用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于收入变迁的城镇居民乘用车需求演化规律研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
基于收入变迁的城镇居民乘用车需求演化规律研究
     经济转型30年来,中国城镇居民的生活水平发生了巨大变化。一方面,城镇居民收入大幅提高带来消费行为的改变,食品消费支出的下降和大型耐用品拥有量的上升说明中国城镇居民的消费结构正在发生转变;另一方面,在整体收入水平提高的同时,收入分配差距的扩大成为导致中国城镇居民消费倾向下降的一个重要原因。此外,金融中介的迅速发展也改变了中国城镇居民的收入分配,进而对消费需求产生影响。中国经济发展的特殊背景使传统西方消费经济理论的一些外生的、稳定的假设在研究中国问题时出现争议。同时,针对中国城镇居民收入分配格局变化的研究仍处于起步阶段,鲜有文献对其内部的变化进行细致刻画。本文认为,可以抓住转型期间消费结构改变的特点,通过可以反映转轨特征的耐用品消费需求,探讨中国城镇居民收入与消费行为的关系。更进一步,在深入刻画收入变迁过程的基础上,考虑不同收入人群的人口密度变动对消费品需求的影响。
     鉴于上述,本文希望从城镇居民收入变迁的视角出发,通过对传统消费理论的回顾和再探讨,研究收入变迁对以乘用车为例的耐用品需求结构的影响。主要研究内容如下:
     本文第1章对传统的西方消费理论和分配理论进行概述,并在回顾和评述其应用成果的基础上,提出本文的研究问题和论文的结构设计。
     本文第2章首先明确了收入变迁的概念,并对其度量指标进行细分定义,同时选用居民收入分布的核密度估计方法来形象的反应个体分布状况以及基本的变动规律。来自CHNS数据库1989年——2006年间7年微观数据的收入变迁估计结果显示,中国的改革和经济增长带来了总体福利的改善,但目前中低收入家庭仍是目前中国城镇居民的主体;不同收入等级的收入水平增长速度并不相同,收入的不平等程度正在加剧。对中国城镇居民的收入变迁状况进一步测度结果显示,近年来收入分配差距具有扩大的趋势特征;样本区间内对于城镇居民的影响主要源自于收入水平的提高和社会福利的改善;低收入群体并没有向更高的收入水平流动,而本应更难提高收入水平的高收入群体平均收入水平却有所提高。在收入分布变迁的背景下,中国城镇居民的消费行为发生了明显变化,其中以乘用车为例的耐用品需求增幅十分显著。
     本文第3章利用中国1997年——2008年的省际面板数据,首先定性地描述了乘用车市场近年的发展情况,发现其呈现明显的非线性增长态势,且各地区基本上处于整体增长曲线的不同阶段。进一步,应用动态面板广义矩估计方法以及面板的VECM估计方法,估计了我国乘用车拥有率的餍足点约会出现在2025年——2030年间,相应的中国城镇居民乘用车拥有量将达到约15344万辆,人均收入水平约为65000~70000元。实证结果亦验证了居民收入增加是近年来中国城镇居民乘用车拥有量激增的根本原因。根据Gompertz曲线的数理特性按现阶段城镇居民收入水平推算,目前中国中国城镇居民乘用车拥有量刚跨过收入弹性拐点,开始步入迅速增长时期。
     本文第4章探讨了新古典框架下一般消费品的跨期需求模型,将具有线性预算约束和完全市场假设的消费者行为的简单新古典需求模型推广到有耐用品的情形,进而得到可应用的耐用品新增需求模型。在定义了居民累积财富作为刻画特殊时期城镇居民当期购买能力的度量指标的基础上,针对样本区间内中国城镇居民累积财富水平在2007年末的明显变化,而乘用车购买则相对平稳的序列特征,采用趋势平稳的结构突变检验验证了累积财富水平在2007年10月结构突变点的存在性。进一步,采用Engle和Granger的两步法对城镇居民的累积财富水平和城镇居民乘用车购买进行变结构的协整分析得出,在不考虑结构突变的情形下累积财富与乘用车购买并不存在协整关系,但变结构的协整分析却表明两者之间存在变结构的协整关系。由于累积财富水平短期的突然变化通常并不会对乘用车整体购买决策产生显著的负向影响,立足于长期视角,累积财富对耐用品市场的影响终将是具有典型阶段性特征的。
     本文第5章在探讨城镇居民收入变迁对分档次耐用品需求偏好的影响中发现,随着收入提高,消费者更偏好性价比较高的车型,高档车型的需求对收入变化的影响并不敏感;低、高收入人群平均收入水平的稳定上升以及人群比重的显著快速扩张,使其不论在购买力和购买数量上均有大幅提升,成为现阶段乘用车整体市场需求急剧增长的主要贡献因素;尽管如此,中收入人群才是导致拉动乘用车市场长期需求快速增加的稳定和持久动力。因此,在居民平均收入水平提高的前提下,努力提高低收入人群的平均收入水平,使更多低收入居民跨过购买临界值成为中收入居民,同时保证中收入人群的稳步增长,才是以拉动乘用车为例的耐用品消费需求增长的源动力。
The Evolution Laws of Demand for Cars of Urban Residents under the Perspective of Income Change
     During the 30 years of China’s economic transition, the standard of living of urban residents in China has undergone tremendously changes. On one hand, the substantial increase in income of urban residents has brought changes in consumer’s behavior, food consumption expenditure has decreased and a large increase in ownership of durable goods per hundred families shows the consumption structure of urban residents in China is changing; on the other hand, with the overall income levels increasing, a widening gap of income distribution was an important reason which led to the propensity to consumption of Chinese urban residents declining. In addition, the rapid development of financial intermediation in China also changed the income distribution, and then had an impact on consumer demand. Some traditional theory of the western consumer exogenous and stable assumption is controversial under the special background of China’s economic development. At the same time, the research on the pattern of Chinese residents’income distribution changes was still in its infancy, and little detailed characterization has done on its internal changes. Based on consumer durables consumption behavior reflecting China’s transition characteristics, this dissertation focused on the characteristics of the changes in consumption structure during transition period. A further study was to explore the effects on consumption demand by different income classes’changes which based on the dynamic evolution of income distribution.
     In view of the above-mentioned facts, from the perspective of income distribution, the research hope to discuss the effects on the consumer durables by income distribution changes and consider the automobiles as an example, through the review of traditional consumption and income distribution theory. The main contents of this dissertation are as follows:
     Chapter 1 summarized the western traditional consumption theory and income distribution theory firstly. Secondly, based on the overview and comment of the application, the problems of this dissertation and design of its structure are propounded.
     In chapter 2, we defined index indicators to describe the purchasing power of urban residents and the special characteristics of the total income, while using kernel density to estimate income distribution and basic law vividly. And then, focuses on the income distribution dynamic changes of China’s urban residents based on the micro household survey data provided by CHNS. The empirical results show that, firstly, the income distribution estimation on CHNS database from 1989——2006 shows that, due to the China’s reform and economic growth, the social welfare has got a promotion. However, the mid&low income families are still the main part of China’s urban residents. Furthermore, the growth speed of different income group is varied which aggravates the inequality degree. Secondly, in the analysis process of the income distribution’s liquidity, despite the proportion of the low income group has always been on decline, mid income group reduced recently revealed the extended tend of income gap. During the decomposition of income changes, the improvement in income level and social welfare has the mainly impact on urban residents, at the same time, low&high income group gathering and mid income group reducing are caused by existence of interval heterogeneous. Due to the inequality, low income group didn’t flow to a higher income level while there is unexpected increasing in high income group which should be more difficult. Finally, the consumer’s behavior changed with the income distribution transformation, which induced to the sudden and sharp demand for durable goods.
     In chapter 3, the provincial panel data of China from 1997 to 2008 are used to describe the development of national automobile market qualitatively which appears a obvious non-linear growth path and stays at the different stage of growth curve with regions varied. Furthermore, the estimation result shows that the satiation point will be achieved around 2025 to 2030, and the corresponding automobiles ownership will rise to about 153.44 million with the disposable income level at 65000 to 70000 Yuan by using the method of dynamic GMM and panel ECM. These empirical results also demonstrate that rapid increasing in urban residents’income level is the main reason of the significant growth in automobile market in recent years. According to it, the current family car ownership is just across the elasticity point of long-run growth curve and has entered a rapid growth period.
     Chapter 4 discussed the general intertemporal consumption demand model under the neoclassical framework, and then extended the simple neoclassical model with linear budget constraints and complete market assumptions of consumer behavior to the case of durable goods. Finally, we got the applied durable goods demand model. Because there is obvious influence of China’s urban residents’accumulated wealth at late 2007 in samples, while demand for automobiles purchasing is a relative stationary serie, the theory of structural breaks is used to verify the structural break point in September 2007. Later on the cointegration analysis on accumulated wealth and automobile demand by utilizing the Engle and Granger two-step method shows that there is no cointegration relationship between them without considering the structural breaks, however, variable structure cointegration analysis proved the contrary facts. Actually, from long-term perspective, the sudden changes of accumulated wealth index have little significant negative impact on the automobiles purchasing decision, and the effects on the durable goods market will be very limited eventually.
     Chapter 5 studied the effects on the sub-grade durable goods demand by income distribution changes of China’s urban residents. The empirical evidence shows that, first, because of the improvement in income level, most consumers prefer high quality with lower cost cars, but the demand for high-grade cars doesn’t rise and fall sensitively with it. Second, there is a significant promoting in both purchasing power and purchasing quantity which gives a rise to low&high grade residents’average income level and group proportion, which is the primary source of the growth in overall automobiles market. Nevertheless, mid income group is the stable and sustainable diver of automobiles demand. Therefore, in a spirit of raising income level of the whole nation, enhancing the low-grade income level and ensuring increasing and steady proportion of mid income group is the source power which can lead to growth of automobiles consumption demand in China.
引文
[1] Ahmad, I.A.. On Multivariate Kernel Estimation for Samples from Weighted Distributions[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 1995, 22:121-129.
    [2] Alesina, A. and Perotti, R.. Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment[J]. European Economic Review, 1996, 40(6): 1203-1208.
    [3] Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D.. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109(2): 465-490.
    [4] Allexander, W. P.. Boundary kernel estimation of the two sample comparison density function[J]. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, 1989:35-67.
    [5] Ando, A. and Modigliani, F.. The“Life Cycle”Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests[J]. American Economic Review, 1963, 53(1): 55-84.
    [6] Angus Deaton. Economics and Consumer Behaviour[M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
    [7] Atkinson, S.E. and Halvorsen, R.. A New Hedonic Technique for Estimating Attribute Demand: An Application to the Demand for Automobile Fuel Efficiency[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1984, 66(3):417-426.
    [8] Aziz, J. and Duenwald, C.. China’s Provincial Growth Dynamics[R]. IMF Working Paper, 2001, 1: 3.
    [9] Bain, A. D.. The Growth of TV ownership in U.K.[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.
    [10] Bandeen, R.A.. Automobile Consumption,1940—1950[J]. Econometrica, 1957, 25(2): 239-248.
    [11] Banerjee, A., Lumsdaine, R.L. and Stock, J.H.. Recursive and Sequential Tests of the Unit-root and Trend-break Hypothesis: Theory and International Evidence[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1992, 10:271-287.
    [12] Barro, R.. Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2000, 5: 5-32.
    [13] Bean, S.J.. and Tsokos,C.P.. Developments in nonparametric density estimation[J]. Int. Stat. Rev., 1980, 48:267-287.
    [14] Benabou, R.. Inequality and Growth[J]. NBER Macroeconomics Annual.11, 1996: 11-74.
    [15] Bennet, W.B.. Cross-Section Studies of the Consumption of Automobiles in the United States[J]. The American Economic Review, 1967, 57(4):841-850.
    [16] Bern, H.. Long-Run Automobile Demand[J]. The Journal of Marketing, 1956, 20(4):379-384.
    [17] Berndt, E.R., Darrough, M.N. and Diewert, W.E.. Flexible Functional Forms and Expenditure Distributions: An Application to Canadian Consumer Demand Functions[J]. International Economic Review, 1977, 18(3):651-675.
    [18] Blinder A.S.. Distribution Effects and the Aggregate Consumption Function[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1975, 83(3):117-175.
    [19] Bonus, H.. Quasi-Engle Curves, Diffusion, and the Ownership of Major Consumer Durables[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81(3):655-677.
    [20] Bowman, A.. An Alternative Method of Cross-Validetion for the Smoothing of Density Estimates[J]. Biometrika, 1984(71):353-360.
    [21] Breitung. J.. A Parametric Approach to the Estimation of Cointegration Vectors in Panel Data[J]. Econometric Reviews, 2005, 24(2):151-173.
    [22] Brew, M. L.. A Home Economist Looks at Marketing[J]. The Journal of Marketing, 1949, 14(1):72-76.
    [23] Brew, M. L., O’Leary, R. R. and Dean, L. C.. Family Clothing Inventories and Purchases: With an Analysis to Show Factors Affecting Consumption (Agriculture Information Bulletin) [Z]. Household Economics Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., 1956.
    [24] Browning, T.R. and Ramasesh, R.V. A Survey of Activity Network-Based Process Models for Managing Product Development Projects[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2007, 16(2):217-240.
    [25] Burk, M. C.. On the Need for Investment in Human Capital for Consumption[J]. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 1967, 1(2):123-138.
    [26] Burkhauser, R. V. and Tovba, L.. Income Inequality in the 1900s: Comparing the United States, Great Britain and Germany [J]. The Japanese Journal of Social Security Policy, 2005, 4(1): 1-16.
    [27] Burkhauser, R. V., Crews, A. D. and Daly, M. C.. Recounting Winners and Losers in the 1980s: A Critique of Income Distribution Measurement Methodology[J]. Economics Letters, 1997, 54: 35-40.
    [28] Burkhauser, R. V., Crews, A. D., Daly, M. C. and Jenkins, S. P.. Testing the Significance of Income Distribution Changes Over the 1980s Business Cycle: A Cross-National Comparison[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1999, 14: 253-272.
    [29] Burkhauser, R.V., Cutts, A.C. and Daly, M.C.. Recounting Winners and Losers in the 1980s: A Critique of Income Distribution Measurement Methodology[J]. Economics Letters, 1997, 54:35-40.
    [30] Caballero, R. J. and Engel, J. C.. Explaining Investment Dynamics in U.S.Manufacturing: A Generalized (S, s) Approach[J]. Econometrica, 1999, 67(4):783-826.
    [31] Caballero, R. J.. Consumption Puzzles and Precautionary Saving[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1990, 25:113-136.
    [32] Caballero, R. J.. Durable Goods: An Explanation for Their Slow Adjustment[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(2):351-384.
    [33] Cambell, J. Y. and Deaton, A. S.. Why, Is Consumption So Smooth[J]. Review of Economic Study, 1989, 56:357-373.
    [34] Cambell, J. Y. and Mankiw, N. G.. Consumption, Income, and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence[J]. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1989, 4:185-216.
    [35] Cambell, J. Y. and Mankiw, N. G.. Permanent Income, Current Income, and Consumption[J]. Journal Business and Economic Statistics, 1991, 8:269-279.
    [36] Cambell, J. Y. and Mankiw, N. G.. The Response of Consumption to Income: A Cross-Country Investigation[J]. European Economic Reviews, 1991, 35:723-767.
    [37] Carlson, R.L.. Seemingly Unrelated Regression and the Demand for Automobiles of Different Sizes, 1965-75: A Disaggregate Approach[J]. The Journal of Business, 1978, 51(2):243-262.
    [38] Carroll, C. D. and Samwick, A. A.. How Important Is Precautionary Saving[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998, 80(3): 410-419.
    [39] Carroll, C. D. and Samwick, A. A.. The Nature of Precautionary Wealth[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1997, 40:41-71.
    [40] Carroll, C. D.. Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112:1-55.
    [41] Chow G.C.. The Demand for Automobiles in the U.S.[J]. Econometric, 1956 24,(3): 338-353.
    [42] Chow, G. C.. China's Economic Transformation [M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
    [43] Chow, G.C.. Technological Change and the Demand for Computers[J]. The American Economic Review, 1967, 57(5):1117-1130.
    [44] Chow, G.C.. Demand for automobiles in the United States: A Study in consumer durables[M]. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press, 1957.
    [45] Chow, G.C.. The Chinese Economy[M]. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 1987.
    [46] Chow, G.C.. The Demand for Automobiles in the U.S.[R]. Report of the New York Meeting, 1995, December: 342.
    [47] Christinao, L.J.. Searching for a Break in GNP[J]. Journal Business and Economic Statistics, 1992, 10:237-250.
    [48] Cowell, F. A., Jenkins, S. P. and Litchfield, J. A., The Changing Shape of the UK Income Distribution: Kernel Density Estimates[M]. New Equalities, the Changing Distribution ofIncome and Wealth in the United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
    [49] Cowell, F.A. Measurement of inequlity[M]. Handbook of Income Distribution, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000:78-166.
    [50] Cragg, J.G. and Uhler, R.S.. The Demand for Automobiles[J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1970, 3(3):386-406.
    [51] Cramer, J.S. A Statistical Model of the Ownership of Major Consumer Durables[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.
    [52] Cuddington, J.. Canadian Evidence on the Permanent Income-Rational Expectations Hypothesis[J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 1982, 15(2): 331-335.
    [53] Cwik, J. And Mielniczuk, J. Data-dependent bandwidth choice for a grade density kernel estimate[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 1993, 16:397-405.
    [54] Cwik, J. And Mielniczuk, J. Estimating density ratios with application to discriminant analysis[J]. Communications in Statistics, 1989, 18:3057-3069.
    [55] Daly, V. and Hadjimatheou, G.. Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Evidence for the U.K. Economy[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89(3): 596-599.
    [56] Daniel, B. Suits.. Exploring Alternative Formulations of Automobile Demand [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1961, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 66-69.
    [57] Dargay, J. and Gately, D.. Income’s effect on car and vehicle ownership, worldwide: 1960-2015 [J]. Transportation Research, 1999, Part A(33).
    [58] Dargay, J., Gately, D. and Sommer, M..Vehicle Ownership and Income Growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030[J]. The Energy Journal, 2007, 28(4):143-169.
    [59] Dargay, J.M. and Gately, D.. Income’s effect on car and vehicle ownership, worldwide: 1960-2015[J]. Transportation Research, 1999, Part A (33):101-138.
    [60] Dargay, J.M. and Vythoulkas, P.C.. Estimation of a Dynamic Car Ownership Model: A Pseudo-Panel Approach[J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1999, 33(3):287-301.
    [61] Dargay, J.M.. Demand Elasticities: A Comment[J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1993, 27(1):87-90.
    [62] Dargay, J.M., Gately, D. and Sommer, M.. Vehicle ownership and income growth, Worldwide: 1960-2030[J]. The Energy Journal, 2007, 28(4):143-170.
    [63] Dasgupta, P., Sen A. and Starrett, D.. Notes on the measurement of inequality[J]. Jouranl of Economic Theory, 1973, 6(2):180-187.
    [64] Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J.. Economics and Consumer Behavior[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
    [65] Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J.. An Almost Ideal Demand System[J]. The American Economic Review, 1990, 70(3):312-326.
    [66] Deaton, A.. Life-Cycle Models of Consumption: Is the Evidence Consistent with theTheory? [R]. NBER Working Paper, 1986.
    [67] Deaton, A.. Saving and Liquidity Constraints[J]. Econometrica, 1991, 59:1221-1248.
    [68] Deiniger, K. and Squire, L.. New Ways Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1998, 57(2): 259-287.
    [69] Diewert, W.E.. Exact and Supertative Index Numbers[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1976, 4:115-146.
    [70] Dilip Mookherjee and Anthony Shorrocks. A Decomposition Analysis of the Trend in UK Income Inequality[J]. The Economic Journal, 1982, 92:886-902.
    [71] Dong Dianshen and Oral Capps. Impacts of Income Distribution on Market Demand[C]. selected paper by AAEA Meeting, 1998.
    [72] Doorn, P.V.. Aggregate Consumption and the Distribution of Income[J]. European Economic Review, 1975, 6:417-423.
    [73] Duesenberry, J. S.. Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer Behavior[M]. Harvard, N. J.: Harvard University Press, 1949.
    [74] Dyckman, T.R.. An Aggregate-Demand Model for Automobiles[J]. The Journal of Business, 1965, 38(3):252-266.
    [75] Farrell, M.J.. The demand for motor cars in the United States[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1954, Series A(117):171-201.
    [76] Fingleton, B.. Estinmates of Time to Economic Convergence: An Analysis of Regions of the European Union[J]. International Regional Science Review, 1999, 22(1): 5-34.
    [77] Fisher, Irving.. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection[M]. Oxford: the Clarendon Press, 1930.
    [78] Fisher, Irving.. The Rate of Interest[M]. New York: MacMlillan Company, 1907.
    [79] Fisher, M. R.. Exploration in Saving Behavior[J]. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics & Statistics, 1956, 18(3): 201-277.
    [80] Flavin, M. A.. The adjustment of Consumption to Changing Expectations about Future Income[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89: 1020-1037.
    [81] Flavin, M. A.. The Excess Smoothness of Consumption: Identification and Estimation[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1993, 60: 651-666.
    [82] Fordes, K.. A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth[J]. American Economic Review, 2000, 90(4): 869-887.
    [83] Friedman, M.. A Theory of the Consumption Function[M]. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1957.
    [84] Gastwirth, J.L. The first-median test: A two-sided version of the control scored data[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1968(63):692-706.
    [85] Gorman, W.M.. A Possible Procedure for Analysing Quality Differentials in the Egg Market[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1980, 47:843-856.
    [86] Gorman, W.M.. Community Preference Fields[J]. Econometrica, 1953, 21:63-80.
    [87] Gorman, W.M.. Lecture notes[R]. London School of Economics, Mimeo, 1971.
    [88] Gorman, W.M.. On A Class of Preference Fields[J]. Metroeconomica, 1961, 13:53-56.
    [89] Gorman, W.M.. Separable Utility and Aggregation[J]. Econometrica, 1959, 27:496-481.
    [90] Gorman, W.M.. Tastes, Habits and Choices[J]. International Economic Review, 1967, 8:218-222.
    [91] Gorman, W.M.. The Structure of Utility Functions[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1968, 35:369-390.
    [92] Gregory, A.W. and Hansen, B.E.. Residual0based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1996, 70(1):99-126.
    [93] Grossman, S. J. and Laroque, G.. Asset Pricing and Optimal Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Illiquid Durable Consumption Goods[J]. Econometrica, 1990, 58(1):25-51.
    [94] Guhbels, I. And Mielniczuk, J. Asymptotic properties of kernel estimatiors of the Radon~Nikodym derivative with applications to discriminant analysis[J]. Statistics Sinica, 1995, 5:261-278.
    [95] Hall, R. E.. Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 79:1088-1105.
    [96] Hess, A.C.. A Comparison of Automobile Demand Equations[J]. Econometrica, 1977, 45(3):683-701.
    [97] Hicks, J.. A Revision of Demand Theory[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1956.
    [98] Hongyi Li and Hengfu Zou.. Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and evidence[J]. Review of Development Economics, 1998, 2(3): 318-334.
    [99] Houthakker, H. S. and Taylor, L. D.. Consumer demand in the United States, 1929-1970: Analyses and projections[M]. Harvard, N. J.: Harvard University Press, 1966.
    [100] Hsiao C, Analysis of Panel Data [M], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
    [101] Jappelli, T. and Pagano, M.. Consumption and Capital Market Imperfections:An International Comparison[J]. American Economic Review, 1989, 79: 1088-1105.
    [102] Jappelli, T. and Pagano, M.. Saving, Growth, and Liquidity Constraints[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 109:83-109.
    [103] Jenkins, S.P.. Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK, 1971-86[J]. Economica, 1995, 62(245):29-63.
    [104] Jenkins, S.P.. Did the Middle Class Shrink during the 1980s? UK Evidence from Kernel Density Estimates[J]. Economics Letters, 1995, 49(10):407-413.
    [105] John Dinardo, Nicole M. Fortin and Thomas Lemieux. Labor Market Institutions and Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach[J]. Econometrica, 1996, 64(5):1001-1044.
    [106] Kao, C. and Chiang M.H.. On The Esitimate and Inference of A Cointegerated Regression in Panel Data [J]. Advances in Econometrics, 2002, 15:7-51.
    [107] Keefer, P. and Knack, S.. Polarization, Property Rights and the Links Between Inequality and Growth[R]. World Bank. October. Mimeo.
    [108] Kenneth, B., Ndoh, N. and John, H.. Modeling Vehicle Ownership and Use in Low Income Countries [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1993, XXVII(1).
    [109] Kennickell, A. B. and Lusardi, A.. Disentangling the Importance of the Precautionary Saving Motive[J]. NBER Working Paper, 2004, w10888.
    [110] Kumar, S. and Russel, T.. Technological change, Technological Catch-up and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence[J]. American Economic Review, 2002, 92: 527-548.
    [111] Lee, J. and Strazicich, M.C.. Minimum LM Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2003, 85:1082-1089.
    [112] Leland, H. E.. Saving and Uncertainty: The Precautionary Demand for Saving[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1968, 82: 465-473.
    [113] Levin, A., Lin, C.F., and Chu, C..Unit Toot Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties [J], Journal of Econometics, 2002, 108:1-24.
    [114] Lumsdaine, R.L. and Papell, D. Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit Root Test[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1997, 79:212-218.
    [115] Maddala, G.S. and Wu, S.. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test [J], Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1999, 61:631-652.
    [116] Manfred, M. F. and Peter S.. Income distribution dynamics and cross-region convergence in Europe: Spatial filtering and novel stochastic kernel representations[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2008, 10(2): 109-139.
    [117] Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R.. Post Keynesian Economics[M]. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1954.
    [118] Modigliani, F.. Life Cycle, Individual Thrift, and the Wealth of Nations[J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(June): 297-313.
    [119] Modigliani, F.. The Role of Intergenerational Transfers and Life Cycle Saving in the Accumulation of Wealth[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1988, 2(2): 15-40.
    [120] Mogridge, M.J.H.. The Car Market—A Study of the Statistical and Dynamics of Supply-Demand Equilibrium[M]. London: Pion, 1983.
    [121] Morgan, J. N., David, M. H., Cohen, W. J. and Brazer, H. E.. Income and welfare in the United States[M]. New York, N. J.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1962.
    [122] Morris, M. And Handcock, M. S.. Economic inequality: new methods for new trends[J]. American Sociological Review, 1994, 59(2): 205-219.
    [123] Muellbauer, J.. Surprises in the Consumption Function[J]. The Economic Journal,1983(93): 34-50.
    [124] Muellbauer, J.. Community Preferences and the Representative Consumer[J]. Econometrica, 1976, 44(5):979-999.
    [125] Murphy, K., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.. Income Distribution, Market Size and Industrialization[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, 104: 537-564.
    [126] Nelson, C.R. And Plosser, C.I.. Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implication[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1982, 10: 139-162.
    [127] Parzen, E. Comparison change analysis, in Nonparametric Statistics and Related Topics[M]. North-Holland, Amsterdam: North Holland Press, 1992:3-15.
    [128] Parzen, E. Noparametric statistical data science: A unified approach based on density estimation and testing for ' white noise '[J]. Technical Report 47, Statistical Sciences Division, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 1977.
    [129] Parzen, E.. On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962, 33(3):1065-1076.
    [130] Pearce, I.F.. A Contribution to Demand Analysis[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1964.
    [131] Pedroni, P.. Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels[J]. Advances in Econometrics, 2000, 15:93-130.
    [132] Perotti, R.. Growth, income distribution and democracy: What the data say[J]. Journal of Economic growth, 1996, 1(2): 149-187.
    [133] Perotti, R.. Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution, and Growth[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1993, 29: 267-279.
    [134] Perron, P.. The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis[J]. Econometrica, 1989, 57(6):1361-1401.
    [135] Persson, T. and Tabellini, G.. Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? [J]. American Economic Review, 1994, 84(3): 600-621.
    [136] Phlillips, P.C.B. and Perron, P.. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression[J]. Biometrika, 1988, 75:335-346.
    [137] Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L.. Microeconomics[M]. Pearson Education, 2004.
    [138] Pollak, R.A.. Generalised Separability[J]. Econometrica, 1972, 40:431-453.
    [139] Prihoda, T.J. A generalized approach to the two sample problem: The quantile approach[J]. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, 1981:34-37.
    [140] Quah, D.. Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 1997, 2(1): 27-59.
    [141] Quah, D.. Galton’s Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1993, 95: 427-443.
    [142] Quah, D.. Twin Peaks Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics[J]. Economic Journal, 1996, 106: 1045-1055.
    [143] Ramsey, F.P.. The Mathematical Theory of Saving[J]. The Economic Journal, 1928, 38: 543-559.
    [144] Robert, Z. and Maria, G. P.. Empirical evidence of income dynamics across EU regions[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2006, 21(5): 605-628.
    [145] Roos, C.F. and Szeliski, V.. The Concept of Demand and Price Elasticity—The Dynamics of Automobile Demand[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1939, 34(208):652-664.
    [146] Rosenblatt, M.. Remarks on Some Nonparametric Estimates of a Density Function[J]. Ann. Math. Statist., 1956, 27(3):832-837.
    [147] Sala-i-Martin, X.. The World Distribution of Income[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006, 121: 351-397.
    [148] Sandmo, A. On the Theory of the Competitive Firm under Price Uncertainty[J]. American Economic Review, 1971, 61(1):65-73.
    [149] Sandmo, A.. The Effect of Uncertainty on Saving Decisions[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1970, 37:353-360.
    [150] Sheather, S.J.. and Jones, M.C. A Reliable Data-Based Bandwidth Selection Method for Kernel Density Estimation[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1991, Series B53:683-690.
    [151] Shi Xinzheng, Terry Sicular, Yaohui Ahao. Analyzing Urban-Rural Income Inequality in China[R]. Discussion Draft, CCER, Peking University.
    [152] Silverman, M.W.. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis[M]. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1986.
    [153] Simmons, P.. Evidence on the Impact of Income Distribution on Consumer Demand in the UK 1955-1968[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1980, 47(5):893-906.
    [154] Simonoff, J.S. Smoothing Methods in Statistics[M]. Soringer Verlag, New York, 1996.
    [155] Skinner, J.. Risky Income, Life Cycle Consumption, and Precautionary Saving[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988, 22:237-255.
    [156] Stephen P. J. and Phlippe van Kern.. Accounting for income distribution trends: A density function decomposition approach[J]. Journal of Eocnomic Inequality, 2005, 3:43-61.
    [157] Stuart, A. And Ord, J.K.. Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics[M]. Charles Griffen, London, UK, 1978.
    [158] Suits, D.B.. Exploring Alternative Formulations of Automobile Demand[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1961, 43(1):66-69.
    [159] Suits, D.B.. The Demand of New Automobiles in the United States 1929—1956[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1958, 40(3): 273-280.
    [160] Sun Wei, Semiparametric Analysis of Income Inequality: An Application to China[D]. Dissertation, 2005, University of California PhD.
    [161] Theil, H. Principles of Econometrics[M]. New York: North Holland Press, 1971.
    [162] Venieris, Y. and Gulta, D.. Income Distribution and Sociopolitical Instability as Determinants of Savings: A Cross-sectional Model. [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94: 873-883.
    [163] Wu, C.O.. Kernel Smoothing of the Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Based Sampling Models[J]. Math Methods Statistic, 1996, 5:275-298.
    [164] Wu, Demin.. An empirical analysis of household’s durables goods expenditure[J]. Econometrics, 1956, 33:761-780.
    [165] Zeldes, S. P.. Consumption and Liquidity Constraint: An Empirical Investigation[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97:305-346.
    [166] Zellner, A.. An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1962, 57(298):348-368.
    [167] Zheng Zhihao and Henneberry S.R.. The Impact of Changes in Income Distribution on Current and Future Food Demand in Urban China[J]. Journal of Agricultrual and Tesource Economics, 2010, 35:51-71.
    [168] Zivot, E. and Andrews, D.. Further Ecidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-price Shock and the Unit-root Hypothesis[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 1992, 10:251-270.
    [169]安格斯·迪顿,约翰·米尔鲍尔.经济学与消费者行为[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.
    [170]白仲林.面板数据的计量经济分析[M].南京:南开大学出版社,2008:100.
    [171]陈娟,孙敬水.我国城镇居民收入不平等变动实证研究[J].统计研究,2009,26(9):77-81.
    [172]陈云.居民收入分布及其变迁的统计研究[D].首都经济贸易大学博士学位论文,2003.
    [173]成邦文.基于对数正态分布的洛伦兹曲线与基尼系数[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(2):127-135.
    [174]邓亚东.刚性需求决定中国汽车销量至少保持10年增长[J].中国汽车市场,2009(11):23.
    [175]樊潇彦,袁志刚,万广华.收入风险对居民耐用品消费的影响[J].经济研究,2007(4):124-136.
    [176]范剑平.论投资主导型想居民消费、社会投资双向拉动型转换——我国经济增长的需求结构分析[J].经济学动态,2003(2):11-12.
    [177]封建强.我国城镇居民耐用消费品的消费特点[J].统计与决策,1999(7):42-43.
    [178]古继宝.基于Gompertz模型的中国民用汽车保有量预测[J].技术经济,2010,(1):57-62.
    [179]古继宝.中国民用汽车保有量的组合预测[J].工业技术经济,2010,(4):123-127.
    [180]顾严,冯银虎.我国行业收入分配发生两极分化了么?——来自非参数Kernel密度估计的证据[J].经济评论,2008(4):5-13.
    [181]郭克莎.汽车产业对经济发展的带动作用[J].财经问题研究,2001(9):3-8.
    [182]郭克莎.中国汽车产业发展的市场与经济技术条件分析[J].管理世界,2001(2):102-111.
    [183]国家统计局综合司课题组.我国居民消费行为研究[J].统计研究,2003(5):29-32.
    [184]杭斌.基于持久收入和财富目标的跨时消费选择——中国城市居民消费行为的实证研究[J].统计研究,2007,24(2):39-44.
    [185]何江,张馨之.中国省际收入分布演进的空间——时间分析[J].南方经济,2006(12):64-77.
    [186]黄宇.品质升级的衡量与评价——基于对转型时期我国耐用品的实证分析[J].产业经济评论,2008,7(9):103-114.
    [187]贾良定,陈秋霖.消费行为模型及其政策含义[J].经济研究,2001(3):86-92.
    [188]金晓彤,杨晓东.中国城镇居民消费行为变异的四个假说及其理论分析[J].管理世界,2004(11):5-15.
    [189]凯恩斯.就业利息和货币通论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
    [190]孔东民.前景理论、流动性约束与消费行为的不对称——以我国城镇居民为例[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2005(4):134-142.
    [191]李爱华,成思危,李自然.城镇居民住房购买力研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(5):8-17.
    [192]李实,张平,魏众,仲济垠.中国居民收入分配实证分析[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.
    [193]李玉忍,高社生,张学源.核密度的随机加权估计及其应用[J].西北大学学报,2008,3:351-361.
    [194]李子奈,周建.宏观经济统计数据结构突变分析及其对中国的实证[J].经济研究,2005(1):15-26.
    [195]厉以宁.消费经济学[M].北京:人民出版社,1984.
    [196]厉以宁.中国宏观经济的实证分析[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.
    [197]林伯强.中国经济的增长、贫困减少与政策选择[J].经济研究,2003(12):15-26.
    [198]刘建民,欧阳俊,靳云汇.中国居民消费行为的理性预期检验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003(11):55-59.
    [199]刘婧,张车伟,毛学峰.中国1991~2006年收入分布的动态变化:基于核密度函数的分解分析[J].世界经济,2009(10):3-13.
    [200]龙志和,我国城镇居民消费行为研究[J].经济研究,1994(4):66-73.
    [201]栾惠德,张晓峒.协整还是协变:来自中国进出口是时间序列的经验证据(1950-2004)[J].南开经济研究,2007(2):140-152.
    [202]马强.居民消费需求不足的成因与对策[J].宏观经济管理,2004(5):46-48.
    [203]马歇尔.经济学原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
    [204]毛利本,于清文,姜玉华,杨连红.几种耐用消费品需求函数和需求预测的研究[J].经济研究,1981(10):72-77.
    [205]毛利本,于清文、姜玉华,杨连红.几种耐用消费品需求函数和需求预测的研究[J].经济研究,1981(10):72-77.
    [206]毛艺萍,王斌会.增长型线性模型参数估计的新思路[J].统计与决策,2006(4):12-14.
    [207]莫迪里亚尼等.效用分析与消费函数——对横截面资料的一个解释.载于肯尼斯·栗原编.凯恩斯学派经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964.
    [208]欧阳俊,刘建民,秦宛顺.居民消费流动性约束的实证分析[J].经济科学,2003(5):98-103.
    [209]彭汉香.从当前房地产之“刚性需求”看科学务实统计观[J].统计与决策,2008(22):75-76.
    [210]齐天翔.经济转轨时期的中国居民储蓄研究——兼论不确定性与居民储蓄的关系[J].经济研究,2000(9):25-33.
    [211]荣昭,盛来运,姚洋.中国农村耐用消费品需求研究[J].经济学(季刊),2002,1(3):589-602.
    [212]申朴,刘康兵.中国城镇居民消费行为过度敏感性的经验分析:兼论不确定性、流动性约束与利率[J].世界经济,2003(1):61-66.
    [213]沈中元.利用收入分布曲线预测中国汽车保有量[J].中国能源,2006,28(8):11-16.
    [214]宋冬林,金晓彤,刘金叶.我国城镇居民过度敏感性的实证检验与经验分析[J].管理世界,2003(5):29-35.
    [215]苏铭.我国轿车需求的影响因素、趋势及区域变化——基于居民家用轿车保有量的实证分析[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,32(1):43-49.
    [216]孙凤,王玉华.中国居民消费行为研究[J].统计研究,2001(4):24-50.
    [217]孙立平.“扩大内需”重点是扩大耐用消费品需求[J].当代经济,2009(5):1.
    [218]孙巍,李何,李佳.收入差距、房价及利率政策对消费行为的影响[J].黑龙江社会科学,2006,8:81-83.
    [219]孙巍,谢淑萍,朱爱玲,林国怀.收入效应说与现阶段轿车市场需求规律性[J].商业研究,2008(8):16-19.
    [220]万广华,张茵,牛建高.流动性约束、不确定性与中国居民消费[J].经济研究,2001(11):35-45.
    [221]王海港.中国居民家庭收入的变动及其对长期平等的影响[J].经济研究,2005(1):56-66.
    [222]王红玲,柏振忠.城乡耐用消费品消费需求的比较分析[J].中国农村经济,2003(12):22-27.
    [223]王兢.拟合收入分布函数在贫困线、贫困率测算中应用[J].经济经纬,2005(2):66-68.
    [224]王少平,李子奈.结构突变与人民币汇率的经验分析[J].世界经济,2003(8):22-27.
    [225]王曦.当期收入还是永久收入:转型时期中国居民消费模式的检验[J].世界经济,2002(12):47-54.
    [226]王信.我国居民收入高增长时期的储蓄存款分析[J].经济科学,1996(5):24-31.
    [227]王旖旎.中国汽车需求预测:基于Gompertz模型的分析[J].财经问题研究,2005,264(11):44-51.
    [228]魏众.健康对非农就业及其供给决定的影响[J].经济研究,2004(2):64-74.
    [229]吴春霞,杨为民,邓蓉.中国农村居民家庭耐用品消费特点及有卖行为探究[J].消费经济,2010,26(2):49-53.
    [230]吴涛,贺汉根,贺明科.核密度的随机加权估计及其应用[J].西北大学学报,2008,3:351-361.
    [231]吴喜之.非参数统计[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1999.
    [232]吴义虎,陈荫三,侯志祥,龙锦,周玉才.基于神经网络的中国汽车保有量建模与预测[J].西安公路交通大学学报,2001,21(2):91-93.
    [233]徐长明.1994年汽车市场预测[J].汽车工业研究,1994(1):28-34.
    [234]徐长明.1995年汽车市场预测[J].汽车工业研究,1995(1):35-41.
    [235]徐建国.收入分布和耐用消费品的增长方式[R].北京大学中国经济研究中心学术刊物,2000(3).
    [236]徐现祥,王海港.我国初次分配中的两极分化及成因[J].经济研究,2008(2):106-118.
    [237]许冰.一种可选择的新方法:加权人均GDP[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006(7):14-23.
    [238]许建华,张学工,李衍达.一种基于核函数的非线性感知器算法[J].计算机学报,2002,25:689-695.
    [239]薛留根,廖靖宇.条件密度近邻核估计的逼近速度[J].应用概率统计,2001,2:163-167.
    [240]尹恒,龚六堂,邹恒甫.当代收入分配理论的新发展[J].经济研究,2000(8):83-95.
    [241]袁志刚,宋铮.城镇居民消费行为变异与我国经济增长[J].经济研究,1999(11):20-28.
    [242]袁志刚,宋铮.消费理论的新发展及其在中国的应用[J].上海经济研究,1999(6):2-9.
    [243]袁志刚.对中国当前宏观经济状况的经济学分析[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1998(4):10-17.
    [244]臧旭恒.居民跨时预算约束与消费函数假定及验证[J].经济研究,1994(9):51-60.
    [245]臧旭恒.中国消费函数分析[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1994.
    [246]战明华.我国居民消费行为的实证研究——总量分析与地区比较[J].中国软科学,2004(6):49-52.
    [247]张瑜.我国城乡居民收入分布的核密度估计[J].统计与决策,2006,223(10):73-74.
    [248]章上峰,许冰,胡祖光.中国城乡收入分布动态演进及经验检验[J].统计研究,2009,26(12):33-40.
    [249]赵韩,许辉,梁平,陈传魁,陈欢.最优组合预测方法在家用汽车需求预测中的应用[J].工业工程,2008(1):126-129.
    [250]赵人伟,李实,卡尔里斯勤.中国居民收入分配再研究[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1999.
    [251]赵人伟,李实.中国居民收入差距的扩大及其原因[J].经济研究,1997(9):19-28.
    [252]郑殿旺,卢英生,王雨.民用汽车保有量的灰色预测模型研究[J].工业技术经济,1996,15(2):55-57.
    [253]周建,杨秀祯.我国农村消费行为变迁及城乡联动机制研究[J].经济研究,2009(1):83-95.
    [254]周建.央行加息对我国房地产经济的影响——基于当前我国房地产结构性需求刚性的思考[J].当代经济,2005(1):70.
    [255]朱农,骆许蓓.收入增长、不平等和贫困——中国健康与营养调查数据分析[J].中国人口科学,2008(2):12-24.
    [256]邹薇,周浩.经济趋同的计量分析与收入分布动态学研究[J].世界经济,2007(6):81-96.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700