、蒙阴组、朱巷组,并且合肥盆地、胶莱盆地等早白垩世均表现为由郯庐断裂带控制的半地堑或地堑结构,地层时代指示郯庐断裂带伸展活动的时间持续至古近纪;另外,华北克拉通东部普遍发育的变质核杂岩形成时间集中在早白垩世初145Ma至早白垩世中晚期的116Ma,指示了伸展活动开始于早白垩世早期。因此,综合华北克拉通东部岩浆活动、断陷盆地发育及变质核杂岩形成时间等多种证据,认为郯庐断裂带伸展活动始于早白垩世初,并持续至古近纪。
在综合前人研究成果的基础上,本研究应用断层滑动面上擦痕资料对郯庐断裂带及邻区区域应场进行了分析,获得了研究区晚侏罗世以来各时期的区域应力场演化状况,本次重点分析了晚侏罗世挤压作用、早白垩世区域拉张与裂谷作用、晚白垩世-古近纪区域拉张与郯庐断裂走滑伸展等3期构造应力场的转变与盆地演化的关系。
通过对盆地沉积充填特征、区域构造及应力场的分析,明确了郯庐断裂带晚侏罗世以来与周缘盆地的关系:(1)晚侏罗世时期,由于太平洋区大洋板块的高速斜向运动,使中国大陆东部呈现左旋压扭性活动,中国东部普遍缺失晚侏罗世沉积,该时期郯庐断裂带发生晚期左旋平移;(2)在白垩纪期间郯庐断裂带转变为伸展断陷活动,成为中国东部的巨型断陷活动带,对带内及相邻陆相盆地发育与沉积具有明显的控制作用,其中下白垩统沉积时沉降中心明显向郯庐断裂带附近迁移,上白垩统沉积中心向郯庐断裂带旁侧的东西向断陷区迁移;(3)古近纪断陷活动最强处为渤海湾盆地,其次为苏北盆地。渤海湾盆地的强烈断陷活动是在近南北向的拉伸作用下,古近纪从早至晚沉积中心呈现自南向北、自西向东的有规律迁移,也使沉积中心最终向着郯庐断裂带所在的海域内迁移;(4)研究区至新近纪结束断陷活动,断陷盆地发生反转,一部分抬升消亡,另一部分转变为拗陷式盆地(渤海湾盆地、苏北盆地),接受披盖式沉积,拗陷最强处出现郯庐断裂带的海域内。
以渤海湾盆地为重点,对郯庐断裂带周缘盆地古近纪伸展活动、构造沉降进行了对比分析。结果表明,渤海湾地区不同凹陷新生代主要伸展方向为南北向,伸展作用主要发生在孔店组—沙三段沉积时期,盆地最大伸展量、伸展率、伸展速率等从早到晚具有自南北两端向渤海中部迁移的特征;同时,郯庐断裂带内及其附近坳陷(昌潍、济阳、渤中、辽东等坳陷)古近纪构造沉降量较大,而远离郯庐断裂带坳陷(临清、冀中等坳陷)构造沉降量较小,指示郯庐断裂带是断陷活动中的强活动带,控制着强断陷带的发育。
结合深部构造研究成果,分析了华北克拉通东部郯庐断裂带周缘盆地早白垩世以来构造沉降规律及与深部构造活动的关系。盆地的主要构造沉降中心早白垩世集中于华北克拉通南部和北部,而古近纪则迁移至华北克拉通内部渤海湾盆地区,构造沉降中心的迁移从早到晚具有由克拉通边缘向内部变化的规律;盆地构造沉降中心的迁移主要受岩石圈结构及岩石圈温度与强度演化的控制,而岩石圈热状态与强度、岩石圈结构、区域拉伸应力方向的控制及动力学机制等四个因素共同控制了郯庐断裂带周缘早白垩世以来断陷盆地的发育特征。
本研究系统分析了郯庐断裂带周缘盆地古近系烃源岩有机地化、空间分布特征。研究区古近系主要发育孔店期、沙四期、沙三期、沙一期及东营期等五套烃源岩,其中孔店期、沙三期烃源岩是区内主要烃源岩,烃源岩发育层位自南而北时代逐渐变新;构造沉降中心的迁移控制了主要烃源岩发育层位和厚度大小的迁移变化,而沉积相带明显控制了烃源岩的有机丰度和类型,因而郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及盆地沉降中心的迁移控制了烃源岩品质。郯庐断裂带白垩纪期间的伸展活动造成盆地沉积与沉降中心向着郯庐断裂带附近迁移,深湖—半深湖相沉积环境主要出现在郯庐断裂带附近,烃源岩较为发育,品质较好,因此,济阳坳陷惠民、沾化凹陷、胶莱盆地莱阳凹陷中部是胜利探区下步中生界勘探的有利方向;孔店—沙四期渤海湾盆地南部潍北凹陷、东营凹陷和惠民凹陷烃源岩发育,是胜利探区古近系深层勘探的有利方向。
The Tan-Lu fault zone is a large-scale strike-slip fault zone and important geological boundary striking NNE in East China, which extends about 2400 km. More than fifty years studies on the large fault zone suggest that it has experienced polyphase and complicated evolution history since Mesozoic , and is a complex geological body which has strike-slip, extensional and compressive behaviors on different segments during different geological stages. On the one hand the active stage and regime of the fault zone was controlled by the activities of deep structure and the regional tectonic setting, but on the other hand the active stage and regime significantly has modified or affected the evolution of its adjacent structures, and has important effects on the tectonic subsidence, sedimentary filling and petroleum geological conditions in the adjacent Meso-Cenozoic basins. There are many Meso-Cenozoic basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone, including basins rich in hydrocarbon, such as the Bohai Bay Basin and the Subei Basin, also including basins without oil and gas, such as the Jiaolai Basin and the Southern North China Basin. Therefore, putting the Tan-Lu fault zone and its adjacent basins, which is independent in time, space on each other, under the same tectonic system to research their evolution relationship in the macro level, we can understand the effects of the Tan-Lu fault zone on the formation, evolution as well as petroleum generation, migration and accumulation of its adjacent sedimentary basins, and grasp the law of geological conditions and the petroleum enrichment, which is meaningful for targeting new strata, optimizing favorable exploration blocks in the eastern old oilfields.
On the basis of the field geology research and laboratory analysis, the dissertation systematically studied the structural features, the formation temperature and pressure environment, and the formation time of the late sinistral shear belt along the Tan-Lu fault zone. The structure characteristics, such as the microstructures of mylonite, the outcrop-scale S-C structures, the rotation porphyroblasts, indicates the late shear belt formed due to the sinistral activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone. The newformed mineral assemblage, deformation behaviors in mylonite, and muscovite electron probe test results show that the formation temperatures of the late shear belt is 400-500℃, and the formation pressure is low pressure environment; Through two muscovite, 6 biotite ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating, this study obtained a representative age (149.8±0.9 Ma) which was the cooling age of the late shear belt due to the sinistral activity of the Tan-Lu fault zone, that is, the second sinistral activity of the Tan-Lu fault zone occurred at the Late Jurassic and before 150Ma.
Timing of magmatic activities in North China in the Early Cretaceous shows that the earliest age of magmatic activities is 135Ma (found in the Qingshan Formaition in the Mengyi basin) and 133Ma (found in the Huangshiba Formation along the Tan-Lu fault zone), and the peak time of magmatic eruption is 120-110Ma, which was widely distributed in most rift basins. The above magmatic activities indicate that both the Tan-Lu fault zone and the eastern North China Craton were involved into intensively extensional faulted events in the Early Cretaceous due to a tensile tectonic setting. According to the stratigraphic sequence of Cretaceous in the eastern North China craton, before the large-scale volcanic eruption represented by the Qingshan Formation, the rift basins were filled with a set of continental sediments including the Laiyang Group, the Mengyin Formation and the Zhuxiang Formation, etc. Some rift basins, such as the Hefei and Jiaolai basins, showed the half-graben or graben structures controlled by the Tan-Lu fault zone, and the stratigraphic thickness increases markedly near the boundary normal faults, thus the stratigraphic age of the faulted basins indicates the extensional activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone continued to Paleogene; In addition, the formation time of metamorphic core complex distributed generally in the eastern North China Craton, concentrates in the earliest(145 Ma) to middle (116 Ma) Early Cretaceous, and indicates the extensional activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone occurred at the beginning of the Early Cretaceous. Therefore, the evidence, including magmatic activities in the eastern North China Craton, faulted basin development and the formation of metamorphic core complexes and so on, demonstrates that the extensional activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone started at the beginning of the Early Cretaceous and continued to Paleogene.
Combined with previous results and based on the fault slip data from field work along the Tan-Lu fault zone and adjacent areas, we analyzed the regional stress fields, and summarize stress field evolution since Late Jurassic. This study divides the stress field evolution into 6 stages, and focused on 3 stages of tectonic stress field evolution and their relationship with the evolution of the basins. Three stages are the compression in Late Jurassic, the regional extension and rifting in Early Cretaceous, and regional extension with a strike-slip component along the Tan-Lu fault zone during Late Cretaceous to Paleogene.
The study established the relationship between activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone and its adjacent basin development since Late Jurassic, through analyzing sedimentary filling, regional tectonics and stress fields. The relation of activities between the fault zone and its adjacent tectonics can be divided into 4 stages: (1) During the Late Jurassic period, the high-speed, oblique subduction of the Pacific ocean plate occurred underneath the eastern Eurasia plate amrgin, which caused the eastern China in a sinistral transpression stress field and hiatus of Late Jurassic deposition. Sinistral motion took place along the Tan-Lu fault zone in the Late Jurassic; (2) During the Early Cretaceous, the activities of the Tan-Lu fault zone changed into extension, leading to devilment of rift basins along the Tan-Lu fault zone and its adjacent areas in eastern China. According to the isopach maps of the residual strata, normal faulting along the Tan-Lu fault zone resulted in the sedimentary centers obviously around the Tan-Lu fault zone when the Lower Cretaceous strata were deposited while the sedimentary centers of the Upper Cretaceous strata migrated to the east-west trending, normal faults flanking the Tan-Lu fault zone; (3) Bohai Bay Basin was the intense rifted area in Paleogene, followed by the Subei Basin. The near north-south extension event, combined with the right-lateral slip pull-apart between the Tan-Lu fault zone and the frontal fault of the Taihang Mountains, induced the intensive extension of the Bohai Bay Basin. Under the control by both the near norh-south extension and the right strike-slip pull-apart, the sedimentary centers in the Bohai Bay Basin in Paleogene, migrated from south to north and from west to east regularly. In the end of Paleogene, the sedimentary center migrated to the central part of the Bohai sea where the Tan-Lu fault zone passed through; (4) The extensional activities ended in the study area in the Early Neogene due to the change of regional stress field from extension to compression. As a response to the change of stress field, the inversion widely happened in the faulted basins with termination for most of the rift basins due to uplifting and survival for other basins into depression-type basins (such as the Bohai Bay Basin, Subei Basin) and filled with draping sediments. According to the isopach maps of the Neogene, the Bohai sea segment of the Tan-Lu fault zone was the center of the depression deposition.
Focusing on the structural analysis in the Bohai Bay Basin in Cenozoic, this study analyzed Paleogene extensional activities, and compared tectonic subsidence in different basins or sags adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone. The results show that the main extension direction is north-south in different sags of the Bohai Bay region during Cenozoic, and extensional activities occurred mainly in the deposition period from the Kongdian Formation to Member 3 of the Shahejie Formation. From the Early Paleogene to the Late Paleogene, the largest extensional quantity, extensional rate, and extensional velocity migrate from both north and south ends in the study area to the Central Bohai. Moreover, the farther from the Tan-Lu fault zone, the smaller subsidence quantity of the depression is, that is, the depressions (such as the Changwei, Jiyang, Bozhong, Liaodong depression) within and near the Tan-Lu fault zone have a larger subsidence quantity, and the depressions far away from the Tan - Lu fault zone (the Linqing, Jizhong depression, etc.) have a smaller subsidence quantity. The above phenomenon shows that the Tan-Lu fault zone is a strong rifting zone during the extensional activities, and controls the development of the strong rifting region.
On the basis of researches on the tectonic activities in the eastern North China Craton since Early Cretaceous, combined with the results from previous studies on deep structure, the tectonic subsidence characteristics of the basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone and its relationship with deep structures were discussed in this study. The main tectonic subsidence centers of the basins in the study area focused on the southern and northern areas of the eastern North China Craton in Early Cretaceous, and in Paleogene the subsidence centers moved to the Bohai Bay basin area within the eastern North China Craton, thus the subsidence centers migrated from the margin to the internal of the eastern North China Craton with the changes in geological ages since Early Cretaceous. The research results shows that tectonic subsidence centers of the basins were mainly controlled by the structures and temperatures of lithosphere while the development characteristics of the rift basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone since Early Cretaceous were controlled by the four geological factors, namely, thermal state and strength of lithosphere, lithosphere structure, regional extension stress direction and dynamic mechanism.
The study systematically analyzed the organic geochemical characteristics and the spatial distribution characteristics of Paleogene source rocks in the basins adjacent to the Tan-Lu fault zone. There are five hydrocarbon source rocks for Eogene, including the Kongdian Formation, Member1, 3 and Member 4 of the Shahejie Formation, and the Dongying Formation, Of which source rocks for the Kongdian Formation and Member 3 of the Shahejie Formation are the major source rocks in the study area, and the geologic ages of the source rocks progressively become younger from south to north. The migration of tectonic subsidence centers controls the source rock development and thicknesses, and the sedimentary fades in the basins obviously controlled organic abundance and type of the source rocks, thus the extending of the Tan-Lu fault zone and tectonic subsidence center migration of the adjacent basins have great effect on quality of source rocks. The extensional activities along the Tan-Lu fault zone in Cretaceous make sedimentary centers in the adjacent basins migrated to the nearby of the Tan-Lu fault zone., such as deep lake -semi-deep lacustrine sedimentary environment mainly appearing near the Tan-Lu fault zone where is suitable for high-quality source rock development. Therefore, the Huming and zhanhua sags in the Jiyang Depression, and the center of the Laiyang sag in the Jiaolai Basin are the favorable exploration areas of Mesozoic exploration. The Weibei, Dongying and Huimin sags in the south of the Bohai bay basin are the favorable exploration areas for the Kongdian Formation and Member 4 of the Shahejie Formation.
引文
Allen P A and Allen J R. Basin analysis principles and applications. 1990. London: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 263-281
Altenberger U. Ductile deformation of K-feldspar in dry eclogite facies shear zones in the Bergen Arcs, Norway. Tectonophysics. 2000. 320:107-121.
Angelier J. Tectonic analysis of fault slip data sets. J. Geophys.Res. 1984. 89: 5835-5848
Benes, V., Davy, P. Modes of continental lithospheric extension: experimental verification of strain localization processes. Tectonophysics. 1996.69-87
Carey E. Recherche des directions principles de contraintes associ es au jeu d' une population de failles. Rev. Geol. Dyn.G ogr. Phys. 1979.21 (1): 57-66
Chang Edmund Z. Collisional orogene between north and south China and its eastern extension in the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences. 1996. 13 (3/5): 267-277
Dahlstrom C D A. Balanced cross sections. Canadian Journal ofEarth Sciences, 1969,6(4): 743-757.
Dahlstrom C D A. 1970. Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian RockyMountain. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 187(3): 332-406.
Deng JF, Su SG, Niu YL, Liu C, Zhao GC, Zhao XG, Zhou S, Wu ZX. A possible model for the lithospheric thinning of North China Craton: Evidence from the Yanshanian (Jura-Cretaceous) magmatism and tectonism. Lithos. 2007.96:22-35
Dodson M H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems . Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1973. 40: 259-174
Engebretson D C, Cox A, Gordon R G. Relative motions between oceanic and continental plates in the Pacific basin. The Geological Society of America, Special Paper. 1985. 206: 1-59
Gao S, Rudnick RL, Carlson RW, McDonough WF, Liu YS. Re-Os evidence for replacement of ancient mantle lithosphere beneath the North China Craton. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002. 198: 307-322
Gao S, Rudnick RL, Xu WL, Yuan HL, Hu ZC, Liu XM. Lithospheric evolution of the North China Craton: Evidence from high-Mg adakitic rocks and their entrained xenoliths (Abstract for Goldschmidt Conference). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2006. 70 (18), Suppl. 1, A193
Gilder S A, Leloup P H, Courtillot V, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang (Tan-Lu) fault via middle Triassic to Early Cenozoic paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1999. 104(B7): 15365-15390
Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zonr: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tectonophysics. 2002. 359: 225-253
Harland W B, Armstrong R L, Cox A V, Craig L E, Smith A G, Smith D G. A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press. 1989
Hsu K J, Li J, Chen I, et al. Tectonic evolution of Qinling Mountains, China. Eclogae. Geol. Helve., 1987. 80:735-752
Jacques MERCIER, Pierre VERGELY. Tectonique. Collection of Geosciences, DUNOD, PARIS. 1992.
J.C. Grimmer, R. Jonckheere, E. Enkelmann, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tectonophysics. 2002.359:225-253
J.C. Schmid, Lothar Ratschbacher, Bradley R. Hcker, et al. How did the foreland react? Yantze foreland fold-and-thrust belt deformation related to exhumation of the Dabie Shan ultrahigh-pressure continental crust (eastern China). Terra Nova. 1999.11(6): 266-272.
Li Z X. Collision between the north and south blocks: A crust-detachment model for suturing in the region east of the Tan-Lu feult. Geology. 1994.22:739-742.
Lin J L, Fuller M. Paleomagnetism, North and South China collision, and the Tan-Lu fault. Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.Lond., 1990. A331,589-598.
Lin Wei, Michel Faure, Fatrick Monie, Urs Scharer, Dominique Panis. Mesozoic Extensional Tectonics in Eastern Asia: The South Liaodong Peninsula Metamorphric Core Complex(NE China). The Journal of Geology, 2008.116:134-154.
Liu Junlai, Gregory A.Davis, Lin Zhiyong, et al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, Southeastern Liaoning Province, North China: A likely contributor to Cretaceous rotation of Eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas. Tectonophysics. 2005. 407(2005): 65-80.
Liu M, Furlong K P. Intrusion and underplating of mafic magmas: thermal-rheological effects and implications for Tertiary tectono-magmatism in the North American Cordillera. Tectonophysics. 1994.237:175-187.
Liu, M. Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the North American Cordillera: the role of gravitational collapse. Tectonophysics. 2001. 342:407-433.
Ludwig K R. Isoplot-a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication. 2001
Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G. et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands : plate tectonic systhesis from 750 Ma to the present Island Arc. 1997. 6(3): 121-142.
Massonne H J, Schreyer W. Phengite geobarometry based on the limiting assemblage with K-feldspar, phlogopite, and quartz. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987.96:212-224
Massonne H J, Szpurka Z. Thermodynamic properties of white micas on the basis of high-pressure experiments in the systems K_2O-MgO-Al_2O_(3-)Si0_2-H_2O and K_2O-FeO-Al_2O_3-SiO_2-H_2O. Lithos. 1997.41: 229-250
Menzies MA, Xu YG. Geodynamics of the North China Craton. In Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interactions in East Asia (eds. Flower MFJ, Chung SL, Lo CH, Lee TY), Am. Geophy. Union, Washington, D. C, Geodyn. Sen, 1998.27:155-165.
Menzies M, Xu Y G, Zhang H F,et al. Integration of geology,geophysics and geochemistry: A key to understanding the North China Craton.Lithos. 2007.96: 1-21.
Okay A I and Sengor A M C. Evidence for intracontinental thrust related exhumation of the ultra-high-pressure rocks in China. Geology. 1992. 20:411-414
Pryer L L. Microstructures in feldspars from a major crustal thrust zone: the Grenville Front, Ontario, Canada . Journal of Structural Geology. 1993. 15: 21-36
Qiu Jiansheng, Xu Xisheng, Lo Ching-hua. Potash-rich Volcanic rocks and lamprophyres in Western Shandong Province: 40Ar-39Ar dating source tracing. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2002. 47(2): 91-96
Ratschbacher L, Hacker B R, Webb L E, et al. Exhumation of the ultrahigh-pressure continental crust in east central China: Cretaceous and Cenozoic unroofing and the Tan-Lu fault zone. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2000.105(B6):13303~13338
Ren J, Kensaku T, Li S, Zhang J. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics. 2002. 344(3-4): 175-205
Schmid R, Ryberg T, Ratschbacher L, et al. Crustal structure of the eastern Dabie Shan interpreted from deep reflection and shallow tomographic data. Tectonophysics. 2001. 333: 347-359
Sokoutis,D.,Corti,G.,Bonini,M.,et al.Modelling the extension of heterogeneons hot lithosphere.Tectonophysics.2007.444:63-79
Stipp M.,Stunitz H.,Heilbronner R.,et al.The eastern Tonale fault zone:a 'natural laboratory' for crystal plastic deformation of quartz over a temperature range from 250 to 700℃.Journal of Structural Geology.2002.24:1861-1884
Tullis J and Yund R A.Diffusion creep in feldspar aggregates:experimental evidence.Journal of Structural Geology.1991.13:987-1000
Wang T,Zheng Y,Li T,Gao Y.Mesozoic granitic magmatism in extensional tectonics near theMongolian border in China and its implications for crustal growth[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences.2004.23:715-729.
Wang Yu.The onset of the Tau-Lu fault movement in eastern China:constraints from zircon(SHRIMP) and ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating.Terra Nova.2006.18(6):423-431.
Watts A B,Ryau W B F.Flexure of the lithosphere and continental margin basins.Tectonophysics.1976.36(4):24-44.
Watts A B.Tectonic subsidence,flexure and global changes of sea level.Nature.1982.297:469-47
Webb L E,Hacker B R,Ratschbacher L,et al.Thermochronologic constraints on deformation and cooling history of high-aud ultrahigh-pressure rocks in the Qinling-Dabie Orogen,Eastern China.Tectonics.1999.18(4):621-638.
Xu J W and Zhu G.Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone,eastern China.International Geology Review.1994.36:771-784
Xu J W,Zhu G,Tong W X,et al.Formation and evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiaug wrench fault system:a major shear system to the northern of the Pacific Ocean Tectonophysics.1987.134:273-310
Xu J W,Zhu G.Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone,eastern China.International Geology Review.1994.36:771-784
Xu Y G,Diachronous lithospheric thinning of the North China Craton and formation of the Daxin'auling-Talhangshan gravity lineament.Lithos.2007.96:281-298.
Yin A,Nie S Y.An indendation model for the North and South China collision and the development of the Tan-Lu and Honam fault system,eastern Asia.Tectonics.1993.12(4):801-813
Zhaug Y Q,Dong S W.Shi W.Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tau-Lu fault zone in Shandong province,eastern China.Tectonophysics.2003.363(3/4):243-258
Zhaug Yueqiao,Ma Yinsheng,Yang Nong,et al.Cenozoic extensional stress evolution in North China.Journal of Geodynamics.2003.36:591-613
Zheng JP,O'Reilly SY,Griffin WL,Lu FX,Zhaug M,Pearson NJ.Relict refractory mantle beneath the eastern North China block:significance for lithosphere evolution.Lithos.2001.57:43-66.
Zheng Y,Wang S,Wang Y.An enormous thrust nappe and extensional metamorphic core complex newly discovered in Sino-Mongolian boundary area.Science in China(Series B).1991.34(9)." 1145-1152.
Zhu G,Liu G S,Niu M L,Xie C L,Wang Y S,Xiaug B W.Syn-collisional transform faulting of the Tau-Lu fault zone,East China.Int J Earth Sci.2008
Zhu G,Wang Y S,Liu G S,et al.~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating of strike-slip motion on the Tan-Lu fault zone,East China.Journal of Strnctural Geology.2005.27(8):1379-1398
Zhu Guaug,Wang Yongsheng,Liu Guosheng,Niu Maulan,Xie Chenglong,Li Chaugcheng.~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating of strike-slip motion on the Tau-Lu fault zone,East China.Journal of strnctural geology.2005.27:1379-1398
安徽省地质矿产局.安徽省区域地质志.1987.北京:地质出版社.
安徽省地质矿产局区域地质调查队.安徽地层志(三叠系分册、侏罗系分册、白垩系分册、第三系分册).1988.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社.1-146
陈宣华,王小凤,张青,等.郯庐断裂带形成演化的年代学研究.长春地质学院学报.2000.30(3):215-220
程有义,李晓清,汪泽成,等.潍北拉分盆地形成演化及其对成油气条件的控制.石油勘探与开发.2004.31(6):32-35
窦立荣,宋建国,王瑜.郯庐断裂带北段形成的年代学及其意义.地质论评.1996.42(6):508-512
杜旭东,李洪革,陆克政,等.华北地台东部及邻区中生代(J—K)原型盆地分布及成盆模式探讨.石油勘探与开发.1999&26(4):5-9
杜旭东,薛林福,邬光辉.中国东部大陆内部中生代盆地分布特征与地球动力学背景探讨.长春科技大学学报.1999b.29(2):138-143
杜旭东,漆家福,陆春生.沉降史反演的现状与应用.世界地质.1997.16(2):23-26
葛建党.郯庐断裂在渤中凹陷的构造特征与油气成藏的关系.海洋石油.2001.(1):14-20
关康,罗镇宽,苗来成,等.胶东招远郭家岭型花岗岩锆石 SHRIMP 年代学研究.地质科学.1998.33(3):318-328
国家地震局地质研究所.郯庐断裂.1987.北京:地震出版社
侯明金,王永敏.断裂带的动力学分析—“利用断层面上擦痕观察、测量计算主应力轴状态”方法简介.安徽地质.2002.12(2):86-91
侯明金,王永敏,Jacques M,等.郯庐断裂带(安徽部分)动力学演化及其构造意义.地质通报,2003.22(2):105-112
侯明金,朱光,Merrier.J,et aI.郯庐断裂带(安徽段)及邻区的动力学分析与区域构造演化.地质科学,2007.42(2):362-381
江来利,吴维平,储东如,等.大别山北部碰撞后伸展—逆冲推覆构造.科学通报,2003.48(14):1557-1563.
斩克,许文良,王清海,等.蚌埠淮光“混合花岗闪长岩”的形成时代及源区:锆石SHRIMP U-Pb地质年代学证据.地球学报,2003.24(4):331-335.
李思田,谢习农,王华.沉积盆地分析基础与应用.2004.北京:高等教育出版社
李学明,李彬贤,张巽,等.安徽管店岩体的同位素地质年龄和郯庐断裂带的动力学变质作用.中国科学技术大学学报.1985(增刊):254-261
刘国生,朱光,王道轩,等.郯庐断裂带张八岭隆起走滑运动与合肥盆地的沉积响应.沉积学报.2002a,20(2):267-273
刘俊来,关会梅,纪 沫,等.华北晚中生代变质核杂岩构造及其对岩石圈减薄机制的约束.自然科学进展.2006.16(1):21-26
陆克政,藏俊生.胶莱盆地的形成和演化.1994.山东东营:石油大学出版社
陆克政,漆家福,等.渤海湾新生代含油气盆地构造模式.1997.北京:地质出版社
陆克政.2003.含油气盆地分析.山东东营:石油大学出版社
马昌前,杨坤光,明厚利,等.大别山中生代地壳从挤压转向伸展的时间:花岗岩的证据.中国科学(D 辑).2003.33(9):817-827
苗来成,罗镇宽,关康,等.玲珑花岗岩中锆石的离子质谱U-Pb年龄及其岩石学意义.岩石学报.1998.14(2):198-206
苗来成,罗镇宽,黄佳展,等.山东招掖金矿带内花岗岩类侵入体锆石SHRIMP研究及其意义.中国科学(D辑).1997.27(3):207-213
牛漫兰.张八岭隆起南缘早白垩世火山岩稀土元素对比研究.中国稀土学报.2006.24(6):739-744
牛漫兰,朱光,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带南段走滑期同构造岩体的稀土元素对比研究.中国稀土学报.2005.23(2):235-238
牛漫兰,朱光,刘国生等.郯庐断裂带中—南段中生代岩浆活动构造背景和深部过程.地质科学.2002.37(4):393-404
牛漫兰,朱光,宋传中,等.郯庐断裂带火山活动与深部过程的新认识.地质科技情报.2000.19(3):21-26
牛漫兰,朱光,宋传中,等.郯庐断裂带中南段新生代玄武岩源区地幔特征及其演化.现代地质。2001.15(4):383-390
牛漫兰.张八岭地区中生代岩体中黑云母的40Ar/39Ar年龄及其地质意义.地质科学.2006.41(2):217-225
漆家福,陈发景.下辽河—辽东湾新生代裂陷盆地的构造解析.1995.北京:地质出版社
漆家福,杨桥.关于碎屑岩层的去压实校正方法的讨论—兼讨论李绍虎等提出的压实校正法.石油实验地质.23(3):351-356
漆家福,杨桥,陈发景,等.辽东湾—下辽河盆地新生代构造的运动学特征及其演化过程.现代地质.1994.8(1):34-42
漆家福,杨桥,王子煜,等.关于编制盆地构造演化剖面的几个问题的讨论.地质论评.2001.47(4):388-392
漆家福,张一伟,陆克政,等.渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化.石油大学学报.1995.19(Suppl):1-6
漆家福.渤海湾盆地新生代裂陷盆地的伸展构造模式及其构造动力学过程.石油实验地质.1995.17(4):316-323
漆家福.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释.中国地质.2004.31(1):15-22
邱检生,王德滋,罗清华,等.鲁东胶莱盆地青山组火山岩的~(40)Ar-~(39)Ar定年—以五莲分岭山火山机构为例.高校地质学报.2001.7(3):351-355
邱检生,王德滋,周金城,等.山东中生代橄榄安粗岩系火山岩的地质.地球化学特征及岩石成因.地球科学.1996.21(6):546-552
宋建国,窦立荣.中国东部中生代盆地分析和含油气系统.1997.北京:石油工业出版社.
苏尚国,周若,顾德林,等.山东沂水紫苏花岗岩特征、形成时代及成因探讨.地球科学—中国地质大学学报.1999.24(1):57-62.
田在艺,韩屏.渤海断陷盆地拉张量分析与油气潜力.石油学报.1990.1l(2):1-12
田在艺,张庆春.中国含油气沉积盆地论.1996.北京:石油工业出版社
万天丰,Teyssier C,曾华霖,等.山东玲珑花岗岩体侵位机制.中国科学(D辑).2000.30(4):337-344
万天丰,朱鸿,赵磊,等.郯庐断裂带的形成与演化:综述.现代地质.1996.10(2):159-168
万天丰,朱鸿.郯庐断裂带的最大左行走滑断距及其形成时期.高校地质学报.1996.2(1):14-27
万天丰.山东省构造演化与应力场.山东地质.1992.8(2):70-101
王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等.郯庐断裂带.2000.北京:地质出版社
王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等.郯庐走滑断裂系的形成演化及其地质意义.见:郑亚东等主编.第30届国际地质大会论文集.1998.北京:地质出版社
王永新,汪集旸,胡圣标.辽河盆地东部凹陷热历史及构造—热演化特征.地质科学.2003.38(2):214-220
王勇生,朱光,陈文,等.郯庐断裂带的热年代学信息及其与大别造山带折返的关系.地球化学.2005.34(3):193-214
王勇生,朱光,宋传中,等.大别山东缘郯.庐断裂带由走滑向伸展运动转换的~(40)Ar-~(39)Ar年代学记录.地质科学.2006.41(2):242-255
王子煜,漆家福,陆克政.黄骅坳陷东部构造带新生代构造沉降史分析.石油与天然气地质.2000.21(2):127-129
吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题.地学前缘.2003.10(3):51-60
吴福元,孙德有.中国东部中生代岩浆作用与岩石圈减薄.长春科技大学学报.1999.29(4):313-318
谢成龙,朱光,牛漫兰,等.滁州中生代火山岩LA-ICP MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造地质学意义.地质论评.2007.53(5):642-655
谢成龙,朱光,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带巢湖一庐江段晚中生代火山岩的锆石U-Pb年代学.地质科学.2008.43(2):294-308.
徐嘉炜,马国锋.郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾.地质论评.1992.38(4):316-324
徐嘉炜.郯城-庐江平移断裂系统.构造地质论从(3).1984.北京:地质出版社
许文良,王冬艳,刘晓春,等.徐淮地区早侏罗世侵入杂岩体中榴辉岩类包体的发现及其地质意义.科学通报.2002.47(8):618-622
许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.华北地块中东部中生代侵入杂岩中角闪石和黑云母的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar定年:对岩石圈减薄时间的制约.地球化学.2004.33(3):221-231
许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.华北地块中东部中生代侵入杂岩中角闪石和黑云母的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar定年:对岩石圈减薄时间的制约.地球化学.2004.33(3):221-231
许文良,王清海,王冬艳,等.华北克拉通东部中生代岩石圈减薄的过程与机制:中生代火成岩和深源捕虏体证据.地学前缘.2004.11(3):309-317
杨德彬,许文良,裴福萍,等.蚌埠隆起区花岗岩形成时代及岩浆源区性质:锆石LA-ICPMS U-Pb定年与示踪.地球化学.2005.34(5):443-454.
杨文采,余长青.根据地球物理资料分析大别—苏鲁超高压变质带演化的运动学与动力学.地球物理学报.2001.44(3):346-359.
姚益民等.中国油气区第三系(Ⅳ)·渤海湾盆地油气分册.1994.北京:石油工业出版社.
姚益民,修申成,魏秀玲,等.东营凹陷下第三系ESR测年研究.油气地质与采收率.2002.9(2):31-34.
叶得泉,钟筱春等.中国油气区第三系(Ⅰ)·总论.1993.北京:石油工业出版社.
张宏福,英基丰,徐平,马玉光.华北中生代玄武岩中地幔橄榄石捕虏晶:对岩石圈地幔置换过程的启示.科学通报.2004.49(8):784-789
张进江,郑亚东,刘树文.小秦岭变质核杂岩的构造体制形成机制及构造演化.1998.北京:海洋出版社
张旗,金惟俊,王元龙,等.大陆下地壳拆沉模式初探.岩石学报.2006.22(2):265-276
张旗,金惟俊,王元龙,等.晚中生代中国东部高原北界探讨.岩石学报.2007.23(4):689-700
张旗,钱青,王二七,等.燕山中晚期的中国东部高原:埃达克岩的启示.地质科学.2001.36(2):248-255
张旗,王焰,王元龙.燕山期中国东部高原下地壳组成初探:埃达克质岩Sr,Nd同位素制约.岩石学报.2001.17(4):505-513
张晓东,余青,陈发景,等.松辽盆地变质核杂岩和伸展断陷的构造特征及成因.地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京).2000.7(4):411-419
张岳桥,赵越,董树文,等.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘.2004.11(3):123-134
张岳桥,李金良,张田,等.胶莱盆地及其邻区白垩纪—古新世沉积构造演化历史及其区域动力学意义.地质学报.2008.82(9):1229-1257
张岳桥,董树文.郯庐断裂带中生代构造演化史:进展与新认识.地质通报.2008.27(9):1371-1390.
郑建平,路凤香,O'Reilly S Y,等.华北东部地幔改造作用和置换作用:单斜辉石激光探针研究.中国科学(D辑).2000.30(4):373-382
郑亚东,张青.内蒙亚干变质核杂岩核内递进伸展作用.伸展构造研究.1994.北京:地质出版社
郑亚东,王涛.中蒙边界区中生代推覆构造与伸展垮塌作用的运动学和动力学分析.中国科学D辑地球科学.2005.35(4):291-303
周建波,胡克,申宁华,等.郯庐断裂中段石场.中楼拉分盆地的确定.地质科学.1999.34(1):18-28
周建波,郑永飞,赵子福.山东五莲中生代岩浆岩的锫石U-Pb年龄.高校地质学报.2003.9(2):14-23
周荔青,刘池阳.深大断裂与中国东部新生代盆地油气资源分布.2006.北京:石油工业出版社.
周翥虹,王文军等.苏北盆地未—低熟生油岩中的藻类研究.小型油气藏.1998(3):6-9.
朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带新第三纪以来的挤压活动与深部过程.地震地质.2002.24(2):265-277
朱光,侯明金,王勇生,等.郯庐断裂带早白垩世的走滑运动与中国东部构造格局的转换.安徽地质.2003.13(2):89-96
朱光,胡召齐,陈印,等.华北克拉通东部早白垩世伸展盆地的发育过程及其对克拉通破坏的指示.地质通报.2008.27(10):14-24
朱光,刘圈生,Dunlap W J,等.郯庐断裂带同造山走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar年代学证据.科学通报.2004a.49(2):190-198.
朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的平移运动与成因.地质通报.2003.22(3):200-207
朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带晚第三纪以来的浅部挤压活动与深部过程.地震地质.2002b.24(2):265-277
朱光,刘国生,王道轩,等.郯庐断裂带的脉动式伸展活动.高校地质学报.2000.6(3):396-404
朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar法定年.地质学报.2005.79(3):303-316
朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带早白垩世走滑运动中的构造、岩浆、沉积事件.地质学报.2002a.76(3):323-334.
朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar法定年.地质学报.2005.79(3):303-316
朱光,宋传中,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的岩石圈结构及其成因分析.高校地质学报.2002.8(3):248-256
朱光,宋传中,王道轩,等.郯庐断裂带走滑时代的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar年代学研究及其构造意义.中国科学(D辑).2001a.31(3):250-256
朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景.地质科学.2001b.36(3):269-278
朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应.地质科学.2004b.39(1):36-49
朱光,王道轩,徐春华,等.大别高压—超高压变质岩剥露历史在合肥盆地的记录.高校地质学报.2004b.10(4):594-605
朱光,王勇生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的同造山运动.地学前缘.2004a.11(3):169-182
朱光,谢成龙,向必伟,等.洪镇变质核杂岩的形成机制及其大地构造意义.中国科学(D辑).2007.37(5):584-592
朱光,胡召齐,陈印,等.华北克拉通东部早白垩世伸展盆地的发育过程及其对克拉通破坏的指示.地质通报.2008.27(10):1594-1604.
朱光,徐嘉炜,C.J.N.Flctchcr,et aJ.应用X射线衍射分析胶北蓬莱群板岩中的变质作用.地质与勘探.1994.30(2):42-49
朱光,徐嘉炜,刘国生,等.下扬子地区沿江前陆盆地形成的构造控制.地质论评.1998.44(2):120-129
朱光,徐嘉炜,孙世群.郯庐断裂带平移时代的同位素年龄证据.地质论评.1995.4l(5):452-456
朱光,徐嘉炜.郯庐断裂带的平移幅度、平移时代及其构造模式.陈毓川等主编第30届国际地质大会沦文集.北京:地质出版社.1998.167-175.
朱光,徐嘉炜.沂沐断裂带内盖层的剪切变形及其构造意义.长春地质学院学报.1995.25(3):279-285
朱光,徐佑德,刘国生.等.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律.地质科学.2006.41(2):226-241
朱光,谢成龙,王勇生,等.郯庐高压走滑韧性剪切带特征及其~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar定年.岩石学报.2005.21(6):1687-1702
朱光.用伊利石结晶度确定碎屑沉积岩甚低级变质等级.石油勘探与开发.1995.22(1):33-35
Altenberger U. Ductile deformation of K-feldspar in dry eclogite facies shear zones in the Bergen Arcs, Norway. Tectonophysics. 2000. 320:107-121.
Angelier J. Tectonic analysis of fault slip data sets. J. Geophys.Res. 1984. 89: 5835-5848
Benes, V., Davy, P. Modes of continental lithospheric extension: experimental verification of strain localization processes. Tectonophysics. 1996.69-87
Carey E. Recherche des directions principles de contraintes associ es au jeu d' une population de failles. Rev. Geol. Dyn.G ogr. Phys. 1979.21 (1): 57-66
Chang Edmund Z. Collisional orogene between north and south China and its eastern extension in the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences. 1996. 13 (3/5): 267-277
Dahlstrom C D A. Balanced cross sections. Canadian Journal ofEarth Sciences, 1969,6(4): 743-757.
Dahlstrom C D A. 1970. Structural geology in the eastern margin of the Canadian RockyMountain. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 187(3): 332-406.
Deng JF, Su SG, Niu YL, Liu C, Zhao GC, Zhao XG, Zhou S, Wu ZX. A possible model for the lithospheric thinning of North China Craton: Evidence from the Yanshanian (Jura-Cretaceous) magmatism and tectonism. Lithos. 2007.96:22-35
Dodson M H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems . Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1973. 40: 259-174
Engebretson D C, Cox A, Gordon R G. Relative motions between oceanic and continental plates in the Pacific basin. The Geological Society of America, Special Paper. 1985. 206: 1-59
Gao S, Rudnick RL, Carlson RW, McDonough WF, Liu YS. Re-Os evidence for replacement of ancient mantle lithosphere beneath the North China Craton. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2002. 198: 307-322
Gao S, Rudnick RL, Xu WL, Yuan HL, Hu ZC, Liu XM. Lithospheric evolution of the North China Craton: Evidence from high-Mg adakitic rocks and their entrained xenoliths (Abstract for Goldschmidt Conference). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2006. 70 (18), Suppl. 1, A193
Gilder S A, Leloup P H, Courtillot V, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang (Tan-Lu) fault via middle Triassic to Early Cenozoic paleomagnetic data. Journal of Geophysical Research. 1999. 104(B7): 15365-15390
Grimmer J C, Jonckheere R, Enkelmann E, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zonr: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tectonophysics. 2002. 359: 225-253
Harland W B, Armstrong R L, Cox A V, Craig L E, Smith A G, Smith D G. A Geologic Time Scale. Cambridge University Press. 1989
Hsu K J, Li J, Chen I, et al. Tectonic evolution of Qinling Mountains, China. Eclogae. Geol. Helve., 1987. 80:735-752
Jacques MERCIER, Pierre VERGELY. Tectonique. Collection of Geosciences, DUNOD, PARIS. 1992.
J.C. Grimmer, R. Jonckheere, E. Enkelmann, et al. Cretaceous-Cenozoic history of the southern Tan-Lu fault zone: apatite fission-track and structural constraints from the Dabie Shan (eastern China). Tectonophysics. 2002.359:225-253
J.C. Schmid, Lothar Ratschbacher, Bradley R. Hcker, et al. How did the foreland react? Yantze foreland fold-and-thrust belt deformation related to exhumation of the Dabie Shan ultrahigh-pressure continental crust (eastern China). Terra Nova. 1999.11(6): 266-272.
Li Z X. Collision between the north and south blocks: A crust-detachment model for suturing in the region east of the Tan-Lu feult. Geology. 1994.22:739-742.
Lin J L, Fuller M. Paleomagnetism, North and South China collision, and the Tan-Lu fault. Phil.Trans.Roy.Soc.Lond., 1990. A331,589-598.
Lin Wei, Michel Faure, Fatrick Monie, Urs Scharer, Dominique Panis. Mesozoic Extensional Tectonics in Eastern Asia: The South Liaodong Peninsula Metamorphric Core Complex(NE China). The Journal of Geology, 2008.116:134-154.
Liu Junlai, Gregory A.Davis, Lin Zhiyong, et al. The Liaonan metamorphic core complex, Southeastern Liaoning Province, North China: A likely contributor to Cretaceous rotation of Eastern Liaoning, Korea and contiguous areas. Tectonophysics. 2005. 407(2005): 65-80.
Liu M, Furlong K P. Intrusion and underplating of mafic magmas: thermal-rheological effects and implications for Tertiary tectono-magmatism in the North American Cordillera. Tectonophysics. 1994.237:175-187.
Liu, M. Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the North American Cordillera: the role of gravitational collapse. Tectonophysics. 2001. 342:407-433.
Ludwig K R. Isoplot-a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Center Special Publication. 2001
Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G. et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese Islands : plate tectonic systhesis from 750 Ma to the present Island Arc. 1997. 6(3): 121-142.
Massonne H J, Schreyer W. Phengite geobarometry based on the limiting assemblage with K-feldspar, phlogopite, and quartz. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 1987.96:212-224
Massonne H J, Szpurka Z. Thermodynamic properties of white micas on the basis of high-pressure experiments in the systems K_2O-MgO-Al_2O_(3-)Si0_2-H_2O and K_2O-FeO-Al_2O_3-SiO_2-H_2O. Lithos. 1997.41: 229-250
Menzies MA, Xu YG. Geodynamics of the North China Craton. In Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interactions in East Asia (eds. Flower MFJ, Chung SL, Lo CH, Lee TY), Am. Geophy. Union, Washington, D. C, Geodyn. Sen, 1998.27:155-165.
Menzies M, Xu Y G, Zhang H F,et al. Integration of geology,geophysics and geochemistry: A key to understanding the North China Craton.Lithos. 2007.96: 1-21.
Okay A I and Sengor A M C. Evidence for intracontinental thrust related exhumation of the ultra-high-pressure rocks in China. Geology. 1992. 20:411-414
Pryer L L. Microstructures in feldspars from a major crustal thrust zone: the Grenville Front, Ontario, Canada . Journal of Structural Geology. 1993. 15: 21-36
Qiu Jiansheng, Xu Xisheng, Lo Ching-hua. Potash-rich Volcanic rocks and lamprophyres in Western Shandong Province: 40Ar-39Ar dating source tracing. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2002. 47(2): 91-96
Ratschbacher L, Hacker B R, Webb L E, et al. Exhumation of the ultrahigh-pressure continental crust in east central China: Cretaceous and Cenozoic unroofing and the Tan-Lu fault zone. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2000.105(B6):13303~13338
Ren J, Kensaku T, Li S, Zhang J. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics. 2002. 344(3-4): 175-205
Schmid R, Ryberg T, Ratschbacher L, et al. Crustal structure of the eastern Dabie Shan interpreted from deep reflection and shallow tomographic data. Tectonophysics. 2001. 333: 347-359
Sokoutis,D.,Corti,G.,Bonini,M.,et al.Modelling the extension of heterogeneons hot lithosphere.Tectonophysics.2007.444:63-79
Stipp M.,Stunitz H.,Heilbronner R.,et al.The eastern Tonale fault zone:a 'natural laboratory' for crystal plastic deformation of quartz over a temperature range from 250 to 700℃.Journal of Structural Geology.2002.24:1861-1884
Tullis J and Yund R A.Diffusion creep in feldspar aggregates:experimental evidence.Journal of Structural Geology.1991.13:987-1000
Wang T,Zheng Y,Li T,Gao Y.Mesozoic granitic magmatism in extensional tectonics near theMongolian border in China and its implications for crustal growth[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences.2004.23:715-729.
Wang Yu.The onset of the Tau-Lu fault movement in eastern China:constraints from zircon(SHRIMP) and ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating.Terra Nova.2006.18(6):423-431.
Watts A B,Ryau W B F.Flexure of the lithosphere and continental margin basins.Tectonophysics.1976.36(4):24-44.
Watts A B.Tectonic subsidence,flexure and global changes of sea level.Nature.1982.297:469-47
Webb L E,Hacker B R,Ratschbacher L,et al.Thermochronologic constraints on deformation and cooling history of high-aud ultrahigh-pressure rocks in the Qinling-Dabie Orogen,Eastern China.Tectonics.1999.18(4):621-638.
Xu J W and Zhu G.Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone,eastern China.International Geology Review.1994.36:771-784
Xu J W,Zhu G,Tong W X,et al.Formation and evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiaug wrench fault system:a major shear system to the northern of the Pacific Ocean Tectonophysics.1987.134:273-310
Xu J W,Zhu G.Tectonic models of the Tan-Lu fault zone,eastern China.International Geology Review.1994.36:771-784
Xu Y G,Diachronous lithospheric thinning of the North China Craton and formation of the Daxin'auling-Talhangshan gravity lineament.Lithos.2007.96:281-298.
Yin A,Nie S Y.An indendation model for the North and South China collision and the development of the Tan-Lu and Honam fault system,eastern Asia.Tectonics.1993.12(4):801-813
Zhaug Y Q,Dong S W.Shi W.Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tau-Lu fault zone in Shandong province,eastern China.Tectonophysics.2003.363(3/4):243-258
Zhaug Yueqiao,Ma Yinsheng,Yang Nong,et al.Cenozoic extensional stress evolution in North China.Journal of Geodynamics.2003.36:591-613
Zheng JP,O'Reilly SY,Griffin WL,Lu FX,Zhaug M,Pearson NJ.Relict refractory mantle beneath the eastern North China block:significance for lithosphere evolution.Lithos.2001.57:43-66.
Zheng Y,Wang S,Wang Y.An enormous thrust nappe and extensional metamorphic core complex newly discovered in Sino-Mongolian boundary area.Science in China(Series B).1991.34(9)." 1145-1152.
Zhu G,Liu G S,Niu M L,Xie C L,Wang Y S,Xiaug B W.Syn-collisional transform faulting of the Tau-Lu fault zone,East China.Int J Earth Sci.2008
Zhu G,Wang Y S,Liu G S,et al.~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating of strike-slip motion on the Tan-Lu fault zone,East China.Journal of Strnctural Geology.2005.27(8):1379-1398
Zhu Guaug,Wang Yongsheng,Liu Guosheng,Niu Maulan,Xie Chenglong,Li Chaugcheng.~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar dating of strike-slip motion on the Tau-Lu fault zone,East China.Journal of strnctural geology.2005.27:1379-1398
安徽省地质矿产局.安徽省区域地质志.1987.北京:地质出版社.
安徽省地质矿产局区域地质调查队.安徽地层志(三叠系分册、侏罗系分册、白垩系分册、第三系分册).1988.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社.1-146
陈宣华,王小凤,张青,等.郯庐断裂带形成演化的年代学研究.长春地质学院学报.2000.30(3):215-220
程有义,李晓清,汪泽成,等.潍北拉分盆地形成演化及其对成油气条件的控制.石油勘探与开发.2004.31(6):32-35
窦立荣,宋建国,王瑜.郯庐断裂带北段形成的年代学及其意义.地质论评.1996.42(6):508-512
杜旭东,李洪革,陆克政,等.华北地台东部及邻区中生代(J—K)原型盆地分布及成盆模式探讨.石油勘探与开发.1999&26(4):5-9
杜旭东,薛林福,邬光辉.中国东部大陆内部中生代盆地分布特征与地球动力学背景探讨.长春科技大学学报.1999b.29(2):138-143
杜旭东,漆家福,陆春生.沉降史反演的现状与应用.世界地质.1997.16(2):23-26
葛建党.郯庐断裂在渤中凹陷的构造特征与油气成藏的关系.海洋石油.2001.(1):14-20
关康,罗镇宽,苗来成,等.胶东招远郭家岭型花岗岩锆石 SHRIMP 年代学研究.地质科学.1998.33(3):318-328
国家地震局地质研究所.郯庐断裂.1987.北京:地震出版社
侯明金,王永敏.断裂带的动力学分析—“利用断层面上擦痕观察、测量计算主应力轴状态”方法简介.安徽地质.2002.12(2):86-91
侯明金,王永敏,Jacques M,等.郯庐断裂带(安徽部分)动力学演化及其构造意义.地质通报,2003.22(2):105-112
侯明金,朱光,Merrier.J,et aI.郯庐断裂带(安徽段)及邻区的动力学分析与区域构造演化.地质科学,2007.42(2):362-381
江来利,吴维平,储东如,等.大别山北部碰撞后伸展—逆冲推覆构造.科学通报,2003.48(14):1557-1563.
斩克,许文良,王清海,等.蚌埠淮光“混合花岗闪长岩”的形成时代及源区:锆石SHRIMP U-Pb地质年代学证据.地球学报,2003.24(4):331-335.
李思田,谢习农,王华.沉积盆地分析基础与应用.2004.北京:高等教育出版社
李学明,李彬贤,张巽,等.安徽管店岩体的同位素地质年龄和郯庐断裂带的动力学变质作用.中国科学技术大学学报.1985(增刊):254-261
刘国生,朱光,王道轩,等.郯庐断裂带张八岭隆起走滑运动与合肥盆地的沉积响应.沉积学报.2002a,20(2):267-273
刘俊来,关会梅,纪 沫,等.华北晚中生代变质核杂岩构造及其对岩石圈减薄机制的约束.自然科学进展.2006.16(1):21-26
陆克政,藏俊生.胶莱盆地的形成和演化.1994.山东东营:石油大学出版社
陆克政,漆家福,等.渤海湾新生代含油气盆地构造模式.1997.北京:地质出版社
陆克政.2003.含油气盆地分析.山东东营:石油大学出版社
马昌前,杨坤光,明厚利,等.大别山中生代地壳从挤压转向伸展的时间:花岗岩的证据.中国科学(D 辑).2003.33(9):817-827
苗来成,罗镇宽,关康,等.玲珑花岗岩中锆石的离子质谱U-Pb年龄及其岩石学意义.岩石学报.1998.14(2):198-206
苗来成,罗镇宽,黄佳展,等.山东招掖金矿带内花岗岩类侵入体锆石SHRIMP研究及其意义.中国科学(D辑).1997.27(3):207-213
牛漫兰.张八岭隆起南缘早白垩世火山岩稀土元素对比研究.中国稀土学报.2006.24(6):739-744
牛漫兰,朱光,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带南段走滑期同构造岩体的稀土元素对比研究.中国稀土学报.2005.23(2):235-238
牛漫兰,朱光,刘国生等.郯庐断裂带中—南段中生代岩浆活动构造背景和深部过程.地质科学.2002.37(4):393-404
牛漫兰,朱光,宋传中,等.郯庐断裂带火山活动与深部过程的新认识.地质科技情报.2000.19(3):21-26
牛漫兰,朱光,宋传中,等.郯庐断裂带中南段新生代玄武岩源区地幔特征及其演化.现代地质。2001.15(4):383-390
牛漫兰.张八岭地区中生代岩体中黑云母的40Ar/39Ar年龄及其地质意义.地质科学.2006.41(2):217-225
漆家福,陈发景.下辽河—辽东湾新生代裂陷盆地的构造解析.1995.北京:地质出版社
漆家福,杨桥.关于碎屑岩层的去压实校正方法的讨论—兼讨论李绍虎等提出的压实校正法.石油实验地质.23(3):351-356
漆家福,杨桥,陈发景,等.辽东湾—下辽河盆地新生代构造的运动学特征及其演化过程.现代地质.1994.8(1):34-42
漆家福,杨桥,王子煜,等.关于编制盆地构造演化剖面的几个问题的讨论.地质论评.2001.47(4):388-392
漆家福,张一伟,陆克政,等.渤海湾盆地新生代构造演化.石油大学学报.1995.19(Suppl):1-6
漆家福.渤海湾盆地新生代裂陷盆地的伸展构造模式及其构造动力学过程.石油实验地质.1995.17(4):316-323
漆家福.渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释.中国地质.2004.31(1):15-22
邱检生,王德滋,罗清华,等.鲁东胶莱盆地青山组火山岩的~(40)Ar-~(39)Ar定年—以五莲分岭山火山机构为例.高校地质学报.2001.7(3):351-355
邱检生,王德滋,周金城,等.山东中生代橄榄安粗岩系火山岩的地质.地球化学特征及岩石成因.地球科学.1996.21(6):546-552
宋建国,窦立荣.中国东部中生代盆地分析和含油气系统.1997.北京:石油工业出版社.
苏尚国,周若,顾德林,等.山东沂水紫苏花岗岩特征、形成时代及成因探讨.地球科学—中国地质大学学报.1999.24(1):57-62.
田在艺,韩屏.渤海断陷盆地拉张量分析与油气潜力.石油学报.1990.1l(2):1-12
田在艺,张庆春.中国含油气沉积盆地论.1996.北京:石油工业出版社
万天丰,Teyssier C,曾华霖,等.山东玲珑花岗岩体侵位机制.中国科学(D辑).2000.30(4):337-344
万天丰,朱鸿,赵磊,等.郯庐断裂带的形成与演化:综述.现代地质.1996.10(2):159-168
万天丰,朱鸿.郯庐断裂带的最大左行走滑断距及其形成时期.高校地质学报.1996.2(1):14-27
万天丰.山东省构造演化与应力场.山东地质.1992.8(2):70-101
王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等.郯庐断裂带.2000.北京:地质出版社
王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等.郯庐走滑断裂系的形成演化及其地质意义.见:郑亚东等主编.第30届国际地质大会论文集.1998.北京:地质出版社
王永新,汪集旸,胡圣标.辽河盆地东部凹陷热历史及构造—热演化特征.地质科学.2003.38(2):214-220
王勇生,朱光,陈文,等.郯庐断裂带的热年代学信息及其与大别造山带折返的关系.地球化学.2005.34(3):193-214
王勇生,朱光,宋传中,等.大别山东缘郯.庐断裂带由走滑向伸展运动转换的~(40)Ar-~(39)Ar年代学记录.地质科学.2006.41(2):242-255
王子煜,漆家福,陆克政.黄骅坳陷东部构造带新生代构造沉降史分析.石油与天然气地质.2000.21(2):127-129
吴福元,葛文春,孙德有,等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题.地学前缘.2003.10(3):51-60
吴福元,孙德有.中国东部中生代岩浆作用与岩石圈减薄.长春科技大学学报.1999.29(4):313-318
谢成龙,朱光,牛漫兰,等.滁州中生代火山岩LA-ICP MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造地质学意义.地质论评.2007.53(5):642-655
谢成龙,朱光,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带巢湖一庐江段晚中生代火山岩的锆石U-Pb年代学.地质科学.2008.43(2):294-308.
徐嘉炜,马国锋.郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾.地质论评.1992.38(4):316-324
徐嘉炜.郯城-庐江平移断裂系统.构造地质论从(3).1984.北京:地质出版社
许文良,王冬艳,刘晓春,等.徐淮地区早侏罗世侵入杂岩体中榴辉岩类包体的发现及其地质意义.科学通报.2002.47(8):618-622
许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.华北地块中东部中生代侵入杂岩中角闪石和黑云母的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar定年:对岩石圈减薄时间的制约.地球化学.2004.33(3):221-231
许文良,王冬艳,王清海,等.华北地块中东部中生代侵入杂岩中角闪石和黑云母的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar定年:对岩石圈减薄时间的制约.地球化学.2004.33(3):221-231
许文良,王清海,王冬艳,等.华北克拉通东部中生代岩石圈减薄的过程与机制:中生代火成岩和深源捕虏体证据.地学前缘.2004.11(3):309-317
杨德彬,许文良,裴福萍,等.蚌埠隆起区花岗岩形成时代及岩浆源区性质:锆石LA-ICPMS U-Pb定年与示踪.地球化学.2005.34(5):443-454.
杨文采,余长青.根据地球物理资料分析大别—苏鲁超高压变质带演化的运动学与动力学.地球物理学报.2001.44(3):346-359.
姚益民等.中国油气区第三系(Ⅳ)·渤海湾盆地油气分册.1994.北京:石油工业出版社.
姚益民,修申成,魏秀玲,等.东营凹陷下第三系ESR测年研究.油气地质与采收率.2002.9(2):31-34.
叶得泉,钟筱春等.中国油气区第三系(Ⅰ)·总论.1993.北京:石油工业出版社.
张宏福,英基丰,徐平,马玉光.华北中生代玄武岩中地幔橄榄石捕虏晶:对岩石圈地幔置换过程的启示.科学通报.2004.49(8):784-789
张进江,郑亚东,刘树文.小秦岭变质核杂岩的构造体制形成机制及构造演化.1998.北京:海洋出版社
张旗,金惟俊,王元龙,等.大陆下地壳拆沉模式初探.岩石学报.2006.22(2):265-276
张旗,金惟俊,王元龙,等.晚中生代中国东部高原北界探讨.岩石学报.2007.23(4):689-700
张旗,钱青,王二七,等.燕山中晚期的中国东部高原:埃达克岩的启示.地质科学.2001.36(2):248-255
张旗,王焰,王元龙.燕山期中国东部高原下地壳组成初探:埃达克质岩Sr,Nd同位素制约.岩石学报.2001.17(4):505-513
张晓东,余青,陈发景,等.松辽盆地变质核杂岩和伸展断陷的构造特征及成因.地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京).2000.7(4):411-419
张岳桥,赵越,董树文,等.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘.2004.11(3):123-134
张岳桥,李金良,张田,等.胶莱盆地及其邻区白垩纪—古新世沉积构造演化历史及其区域动力学意义.地质学报.2008.82(9):1229-1257
张岳桥,董树文.郯庐断裂带中生代构造演化史:进展与新认识.地质通报.2008.27(9):1371-1390.
郑建平,路凤香,O'Reilly S Y,等.华北东部地幔改造作用和置换作用:单斜辉石激光探针研究.中国科学(D辑).2000.30(4):373-382
郑亚东,张青.内蒙亚干变质核杂岩核内递进伸展作用.伸展构造研究.1994.北京:地质出版社
郑亚东,王涛.中蒙边界区中生代推覆构造与伸展垮塌作用的运动学和动力学分析.中国科学D辑地球科学.2005.35(4):291-303
周建波,胡克,申宁华,等.郯庐断裂中段石场.中楼拉分盆地的确定.地质科学.1999.34(1):18-28
周建波,郑永飞,赵子福.山东五莲中生代岩浆岩的锫石U-Pb年龄.高校地质学报.2003.9(2):14-23
周荔青,刘池阳.深大断裂与中国东部新生代盆地油气资源分布.2006.北京:石油工业出版社.
周翥虹,王文军等.苏北盆地未—低熟生油岩中的藻类研究.小型油气藏.1998(3):6-9.
朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带新第三纪以来的挤压活动与深部过程.地震地质.2002.24(2):265-277
朱光,侯明金,王勇生,等.郯庐断裂带早白垩世的走滑运动与中国东部构造格局的转换.安徽地质.2003.13(2):89-96
朱光,胡召齐,陈印,等.华北克拉通东部早白垩世伸展盆地的发育过程及其对克拉通破坏的指示.地质通报.2008.27(10):14-24
朱光,刘圈生,Dunlap W J,等.郯庐断裂带同造山走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar年代学证据.科学通报.2004a.49(2):190-198.
朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的平移运动与成因.地质通报.2003.22(3):200-207
朱光,刘国生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带晚第三纪以来的浅部挤压活动与深部过程.地震地质.2002b.24(2):265-277
朱光,刘国生,王道轩,等.郯庐断裂带的脉动式伸展活动.高校地质学报.2000.6(3):396-404
朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar法定年.地质学报.2005.79(3):303-316
朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带早白垩世走滑运动中的构造、岩浆、沉积事件.地质学报.2002a.76(3):323-334.
朱光,牛漫兰,刘国生等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar法定年.地质学报.2005.79(3):303-316
朱光,宋传中,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的岩石圈结构及其成因分析.高校地质学报.2002.8(3):248-256
朱光,宋传中,王道轩,等.郯庐断裂带走滑时代的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar年代学研究及其构造意义.中国科学(D辑).2001a.31(3):250-256
朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景.地质科学.2001b.36(3):269-278
朱光,王道轩,刘国生,等.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块运动的响应.地质科学.2004b.39(1):36-49
朱光,王道轩,徐春华,等.大别高压—超高压变质岩剥露历史在合肥盆地的记录.高校地质学报.2004b.10(4):594-605
朱光,王勇生,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的同造山运动.地学前缘.2004a.11(3):169-182
朱光,谢成龙,向必伟,等.洪镇变质核杂岩的形成机制及其大地构造意义.中国科学(D辑).2007.37(5):584-592
朱光,胡召齐,陈印,等.华北克拉通东部早白垩世伸展盆地的发育过程及其对克拉通破坏的指示.地质通报.2008.27(10):1594-1604.
朱光,徐嘉炜,C.J.N.Flctchcr,et aJ.应用X射线衍射分析胶北蓬莱群板岩中的变质作用.地质与勘探.1994.30(2):42-49
朱光,徐嘉炜,刘国生,等.下扬子地区沿江前陆盆地形成的构造控制.地质论评.1998.44(2):120-129
朱光,徐嘉炜,孙世群.郯庐断裂带平移时代的同位素年龄证据.地质论评.1995.4l(5):452-456
朱光,徐嘉炜.郯庐断裂带的平移幅度、平移时代及其构造模式.陈毓川等主编第30届国际地质大会沦文集.北京:地质出版社.1998.167-175.
朱光,徐嘉炜.沂沐断裂带内盖层的剪切变形及其构造意义.长春地质学院学报.1995.25(3):279-285
朱光,徐佑德,刘国生.等.郯庐断裂带中-南段走滑构造特征与变形规律.地质科学.2006.41(2):226-241
朱光,谢成龙,王勇生,等.郯庐高压走滑韧性剪切带特征及其~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar定年.岩石学报.2005.21(6):1687-1702
朱光.用伊利石结晶度确定碎屑沉积岩甚低级变质等级.石油勘探与开发.1995.22(1):33-35
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |